DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5263

IVM is Governor Soludo’s Official Car in Anambra State

0

My highest professional accomplishment remains delivering the Federal University of Technology Owerri (FUTO) Convocation lecture. And the most amazing thing about that experience was that the University sent a special car to the airport with FGN to pick me up. That car has the “IVM” logo. People, I had just landed from the United States a few hours ago, and was going to touch Innoson Motors for the first time. (Sure, two cars came with Toyota as a backup.)

Of course, I went with IVM and it was indeed built for African roads. Quickly after that, I contacted  Innoson Motors through my contacts with HRH Dr Obi Gibson Nwosu, Eze Uzu II (the traditional ruler of Awka) and at the end, I posted IVM products on my website. (Then, IVM had a poor website and I felt we could improve its position). That page generates tons of traffic for Innoson. They gave me a great ride; I thanked them by showcasing their products.

Now, Governor Charles Soludo has taken all to the mountaintop: IVM is the official car of the governor in Anambra state. What a moment for Nigeria. We need MADE in Nigeria to be used by Nigerians. All the way to $1 trillion GDP by 2028 for Nigeria.

IVM cars here

Comment on Feed

The Threat of Dangote/Peugeot alliance: 

My response: I will not throw the tribal element to this. Buhari’s government has actually supported Innoson Motors very well. It generates tons of revenue from law enforcement. IVM CEO has said so publicly. Yet, as you noted, Dangote/PAN presents a test for IVM, not because of tribe but business model. Dangote/PAN can raise $1 billion to finance sales, allowing governments/people to buy cars and pay over time at low interests, IVM may not have that capacity. 

No one wins by making cars but by providing credits to acquire cars. That is where IVM needs smart bankers, not just engineers. Yet, this market is so big that all of them should be fine if Nigerians are empowered via economic opportunity.

What should you do when you get a Notice of resignation?

0

The technology space is expanding by the day, both within and beyond Africa. With this expansion, newer opportunities are emerging and most entrepreneurs admit that the struggle is no longer that of getting good hands, but keeping them on the team long enough without being poached. There is a high demand for tech professionals who know what they are doing, and if you have any on your team, you want to keep them with you.

However, it is unavoidable that you will have to face the reality of losing a staff every now and then, even your exceptionally good staff. Some of them leave without notice of resignation, while others have the courtesy of giving you a 2-week or 1-month notice of their exit. 

In the light of trying to retain your good hands; what should you do when you receive a notice of resignation from any staff? Different founders, business owners, and managers react differently in such situations. There is no hard and fast rule to this, but I will share my thoughts on some of these actions and reactions.

Presenting a counteroffer?

In cases where talent is leaving the team for a better offer, some managers try to lure them back in with a counter-offer that tries to match their new offer. As I said, this is neither right nor wrong, but here is what statistics show.

Even when presented with an alluring counter-offer, a significant percentage of these employees still leave. Why? Because remuneration is NOT among the top three reasons employees want to leave their jobs. Toxic work environment, lack of appreciation and recognition, need for growth are some factors that rank higher than poor pay, when you consider reasons people leave their jobs.

As an addition, I think this move sends a wrong message to the other staff (and they will get to find out whether you tell them or not). If you offer a staff higher pay just because he is about to leave your team, you may be communicating to the others that they also need to make similar moves before they can get a raise or better work conditions. A review is something that should be done occasionally and across the board, not when you are about to lose staff.

Separate them from the rest of the team?

Some staffs turn in their notice of resignation and suddenly observe that they are now being treated as outsiders. There are accounts of some staff who say they were being excluded from team meetings and strategic projects just because they turned in their notice of resignation. I am not sure the reasoning behind this move, but the effects can be far-reaching. You may be communicating to your staff that the day they choose to leave the team (for career advancement or for other reasons), they become anti-team. It is like telling your child that the day he chooses to move out of your house, he ceases to be your child. This does not help for team bonding, even among the remaining staff.

A certain bank in Nigeria (now acquired by another) created such a bond among its staff, encouraging their career goals and academic pursuits, that the ex-staffs formed a sort of Alumni body after leaving the bank. When their founder celebrated his 60th birthday, the alumni body in New York threw him a second birthday party, after the one he had in Nigeria. This can only be a result of strong team bonding. The management must have communicated to them that even after leaving the bank, they remained a part of the team.

Trying to talk them out of it

This can be a way to show team members that they are appreciated and their presence on the team has not been taken for granted. However, I do not think this should be over-flogged. It is fine to ask them if they would have stayed back if a couple of things were changed, but you need not push them to change their minds.

Asking for an honest review/feedback

There is no data telling exactly how many businesses adopt this approach, but I think this is something every manager and business owner should adopt (in addition to whatever else they choose). There are feedbacks that some staff would only give when they know that they are leaving the company, and you can really use the honest feedback.

Some questions to ask could be; “why are you leaving us?”, “what do you like most about our operations and management style?”, “Is there something you think we could be doing better?”, “do you think this company supports your individual career growth?”, etc. It is the feedback from questions like this that you can use to make the work environment better for those left behind.

Join Our Presentation Before Canadian Investors Today

0

I will be speaking to a group in Canada which wants to invest in African startups via Tekedia Capital at 12 noon Toronto time today (5pm WAT). At Tekedia Capital, we run a Syndicate which pools funds and invests in tech-anchored startups which operate mainly in Africa. Membership fee is $1,000 and minimum investment is $10k.

A happy member of our Syndicate is making this connection, and we hope to expand our membership base. Last week, we spoke before an India-based investing community. All destinations: Africa.

If you want to join this meeting, write to the email address on this page for the Zoom link

The controversy surrounding the S 84(12) of the Electoral Act 2022 Nigeria

0

The controversy hanging around the newly signed electoral law seems not going to end any time soon. The s. 84(12) which has been the centre point of the controversy is still lingering around. 

Previously, the president advised the lawmakers to expunge the section completely from the new law but the lawmakers refused to heed the presidential advice, the Attorney General of the Federation has also approached the parliament and requested the removal of that section but the parliaments refused to remove this notorious section from the law.

What is the impeccable provision of this section that is making everyone to be running helter-skelter, especially public office holders who have an interest in contesting for political offices come 2023?. 

This section stipulates that anyone holding a political office – ministers, commissioners, special advisers, and others – must first relinquish the position before they can be eligible to participate in the electoral process either as a candidate or as a delegate.

To this effect, every appointed political office holder under this present political dispensation who has an eye on any elective political post in the upcoming election must first resign before that individual can participate in any electoral process even if as a delegate or as a candidate. 

This section directly affects individuals like Malami, Amechi, Festus Keyamo, and others who are currently in the executive cabinet but rumored to be making plans of contesting in different elective positions. This means that Amechi and the likes must first resign as a minister of the federation before he can openly declare to contest or participate in any political process be it as a political candidate or as a political delegate.

The lawmakers are of the opinion that political appointees should not involve themselves in partisan politics, if they must do, they will first have to relinquish their offices and appointments. This is to ensure that those appointed to occupy different positions discharge their duties without any political affiliation. 

The struggle for the extinguishment of this notorious section 84(12) of the 2022 electoral act got a break yesterday as the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia, Abia State in a judgment has ordered the Attorney-General of the Federation to immediately delete Section 84 (12) of the amended Electoral Act.

Her Lordship, Justice Evelyn Anyadike on Friday held that the section was unconstitutional, invalid, illegal, null, void, and of no effect whatsoever and cannot stand, as it violates the clear provisions of the Constitution and since it is inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution it is to the extent of its inconsistency null and void.

In the suit marked FHC/UM/CS/26/2022, Justice Anyadike further stated that Sections 66(1)(f), 107(1)(f), 137(1)(f), and 182(1)(f) of the 1999 Constitution already stipulated that appointees of government seeking to contest elections were only to resign at least 30 days to the date of the election and that any other law that mandated such appointees to resign or leave the office at any time before that was unconstitutional, invalid, illegal null and void to the extent of its inconsistency to the clear provisions of the Constitution.

We patiently await how this political game of thrones will turn out in the coming days, will this judgment be appealed? Will the lawmakers protest for the ridicule the high court judge of Abia state has subjected them to, what will be the reaction of the general public? 

Answers to these questions will surely unfold in the coming days, till then, we will sit tight to enjoy the drama.

Moove Raises $105m in Series A2 Round to Expand Services to New Markets

0

African mobility fintech company, Moove has raised $105 million in an oversubscribed Series A2 round consisting of equity and debt, to expand its services to new markets.

The round is led by existing investors, Speedinvest, Left Lane Capital and the latest.ventures, with participation from new investors including AfricInvest, MUFG Innovation Partners, Latitude and Kreos Capital.

Launched in 2020 by Ladi Delano and Jide Odunsi, Moove is democratizing vehicle ownership across Africa by providing mobility entrepreneurs access to revenue-based financing in markets with low access to credit. Using its alternative credit scoring technology, Moove provides vehicle financing to its customers to purchase brand new vehicles using a percentage of their weekly revenue.

The startup has experienced overwhelming demand and exponential growth across Africa, with its Moove-financed vehicles having completed over 3 million rides covering more than 25 million kilometers. Now, Moove is expanding its model globally to meet the needs of mobility entrepreneurs in other emerging markets.

With this new $105m Series A2 round, which brings the total raised by the mobility fintech pioneer to $174.5m, Moove will rapidly scale its revenue-based vehicle financing model to seven new markets across Asia, MENA, and Europe over the next six months.

“Less than two years ago we discovered this whitespace of mobility fintech and launched Moove. Having now surpassed over 3 million trips in Moove-financed vehicles across Africa, launched in six new cities and connected thousands of ambitious mobility entrepreneurs to ride-hailing, e-logistics and instant delivery marketplaces, we’re now leading this growing category within fintech,” Ladi Delano, co-CEO at Moove, said.

“But there are still millions of budding mobility entrepreneurs in emerging markets across the world who have limited or no access to vehicle financing and marketplaces that are facing critical supply issues. With this new fundraise, we are well-positioned and well funded to help solve this global problem. We’re delighted to have the support of leading investors across the globe who will be integral in enabling us to take our Nigerian-born model to the world.”

Moove is part of a new generation of Nigerian-born startups that are upending financial services across Africa. After raising $23 million in an oversubscribed Series A round in August 2021 and securing seed-stage funding from Future Africa in 2019, Moove is now leading the charge in the “mobility fintech” sector. This is a white space where Moove has emerged as the leader across Africa, helping to solve the continent’s acute problem of limited access to vehicle financing for millions of Africans.

Over the next six months, Moove will scale its revenue-based vehicle financing model to mobility entrepreneurs across Asia, MENA and Europe, and plans to expand its partnerships and vehicle classes to include cars, trucks, bikes, three-wheelers, and buses.

“At Moove, we are working hard to create disruptive and impactful tech solutions to solve real-world problems. The Moove model that we’ve pioneered in Africa providing revenue-based vehicle financing to mobility entrepreneurs can be applied anywhere in the world, which is why we’re excited to be expanding to new emerging markets in Asia and the MENA region,” Jide Odunsi, co-CEO at Moove, said.

Moove’s model has proven transformative in other ways. Its commitment to ensure that at least 60% of the vehicles it finances are electric or hybrid in line with targets set at COP26, means the company is replacing the old-polluting vehicles that are exported from the rest of the world to the continent with new fuel-efficient vehicles. This commitment to tackling the climate crisis saw Moove recently awarded the IFC’s Annual Corporate Award as one of the top 20 most impactful and transformational projects, applying an innovative and scalable solution towards a global problem.

Moove is driving forward new areas of emerging economies with a platform that is disrupting traditional financial services and providing the means to empower a new generation of mobility entrepreneurs. The mobility space in emerging markets is often highly fragmented and informal, Moove is helping to formalize how millions of people can participate in this economy to earn a living and own their own vehicle. Moove has a commitment to ensure that at least 50% of its customers are women, its product design enables more women to access vehicle financing and flexible employment.

“As we scale, we remain committed to empowering women, leading the electrification of the mobility space and driving financial inclusion. These ideals are at the core of what we do as we continue to build a sustainable and impact-driven global business,” Odunsi added.