DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4085

Notable Provisions of The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Regulations 2023- Part 1

0

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) released the new 2023 Customer Due Diligence (CDD)  guidelines in furtherance of its more enhanced regulatory framework and to ensure stricter compliance. 

This article will be focused on the notable provisions of these guidelines including :-

– Their Objectives and Application.

– Core CDD provisions

What are the objectives of the CDD 2023 Guidelines?

The objectives of these guidelines are to —

(a) provide additional customer due diligence measures for financial institutions (FI) under the regulatory purview of the CBN to further their compliance with relevant provisions of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act (MLPPA), 2022, Terrorism(Prevention and Prohibition) Act (TPPA), 2022, Central Bank of Nigeria(Anti-Money Laundering, Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Financial Institutions) Regulations, 2022 (CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations) and international best practices.

(b) enable the CBN enforce compliance with customer due diligencemeasures in line with the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Re-gulations.

(c). complement the relevant provisions of the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations on customer due diligence measures and additional customer due diligence measures for specific customers and activities.

What is the applicability scope of these guidelines?

These guidelines shall be read in conjunction with the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations and will also be applicable to all Financial Institutions (FIs) under the regulatory purview of the Central Bank of Nigeria.

What are the most notable CDD provisions of these guidelines?

They are as follows :-

– FIs shall not establish or keep anonymous accounts, numbered accounts or accounts in fictitious names

– FIs shall undertake CDD measures when: 

(a) establishing business relationships;

(b) carrying out occasional transactions above the applicable and designated threshold of US$1,000 or its equivalent in other currencies or as may be determined by the CBN from time to time, including where the transaction is carried out in a single or several transactions or operations that appear to be linked ;

(c) carrying out occasional transactions that are wire transfers, including cross-border and domestic transfers between FIs and when credit or debit cards are used as a payment method to effect money transfer ;

(d) there are doubts as to the veracity or adequacy of previously obtained customer identification data ; 

(e) there is a suspicion of ML, TF and PF regardless of any exemptions or any other thresholds referred to in these Regulations or the CBN AML,CFT and CPF Regulations.

–  FIs shall establish internal processes and procedures for conducting CDD measures for all potential and existing customers, including occasional customers.

-CDD measures shall include —

(a) customer identification and verification of identity ;

(b) identification and verification of identity of beneficial owners (BOs) ;

(c) understanding nature and purpose of business ;

(d) understanding the sources of funds ; 

(e) conducting ongoing due diligence on the business relationship and monitoring for suspicious activities.

– FIs shall identify their customer (whether permanent or occasional, and whether natural or legal persons or legal arrangements) and obtain the following information —

(a) for individuals —

(i) legal name and any other names used (such as maiden name),

(ii) permanent address (full physical address),

(iii) residential address (where the customer can be located),

(iv) telephone number, e-mail address and social media handle,

(v) date and place of birth,

(vi) Bank Verification Number (BVN),

(vii) Tax Identification Number (TIN),

(viii) nationality,

(ix) occupation, public position held and name of employer,

(x) an official personal identification number or other unique identifier contained in an unexpired document issued by a government agency,that bears a name, photograph and signature of the customer such as a passport, national identification card, residence permit, social security records or drivers’ license,

(xi) type of account and nature of the banking relationship,

(xii) signature, 

(xiii) politically exposed persons (PEPs) status .

(b) for legal persons and legal arrangements —

(i) name of institution,

(ii) mailing address,

(iii) e-mail and social media address,

(iv) phone numbers,

(v) registration number,

(vi) registered address,

(vii) business address,

(viii) valid identification, such as tax identification number,

(ix) nature and purpose of business or activities,

(x) certified true copy of docu-mentary evidence confirming legalexistence such as certificate of incorporation,

(xi) certified true copy of memorandum and articles of association or other similar documents,

(xii) certified true copy of the list of directors and shareholders or similar documents,

(xiii) board resolution to open the account,

(xiv) identification of those who have authority to operate the account,

(xv) legal documents indicating persons exercising control or significant influence over the legal persons and legal arrangement’s assets,

(xvi) valid means of identification of persons mentioned in sub-paragraph (xv) of this paragraph,

(xvii) names and identification documents of the relevant persons having a senior management position in the legal persons and legal arrangements,

(xviii) the original documents referred to in subparagraphs (x) to

(xiv) of this paragraph, shall be sighted and documented.

-FIs shall verify the identity of customers and BOs using reliable, independent source documents, data or information (identification data). 

FIs shall verify the identity of individuals by confirming the —

(a) date of birth from a valid official document, such as birth certificate, passport, identity card and national or social security records.

(b) residential address through physical visitation and use of other sources, including utility bill, tax assessment, bank statement, or letter from a public authority ;

(c) contact details provided by the customer through positive feedback from phone call, email or physical letter to the residential address ;

(d) validity of the official documentation provided through certification by an authorized person such as embassy official, notary public (in the caseof foreign nationals) ; 

(e) phone numbers, particularly for wallet providers, through independent process, including validation against the NCC database or geo-mapping.

– FIs shall verify the identity of a legal person or legal arrangement by —

(a) undertaking search on public registries or databases such as CAC or similar database, other commercial enquiries and through any other available sources of information to confirm —

(i) the existence of the legal person or legal arrangement,

(ii) whether the legal person or legal arrangement has not been, or is not in the process of being diss-olved, struck off, wound up or terminated,

(iii) the information on the directors and shareholders or persons or entities holding similar positions, including their PEP status, 

(iv) information on person with significant control, 

(v) information on BO, and its PEP status,

(b) reviewing a copy of the latest annual report, audited accounts or relevant financial statement, where applicable ;

(c) reviewing a copy of the board resolution or applicable resolution ; 

(d) utilizing the documentation from a reliable independent source proving the name, form and current existence of the customer ;

(e) utilizing an independent information verification process, such as accessing public and private databases ;

(f ) obtaining prior bank references, where applicable ;

(g) visiting the entity,

(h) confirming the contact details provided through phone call, email and physical letter to the business address.

-When conducting CDD measures in relation to customers that are legal persons or legal arrangements, FIs shall —

(a) understand the ownership and control structure ;

(b) at the time of establishing new relationships or whenever there is a change in ownership, identify and verify the identity of the BOs who exercise control through ownership or controlling interest, including voting rights ;

(c) subject all account signatories, Directors and BOs to the requirements for identification and verification of individuals provided in regulations 6 and 7 of these Regulations ; 

– FIs shall verify —

(a) that any person purporting to act on behalf of a customer is so authorized ;

(b) the identity of the person purporting to act on behalf of a customer. 

– The verification referred to in the preceding sub-regulation shall be done through confirmation from the customer the third party is purporting to represent and from other independent sources.

–  FIs shall understand and obtain sufficient information on the nature and purpose of the business that its customer intends to undertake, including expected or predictable patterns of transactions. FIs shall be at alert to circumstances that may indicate any significant changes in the nature of a business or its ownership.

– FIs shall understand and obtain sufficient information on the source of funds into the customer’s account.

The information to be obtained before the commencement of the relationship shall include— 

(a) details of occupation,empl-oyment or business activities and sources of wealth and income ; 

(b) expected origin of the funds to be used in the operation of the account during the relationship.

– FIs shall conduct ongoing due diligence on a business relationship and scrutinize transactions under-taken throughout the course of the relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the —

(a) FI’s knowledge of the customer ;

(b) customer’s business and risk profile ; 

(c) source of funds.

FIs shall take reasonable steps to keep the information up-to-date, and as the need arises, including where an existing customer opens a new account.

– FIs shall apply CDD requirements to existing customers on the basis of materiality and risk and continue to conduct due diligence on such existing relationship at appropriate times.

The appropriate time to conduct CDD for existing customers include, but not limited to when —

(a) transaction of significant value or an unusual transaction occurs ;

(b) there is significant change in the customer’s profile ;

(c) there is a material change in the way that the account is operated ; 

(d) the FIs become aware that it lacks sufficient information about an existing customer.

– FIs shall adhere to e-KYC requirements as stipulated in the CBN Guidelines on e-KYC and the CDD measures stipulated in these Regulations(where applicable) as it relates to digital products, and cust-omer onboarding.

– FIs shall conduct initial risk assessment for each prospective customer to ascertain the customer’s risk profile.

The application of CDD measures may be standard, simplified or enhanced depending on the risks posed by each customer, transaction, products or service resulting from a customer risk assessment.

For low risks customers —

(a) FIs may adopt simplified CDD measures only where lower risks have been identified through an adequate assessment and analysis of the risks, and the simplified CDD measures shall be forwarded to the CBN for approval before implementation by the FI ;

(b) notwithstanding the application of simplified CDD on customer identification and verification, the customer is not exempt from ongoing monitoring for other CDD measures ; 

(c) the simplified measures shall be commensurate with the lower risk factors but are not acceptable whenever there is suspicion of ML, TF or PF, or where specific higher risk scenarios apply.

For high risks customers — 

(a) arising from an initial assessment of a customer, particular attention shall be focused on those customers identified as having a higher risk profile ; 

(b) customers with higher risk profile include, but not limited to, nonresident customers, MVTS providers, private banking customers, non-face-to-face customers, and PEPs. 

 —FIs shall comply with Tiered KYC measures as stipulated in the CBN circulars on TKYC and the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations.

Tiered KYC shall apply to individuals only and shall not apply to legal persons and legal arrangements.

-FIs shall perform enhanced CDD for customers, business relationship or transactions with higher ML, TF, and PF risks.

The enhanced CDD shall include, but not limited to :

(a) obtaining additional information on the customer including occupation, volume of assets, information available through public databases, internet, and updating more regularly the identification data of the customer and BO ;

(b) obtaining additional information on the intended nature of the business relationship ;

(c) obtaining information on the source of funds and source of wealth of the customer ;

(d) obtaining information on the reasons for intended or performed transactions;

(e) obtaining the approval of senior management to commence or continue the business relationship ;

(f ) conducting enhanced monitoring of the business relationship, by increasing the number and timing of controls applied, and selecting patterns of transactions that need further examination ; 

(g) requiring the first payment to be carried out through an account in the customer’s name with a bank subject to similar CDD standards.

– FIs may rely on the identification and verification steps that it had previously undertaken, unless it has doubts about the veracity of that information or where there is a material change in the circumstances or profile of the customer. 

The situations that may lead a FI to have doubts about the veracity of an information include where there is a —

(a) suspicion of ML, TF or PF in relation to that customer ; 

(b) material change in the way that the customer’s account is operated, which is not consistent with the customer’s business profile.

– A FI that is unable to comply with the CDD measures pursuant to these Regulations shall—

(a) not be permitted to open the account, commence business relations or perform the transaction with the concerned persons ; 

(b) be required to render a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) to the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU).

-In addition to the provisions of regulation 27 of the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations where a FI relies on other FIs and DNFBPs to conduct its CDD, it shall —

(a) immediately obtain the necessary information concerning the identification and verification of the customer and BO and the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship ; 

(b) take adequate steps to satisfy itself that copies of identification data and other relevant docu-mentation relating to the CDD requirements is going to be made available from the third party upon request without delay ;

(c) satisfy itself that the third party is regulated, supervised or monitored for, and has measures in place for compliance with, the CDD and record keeping requirements set out in these Regulations and the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations ; 

(d) ensure that adequate KYC provisions are applied to the third party in order to obtain account information for competent authorities.

Notwithstanding the conditions specified in sub-regulation (1) (a) to 

(d) of this regulation, the ultimate responsibility for customer identification and verification shall be with the FI relying on the third party.

–  FIs shall obtain and verify the identity of the customer, beneficial owner and occasional customers before or during the course of establishing a business relationship or conducting transactions for them.

FIs are permitted to complete the verification of the identity of the customer and BO following the establishment of the business based on criteria set out in regulation 22 of the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations.

Where a FI suspects that a transaction relates to ML, TF or PF and it believes that performing the CDD process may tip-off the customer,it shall:

(a) not pursue the CDD process ;

(b) file an STR to the NFIU, immediately.

FIs shall ensure that their employees are aware of, and sensitive to, the issues referred to in subregulation (1) of this regulation when conducting CDD.

– In addition to the provisions of regulation 35 of the CBN AML, CFT and CPF Regulations, FIs shall :

(a) keep all records obtained through CDD measures, account files and business correspondence, and results of any analysis undertaken, either in electronic or written form for at least five years following the termination or cessation of the business relationship or after the date of the occasional transaction ;  

(b) ensure that documents, data or information collected under the CDD process is kept up-to-date and relevant, by undertaking reviews of existing records of customers as stipulated below or whenever the need arises:

(i) for high risk customers, every 12months, 

(ii) for medium risk customers, every 18months, and

(iii) for low risk customers, every 3years.

 

This piece concludes here

Will Blackrock and Fidelity Win Fight Against SEC on Spot ETF Filing?

0

The race to launch the first spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the US is heating up, as two of the world’s largest asset managers, Blackrock and Fidelity, have recently filed applications with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to offer such products. However, the regulator has been reluctant to approve any spot ETFs so far, citing concerns over market manipulation, custody, and investor protection. Will Blackrock and Fidelity be able to overcome these hurdles and win the fight with the SEC?

Spot ETF is a type of fund that tracks the price of an underlying asset, such as Bitcoin, and allows investors to buy and sell shares of the fund on a regulated exchange. Unlike futures-based ETFs, which use contracts that expire and settle at a future date, spot ETFs hold the actual asset in custody and reflect its current market value. Spot ETFs are seen as more attractive by some investors, as they avoid the complexities and costs of rolling over futures contracts and offer more direct exposure to the asset.

Blackrock and Fidelity are not the only contenders in the spot ETF race. Several other firms, such as VanEck, WisdomTree, Valkyrie, and NYDIG, have also filed applications with the SEC. However, a spot Bitcoin ETF also poses significant challenges for the SEC, which has to ensure that the fund meets the standards of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates mutual funds and ETFs. The SEC has to be satisfied that the fund has adequate liquidity, diversification, valuation, and custody of its assets, as well as that it can prevent fraud and manipulation in the Bitcoin market.

The SEC has repeatedly rejected or delayed applications for spot Bitcoin ETFs in the past, most notably from the Winklevoss twins in 2018 and 2019. The regulator has also expressed skepticism about the maturity and integrity of the Bitcoin market, stating that it lacks sufficient surveillance and oversight from regulators and self-regulatory organizations.

However, some analysts believe that the tide may be turning in favor of spot Bitcoin ETFs, as the SEC has recently approved several futures-based Bitcoin ETFs, which track the price of Bitcoin through contracts traded on regulated exchanges. These ETFs have attracted billions of dollars in inflows since their launch in October 2021, signaling strong demand from investors for exposure to Bitcoin.

Bitcoin spot ETFs are seen as a more attractive option for investors who want to gain exposure to the cryptocurrency without having to deal with the complexities and risks of buying, storing and securing it themselves. Unlike futures ETFs, which track the price of Bitcoin contracts that expire at a certain date, spot ETFs would track the price of Bitcoin itself, and would hold the underlying asset in custody. This would eliminate the need for investors to pay premiums or fees associated with futures contracts and would also reduce the tracking error between the ETF and the Bitcoin price.

However, Bitcoin spot ETFs also face significant regulatory hurdles, as the SEC has repeatedly expressed concerns about the lack of transparency, liquidity and oversight in the Bitcoin market. The SEC has rejected several applications for Bitcoin spot ETFs in the past, citing issues such as market manipulation, fraud and investor protection. The SEC has also stated that it would require a surveillance-sharing agreement between the Bitcoin exchanges and the ETF providers.

The SEC has also stated that it would require a surveillance-sharing agreement between the Bitcoin exchanges and the ETF providers, which is not easy to achieve given the decentralized and anonymous nature of the cryptocurrency market. This agreement would ensure that the ETF providers have access to information about the trading activity and price movements of Bitcoin on various platforms, and that they can detect and prevent any fraudulent or manipulative behavior that could affect the ETF’s value.

Why does the SEC want a Surveillance-Sharing Agreement

The SEC’s main concern is to protect investors from potential risks associated with investing in Bitcoin ETFs, such as market manipulation, insider trading, or cyberattacks. The SEC believes that a surveillance-sharing agreement would help to monitor and enforce compliance with the federal securities laws and regulations, and to ensure fair and orderly markets.

According to the SEC, a surveillance-sharing agreement would enable the ETF providers to:

Identify and report any suspicious or illegal trading activity on the Bitcoin exchanges, such as wash trading, spoofing, or front-running.

Verify the accuracy and reliability of the Bitcoin price data used to calculate the NAV (net asset value) of the ETF.

Coordinate with other regulators and law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute any violations of securities laws or market rules.

Respond quickly and effectively to any market disruptions or emergencies that could affect the ETF’s operations or liquidity.

One of the main challenges of establishing a surveillance-sharing agreement is that it would require a high level of cooperation and coordination among multiple parties, including the Bitcoin exchanges, the ETF providers, the SEC, and other regulators. This is not easy to achieve given the decentralized and anonymous nature of the cryptocurrency market, which operates across different jurisdictions and legal frameworks.

Some of the Bitcoin exchanges may be reluctant or unable to share their data with the ETF providers or the SEC, due to privacy, security, or technical reasons. Some of them may not have adequate systems or procedures in place to collect, store, and transmit their data in a timely and accurate manner. Some of them may not be subject to any regulatory oversight or accountability, which could raise questions about their legitimacy and trustworthiness.

On the other hand, a surveillance-sharing agreement could also bring some benefits for both the Bitcoin exchanges and the ETF providers. For example:

It could enhance the transparency and credibility of the Bitcoin market, which could attract more investors and liquidity.

It could reduce the volatility and divergence of Bitcoin prices across different platforms, which could improve price discovery and efficiency.

It could foster a more collaborative and constructive relationship among the market participants, which could facilitate innovation and growth.

The SEC’s requirement for a surveillance-sharing agreement is one of the major hurdles that has prevented any Bitcoin ETF from being approved in the US so far. However, it is not impossible to overcome. In fact, some progress has been made in recent years.

For instance, some of the Bitcoin exchanges have joined forces to form self-regulatory organizations (SROs), such as Crypto Rating Council (CRC) or Virtual Commodity Association (VCA), which aim to establish common standards and best practices for data sharing, compliance, security, and governance. Some of them have also partnered with third-party data providers or analytics firms, such as CryptoCompare or Chainalysis, which can offer independent verification and validation of their data.

Leadership Tussle Amongst The Nigerian Armed Forces And My Conversations With a Retired Senior Military Officer.

0

There recently have been internal issues amongst the Nigeria armed forces since the president made the recent appointment, appointing new leadership.

The president in his wisdom bypassed most senior ranks and appointed leaders from ranks below their seniors and by military tradition as I was made to understand, when a junior rank is appointed over the seniors, all the seniors are expected to voluntarily retire since the seniors cannot take orders from the junior.

Well, most of the senior officers who are expected to voluntarily retire have refused to retire; the Nigerian army even made a publication insisting that Monday, the 3rd of July 2023  is the last day every affected senior officer is to submit his voluntary letter of resignation.

This got me thinking of why a senior respected officer up to the rank of General in the army will wait to be embarrassed or dragged out publicly before he would voluntarily retire as expected. I am privileged to have a senior friend who is a retired major general in the Nigerian army and I had this conversation with him over the weekend. I asked him, why will senior officers refuse to voluntarily retire as expected and be waiting to be embarrassed out of office?.

I told him that I am guessing that maybe it was because of money, the senior officers could be waiting to get more monetary benefits before they exit the office. He quickly corrected that impression that I had by telling me that their refusal to voluntarily retire is never because of money and that the application to retire voluntarily triggers the whole process of the collection of monetary benefits. He said that It’s just the “naija” in us and greed that makes some senior officers want to remain in their seats even when they are expected to voluntarily retire.

He also told me that issues like these of senior officers refusing to voluntarily retire are not that bad amongst the armed forces; in his words; “It is really not as bad in the Armed Forces as it is almost impossible to refuse posting or retirement.  Many effective checks against such are in place if reported. This includes denial of access to the facility or office. Paraphernalia of office will be taken away, arrest and prosecution by court-martial etc. In fact You’ll discover that before all these your subordinates will no longer take instructions from you for the fear of mutiny and its consequences is the beginning of wisdom”.

I also asked him if this is how it’s done in other parts of the world, that the president can appoint juniors to head the military bypassing the seniors that are still in active service because it is expected that the president in appointing heads of the military should appoint from the most senior ranks  to avoid issues like this; he responded thus;

“Well, the C-in-C in his wisdom has the right to appoint whosoever he wants as the head of the Nation’s military. However, his decision is subject to guidelines as stipulated in the books. This is in line with best practices. However,  because of the complexity of our country, issues like ethnicity, religious and political considerations and quota system etc have cropped into the selection process. In other climes, only merit, seniority, strategic national interest, performance and to an extent politics among others play a vital role”.

I wish the newly appointed service Chiefs well and I hope that Nigeria will experience peace and security under their leadership. I also wish affected senior officers a happy voluntary retirement.

Think positive. Be positive. Put in more effort. You will win the FUTURE

0

If you dislike your teacher, you will likely struggle in that class. If you hate your school, you will not have the energy to give your best right there. And if you hate what you do, you will remain unsettled, and will not offer the best doing it. And if you hate your country, most times, your mind will not be open to see the “good” in it.

Young People in Nigeria, the message is to overcome despair with optimism, and in that construct see why the billionaires are getting richer, and startups minting $millionaires, despite all the challenges.

Tomorrow is a promise and you can win it. Live positively! The sounds of crickets will come through. The happy birds will break. And the future will turn out GREAT provided you can focus on doing PRODUCTIVE things, one step at a time.

People will tell you that you have no connections. Those things do not matter: excellence will connect you to any level.  You just need to work hard to make people know what you do well. Over time, opportunities will break. The day they asked me to come to Harvard because of an article I wrote, I could not believe it. I did not know that someone in the finest business temple was reading me. It was the same connecting into Elumelu, Bill Gates, etc worlds; people just discover you! Simply, your excellence will make way. Think positive. Be positive. Put in more effort. You will win the FUTURE.

I have put some things you can do to improve your webinality (web + personality) here. Do them and keep improving with sheer optimism.

Build Your Webinality And Unlock Value

Solving Challenges Faced by Green Africa Airways

0

In today’s highly competitive airline industry, customer satisfaction is crucial for the success and growth of any airline. Green Africa Airways, like any other airline, faces challenges that affect its customers’ experience, such as frequent rescheduling, flight cancellations, and technical glitches on their website. To address these issues and improve customer satisfaction, after analysing recent complaints on digital platforms, our analyst notes that the airline can adopt a strategic framework that focuses on service excellence and customer-centricity.

Implementing a Service Recovery Strategy

Green Africa Airways should develop a comprehensive service recovery strategy to address issues related to rescheduling and flight cancellations. This involves empowering frontline staff to make quick and effective decisions to resolve customer concerns. By proactively communicating changes, offering alternative travel options, and providing compensation or incentives for inconveniences caused, the airline can rebuild trust and enhance customer satisfaction.

Enhancing Operational Efficiency

To minimize rescheduling and cancellations, Green Africa Airways must prioritize operational efficiency. This entails investing in robust maintenance and inspection processes, ensuring adequate fleet availability, and employing proactive measures to address potential issues. By conducting regular audits and adhering to industry best practices, the airline can minimize disruptions and maintain a reliable flight schedule.

Improving Website Performance and Customer Support

Green Africa Airways needs to address the technical glitches on its website promptly. Enhancements to the website infrastructure, usability, and security can significantly improve the online booking experience. Additionally, the airline should provide dedicated customer support channels, such as a responsive helpline or live chat, to assist customers facing technical difficulties. By promptly resolving these issues and providing prompt assistance, the airline can alleviate customer frustration and build a positive brand image.

Embracing Technology and Innovation

To stay ahead in a digital era, Green Africa Airways should embrace technological advancements to enhance customer experiences. This includes leveraging data analytics to anticipate customer needs and preferences, personalizing services, and providing proactive notifications regarding flight updates. Implementing mobile apps, self-service kiosks, and seamless online check-in processes can streamline operations and offer convenience to customers, further enhancing their satisfaction.

Prioritizing a Customer-Centric Culture

Creating a customer-centric culture is vital for Green Africa Airways’ long-term success. This involves fostering a company-wide mindset that prioritizes customer satisfaction at every touchpoint. The airline should invest in comprehensive training programs to empower employees to deliver exceptional service. Encouraging feedback from customers and regularly measuring customer satisfaction metrics can help identify areas for improvement and drive continuous enhancements.

By implementing these strategies, Green Africa Airways can enhance customer satisfaction, rebuild trust, and position itself as a reliable and customer-friendly airline in Nigeria. Ultimately, this commitment to excellence will contribute to long-term success and growth in the highly competitive aviation industry.