A growing number of major brokerages now expect the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates this week, marking a sharp reversal in expectations after stronger-than-expected U.S. inflation data raised doubts about whether price pressures are easing quickly enough without additional monetary tightening.
Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, HSBC and Deutsche Bank are among the firms forecasting a quarter-point increase at the Federal Open Market Committee’s September 15-16 meeting. Several also expect the Fed to keep borrowing costs higher for longer as policymakers try to return inflation to their 2% target.
The shift has come rapidly.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
U.S. consumer and producer prices both increased more than economists expected in August, while oil prices climbed above $100 a barrel amid renewed hostilities in the Middle East. The combination has revived concerns that the decline in inflation could stall or reverse, particularly if higher energy costs begin feeding into transportation, production and consumer prices.
“Lack of inflation progress has tipped the balance,” HSBC economist Ryan Wang said in a note supporting a September rate increase.
J.P. Morgan economists led by Michael Feroli reached a similar conclusion after the latest data.
“The week that saw rising bond yields and energy prices and a firm enough set of inflation readings to make a rate hike at next week’s FOMC meeting more likely than not,” they wrote.
The changing outlook represents a significant departure from the expectations that prevailed earlier this year, when many economists anticipated that the Fed would remain on hold after keeping rates unchanged through 2026 following a quarter-point reduction in December 2025.
Now, investors are preparing for the possibility of renewed tightening.
Inflation Has Changed The Fed Debate
The central issue for policymakers is no longer simply whether inflation is declining, but whether it is declining at a pace consistent with a sustainable return to the Fed’s 2% target.
The August inflation reports have complicated that assessment.
Higher consumer and producer prices suggest that underlying price pressures may be proving more persistent than expected. At the same time, oil above $100 a barrel introduces another source of inflation at precisely the point when policymakers would prefer to see price growth continue moderating.
Energy prices present a particularly difficult problem for central banks because they can rise for reasons largely outside monetary policy. The renewed Middle East conflict is an external supply shock, but sustained increases in energy costs can eventually spread through the broader economy.
The situation has resulted in a dilemma for the Fed. If it responds too aggressively to an energy-driven inflation shock, it risks weakening economic activity unnecessarily. If it waits and inflation expectations or wage and price-setting behavior become more entrenched, bringing inflation back under control could require even more restrictive policy later.
For now, several major banks believe the balance has shifted toward action.
J.P. Morgan now expects another rate increase later this year and has raised its estimate of the long-run federal funds rate to 3.25%, arguing that the latest inflation data cast doubt on the sustainability of the disinflation process.
Markets Are Rapidly Repricing The Rate Path
Financial markets have moved even more decisively than some economists. Investors are now pricing roughly a 90% probability of a quarter-point rate increase at the September meeting, according to CME’s FedWatch Tool, compared with about 70% before the latest inflation figures.
Markets are also beginning to price in another increase in December. That repricing has implications well beyond the federal funds rate. Expectations for higher policy rates can push Treasury yields higher, increase borrowing costs for businesses and households, strengthen the dollar and put pressure on valuations of assets whose prices depend heavily on cheap financing.
The effect is necessary for technology and growth stocks, which have benefited from expectations of easier monetary policy and lower discount rates.
However, higher oil prices have added to the challenges. A sustained move above $100 a barrel could simultaneously pressure household purchasing power, corporate margins and inflation expectations, making the Fed’s task more difficult.
The market’s concern is therefore not simply a single 25-basis-point increase. It is whether September marks the beginning of a broader shift back toward restrictive monetary policy.
Goldman Sees A Later Easing Cycle
Not every major bank believes the current inflation shock will permanently change the Fed’s longer-term trajectory. Goldman Sachs said Sunday that it continues to expect two rate cuts in 2027, although it now sees those reductions occurring later than previously forecast.
The bank also characterized the expected September increase as being driven more by market pricing than by fundamental inflation conditions.
If the recent inflation acceleration is largely temporary and energy prices eventually retreat, the Fed may be able to tighten modestly now while returning to an easing cycle once price pressures resume their decline. But if higher energy costs combine with persistent services inflation and rising inflation expectations, policymakers could face a much more difficult environment.
This means a September hike is not simply a precautionary move. It could be the beginning of a prolonged period in which the Fed keeps rates restrictive to prevent a second inflation wave.
The next few months are expected to be critical for determining if the current hawkish turn represents a temporary response to an energy shock or a broader reassessment of the U.S. inflation outlook.
As policymakers conclude their meeting on Wednesday, investors will be watching not only for the rate decision but also for signals about how officials view the inflation data, the impact of higher oil prices, and the likely path of rates beyond September.



