Tonkeeper, the largest self-custodial wallet in the TON ecosystem with more than 77 million registered users, today announced its rebranding to Keeper, a multichain wallet designed to connect TON with the broader crypto economy.
Keeper now enables users to manage assets across TON, Ethereum, Bitcoin, TRON, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum and Base from a single self-custodial wallet.
Tonkeeper earned its place as the home of TON, trusted by millions of people around the world. Keeper is the next chapter: taking the simplicity we’re known for beyond TON and into the broader crypto economy.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
The ambition is simple: to build the default self-custodial wallet for a multichain world, where people can hold, trade, and spend freely across any chain,” said Andrew Rogozov, CEO and Founder of TOP.
Tonkeeper was created as a dedicated self-custodial wallet for the TON blockchain. But as crypto has evolved into a multichain market, users increasingly hold assets, deploy capital, and access applications across different ecosystems – often juggling multiple wallets, bridges, and gas tokens along the way.
Keeper removes that fragmentation, giving both existing Tonkeeper users and newcomers a single home for their assets, applications, and liquidity across supported blockchains, with a seamless path into and beyond TON.
Rather than simply adding support for more chains, Keeper builds on its position as TON’s leading self-custodial wallet with a focus on making multichain crypto simple. Its Battery enables gasless transactions, allowing users to pay network fees without holding each blockchain’s native gas token.
Combined with a consumer-first experience, Keeper removes much of the complexity of navigating multiple networks while preserving full self-custody. Keeper is built on four core principles: Self-custody and freedom. Users remain in control of their assets, private keys, and privacy at all times, with no Keeper account or KYC required to access core wallet functionality.
Multichain, rooted in TON. Unlike traditional multichain wallets, Keeper combines extensive cross-chain support with deep TON integration, giving users access to different crypto ecosystems, while enabling the crypto community to easily onboard into TON.
More than a wallet. Keeper is designed as a financial home rather than a place where assets simply sit. Users can hold, swap, trade and explore opportunities from within a single application.
Upcoming releases will introduce additional financial products, including perpetual futures trading, further expanding Keeper’s all-in-one crypto experience. Simplicity drives adoption. Keeper combines self-custody with a premium user experience, making advanced blockchain functionality simple through an intuitive interface.
Features like Battery further reduce friction across every supported network. Adding new chains was just the first step. Over the coming year, Keeper will focus on turning its multichain capabilities into something users rely on every day, not just a place to store assets, but a wallet they actively use.
To achieve that, Keeper plans to extend its Battery gasless infrastructure across all supported networks, build native DeFi directly into the wallet, add solutions for everyday spending, and introduce a loyalty program that rewards active users, alongside cross-chain swaps, an integrated browser for decentralized applications, and new financial products.
Together, these additions advance Keeper toward its goal: becoming the default self-custodial wallet for the multichain era – a financial home where holding, trading, spending, and growing assets across chains is simple and rewarding.
U.S. Bitcoin ETFs See $160M Inflows, Robinhood Advances Stock Tokens With Voting Rights
The digital-asset market is showing two parallel developments that could shape its next phase: renewed institutional demand for Bitcoin through U.S. spot ETFs and a push to make tokenized equities behave more like the traditional shares they represent.
The developments point toward a financial system in which blockchain-based assets increasingly compete not merely on price exposure, but on ownership, liquidity and investor rights.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $160 million in net inflows on September 14, according to SoSoValue data.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accounted for $134 million of the inflows, while Fidelity’s FBTC attracted another $53.3 million. ARK Invest and 21Shares’ ARKB, however, recorded roughly $42 million in outflows, showing that capital continues to rotate between products even as aggregate demand remains positive.
The importance of the flow extends beyond a single trading session. Bitcoin has faced renewed volatility as investors weigh inflation, Treasury yields, monetary policy and regulatory developments. The cryptocurrency was trading around the mid-$70,000s on September 15.
While the 10-year Treasury yield briefly moved above 5%, creating a difficult environment for risk assets. Against that backdrop, positive ETF flows suggest that institutional investors have not completely abandoned Bitcoin despite short-term pressure.
The ETF structure remains one of the most important bridges between conventional finance and digital assets. Rather than requiring investors to manage wallets or interact directly with crypto exchanges, spot ETFs provide regulated market exposure through familiar brokerage infrastructure.
Persistent inflows therefore represent more than speculative activity: they demonstrate that Bitcoin can increasingly be incorporated into conventional investment portfolios.
At the same time, Robinhood is attempting to push blockchain further into traditional finance through tokenized stocks.
CEO Vlad Tenev said the company is working toward adding one-for-one in-kind share redemption and voting rights to Robinhood Stock Tokens. The announcement addresses two of the central criticisms surrounding the company’s tokenized-equity model.
The distinction is important because Robinhood’s Stock Tokens have not historically represented direct ownership of the underlying shares. They have been structured as tokenized debt instruments providing economic exposure to stocks, with the underlying securities held separately.
Investors could receive economic benefits linked to the shares but did not possess conventional shareholder rights such as voting. Robinhood’s own regulatory disclosures have described the products as providing economic exposure without conveying legal ownership or shareholder rights.
The proposed redemption mechanism could change that relationship materially. If a token holder can redeem one token for one underlying share, the blockchain representation becomes much closer to a conventional security rather than simply a derivative-like claim. Voting rights would go further by giving eligible token holders a formal role in corporate governance.
Robinhood says its existing shareholder-engagement platform, Say, could help facilitate voting. The company has also emphasized that Stock Tokens are backed one-to-one by real shares held in custody.
According to Robinhood’s crypto chief Johann Kerbrat, the product had surpassed $170 million in total value locked and nearly $50 billion in decentralized-exchange volume, underscoring the scale of interest surrounding tokenized equities.
Tokenization does not automatically eliminate questions about securities law, issuer consent, custody, settlement, liquidity or investor protection. Recent criticism from AMC CEO Adam Aron illustrates the tensions surrounding products that reference publicly traded companies without necessarily being issued by those companies.
The $160 million Bitcoin ETF inflow and Robinhood’s evolving stock-token architecture represent different sides of the same transformation. Bitcoin is becoming increasingly accessible through traditional financial wrappers, while traditional equities are being reconstructed on blockchain infrastructure.
The next stage of digital finance may therefore depend less on whether assets can be tokenized and more on whether tokenized markets can deliver the ownership rights, transparency and investor protections that make traditional markets credible.