DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6014

The Need to Establish More Organisations for Tackling Human Trafficking

0

They are everywhere – city, village, internet, school, market, streets, even our homes. Nowhere is safe and nobody is free. They lie low, monitoring everyone’s movement; waiting for the right time, the opportunity to spring into action. They lure; they deceive; they abduct; they use people’s challenges as weapons and never rest until their target becomes their prey. That is who they are: the traffickers.

Human trafficking is illegal or deceptive recruitment and relocation of individuals of various ages, genders, races, and classes. It knows no one. It does not decide which class to prey on and which to avoid. It goes for the white and the black, the male and the female, the young and the aged, the educated and the uneducated, and the rich and the poor. Yes, human trafficking is a global problem; it is not peculiar to Africa or to Nigeria as many of us were made to believe. And unlike the stories we’ve heard, it does not only target the poor, the female gender and the young. No one is safe from human traffickers.

Nevertheless, traffickers do not strike unless they see opportunities. In developing countries like Nigeria, they use the poor economic status of the country to lure their kills. In the rural areas, where there is poor infrastructural development, people are deceived with the story that they will be taken to places, where they will have access to better education, good jobs, healthcare, good quality water, and even electricity. Many are lured with stories of people making millions within weeks in the cities and that alone draws them off their villages and farming occupation to “cities”, where they won’t have to “suffer” again.

What about the ones in the cities? Why are they victims too?

Everybody wants to “run” out of the country. The watchword is, “if you see a way to leave this country, please take it”. Well, there are so many “easy ways” out of the country and the easiest of them all is through traffickers. But how do these people capture those in the city, considering many people in urban areas are educated? Your guess is as good as mine. But I can bet you traffickers are equally good at brainwashing. They step in gradually until their victims believe solely on what they (the traffickers) fed them. At this stage, it becomes difficult to change the minds of the hoodwinked. Worse is, it is hard to determine whether they were falling into the nets of traffickers or just some Good Samaritans. It becomes hard to draw the person out of trouble because you don’t know if you were “messing up his destiny”. It is hard to tell which is which until it hits the person. And by then, it becomes too late.

Many of us know what victims of traffickers encounter. The commonest predicaments they face are sexual exploitation and cheap labour. We have also heard of those sold into slavery and child marriage. You must have heard about the ones, whose organs were harvested and the “suppliers” of babies for illegal adoption homes, aka baby factories. There are those sent into prostitution (even child prostitutes exist), drug couriers, combatants (even child soldiers), and so on. The one of domestic servitude is common; I don’t even want to go into it.

Some lucky victims are rescued, while many still wallow in bondage. Worst is, it is hard to apprehend these traffickers because of how shady they are. Hence, the only way to fight them is by blocking their access to their preys.

In Nigeria, I only know of NAPTIP (National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons) as the agency that fights human trafficking. I also know of Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM) because of Abike Dabiri-Erewa’s untiring efforts towards rescuing Nigerians trapped in Diaspora. Apart from these two, I don’t know if there is any other agency or organisation that comes to the aid of Nigerians in such circumstances. If there are others, they are very silent; and that is not how it is supposed to be.

Like I asserted earlier, traffickers crawl in on their preys. Most of the times, people are recruited by those that are close to them (friends and family) or those they met through social media (or any other place). But one thing is certain: once a target is sighted, there is constant follow up. Like we say in Nigeria, they follow the person bumper to bumper to make sure he doesn’t change his mind. It only takes the person’s analytical abilities or the efforts of people around him to not fall victim.

But then, when you realise that your person, (or even you) is about to be recruited by a trafficker, what will you do?

This is where experts should come in. There is a need for more organisations with experts on tracking and apprehending traffickers to be established in Nigeria. There is great need for every household to have lists of organisations they can call in cases of suspicion of trafficking. But many of us don’t even know who to call. NAPTIP is a government agency; it is likely overwhelmed. More nongovernmental organisations are needed.

Now that the news of recession (and bad governance) is making it seem like the world is coming to an end for all Nigerians, the traffickers are getting ready for their field day (if they have started already). People need to be at alert to stop them before it is too late.

The E-Nigeria Design At The 2020 Nigerian Economic Summit

0

It begins tomorrow – the 2020 Nigerian Economic Summit Group (NESG). And I will handle the presentation on the E-Nigeria Design. In this design,  we will look at three things: Digital Skills and Literacy, Digital Transformation, and Data Harmonization. With Aderinola Oloruntoye, Jude Ayoka Ayoka and Odunayo Eweniyi, as Discussion Leaders, we will anchor a redesign with 45 other professionals into a future for a nation. I believe in the power of markets, and together with the public sector, we can have a Greater Nation. Good People, Great Nation – Nigeria.

 

We Must Exit This Recession With Precision – Atiku Abubakar

0

It is with a very heavy heart that I received the confirmation that for the second time in five years, Nigeria has entered into another recession. Heaviness of heart, because this could have been avoided had this administration taken heed to patriotic counsel given by myself and other well meaning Nigerians on cutting the cost of governance, saving for a rainy day, and avoiding profligate borrowing.

Yes, the COVID19 pandemic has exacerbated an already bad situation, however, we could have avoided this fate by a disciplined and prudent management of our economy.

Be that as it may, it serves no one’s purposes to quarrel after the fact. We must focus on solutions. Nigeria needs critical leadership to guide her back to the path of economic sustainability.

We cannot afford hand wringing and navel-gazing. We must act now, by taking necessary, and perhaps painful actions.

For a start, the proposed 2021 budget presented to the National Assembly on Tuesday, October 8, 2020, is no longer tenable. Nigeria neither has the resources, or the need to implement such a luxury heavy budget. The nation is broke, but not broken. However, if we continue to spend lavishly, even when we do not earn commensurately, we would go from being a broke nation, to being a broken nation.

As a matter of importance and urgency, every non essential line item in the proposed 2021 budget must be expunged. For the avoidance of doubt, this ought to include estacodes, non emergency travel, feeding, welfare packages, overseas training, new vehicle purchases, office upgrades, non salary allowances, etc.

Until our economic prospects improve, Nigeria ought to exclusively focus on making budgetary proposals for essential items, which include reasonable wages and salaries, infrastructural projects, and social services (citizenry’s health, and other human development investments).

Additionally, we have to stimulate the economy, by investing in human development, and increasing the purchasing power of the most vulnerable of our population. Only a well developed populace can generate enough economic activity for the nation to exit this recession.

We must invest in those most likely to be impacted by the effects of the recession, the poorest of the poor. As well as stimulating the economy, this also ensures that they do not slip further into extreme poverty.

For example, a stimulus package, in the form of monthly cash transfers of ?5000 to be made to every bank account holder, verified by a Bank Verification Number, whose combined total deposit in the year 2019 was lower than the annual minimum wage.

Now, how will this be funded? By more profligate borrowing? No. I propose a luxury tax on goods and services that are exclusively accessible only to the super-wealthy. A tax on the ultra wealthy to protect the extremely poor.

A practical approach to this is to place a 15% tax on all Business and First Class tickets sold to and from Nigeria, on all luxury car imports and sales, on all private jets imports and service charges, on all jewellery imports and sales, on all designer products imported, produced or sold in Nigeria, and on all other luxury goods either manufactured, or imported into Nigeria, with the exception of goods made for export. The proceeds of this tax should be exclusively dedicated to a Poverty Eradication Fund, which must be managed in the same manner as the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, or the Ecological Fund.

I further propose that a 1% poverty alleviation tax should be legislated by the National Assembly on the profits of every International Oil Company operating in Nigeria, and international airlines doing business in Nigeria, which should also go towards the proposed Poverty Eradication Fund.

It is inhumane for us as a nation to increase the cost of goods and services that affect the poor, while keeping the cost of luxuries fairly stable. We must flip this, and flip it immediately.

And above all, Nigeria must stop borrowing for anything other than essential needs. Again, for the avoidance of doubt, borrowing to pay salaries, or to engage in White Elephant projects, is not an essential need. This is particularly important as we need cash at hand, because the world and our economic and development partners are also focused on helping their home economies overcome effects of COVID19. We must be our own saviours.

The more we borrow, the more we will need cash to make interest and principal payments, and the less cash we will have to make necessary investments in our economy and our people. If we keep borrowing, we stand the risk of defaulting, and that will make recession a child’s play, because we will lose some of our sovereignty.

I urge the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari to swallow its pride, and accept its limitations, so that they can open their minds to ideas, without caring who the messenger is. For as Deng Xiaoping said “It doesn’t matter whether the cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice.

The Biggest Problem in Nigeria – The Gyration of Naira is Now A National Security Threat

5

Nigeria has one major decision to make – how to keep the NAIRA stable. That is the unified growth strategy for that nation as nothing else matters. If we cannot keep the Naira stable, we have no economy. I am not writing as an economist (I am not one); I am writing as a business owner, employer of labour, and a proud Nigerian. In all the conversations I have about market systems in Nigeria, the one issue which typically comes up is this: “what would happen to the Naira?” 

That layer distorts everything, pushing demand and supply models of fixing market frictions, by finding and unlocking opportunities in the market, into something no one has any firm control over. The gyration of the Naira is a national security and economic threat in Nigeria.

Nigeria will not have any sustained growing economy until we can fix the Naira. Doing that requires making hard decisions which no one has shown the character to do. It is very offensive to the Nigerian people that we have accepted that the Naira MUST be losing its value seasonally since the 1980s. This is a nation of smart men and women, but we have failed the most important symbol and asset of our economy. The struggle of Naira is a national calamity and a disgrace to our generation. There is no reason we should put Naira in this position.

In the United States, the Federal Reserve, their version of the Central Bank of Nigeria, has two main core roles: keep the U.S. dollars stable (by reducing inflation) and maximize employment through interest rates. Magically, the Federal Reserve uses all the tools in its power to make sure the value of the US dollars is predictable, and stable, and based on that, markets can function. Yes, players can enter into contracts with the market makers, mainstreet merchants and rainmakers having good night sleeps.

Finance Minister, Nigeria

As they do that, they also ensure they use interest rates to boost employment by adjusting the cost of capital. When the interest rate is high, the cost of capital goes high and that affects borrowing which can affect investment and then employment. It plays that game, mixing high and low rates to ensure the economy is not too hot or cold.

For Nigeria, we are not even working to fix employment. That means, we need to fix and stabilize the Naira. Interestingly, if we do that, magically, the employment rates will improve in the nation. I know more than 50 people who will invest in Nigeria if you guarantee them that Naira will hold stable for five years. I am invested in more than 15 Nigerian companies and startups (excluding listed public companies). I do them to support the nation but my case is easy as I am a Nigerian; I would be fine with tons of Naira with no need to repatriate the proceeds back to the US. But for foreign investors, they do not have that privilege, and that means a stable Naira is a necessity on their investment thesis. We need to offer that stable Naira.

I call on the President, Vice President, Finance Minister and the Central Bank Governor to sit down and get orthogonal thinkers and find a solution to this national security threat. We have great minds in Lagos, and it is time we try new things. We are wasting a generation with the state of the economy which we can link to the inability to stabilize the naira. Everything depends on Naira!

 

Comment on LinkedIn Feed

Comment: Ndubuisi, I understand your point. However, I disagree strongly with that position. The Nigerian economy doesn’t depend on the Naira as much as Naira depends on the Nigerian economy.

What’s happening to Naira is a secondary problem emanating from a failing economy. Fix the economy and Naira will fall in line. While Naira is the currency of the Nigerian economy, it is the economy that however drives the currency. Not Vice versa, which is what you stated.

Once there’s a more robust, productive and competitive Nigerian economy, there’s going to be a rising demand for exports and hence the currency. But the continuing failure to address the fundamental and primary economic policy issues in Nigeria will reverberate in a ceaseless worthless and depreciating Naira.

My Response: There is really nothing you disagreed with technically. You look at the issue from the Left while I might have looked from the Right. A “robust, productive and competitive Nigerian economy” will NEVER happen until you can stabilize Naira, and Naira cannot be stabilized until you have a “robust, productive and competitive Nigerian economy”. We are saying the same. When I write, I like to use a known element which everyone can relate with: we see Naira and touch it unlike the economy

Comment: here is. You’re focusing on a secondary problem – the currency that depends on the primary issue – the economy. Nigeria’s fiscal policies are rudderless. As such, their monetary policies alone cannot move any economic and currency needles. Currency or monetary policies are effective when the economy is almost functionally and fundamentally stable. And Nigeria** is far from there.

But to cut you some slack, stable economies use a combination of fiscal and monetary policies to stabilize both their economies and currencies. But to propose a fix on the currency without having to first build a stable economy will just be wishful thinking. **corrected from Niger.

My Response: “But to propose a fix on the currency without having to first build a stable economy will just be wishful thinking.” If you remove the double Naira exchange window, investments will arrive Nigeria in tons from tomorrow. That is policy and which can help the economy. My point remains that it is far easier to have a policy that boxes the Naira than one that boxes the economy. It is nearly impossible to “build a stable economy” when investors cannot invest due to a failing currency.

I will pick my luck, work on removing double exchange, and then move up to fix the economy. Your proposal of fixing the economy even in a double exchange regime is your call: I do not think it can come first because it has never worked anywhere on earth.

“You’re focusing on a secondary problem – the currency that depends on the primary issue – the economy. ” In US, China, and Europe, that is true. In Nigeria, the economy depends on the Naira. Check the data: FDI fails when Naira has the highest variance. Nigeria has the highest per capital income of $2563.90 in 2014 when currency was stable for years. When they moved it from N197 to N310, the economy went. Currency rules here and economy follows.

Leadership Paradoxes in a Time of Disruption in an Educational Company

1

Why your employees won’t be with you in a time of disruption? Change is one of the management elements needed in corporate and personal life settings for desired goals and objectives realisation. In spite of this, experience has shown that people do resist change. The resistance becomes obvious when the change makers or agents are perceived by the followers or change implementers as working for their own benefits.

In our consulting activities with businesses and individuals in education sector, we have realised that making strategic leadership happens is always a herculean task when unexpected forces struck and disrupt processes and procedures for value creation and capturing. The disruption is huge on businesses that primarily use physical platforms for creating and delivering value to different categories of learners and corporate establishments. Appropriation of ‘best practice’ for aggregating and deploying staff to the existing roles and responsibilities are tough, indicating challenges in using strategic resources for value creation and capturing.

At the early stage of the disruption and as it bites harder, it was difficult to integrate existing processes with the emerging processes [evolved as emergent strategies] towards value creation and delivery. It was also obvious that reordering existing organisational structure to align with the emerging needs of the stakeholders remains problematic. Instead of face-to-face communication being used before the disruption, staff at the corporate and business levels have to adopt a number of other approaches that made understanding of messages difficult.

The leadership of our case was forced to sack some staff when the e-learning or online teaching approach was employed. Salaries and other remunerations of the remaining employees were reduced to cater for the shortfalls in the participant enrolment for courses. Roles and responsibilities of the remaining staff were also increased. Some staff were assigned to more than three tasks in a day. This led to stressing of the personnel and led to some health challenges. In the course of making a new leadership approach happens, the management and employees at the corporate level made some leadership paradoxes.

Emerged Leadership Paradoxes in Our Case Study

The mission of our case [studied company] is to promote a culture of continuous learning among professionals and students who have interest in project management and related fields. Specially, the company was established with the strategic intent of solving unskilled work force problem and providing affordable training for individuals willing to broaden their scope.

When the heat of the disruption was high, the management was unable to implement its mission effectively. From the regular learners to non-regular learners, the case company did not properly inform them of changes in learning processes and new fees. With this it is glaring that the company could not work based on its mission that says “providing affordable training for individuals willing to broaden their scope.”

Giving much information at a time or within few seconds while creating and handling new processes for teaching and learning also made employees perplexed. At a point some employees created unofficial groups, discussing some issues such as technologies that should be used or not and needs that were supposed to be addressed by their leaders.

In our experience, when it was clear that the members of the unofficial groups cannot cope with the new changes being introduced, the concept of “Us versus Them” emerged and its practicability was ensured with the low strategies for managing emotional intelligence of the employees. For instance, when they lacked the required technological knowledge of co-creating new processes and the management failed to train them using a number of strategies such as Quality Circle, they felt being sidelined and perceived as opportunity for the management to lay them off.

From our experience, we discovered the leadership of the company employed trait, situational and transformational leadership approaches. This is quite understandable considering the old tradition of using the approaches in during crises. Experiences of the 2016 economic recession and global financial meltdown of 2008 are still fresh in the memory of many business leaders.

Therefore, the approaches would be rightly considered by any C-Executive. The CEO demonstrated that he understands how to determine leadership issues driven by unexpected situations and proffer appropriate solutions. The failure to bridge the digital knowledge gap among the employees was the main negative impact of the adopted leadership approaches.

Mitigating Paradoxes in Making a New Leadership Happens Amidst Disruption

An integrated leadership approach, which entails appropriation of transformational-transactional and normalisation process remain the alternatives to the elimination of challenges experienced by the company. This approach has a high tendency of delivering more outcomes than what the current approaches delivered to the organisation. The employed approaches have over the years been described as being in crisis. Therefore, they ought not have been considered as the best by the organisation.

Having transformation and transaction mindsets is a sure way of carrying every member of the organisation along and also help the participants in having less cost structure while receiving lectures through the digital platform. The approach would have also assisted the participants in paying less for the courses. Employing transformation-transactional approach, including normalisation process would have added a number of qualities, which are quite different from those associated with the leadership approaches used by the management of the company.