West Virginia has recently proposed legislation to establish a form of strategic reserve that includes Bitcoin and gold along with other precious metals.
This development emerged in mid-January 2026, with State Senator Chris Rose introducing Senate Bill 143 (SB143), titled the Inflation Protection Act of 2026. The bill would authorize the West Virginia Treasury or Board of Treasury to invest up to 10% of certain public funds or state reserves in.
Qualifying digital assets specifically those meeting a high market capitalization threshold—currently set at an average of over $750 billion in the prior year, which effectively limits eligibility to Bitcoin as the only cryptocurrency that qualifies.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab (class begins Jan 24 2026).
Precious metals like gold, silver, and platinum. Approved stablecoins. The rationale is positioned as a hedge against inflation and currency debasement, treating Bitcoin alongside traditional hard assets like gold as “sound money” or inflation-resistant stores of value.
Storage and custody rules would apply, potentially allowing holdings via qualified custodians, exchange-traded products (ETPs), or secure on-chain methods.
It does not mandate immediate purchases but grants the treasury discretionary authority to allocate in this way, with some mentions of minimum allocations e.g., not less than 1% in certain reserve funds in related discussions.
This aligns with a broader trend among U.S. states exploring Bitcoin as a treasury asset, following examples in states like Texas, New Hampshire, Arizona, and others that have introduced or passed similar measures in recent years.
West Virginia’s proposal joins this growing wave, framing Bitcoin not as speculation but as a legitimate reserve component similar to gold. The bill was introduced very recently and has been referred to committee for review. Its passage is uncertain, as political support and final outcomes depend on legislative processes.
No earlier versions like SB465 from 2025 appear to have advanced to enactment based on available updates, but this 2026 bill represents the current active proposal. This reflects increasing state-level interest in diversifying reserves beyond traditional assets amid ongoing economic discussions around inflation and digital assets.
As of mid-January 2026, the bill remains in early stages—referred to the Banking and Insurance Committee then potentially Finance—with no passage yet, so outcomes depend on legislative support, debates, and the full session.
The bill frames Bitcoin and precious metals like gold, silver, platinum as “sound money” alternatives to fiat currency, aiming to protect state reserves from inflation and dollar debasement. Up to 10% of certain public funds e.g., treasury-managed accounts could be allocated, providing a discretionary tool for the Treasury Board to preserve purchasing power amid economic uncertainty.
The $750 billion average market cap threshold over the prior year restricts digital assets to essentially Bitcoin alone currently. This acts as a safeguard for liquidity and maturity but limits broader crypto exposure. Investments could occur directly via secure custody/on-chain, through qualified custodians, ETFs/ETPs, or even staking/loans for yield.
Proponents see upside from Bitcoin’s historical performance as a scarce asset. However, volatility could expose state funds to short-term losses, though the cap and no-mandatory-buy provision mitigate this. Stablecoins add another low-volatility option.
West Virginia’s treasury and public funds aren’t massive compared to larger states, so even 10% might represent hundreds of millions to low billions in potential allocation—modest nationally but meaningful locally for signaling fiscal innovation.
This joins a wave of U.S. states e.g., Texas, New Hampshire, Arizona, Florida, and others exploring or enacting Bitcoin reserves. If passed, West Virginia would reinforce Bitcoin’s shift from speculative asset to strategic reserve infrastructure akin to gold. It could spark competitive “race” dynamics—states avoiding being left holding only depreciating cash.
Some backers including state figures view it as enhancing state financial independence from federal overreach or potential central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), treating Bitcoin as a decentralized, non-seizable in self-custody alternative.
Amid federal discussions, state actions build bottom-up legitimacy for Bitcoin as a macro tool. Success here could encourage more states, increasing aggregate demand and normalizing BTC in public portfolios. The proposal has generated buzz in crypto communities, with X posts highlighting it as “massive” or part of accelerating adoption.
It contributes to narratives around sovereign BTC accumulation alongside federal seized holdings or other states. As a proposal with no mandated purchases, direct market impact is limited. Bitcoin’s price reflects broader trends, but cumulative state/federal interest could support long-term demand.
Skeptics note volatility, regulatory hurdles, or opportunity costs vs. traditional bonds. Passage isn’t guaranteed—similar prior bills stalled. This reflects growing institutional recognition of Bitcoin as digital gold for reserves, especially in inflation-conscious environments.
It’s a low-risk step for the state but a high-signal move in the evolving landscape of public-sector crypto adoption. Watch committee progress in the 2026 session for updates.