The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) officially proposed a rule that would make it significantly easier for 401(k) plans to include alternative assets—such as cryptocurrencies, private equity, real estate, private credit, infrastructure, commodities, and related vehicles—in their investment menus.
The proposed regulation, titled Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives, focuses on process-based safe harbors for plan fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). It clarifies that fiduciaries have broad discretion and flexibility when selecting investment options, as long as they follow a prudent, objective process.
Fiduciaries must objectively, thoroughly, and analytically evaluate and document factors such as: Performance including risk-adjusted returns. This asset-neutral approach applies regardless of whether the asset is traditional or alternative. The rule aims to reduce regulatory burdens and litigation risks that have historically deterred plan sponsors from offering these options.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 20 (June 8 – Sept 5, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
The proposal directly implements President Trump’s Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors executive order, which directed the DOL to review and update guidance on alternative investments in retirement plans. The DOL previously rescinded Biden-era warnings that had discouraged or heightened scrutiny on these assets. The new stance is neutral—neither endorsing nor prohibiting specific alternatives, but emphasizing a sound fiduciary process.
This primarily affects participant-directed defined contribution plans like 401(k)s covering ~90–100 million Americans with trillions in assets. Exposure to alternatives could come via target-date funds, asset allocation vehicles, or direct options, rather than requiring every plan to add them immediately.
Greater diversification potential and access to asset classes traditionally limited to institutional or high-net-worth investors. Proponents argue this could improve long-term returns and help democratize alternatives. Critics highlight risks like higher fees, lower liquidity, valuation challenges, complexity, and volatility especially for crypto.
Safe harbors provide more legal protection if they follow the outlined process, potentially reducing litigation abuse. Could open a massive pool of retirement capital, though adoption depends on plan sponsors, record-keepers, and custodians. Widespread inclusion may take time due to operational, educational, and risk-management hurdles.
The DOL has opened a 60-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register. After reviewing comments, the department will decide whether to finalize the rule possibly with changes. This is a proposed rule, not yet final or effective. Plan sponsors remain bound by ERISA’s core fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty.
This marks a clear shift from the rescinded Biden-era 2022 guidance, which urged fiduciaries to exercise extreme care with crypto due to volatility, fraud risks, custody issues, and valuation challenges. That guidance is gone, and the new proposal emphasizes that ERISA does not favor or prohibit any particular investment type.
Bitcoin exposure in 401(k)s would most likely occur through indirect vehicles rather than direct spot Bitcoin holdings or self-directed brokerage windows allowing individual crypto purchases. Common forms include: Bitcoin ETFs or Bitcoin futures ETFs.
Actively managed funds or asset allocation vehicles including target-date funds that allocate a portion to digital assets, including Bitcoin. Crypto-focused mutual funds or commingled trusts that hold Bitcoin or related instruments.
The proposal explicitly references holdings in actively managed investment vehicles that are investing in digital assets and provides examples of how fiduciaries can rely on audited financial statements and valuation procedures for such vehicles. Direct participant access to spot Bitcoin remains unlikely in most plans due to operational, custody, and education hurdles for plan sponsors and record-keepers.
Bitcoin and crypto vehicles can face redemption pressures or market-hour limitations, though spot Bitcoin ETFs have improved this compared to earlier crypto products. Bitcoin trades 24/7 on global exchanges; fiduciaries must ensure reliable, fair valuation procedures.
Fiduciaries must also consider participant demographics and overall plan diversification. A small allocation in a target-date or balanced fund might be easier to justify than a standalone Bitcoin option. Younger or longer-horizon participants could gain easier, tax-advantaged access to Bitcoin as a potential inflation hedge or growth asset, similar to how institutions.
Asset managers may develop more retirement-appropriate vehicles with Bitcoin exposure, such as diversified alternatives sleeves or funds with risk controls. The safe harbor lowers the fear of lawsuits for prudent processes, encouraging more plan sponsors to at least consider options.
Bitcoin’s price swings often 50%+ drawdowns could significantly impact retirement balances, especially for participants nearing retirement. Critics argue this makes it unsuitable as a core holding for most savers. Crypto products typically have elevated costs; fiduciaries must justify them against potential benefits.
Experts note the rule won’t open the floodgates. Plan sponsors move slowly due to record-keeper capabilities, participant education needs, potential fiduciary liability concerns, and the need to monitor evolving crypto regulation. Widespread inclusion could take years. If a Bitcoin option underperforms dramatically, participants could still sue if the process wasn’t thoroughly documented.
This proposal is not yet final. It will undergo public comments, possible revisions, and a final rulemaking process. Plan sponsors, participants, and advisors should monitor updates and consult ERISA counsel or qualified fiduciaries for plan-specific advice—individual circumstances vary widely.