I want to wish those serving the best of luck as they architect policies. The latest is that Nigeria wants to raise $10 billion to support the Naira: “In response to the persistent challenges faced by Nigeria’s currency, the naira, the Federal Government has unveiled plans to raise $10 billion aimed at bolstering liquidity in the foreign exchange market.This announcement comes amidst growing concerns over the currency’s freefall, with the naira plummeting to an unprecedented low of 1,850 per dollar at the parallel market on Tuesday.”

Of course, anything which works is the best. Yet, I will also like to caution the nation to avoid a loop which could become a vicious circle where to fight today’s crisis, you need to raise money, and for tomorrow’s, more funds would be required at the debt market.

My position on this will be to look at critical anchors and enablers which can “wean” Nigeria of persistent currency paralysis. For a start, examine Nigeria’s fiscal architecture which has significantly affected our productivity and economic output. Indeed, can we consider looking at how to rearrange Nigeria?

Good People, if the leaders in the nation march to the National Assembly with a document on full fiscal federalism which will be put into motion within six months, Naira will appreciate to N650/$. That fiscal federalism will follow with Regional Police (not state police) to combate vices which are territorial.

(I am not in full support of State Police as our democracy is still immature to allow some governors to have full control of the Police. If that should happen, forget any opposition at the state level. Rather, I support Regional Police, like Southeast Police Force, under the control of the 5 governors with quarterly rotating chairmanship).

Under a regional government, Nigeria developed faster and during that period, exchange rate was never a problem as Nigeria built things and was productive. I do posit that we could return to that heritage if we organize around regions. The best “raise” to fight for Naira now is fiscal federalism where every region (or state specifically) will keep whatever it earns, and pays taxes to the federal government!

Nigeria Plans $10bn Raise to Tackle Currency Crisis

I want to wish those serving the best of luck as they architect policies. The latest is that Nigeria wants to raise $10 billion to support the Naira: “In response to the persistent challenges faced by Nigeria's currency, the naira, the Federal Government has unveiled plans to… pic.twitter.com/NGSPBWUSYk

— Ndubuisi Ekekwe (@ndekekwe) February 22, 2024

The global landscape of cryptocurrencies is changing rapidly, as two of the world’s most powerful nations compete for dominance in this emerging field. China and the USA have different approaches, goals and strategies when it comes to crypto, and their actions have significant implications for the rest of the world.

We will compare and contrast the main aspects of China’s and USA’s crypto policies and discuss the potential outcomes and challenges for both countries and the global crypto community.

The USA is another major player in the global crypto scene, with a vibrant and diverse ecosystem of crypto companies, investors, developers and users. The USA is home to some of the most popular and influential crypto platforms, such as Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, PayPal and Square. The USA also has a large and active market of crypto users, with millions of people buying, selling and holding cryptocurrencies.

However, unlike China, the USA does not have a clear or consistent policy or regulation on crypto. Instead, the USA has a decentralized and fragmented approach to crypto regulation, with different federal agencies, states and courts having different views and jurisdictions on various aspects of crypto activities.

One of the main challenges for the USA’s crypto policy is its lack of a national digital currency or CBDC. Unlike China, the USA does not have a clear or urgent need or plan to launch its own digital currency. The US dollar is still the dominant reserve currency in the world, and the existing financial system is still relatively stable and efficient.

However, China’s crypto landscape is also characterized by a high degree of centralization and regulation. The Chinese government has a tight grip on the crypto industry, imposing strict rules and bans on various aspects of crypto activities.

For example, China has banned initial coin offerings (ICOs), crypto exchanges, foreign platforms and mining operations in certain regions. China has also cracked down on illegal or fraudulent crypto schemes, such as Ponzi schemes, money laundering and tax evasion.

One of the main reasons for China’s strict regulation of crypto is its ambition to launch its own digital currency, the digital yuan or e-CNY. The digital yuan is a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that is issued and controlled by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC).

The digital yuan is designed to be a legal tender that can be used for payments, settlements and transfers within China and abroad. The digital yuan is also intended to enhance China’s financial sovereignty, security and efficiency, as well as to challenge the dominance of the US dollar in the global financial system.

The digital yuan is currently in the testing phase, with several pilot projects running in various cities and regions across China. The PBOC has also partnered with several domestic and foreign institutions, such as banks, payment platforms, retailers and telecom operators, to facilitate the adoption and use of the digital yuan. The PBOC has not announced a specific timeline for the official launch of the digital yuan.

However, some experts argue that the USA should consider developing its own CBDC to keep up with the global trend of digitalization and innovation in finance. A US CBDC could potentially enhance the US financial sovereignty, security and efficiency, as well as to counter the threat of China’s digital yuan.

These different regulatory frameworks in USA and China create uncertainties, complexity and inconsistency for crypto companies and users in the USA, China and the world at large. They also create challenges for innovation and competition in the crypto industry, as some crypto companies face barriers or restrictions to operate or expand in certain states or markets.

Moreover, they create risks for compliance and enforcement, as some crypto companies or users may violate or evade existing laws or regulations.