DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4066

DogeMiyagi Is Revolutionizing Meme Coins and Challenging Crypto Altcoin Giants Like Avalanche and Arbritrum

0

In crypto, meme coins have emerged as a unique and entertaining category. Among the notable contenders in this space, DogeMiyagi (MIYAGI) stands out with its innovative approach and potential to disrupt the crypto industry.

In this article, we will explore DogeMiyagi’s distinctive features and how it is positioned to surpass industry veterans like Avalanche (AVAX) and Arbitrum (ARB) in the long run. We will also be speculating on the question in every crypto investor’s mind; can AVAX reach $1,000?

Avalanche: Can AVAX reach $1,000?

Avalanche (AVAX) has made waves in the crypto world with its exceptional scalability and rapid transaction finality. This blockchain platform aims to be the go-to choice for decentralised applications (dApps) and the booming DeFi sector. Its key strengths lie in its ability to handle high throughput, maintain low fees, and provide near-instantaneous transaction confirmations.

Compared to other crypto projects, Avalanche shines with its innovative consensus protocol, Avalanche consensus. This protocol ensures network security and enables validators to reach consensus swiftly, even in the face of malicious actors. Additionally, Avalanche’s robust ecosystem and interoperability with other blockchains make it a formidable force in the crypto space.

While it is important to acknowledge the inherent uncertainty in price predictions, the prospects for AVAX reaching $1,000 in the next bull run are optimistic. With Avalanche’s innovative technology, expanding ecosystem, and positive market sentiment towards altcoins, there is a strong foundation for potential growth. As adoption and recognition of Avalanche continue to increase, AVAX could potentially achieve significant price milestones, making the $1,000 mark an exciting possibility.

Arbitrum: Empowering Ethereum’s Scalability

Arbitrum (ARB), a Layer 2 scaling solution built on the Ethereum blockchain, tackles the scalability challenges faced by the network. By employing rollups, Arbitrum significantly increases Ethereum’s transaction throughput while maintaining its security and decentralisation.

What sets Arbitrum apart from other scaling projects is its seamless compatibility with existing Ethereum smart contracts. This ensures developers and users can benefit from Arbitrum’s enhanced capabilities without sacrificing the familiarity and functionality offered by Ethereum. With its potential to revolutionise Ethereum’s scalability, Arbitrum is well-positioned for long-term success.

DogeMiyagi Coin: The Future of Meme Coins

Now let’s shift our focus to the game-changer in the meme coin landscape – DogeMiyagi (MIYAGI). This vibrant and dynamic meme coin is built on the Ethereum blockchain, leveraging the power of humour and technology to create an ecosystem that is both entertaining and functional.

DogeMiyagi sets itself apart from traditional meme coins by integrating real-world use cases. The crypto offers a wide range of utilities, including staking, voting on platform decisions, and even participating in meme-creation contests. By tapping into the allure of memes, DogeMiyagi attracts a diverse community, from casual investors to passionate meme enthusiasts. This innovative tokenomics strategy establishes a solid foundation for adoption and long-term value.

Transparency and community engagement are at the core of DogeMiyagi’s philosophy. The project’s roadmap emphasises continuous technological updates, the introduction of new features, and strategic partnerships to enhance user experience and utility. Backed by a vibrant community, DogeMiyagi has emerged as a promising player in the meme coin landscape.

To sum up, as we navigate the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies, DogeMiyagi stands tall as a disruptive force ready to challenge established giants like Avalanche and Arbitrum. While Avalanche impresses with its scalability and Avalanche consensus, and Arbitrum empowers Ethereum’s scalability, DogeMiyagi brings a unique blend of humour, utility, and community engagement to the table.

With its commitment to innovation and a strong community backing its growth, DogeMiyagi is set to redefine the meme coin landscape and make a lasting impact in the crypto industry. Keep an eye on DogeMiyagi as it revolutionises the way we perceive and engage with meme coins!

 

DogeMiyagi:

Website: https://dogemiyagi.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/_Dogemiyagi_

Telegram: https://t.me/dogemiyagi

The Equation of National Wealth Creation And How Nations Advance

0

If you check 2,000 years of gross world product, you will notice a revelation: no nation has advanced faster than its property rights regime. In other words, the abilities to own properties, and those rights supported by the legal ordinance of nations, with adequate protections, are cardinal to the advancements of nations.

When the Igbo Nation says “uwa bu ahia” [the world is a market], they believe that all great markets have rules, and that means, my property and your property are bound by ordinances. If those rules disappear, markets fade because the abilities for demand and supply to come into an equilibrium point where transactions take place become imperiled.

For more than 1,500 years from AD 1, the gross world product was flat over generations. But when the property rights regime was invented, and applied in some nations, the GDPs of those nations rose, and wealth accelerated. Simply, the equation of national wealth creation is clear: if there is no rule of law, there will not be an optimal market system, and wealth cannot be accumulated at scale, for the people. The best accelerant to innovation and the stimulation of entrepreneurial capitalism is RULE of LAW because demand and supply operate better when there are rules.

We have also extrapolated that hypothesis to companies and we know what makes great enduring global companies. At Tekedia Institute, we understand their DNAs building the Cells of vision which drive the Tissues of competition, delivering solid Organs in markets for SYSTEMS of innovation and market resilience.

Have you registered for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA? Early birds discounts end today. Register here

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: There are proponents of social cooperation, who tend to suggest that everyone should be sharing with one another – in this case, there should be no property rights.

While this is a great theoretical concept – problem is we’ve seen how well that has worked out – we’ve seen champions of social entrepreneurship caught in all sorts of financial misappropriation scandals, ranging from fund raising for “the poor” that never gets to the poor, to scandalous charities of all shades, shapes and sizes.

My Response: “in this case, there should be no property rights. ” – there is always a property rights component when GREAT things are done. But you can decide to waive or suspend it. Even when you see a drug company which invested $1 billion to develop a drug appears to give it FREE, check well, they are being compensated in other ways. Across human history, there is no way any human will do something GREAT for free because resources are not free if we believe basic economics which is opined on the scarcity of factors of production which require competition.

AI News Anchors: New Possibilities or Restrictions for Human News Anchors?

0

In an era of rapid digital transformation and the rise of emerging technologies, the global broadcasting industry is undergoing a significant revolution. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a game-changer, enabling broadcasters to explore new avenues for delivering news content. With the recent launch of the first AI news anchor in India by Odisha Television (OTV), questions arise about the future of human news anchors in this evolving landscape. While AI offers unique advantages, it is important to consider the distinctive value that human news anchors bring to the table.

Unleashing the Power of AI News Anchors

AI news anchors, such as Lisa, introduced by OTV, represent a pivotal step forward in streamlining news delivery. By leveraging AI’s capabilities, these virtual news anchors can perform repetitive tasks and data analysis, offering significant time and cost efficiencies. They enable broadcasters to swiftly process vast amounts of information and provide unique angles and insights that viewers increasingly demand.

AI news anchors, such as Lisa, introduced by OTV, represent a pivotal step forward in streamlining news delivery. By leveraging AI’s capabilities, these virtual news anchors can perform repetitive tasks and data analysis, offering significant time and cost efficiencies. They enable broadcasters to swiftly process vast amounts of information and provide unique angles and insights that viewers increasingly demand.

AI news anchors can also enhance the viewer experience by delivering news in a consistent and predictable manner. With a digital presence, they have the potential to provide round-the-clock coverage, breaking news updates, and personalized content tailored to individual viewers’ preferences. This adaptability ensures that news is readily available, creating a more engaging and immersive experience.

The Value of Human News Anchors

However, amidst the rise of AI news anchors, the intrinsic value of human news anchors should not be overlooked. Human anchors possess a set of irreplaceable qualities that contribute to the trust, credibility, and emotional connection viewers have with news presenters. These qualities include empathy, intuition, the ability to interpret complex information, and a nuanced understanding of cultural and societal contexts.

Human news anchors excel at conveying emotion and empathy, which are crucial for storytelling and connecting with audiences on a deeper level. They bring a human touch to news reporting, providing comfort, reassurance, and the ability to navigate sensitive topics with sensitivity. Human anchors can establish a rapport with viewers, fostering a sense of familiarity and trust that may be harder to achieve with AI counterparts.

Balancing Human and Artificial Intelligence

The future of news anchoring lies in striking a balance between human and AI elements. Rather than viewing AI as a threat to the role of human anchors, it should be seen as a powerful tool that complements and augments their abilities. AI can empower human anchors by automating repetitive tasks, gathering data-driven insights, and facilitating in-depth research, enabling them to focus on analysis, context, and delivering a more comprehensive news narrative.

Broadcasters should invest in upskilling human anchors to embrace new technologies and leverage AI to their advantage. By incorporating AI tools, such as real-time data analytics and automated fact-checking, human anchors can enhance their reporting, provide accurate information, and deliver a more engaging news experience.

The emergence of AI news anchors in the global broadcasting industry signifies a transformational shift. While AI offers undeniable benefits in terms of efficiency and data analysis, human news anchors continue to play a crucial role in news reporting. Their innate ability to connect emotionally with viewers, interpret complex information, and provide nuanced perspectives ensures that the human element remains a valuable asset.

In the age of AI, the future of news anchoring lies in embracing the synergy between human and artificial intelligence. By harnessing the unique strengths of both, broadcasters can deliver news that combines the efficiency of AI-driven analysis with the empathy, intuition, and contextual understanding of human anchors. Together, they can shape a future where technology and humanity coexist to deliver news experiences that are informative, engaging, and authentic.

Benjamin Mendy; Punishment for False Rape Accusation

1

As the story of the non-guilty verdict of Benjamin Mendy fills the air today, down here in Nigeria, a Magistrate Court sitting in Kaura, Nasarawa state also today found one Josiah Moses not guilty of rape allegations he was accused of in 2019 after he had spent about four years in prison before he was found not guilty and released today.

Benjamin Mendy, the former Manchester City football star was in October 2022 accused of raping a 24-year-old woman, similarly, a 29 years old woman also alleged that the football star molested and attempted to rape her two years earlier. He was found innocent of the rape and the attempted rape allegations and was released today after months of being behind bars.

Well, Benjamin Mendy and Josiah Moses who were both found not guilty and released today were even fortunate enough to not have lost their lives from the ordeal, unlike one late Izu who could not take the framing and accusations and was forced to take his life in 2020. The story of Izu is always evergreen in my memory, a budding fashion designer in his early 20s. His name was added to the list of rapists that was circulated on Twitter. He reached out to the compilers of the list to clear his name, his accuser confirmed that Izu never raped or attempted to rape her but she won’t take his name off the list of rapists. Izu could not take it anymore and he had to commit suicide to end it all.

Understandably, it is a societal thing that when it involves rape everyone gets sentimental and emotional and sides with the accuser or the presumed victim while the accused person loses the benefit of doubt or the presumption of innocence as provided by the Constitution. Immediately you are accused of rape, there is the likelihood that everyone, including the investigators and prosecutors, even your family and friends will believe your accuser over you, even when you are framed.

As a lawyer, I cannot count how many persons I have encountered who are languishing in prison detention for false rape accusations. Some are still in prison because they are indigent and cannot afford a lawyer to help them out, in fact, Josiah Moses was not able to afford a lawyer, he was represented pro bono. Just imagine if our office had not come along to represent him free of charge he wouldn’t have been out yet.

People like the late Izu have lost their lives by being falsely accused of rape, people like Benjamin Mendy will forever have their lives and careers ruined, and people like Josiah Moses suffered and lost a whole four years of his life; all these incidents and many more poses the question, whether there is a punishment for false rape accusers, if there is, is it commensurate or stringent enough to deter mischief makers from falsely accusing persons of rape?

As the punishment for rape in most jurisdictions of the world is a life sentence, nobody cares if you are framed or not, if you are not able to prove that you didn’t do it you will be jailed for life for something that you didn’t do, the same way should the punishment for false accusation of rape attract a life jail term but no, that is not the case; in the UK the accusers of Benjamin Mendy is likely going to pay just £2000 as a fine and or some months in jail and that will be it while back home in Nigeria, there is no provision for any punishment not even monetary fine against the false accusers of Josiah Moses. The worst he can do is to seek monetary compensation from the state and not from his accuser since it is the state that prosecuted him.

Nigerian laws should be amended to provide punishment for false rape accusers, not just some punishment but a stringent one. Lying under oath to incriminate a person itself is perjury which is a crime punishable with at least 14 years jail term as provided in S. 118 of the criminal code act and if the perjurer lies to incriminate a person for an offense punishable with a death sentence or life sentence, the accuser is to be punished with life jail term. False rape accusers should be prosecuted under the provisions of section 118 of the criminal code since they lied under oath to incriminate another, but this is yet to be the case.

Aside from false rape accusers being prosecuted for perjury and sent to jail, they should as well be made to pay substantial monetary compensation to the accused, compensating him for the stain on his name and for the lost time. The name of a false rape accuser should as well be on public record so that anyone interested can access and see it.

Once people are aware that if you accuse someone of rape and it ends up being a false accusation, you will be made to pay heavily for it, there will be little or no false rape accusations and innocent persons won’t be losing their lives and be sent to jail for something they did not do.

As a disclaimer, I as an individual and also as a legal practitioner condemns rape in its totality and I believe that no punishment melted on a rapist is enough but my submission is while rapists are being punished, false rape accusers should as well be punished, with that we can minimize the case of false rape accusations which are most times concocted as a vendetta by scorned lovers or angry exes. The side effect no doubt is that it may discourage genuine rape victims to come forward but as a principle of natural Justice postulates that it is better and more satisfactory for ten guilty persons to go free than one innocent person to be punished, we can live with rapists going scot free than innocent people falsely accused being punished for the offence they didn’t commit.

 

Ripple CEO Calls SEC a Bully Following XRP Partially Win

0

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse shared his thoughts on the ongoing legal battle between his company and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He accused the SEC of being a bully and acting against the interests of the crypto industry and American innovation.

Garlinghouse claimed that Ripple has achieved a partial victory in the case, as the court denied the SEC’s request to access Ripple’s legal communications. He said that this was a “very important moment” for the case, as it showed that Ripple did not have fair notice from the SEC that XRP was considered a security.

He also criticized the SEC for its “regulation by enforcement” approach, which he said creates uncertainty and confusion for the crypto market. He argued that the SEC should provide clear and consistent guidance for the industry, instead of suing companies after the fact.

The SEC accused Ripple in 2020 of illegally raising $1.3 billion through the sale of XRP. A judge on Thursday seemingly decided that XRP was not a security when sold on the secondary market but would be a security when sold to institutional investors. “The law of the land right now is that XRP is not a security,” Garlinghouse said on Bloomberg TV.

Garlinghouse reiterated that Ripple is committed to defending itself and its customers in court, and that it will continue to work with regulators and policymakers around the world to foster innovation and growth in the crypto space. He expressed his confidence that Ripple will prevail in the case, and that XRP will be recognized as a legitimate digital asset that benefits millions of users globally.

The SEC and Ripple could still appeal the judge’s decision. An appeal from the SEC could take years, Garlinghouse told Bloomberg. The court agreed with the SEC that the Howey test governs the securities analysis of crypto transactions and rejected Ripple’s made-up test as to what constitutes an investment contract, instead emphasizing that Howey and subsequent cases have held that a variety of tangible and intangible assets can serve as the subject of an investment contract.

Meanwhile, ex-Celsius CEO faces fraud charges, LinkedIn News reports.

Federal prosecutors have charged Alex Mashinsky, ex-CEO of bankrupt crypto exchange Celsius, with several counts of fraud connected to “a yearslong scheme to mislead customers” about Celsius’ financial stability, according to Bloomberg. Mashinsky, who was arrested Thursday, is also accused of market manipulation. Meanwhile, the company has agreed to a $4.7 billion civil settlement with the Federal Trade Commission — one of the largest settlements in FTC history, CNBC notes — but payment is suspended while Celsius pays back any remaining customer assets.

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced their own lawsuits against Mashinsky and Celsius Thursday.
  • Roni Cohen-Pavon, Celsius’ chief revenue officer, has also been charged with fraud.
  • Coinbase says its fight with the SEC received a boost after a judge ruled in a separate case Thursday that XRP token purchases via exchanges are not securities transactions.