DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 57

Bitcoin ETF Outflows, Pump.fun RWA Expansion and Trezor Security Alert

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The crypto market is sending a more complicated signal than a simple rise or fall in digital-asset prices. Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds are recording roughly $120 million in net outflows, while spot ETFs tied to Ethereum, Solana and XRP continue to attract capital.

At the same time, Pump.fun is expanding its ambitions beyond memecoins with custom trading pairs for real-world assets and stocks, while hardware-wallet maker Trezor is warning users about phishing attempts following a breach involving a third-party email provider.

The developments reveal a market increasingly defined by capital rotation, tokenization and security. Bitcoin’s ETF outflows are particularly notable because spot ETFs have become one of the clearest institutional channels into cryptocurrency.

When investors withdraw money from Bitcoin products while allocating toward Ethereum, Solana and XRP vehicles, the movement suggests that appetite for digital assets has not necessarily disappeared.

Instead, investors may be rotating toward alternative networks and narratives with different growth expectations. Such flows should not automatically be interpreted as a bearish verdict on Bitcoin.

ETF activity can change rapidly in response to positioning, macroeconomic expectations, profit-taking and relative performance. Bitcoin remains the largest and most established cryptocurrency, but the growing variety of regulated investment products gives institutions more ways to express views across the digital-asset ecosystem.

Meanwhile, Pump.fun is pushing deeper into the transformation of financial markets. Its introduction of Custom Pairs for real-world assets and stocks represents a significant expansion from its original identity as a memecoin launch platform.

The model reportedly allows creators to earn fees or cashback while directing 50% of protocol revenue toward $PUMP buybacks and burns. The economic logic is straightforward: if activity generates protocol revenue, part of that revenue can be used to reduce the circulating supply of the platform’s token.

In theory, sustained usage could therefore create a link between platform activity and token economics. But buyback-and-burn mechanisms are not guarantees of appreciation. Their effectiveness ultimately depends on genuine demand, sustainable revenue and the quality of the underlying market activity.

More importantly, custom pairs involving RWAs and stocks point toward a broader convergence between crypto infrastructure and traditional finance. Tokenization promises to make ownership and trading more programmable.

Potentially allowing assets traditionally confined to conventional financial systems to interact with blockchain-based markets. Yet this opportunity also brings regulatory, liquidity and investor-protection challenges.

The Trezor warning adds the necessary counterweight. As crypto infrastructure becomes more connected and valuable, attackers increasingly target the human layer surrounding wallets and exchanges.

A compromised third-party email provider can become an avenue for phishing campaigns even when the underlying hardware wallet itself has not been compromised.

For users, the lesson is crucial: an email appearing to come from a trusted crypto company should never be treated as proof of authenticity. Hardware-wallet users should avoid clicking unsolicited links, verify domains independently and never reveal seed phrases or private keys.

The three stories converge around one theme: crypto is becoming more sophisticated, but so are its risks. Capital is rotating across assets, blockchain platforms are reaching toward stocks and real-world assets, and attackers are exploiting the expanding ecosystem.

The next phase of crypto adoption will therefore depend not only on liquidity and innovation, but also on trust, security and credible infrastructure.

Coinbase CEO Says U.S. Crypto Regulation Will Advance Regardless of Clarity Act Vote

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has stated that the U.S. cryptocurrency industry is positioned to gain clearer regulatory rules in the coming days whether or not the Senate advances the Clarity Act.

Speaking in a CNBC interview, Armstrong expressed confidence that regulatory clarity will arrive around the bill’s scheduled procedural vote on September 15, either through legislation or through independent action by federal agencies.

The legislation has drawn support from crypto companies, certain banks, and law-enforcement groups after earlier negotiations resolved several industry concerns.

Armstrong described the bill as ready for approval, noting that senators he has spoken with are largely on board. A key remaining point of discussion involves ethics rules for government officials who hold digital assets.

The September 15 vote is a cloture motion that requires 60 votes to advance, meaning several Democratic senators would need to join Republicans.

Even if the measure falls short, Armstrong said the outcome would still be favorable. He pointed to indications that the SEC and CFTC are prepared to move forward with their own rulemaking. “If it passes, great, we’ve got legislation,” he said.

“Frankly, if it doesn’t pass, it’s also going to be a good outcome because the SEC and the CFTC have said that they’re ready to publish rulemaking, and we’re going to get regulatory clarity one way or another on the 15th or the day or two after.”

Armstrong framed passage of the Clarity Act as an important regulatory milestone that could help unlock greater institutional capital and support the development of products such as tokenized equities in the United States. He has previously emphasized the need for clear rules to reduce uncertainty that has long hindered the industry’s growth.

His comments come as White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt, issued a stark warning to lawmakers, stating that Congress is running out of time to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.

In comments reported around September 10, 2026, Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, urged both Republicans and Democrats to support a procedural vote scheduled for September 15.

“I would say to everyone, Republican and Democrat: Get on the bill and let’s keep talking,” Witt told Semafor. “A failed motion-to-proceed vote doesn’t give anyone anything they want.”

The vote would test whether the Senate can advance the roughly 600-page bill for further debate and potential amendments.

What the Clarity Act Would Do

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (often called the CLARITY Act, seeks to end years of regulatory uncertainty by creating a clear taxonomy for digital assets and dividing oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Key elements include:

– Granting the CFTC primary authority over digital commodities (such as many cryptocurrencies that achieve sufficient decentralization) and related spot markets, exchanges, brokers, and dealers.

– Establishing registration, disclosure, trading, and customer-protection rules for intermediaries.

– Provisions on stablecoin yields and related competitive issues between banks and crypto firms.

– Ethics restrictions limiting federal officials (and in some versions, spouses) from issuing or sponsoring digital assets while in office.

Supporters argue the bill would provide the legal certainty needed to keep innovation and capital in the United States rather than driving it overseas.

Progress has repeatedly stalled over several flashpoints

– Ethics and conflicts of interest: Democrats have pushed for stronger restrictions on officials’ crypto activities, particularly in light of President Trump’s and his family’s digital asset holdings and reported profits. The White House has agreed to significant ethics language but has resisted some broader proposals involving forced divestment or enforcement by state attorneys general.

– Stablecoin yields/rewards: Ongoing debates over how interest or rewards on stablecoins should be treated and the potential impact on traditional bank deposits.

– Illicit finance and anti-money laundering (AML): Law enforcement groups and some senators have raised concerns that certain developer protections could complicate tracing illicit funds.

Witt has repeatedly described the current window as critical. With midterm elections approaching, a failure on the September 15 procedural vote could significantly complicate further action this Congress.

He noted that passage becomes much harder in a potential divided government. The September 15 vote will serve as the clearest near-term test of whether negotiators can bridge the remaining gaps.

Market participants are watching the Senate closely, given the compressed legislative calendar ahead of the midterm elections and the potential for either legislative or regulatory progress to reshape the U.S. digital-asset landscape in the near future.

TSMC Posts Record August Revenue as AI Chip Demand Drives 53% Surge

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. posted record monthly revenue in August as demand for chips powering artificial intelligence systems continued to surge, providing another indication that the global AI infrastructure buildout remains a major growth engine for the semiconductor industry.

The world’s largest contract chipmaker reported revenue of NT$514.8 billion ($16.35 billion) for August, up 53.3% from the same month a year earlier and 10.1% from July.

August marked TSMC’s fourth consecutive month of revenue growth and set a new monthly record for the company.

TSMC shares closed 0.61% lower on Thursday before the revenue figures were released, suggesting that the latest sales performance was already being weighed against expectations for the company’s AI-driven growth.

The latest result reinforces the strength of the demand environment TSMC described during its second-quarter earnings call in July, when management said demand related to artificial intelligence remained “extremely robust.”

TSMC reported a more than 77% year-on-year increase in second-quarter profit and forecast third-quarter revenue of between $44.6 billion and $45.8 billion.

The August performance puts the company on a strong trajectory toward that quarterly target, although monthly revenue alone does not determine the final quarterly result.

AI Keeps TSMC’s Advanced Capacity Full

The growth is notable because TSMC sits at the center of the supply chain for some of the world’s most advanced AI processors.

TrendForce said TSMC held a 72.5% share of the global foundry market in the second quarter, leaving the company far ahead of its competitors. Samsung Foundry ranked second with 5.9%, followed by China’s SMIC with 5.4%.

The gap demonstrates the degree to which AI chip demand is translating into business for TSMC rather than being distributed evenly across the foundry industry.

TrendForce said TSMC’s advanced 5-nanometer, 4-nanometer, and 3-nanometer production capacity was fully booked during the second quarter, with demand from AI server processors a major factor.

These advanced manufacturing processes allow chip designers to pack more transistors into sophisticated processors while improving performance and power efficiency. They are therefore critical to the development of the accelerators and high-performance computing processors used in AI data centers.

For TSMC, that creates a particularly attractive position in the AI boom. The company does not have to win the market for a particular AI application or model. It can benefit from demand across multiple chip designers and technology companies that depend on advanced foundry capacity.

The strength of the AI cycle extends beyond TSMC.

The world’s 10 largest foundries generated combined second-quarter revenue of nearly $53.49 billion, a record for the group, according to TrendForce.

Supply constraints for advanced manufacturing processes used in AI and high-performance computing processors contributed to the increase.

The market therefore has two interconnected dynamics. AI companies are spending heavily on computing capacity, while semiconductor designers are competing for access to the advanced manufacturing capacity needed to produce more powerful processors.

TSMC’s dominant market share means it is one of the biggest beneficiaries of that bottleneck.

The company’s scale also gives it an advantage as chip complexity increases. Producing cutting-edge processors requires expensive manufacturing equipment, highly controlled processes, and large investments in research and development. Those requirements make it difficult for smaller foundries to close the technology gap quickly.

TSMC And ASML Prepare For Next Generation

TSMC is already planning beyond today’s leading-edge nodes. The company and Dutch semiconductor equipment maker ASML announced an initiative this week aimed at advancing next-generation chip manufacturing.

TSMC said it plans to use ASML’s High Numerical Aperture, or High NA, technology in large-scale manufacturing of advanced nodes beginning in 2030.

High NA extreme ultraviolet lithography is designed to enable chipmakers to print intricate circuit patterns as transistor architectures become more complex.

The planned adoption indicates that the AI boom is changing not only demand for semiconductors but also the technology required to manufacture them.

As AI processors become larger and more sophisticated, chipmakers face increasing pressure to improve transistor density, performance, and energy efficiency. That pushes manufacturers toward more advanced lithography and increasingly expensive production equipment.

TSMC’s planned use of High NA technology therefore represents a longer-term investment in maintaining its manufacturing lead rather than simply responding to the current AI cycle.

However, TSMC’s August numbers provide another data point supporting the view that AI-related semiconductor demand remains exceptionally strong.

The 53.3% annual increase in monthly revenue is significant not only because of its size but because it comes from a company operating at the center of the most advanced part of the chip supply chain.

The key question for investors now is how long the current level of AI infrastructure spending can be sustained.

Technology companies and data-center operators are committing enormous amounts of capital to AI computing infrastructure, creating extraordinary demand for advanced processors and the semiconductor manufacturing capacity behind them.

TSMC’s results are seen as an indication that spending is still feeding through to chip production at scale. Yet the company’s position also exposes it to the risks surrounding the AI investment cycle. If customers eventually slow capital expenditure or if AI infrastructure supply catches up with demand, the pressure on advanced foundry capacity could ease.

For now, the opposite is occurring. TSMC is reporting record monthly sales, its most advanced production lines remain in high demand, and the company is preparing to deploy another generation of manufacturing technology as AI workloads become more computationally intensive.

Why Brian Armstrong Believes Bitcoin Could Reach $400K by 2030

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Brian Armstrong’s latest Bitcoin forecast places a striking number at the centre of the crypto market’s long-term imagination: $400,000 by 2030.

The Coinbase CEO has described that level as a reasonable target, reinforcing his broader conviction that Bitcoin is evolving from a speculative digital asset into a significant component of the global financial system.

Armstrong’s argument matters because Coinbase sits at the intersection of crypto and traditional finance.

The exchange has become an important gateway for institutions entering digital assets, while the emergence of regulated Bitcoin investment products has made exposure to BTC increasingly accessible to conventional investors.

His forecast therefore reflects more than a simple bet on another cryptocurrency rally. It represents a view that Bitcoin’s role in global finance could continue expanding through the end of the decade. At $400,000, Bitcoin would require a dramatic increase in market capitalization.

Yet the target is not entirely detached from the scale of the assets Bitcoin increasingly competes with. Bitcoin’s fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins gives its monetary narrative a structural difference from fiat currencies.

Whose supply can expand through monetary policy and credit creation. If investors increasingly treat Bitcoin as a digital form of scarce monetary property, demand could continue rising even as new supply becomes increasingly constrained.

The institutional channel is particularly important. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have created a bridge between Wall Street portfolios and the cryptocurrency market, allowing investors to obtain Bitcoin exposure without directly managing wallets or private keys.

Corporations, asset managers and other financial institutions are also becoming more comfortable incorporating digital assets into investment strategies. Armstrong has previously argued that regulatory clarity is one of the major factors capable of unlocking larger institutional allocations.

Regulation could therefore become one of the defining variables between $400,000 Bitcoin and another prolonged cycle of volatility.

The proposed CLARITY Act has become central to expectations for a clearer U.S. digital-asset framework. If lawmakers establish clearer boundaries for regulators and market participants, financial institutions could have greater confidence to expand their participation.

Armstrong has pointed to this regulatory progress as an important catalyst for Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory. Bitcoin’s programmed scarcity provides another potential catalyst. The 2028 halving is expected to reduce the rate at which new bitcoins enter circulation.

Historically, halvings have become major reference points for Bitcoin’s market cycles, although they do not guarantee future price appreciation. If demand continues growing while newly created supply declines, the resulting supply-demand imbalance could provide additional upward pressure.

Still, $400,000 should be understood as a forecast, not a promise. Bitcoin remains one of the world’s most volatile financial assets. Regulation can change, liquidity can disappear, institutional appetite can weaken and macroeconomic shocks can trigger severe drawdowns.

Even bullish long-term trajectories can contain brutal corrections. Armstrong himself has previously floated an even more aggressive $1 million Bitcoin target for 2030, making the current $300,000–$400,000 range appear considerably more measured.

The shift illustrates how quickly expectations can change in crypto markets. The $400,000 thesis is less about a magic number than about Bitcoin’s transformation. If adoption, institutional participation, regulatory clarity and scarcity continue reinforcing one another.

Bitcoin could become increasingly comparable to digital gold. Whether the market reaches $400,000 by 2030 remains uncertain, but Armstrong’s forecast captures the central question of the next crypto era: can Bitcoin evolve from a disruptive asset into a global monetary reserve?

Coinbase Sees Clarity Act Passage As Regulatory Turning Point As Trading Revenue Weakens

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong expects the U.S. Senate to approve the Clarity Act, arguing that broad support across the crypto industry, parts of the banking sector, and law enforcement has brought the legislation close to becoming a federal framework for digital assets.

Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Thursday, Armstrong said the legislation appeared to have enough backing to move through the Senate, where lawmakers are scheduled to vote on Sept. 15.

“I think the Clarity Act is ready to be supported by the Senate,” Armstrong said, adding that people he had spoken with were broadly on board with the legislation.

Armstrong’s confidence comes as the bill enters a critical stage. Securing the 60 votes needed in the Senate remains the central challenge, with negotiations continuing over ethics provisions and other outstanding issues.

Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona said at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium last month that reaching 60 votes would require lawmakers to address the ethics provisions as well as other unresolved elements of the legislation.

Armstrong said those negotiations were still underway but appeared “very close to a solution” ahead of the vote.

Coinbase has been one of the most prominent corporate supporters of the Clarity Act, which seeks to establish clearer lines of regulatory authority over digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Introduced in May 2025, the legislation passed the House last July. Senate approval would represent a significant step toward establishing a more defined federal regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto market.

Armstrong, however, said that the industry could still emerge with greater certainty even if the bill fails to clear the Senate.

“Frankly, if it doesn’t pass, it’s also going to be a good outcome because the SEC and the CFTC have said that they’re ready to publish rulemaking, and we’re going to get regulatory clarity one way or another on the 15th or the day or two after,” he said.

For Coinbase, that matters because regulatory uncertainty has extended well beyond questions about how cryptocurrencies should be classified. Greater clarity could make it easier for financial institutions to participate in digital assets and give companies such as Coinbase more room to develop products beyond conventional crypto trading.

Armstrong described passage of the legislation as a “regulatory checkbox” that could help unlock institutional capital and support products such as tokenized equities in the United States.

“It’d be a big milestone,” he said.

Coinbase Looks Beyond Spot Trading

The push for regulatory clarity comes as Coinbase itself is confronting a less favorable trading environment.

Armstrong said crypto spot trading has “basically been down for the last year,” putting pressure on a business that still generates about half of Coinbase’s revenue from trading.

The company has responded by broadening its trading operations into stocks, commodities and foreign exchange, while building non-trading businesses around areas including stablecoins and institutional custody.

The diversification effort is becoming more important as Coinbase’s financial results show the cost of weaker trading activity.

The company reported second-quarter revenue of $1.2 billion in July, down from $1.5 billion a year earlier. Coinbase also recorded a net loss of $359.5 million, compared with a profit of $1.43 billion in the same quarter the previous year.

The results missed Wall Street expectations for both revenue and earnings for a third consecutive quarter.

That puts the Clarity Act in a broader business context for Coinbase. Regulatory certainty could help expand the market for products tied to tokenized securities, institutional custody and other forms of digital-asset infrastructure at a time when the company’s traditional spot-trading engine is no longer providing the same level of support.

Coinbase has also been looking outside the United States for growth. The company has established a presence in the United Arab Emirates and Singapore, which Armstrong described as its Asia hub.

Those international footholds became important during periods when the U.S. regulatory environment was less permissive, Armstrong said. Coinbase is also seeking opportunities in markets where governments have been more receptive to cryptocurrency.

“We basically just try to grow when we have windows and we try to bide our time in the areas where we’re sensing hostility,” he said.

The approach reflects the uneven regulatory landscape facing crypto companies globally. For Coinbase, regulatory openness is now a factor not only in where it operates but also in where it can introduce new products and deploy capital.

The development makes the Senate vote potentially important beyond the immediate legal status of digital assets. A federal framework could reduce one of the industry’s biggest barriers to institutional participation, while giving Coinbase a clearer foundation for expanding into financial products that sit outside its traditional cryptocurrency trading business.

Still, passage of the legislation would not eliminate the company’s underlying commercial challenge. Coinbase remains heavily exposed to transaction activity, and its latest results show how quickly weaker trading conditions can flow through to revenue and earnings. Its shares have fallen nearly 23% this year, with Armstrong attributing part of the pressure on the company’s financial performance to the prolonged weakness in crypto spot trading.

The Clarity Act could then arrive at an important moment for Coinbase. The company is seeking greater regulatory certainty at the same time as it tries to reduce its dependence on the very trading activity that built its business.

1...565758...9,361Page 57 of 9,361

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy