DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3845

Advice for Nigerian Software Devs. from a Recruiter.

1

No. The recruiter isn’t me!

So I’m there. I’m having a video chat with Chioma.

I’ve known Chioma for a while. She used to handle technical roles for companies in Nigeria like 21st Century, MTN, American Towers, Medallion, Rackcenter, Main One Cable and the like.

Increasingly, she began to find more and more people asking about phone app design, so she gradually began balancing her black book of hardware and network configuration experts to include people with coding skills.

She was trying to feel me out for business opportunities, but I was more interested in signposts to junior partners capable of joining the journey and doing some heavy lifting – not employees or contractors.

That was going nowhere, and as usual, when one hasn’t spoken to someone familiar for some time, then the conversation starts to drift to other things.

One of the things she said was about first impressions from LinkedIn.

She said that people just aren’t careful about content, particularly visual content.

I know people want to get attention to pump the stats, she said. But providing too much visual content about yourself makes it more difficult to have a first impression to create later, for an interview situation.

I asked her if she meant dress style, and she said no.

Those who code work remotely a lot of the time, or as freelancers. It’s common to find people in their normal home-clothes or ‘glad rags’, so we don’t expect to find them on LinkedIn pictures like catwalk kings and queens. Their dress style doesn’t really matter.

Well, what sort of stuff can you see in LinkedIn content that raises questions?

Chioma: Mostly it is when people try to use images of possessions or surroundings to create an impression.

We want to become impressed by the product from your head, not by what you are surrounded by.

For example, we don’t need to see what type of phone a candidate has. This is just a distraction. It offers something else an opinion can be formed about, which doesn’t help showcase the candidates talent.

Have you noticed a gender bias across different types of distracting possessions or surroundings?

Chioma ; Yes. Men are far more likely to pose in front of a vehicle. Young women do it too, but less.

Young women more often stand in front of the gate to an expensive property, or the front of an expensive property.

It is as if there is this deliberate effort to create this impression of affluence and business success.

Those hoping to become our people don’t need to sell us a story of them enjoying and being buoyant. We only need to know they are hungry enough for the work, and will code efficiently without taking time.

Any other kinds of pictures you find strange Chioma?

Chioma: Definitely, pictures taken in, or in front of planes.

It is as if there is this huge desire to create this image of living the ‘high life’ , surrounded by fine things, and being highly mobile. This is more the image of a high fee international management and sales consultant.

You don’t expect imagery of jets and fancy cars associated closely with salaried or freelance coders.

The stereotypical image of the coder is someone who hides out in their ‘den’ for days on end without even talking to another human being, and the only evidence of enduring life, is the empty pizza boxes and left over crusts outside the door!

So, the pictures in the posts of yourself you put on LinkedIn need to match the story of yourself as an employee or contractor you are trying to sell someone like me.

If they can’t tell the right story, it is best they tell no story at all.

The Nigerian Police Force: How Corrupt Are They?

0
A police officer search Catholics before they attend a Mass to celebrate Good Friday in Abuja, Nigeria Friday, April 18, 2014. Nigerian Catholics joined Christians around the world in celebrating Holy Week ahead of Easter Sunday. (AP Photo/ Sunday Alamba)

Whenever I hear people complain about the Nigerian police force, I just shake my head in disgust because I get tired and emotional talking about them.

Saying that the Nigerian police force is corrupt is just an understatement. There is no word in the English dictionary yet to describe how corrupt they are; all I can say is that they are “fantastically and stinkingly corrupt”. 

I have yet to meet a police officer who is not grossly corrupt; both senior and junior officers are all birds of a feather. I meet and interact with police officers on a daily basis due to the nature of my job as a lawyer and I have both senior and junior police officers as acquaintances; some of them I have acted on some occasions as their lawyer so I can boldly speak as an insider that the corruption in the Nigerian police force is far more than it meets the eye. It is unfathomable, indescribable, if you think you have seen it before, believe me, that you haven’t scratched the surface yet. 

I make this statement with the full knowledge of its gravity and with every atom of responsibility that the Nigerian police force is the most corrupt institution in Nigeria, followed closely by the Nigerian civil services. The religious leaders and the politicians can compete for third and fourth place in the cadre of corruption respectively. 

For instance, whenever you walk into any police station to make a complaint or file a petition or report a crime as a patriotic citizen, you will be asked to pay money before you can successfully file the petition or make your statement and they demand the payment with so much flair letting you know that that is how it is done, if you are not ready to pay then you are not ready to file the petition. If you insist that you won’t pay, they might just collect the petition and shove it under the desk and your complaints will never be attended to or assigned to a unit to be investigated.

From paying money to file a petition or make the criminal report/ complaint, you will be asked to pay another money for the petition to be approved, then you will pay another money for the investigation, then pay more money to fast-track track investigation to paying money to mobilize the officers for the arrest of the suspect and subsequently pay another money to make sure that the suspect when arrested will not be arbitrarily released. After paying all this money, they might still collect from the suspect and release him. 

The officers demand this payment as if it is the right thing, at any point you refuse to pay then your case will be stalled until you are ready to “roger or wet ground”. 

Every lawyer or any person who has done anything with the police can collaborate with this. I am not making it up.

They are so greedy and corruption-infested that they also demand money from anybody, even those who come to report the murder of their loved ones. How can you ask a wife whose husband has just been murdered to pay money before you can commence investigations? 

The corruption of the police does not even start or end with them always demanding money, they are very nonchalant in terms of doing their jobs, they are power-drunk and the majority of them are grossly incompetent. 

Don’t get me started on them withholding every proceeds of crime they recovered or selling them off. If you report that your item was stolen, and you pay all this money to have it recovered by the police, there’s a high chance that after it is recovered by the police they won’t release it to you, they will keep it for themselves or sell it off.

All the heads of police always make the promise that they will fight corruption in the force but it’s always the same stories over and over. The corruption keeps eating deep. It now appears that the corruption has overwhelmed the force that cleansing it or weeding it out will be practically impossible because if you want to fire the corrupt officers then you will literally have to fire every member of the Nigerian police force.

Accessory Before And After The Fact!

0

If you have knowledge of a crime that is about to be committed or that was just committed, you are mandated by law to report it immediately to the police if not you will be held to be an accessory and you will be treated like you helped the criminal with the planning or execution of the crime or that you helped the criminal to get away after he committed the crime.

Therefore, after you get a wind that a person is about to commit a crime and you did not report that to the police, you are an accessory and if you have the knowledge that a person just committed a crime and you did not report to the police you are also an accessory.

This legal obligation of reporting or disclosing information happens to be an exception to the privileged information rule. This means that, as a professional like a lawyer or doctor and a client or patient confides in you that he is planning to commit a crime or confides in you that he just committed a crime, you are expected to immediately report it to the police if not you will be held to be an accessory to the crime.

The prosecutor does not necessarily have to prove that a person acted with intent to assist the person in committing the crime (accessory before the fact) or acted with the intent to cover up the crime or help the person escape (accessory after the fact), proving that the person has the knowledge of the crime was committed or before it was committed is enough for a person to be held culpable as an accessory.

There are two kinds of accessories. There is an accessory-after-the-fact which is someone who assists someone who has committed a crime after the person has committed the crime, with knowledge that the person committed the crime, and with the intent to help the person avoid arrest or punishment. An accessory after the fact is basically a person who, after the commission of the felony, “harbors, conceals, maintains, or assists the principal felon. While an accessory before the fact is someone who “counsels, hires, assists or otherwise procures a felony to be committed.”

In numerous criminal jurisdictions, an accessory both before and after the fact is also referred to as an accomplice.

As for the punishment for being an accessory or an accomplice to the commission of a crime, when a person is being held culpable for being an accessory or an accomplice, while the principal offender is liable for the full punishment, the accessory or the accomplice is given a lesser punishment for the commission of the crime.

Is the Call for Investigation on Elon Musk by US Senator Elizabeth Warren Justifiable?

0

In a surprising move, US Senator Elizabeth Warren has called for an investigation into Elon Musk, the billionaire founder and CEO of SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink and The Boring Company. Warren accused Musk of abusing his power and influence to manipulate the stock market, evade taxes and endanger public safety with his space ventures.

Warren claims that Musk’s tweets have caused “wild fluctuations” in the prices of Bitcoin and Dogecoin, and that he has exploited his influence on “enriching himself” and “hurt ordinary investors”. She also accuses Musk of evading taxes and undermining democracy by spreading misinformation.

Warren made her remarks in a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), urging them to probe Musk’s activities and hold him accountable for any violations. She cited several examples of Musk’s alleged misconduct, such as:

His frequent and erratic tweets have caused volatility in the prices of cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Dogecoin, as well as his own company’s shares. Warren claimed that Musk has used his social media platform to create hype and speculation, while benefiting from insider trading and market manipulation.

His failure to pay his fair share of taxes, despite being the richest person in the world. Warren pointed out that Musk paid zero federal income tax in 2018, and only $455 million in 2020, which amounts to less than 1% of his net worth. She argued that Musk has exploited loopholes and avoided taxes by holding most of his wealth in unrealized capital gains, while borrowing against his assets to fund his lavish lifestyle.

His reckless and irresponsible behavior with his space exploration company, SpaceX. Warren alleged that Musk has endangered public safety and national security by launching rockets without proper authorization, violating environmental regulations, and interfering with other satellites and spacecraft. She also accused Musk of using SpaceX as a vehicle for his personal ambitions, such as colonizing Mars and sending civilians to orbit, without regard for the scientific value or the public interest.

Warren concluded her letter by calling on the regulators to take swift and decisive action against Musk, saying that he poses a threat to the stability and integrity of the financial system, the fairness and efficiency of the tax system, and the safety and security of the space domain. She said that Musk should not be allowed to continue his “reckless and selfish” behavior without facing any consequences.

On one hand, some might argue that Warren has a valid point in raising concerns about Musk’s impact on the cryptocurrency markets. Cryptocurrencies are volatile and unregulated assets that can be easily influenced by external factors, such as news, events, or social media posts. Musk’s tweets, which often express his opinions or jokes about cryptocurrencies, have been shown to have a significant effect on their prices.

For example, in May 2021, Musk announced that Tesla would stop accepting Bitcoin as a payment method due to environmental concerns, which caused a sharp drop in Bitcoin’s value. Later, he hinted that Tesla might sell or buy more Bitcoin, which caused another spike in its price. Similarly, Musk’s tweets about Dogecoin, a meme-based cryptocurrency that he has endorsed and promoted, have also caused huge swings in its value.

Some might say that Musk’s tweets are irresponsible and unethical, as they create uncertainty and instability in the cryptocurrency markets, and potentially harm millions of investors who rely on them. They might also say that Musk is abusing his power and influence to manipulate the markets for his own benefit, or for his amusement. They might point out that Musk has a conflict of interest, as he owns a large amount of Bitcoin and Dogecoin, and that he stands to gain or lose from their price movements.

They might also accuse him of evading taxes by holding his wealth in cryptocurrencies, which are not subject to the same taxation rules as traditional currencies. They might also question his credibility and integrity, as he has been known to spread false or misleading information on social media, such as his claim that he had secured funding to take Tesla private in 2018, which resulted in a lawsuit and a fine from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

On the other hand, some might argue that Warren’s call for investigation is unjustified and unfair. They might say that Musk is not doing anything illegal or immoral by expressing his views or preferences on cryptocurrencies, and that he has the right to free speech and opinion. They might say that Musk is not intentionally trying to manipulate the markets, but rather sharing his genuine thoughts or feelings on cryptocurrencies, which reflect his vision and passion for innovation and technology.

They might say that Musk is not exploiting his influence, but rather inspiring and educating millions of people about cryptocurrencies, which are a new and exciting form of money that can empower individuals and communities. They might also say that Musk is not evading taxes, but rather contributing to society by creating jobs, advancing science, and solving global problems through his companies.

They might also defend his credibility and integrity, as he has proven to be a visionary and a leader who has achieved remarkable feats in various fields, such as electric vehicles, space exploration, renewable energy, artificial intelligence, and more.

The call for investigation on Elon Musk by US Senator Elizabeth Warren is a controversial and complex issue that has no clear or easy answer. Both sides of the argument have some merit and some flaws, and both raise important questions about the role and responsibility of influential figures in the cryptocurrency markets. Ultimately, it is up to the regulators, the lawmakers, the investors, and the public to decide whether Musk’s tweets are harmful or helpful, and whether he should be investigated or not.

Warren’s letter has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers, experts, investors and the public. Some have praised her for standing up to Musk and exposing his abuses, while others have criticized her for attacking a visionary entrepreneur and innovator who has contributed to the advancement of humanity. Musk himself has not responded directly to Warren’s letter, but he has tweeted a cryptic message that reads: “Don’t panic.”

Innovate On Your Pricing Model To Thrive In Business

0

Getting customers to open their wallets, and pay for products, requires a lot of work. If you think otherwise, you will be making a big mistake. Yes, consumers are smart. Daily, they have to deal with opportunity costs in a world where they have limited resources to meet their largely unlimited needs.

Yet, there are many ways of getting customers to open their wallets and buy from you. Over the years, I have noticed one technique that works. I call it the Car Salesman Pricing Strategy. Most car salespeople in the U.S. do not give a price as a whole amount when you visit dealers for car shopping. Rather, they give you the price based on your estimated monthly payment installment amount, for cars, that will be financed. They do not want you to be thinking of committing to a huge amount with all the associated burdens of paying back. The monthly payment is very manageable, in your brain.

This Car Salesman Pricing Strategy is not new. It has been part of the retail industry especially where the companies offer financing. You want to offer the pricing in ways that customers get to sign the papers as quickly as possible. Apple deploys that as it works to obfuscate the very fact that its iPhone smartphones are expensive.

What is your pricing strategy? How do you price? Does pricing bring competitive advantage in your business? To capture and validate the hypothesis of starting that business, innovate on your pricing model.

Let us say you want to buy a car that costs $24,000 to be financed at 0% for 6 years. A good salesman will give you the price, usually in a written pad, as $333 per month, instead of $24,000. That $333 is more manageable than $24,000 even though the price is largely the same at 0% financing. That you can get 0% means that you have a good credit and the system is rewarding you for that. The product actually costs lesser when you factor inflation over time. But the reality is that you have a product of $333 and not necessarily $24,000 as you will be dealing with paying only $333 every month. You think of your paycheck  to see if it can accommodate additional $333 monthly.

Of course, it is all about reality as positions shift. I will take a case study of Instacart which has been re-priced: “Instacart targeted a valuation of up to $9.3 billion in its initial public offering Monday. The grocery delivery company, which kicked off its IPO roadshow this week, was valued as high as $39 billion during a 2021 funding round, as the pandemic boosted demand for contactless deliveries. But deliveries have since flattened, prompting Instacart to cut its internal valuation to as low as $10 billion. Analysts are watching Instacart’s performance for signs of what may be ahead: Interest rates and geopolitical instability stemming from the war in Ukraine have quieted IPO markets these past two years.”