DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog

Saylor’s Strategy Sells Bitcoin at $60K, Funding Dividends While Holding Massive Reserves

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Michael Saylor’s company Strategy has reportedly sold 3,588 Bitcoin at $60k for approximately $216 million.

While the move marks a rare instance of the company monetizing a portion of its Bitcoin holdings, it does not signal a shift away from its long-term conviction in the crypto asset.

Instead, the sales are designed to meet financial commitments while preserving the company’s core strategy of accumulating and holding one of the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin reserves

The proceeds are being used to fund dividends on its suite of Digital Credit securities, including the Q2 quarterly dividends for $STRF, $STRE, $STRK, and $STRD, plus the full monthly dividend for June on $STRC.

As of July 5, 2026, Strategy continues to hold a substantial 843,775 BTC in its Bitcoin reserves along with $2.55 billion in USD reserves. The sale represents a small fraction of the company’s overall Bitcoin position, which remains one of the largest corporate treasuries in the industry.

The announcement quickly drew sharp reactions across the crypto community. Gold advocate and Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff criticized the execution as poor, claiming Strategy buys Bitcoin at highs and sells at lows.

He suggests the parties handling Strategy’s order flow are profiting handsomely from the timing and execution of these trades. 

Critics pointed to the sale price near $60,200 per BTC, contrasting it with Strategy’s higher average acquisition cost and Saylor’s long history of advocating Bitcoin as a long-term hold.

Some users on X highlighted Saylor’s past statements encouraging aggressive Bitcoin accumulation, leading to widespread memes and commentary about timing and execution.

They further noted the apparent contradiction between public HODL messaging and this operational move to support dividend obligations.

Some of the comments reads,

@thezzohan wrote,

“So the money you got from MSTR u bought bitcoin with and now sold to pay STRC holders? Doesn’t sound like a good deal for MSTR holders if you are using the money they give you to give it to STRC investors?”

@Rus_Khairullin wrote,

“You sold 3,588 BTC to pay dividends on preferred stock that’s already down 20% from par. The whole MSTR pitch was “we never sell.” Now you’re selling BTC to pay income on paper that isn’t holding its own peg. This is the sequence of events retail was told would never happen.”

@crypto_jargon wrote,

“Don’t forget, Strategy still has over $1.034 billion worth of BTC ready to sell under its $1.25 billion Bitcoin Monetization Program authorization. Absolute traitor.”

Despite the backlash, Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings dwarf the amount sold, suggesting the transaction was driven by specific financial obligations rather than a broader shift in strategy.

The event underscores the challenges public companies face when balancing Bitcoin treasury management with shareholder returns through structured securities.

Notably, this latest development adds another chapter to the evolving narrative around Strategy Bitcoin adoption. Recall that in June this year, the company broke its more than three-year streak of never selling its cryptocurrency.

Reports reveal that Strategy sold 32 BTC worth $2.5 million between May 26 and May 31, 2026.

While the recent BTC sale represents only a small fraction of its massive holdings, it has sparked discussions across the crypto market about the firm’s evolving treasury strategy and what it could signal for institutional Bitcoin adoption going forward.

Outlook

Looking ahead, Strategy’s selective Bitcoin sales are likely to remain an important point of discussion among investors and market participants.

While the company has reiterated that Bitcoin remains its primary treasury reserve asset, its willingness to monetize a small portion of its holdings to meet dividend obligations suggests a more pragmatic approach to balance sheet management.

The market will be closely watching whether future dividend payments and obligations are similarly funded through limited Bitcoin sales or through alternative financing mechanisms.

With approximately 843,775 BTC still on its balance sheet and billions of dollars in liquidity, Strategy retains significant financial flexibility, making the recent sale relatively insignificant compared to its overall position.

African Startups Raise Nearly $1.4 Billion in H1 2026 as June Funding Surge Reverses Slow Start

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

For much of the first half (H1) of 2026, Africa’s startup ecosystem appeared headed for another disappointing funding period as investment activity remained subdued and major deals were scarce.

However, a remarkable turnaround in June dramatically changed the narrative, with a wave of high-value investments injecting fresh momentum into the market.

By the close of the first six months, the continent’s startups had raised nearly $1.4 billion, erasing much of the earlier slowdown and finishing the period almost level with H1 2025, highlighting the resilience of investor interest in Africa’s fast-growing innovation ecosystem.

According to the report by Africa: The Big Deal, a wave of large equity investments led by electric mobility company Spiro’s $270 million funding round lifted capital inflows significantly, bringing total H1 funding to nearly $1.4 billion, only slightly below the level recorded during the same period in 2025.

During the period, 190 startups raised at least $100,000, while more than 264 investors participated in one or more funding rounds, highlighting continued investor engagement despite a challenging fundraising environment.

The strong June performance dramatically changed the trajectory of the year’s funding landscape. By the end of May, African startups had collectively raised just $843 million, leaving H1 funding down 21% year-over-year, while equity funding had fallen nearly 48% compared to the same period in 2025.

February had been the only month to exceed the previous year’s monthly average, raising $273 millionagainst the 2025 monthly average of $264 million.

However, June delivered a decisive turnaround. During the month, 48 startups raised a combined $515 million, making it the strongest fundraising month since July 2025 and the second-highest monthly total since early 2023.

Equity financing dominated activity, accounting for 91% of all capital raised in June after equity and debt had been almost evenly split during the first five months of the year.

While debt financing, grants, and venture debt have gained traction in recent years, equity financing has once again emerged as one of the most dominant sources of capital for African startups seeking to scale their operations.

Increasingly, founders are turning to equity investments not only to secure larger funding rounds but also to gain access to strategic investors capable of unlocking new markets, partnerships, and long-term growth opportunities.

The trend reflects a maturing African venture capital landscape where investors are placing bigger bets on startups with strong business fundamentals, clear paths to profitability, and scalable business models

African startups raised approximately $468 million in equity funding alone during June, more than the total equity capital secured during the previous five months combined.

The figure was nearly three times higher than the average monthly equity funding recorded over the preceding year and represented the strongest equity fundraising month since March 2022.

Much of the momentum came from a handful of landmark transactions. Spiro led the month with a $270 million funding round, bringing its total capital raised in 2026 to $327 million.

The achievement marked the largest amount raised by an African startup during a half-year period since MNT-Halan secured $400 million in the first half of 2023.

Other major transactions also contributed to June’s exceptional performance. Africa’s payment company Flutterwave reportedly closed an estimated $100 million Series E financing round, while MNT-Halan added another $50 million to its funding tally.

The influx of large equity investments significantly narrowed the funding gap with the previous year. By the close of H1 2026, total startup funding stood just 6% below H1 2025 levels, while equity funding finished only 7% lower, underscoring the resilience of Africa’s startup ecosystem despite a difficult beginning to the year.

The June rebound has positioned the African venture capital market on a much stronger footing heading into the second half of 2026, with analysts expected to closely monitor whether the renewed investment momentum can be sustained in the months ahead.

Sky to acquire ITV’s broadcast and streaming business in £1.6bn deal to challenge Netflix and global streaming giants

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Comcast-owned Sky has agreed to acquire the broadcast channels and streaming platform of ITV in a £1.6 billion ($2.13 billion) deal, marking one of the biggest shake-ups in British media in decades as traditional broadcasters consolidate to compete with global streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ and YouTube.

The transaction, announced on Monday would combine Britain’s largest commercial free-to-air broadcaster with its biggest pay-TV operator, creating a media powerhouse spanning broadcast television, subscription TV, streaming, advertising, and sports.

Sky Chief Executive Dana Strong described the acquisition as a “defining moment” for the British broadcasting industry, saying the enlarged company would be better positioned to invest in premium British content while competing against technology companies that have dramatically altered viewing habits over the past decade.

“This is a defining moment and one of the biggest in the history of British broadcasting,” Strong said, adding that the deal would enable the combined business to continue delivering “outstanding British programming” as audiences increasingly migrate to digital and on-demand viewing.

She stressed that ITV would continue to fulfil its public service broadcasting obligations despite the change in ownership.

“ITV will remain a public service broadcaster at the heart of British life, and we’re excited about the future we can build together,” she said.

The acquisition is believed to have been orchestrated by the mounting pressure facing traditional broadcasters across Europe as streaming services and digital video platforms continue to capture audiences, advertising revenue, and sports rights. Only a few years ago, a merger between Sky and ITV would have been politically and commercially difficult to imagine. However, the rapid expansion of global streaming services and the growing dominance of online platforms have fundamentally reshaped the television industry.

Consumers are increasingly shifting away from scheduled television toward on-demand viewing. At the same time, advertising budgets have steadily migrated to digital platforms operated by companies such as Alphabet-owned YouTube, Meta, Netflix and Amazon.

The combined Sky-ITV business is expected to strengthen its position by integrating ITV’s mass-market broadcast reach with Sky’s subscription television business, streaming capabilities, broadband services, and premium sports and entertainment offerings.

Advertising Powerhouse Raises Competition Questions

The proposed merger is also likely to attract intense scrutiny from Britain’s competition authorities. According to analysts, the combined company would control more than 70% of the UK’s television advertising market, giving it enormous influence over commercial television advertising.

That level of market concentration is expected to become a central issue during regulatory reviews by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and communications regulator Ofcom, with lawmakers also likely to examine whether the transaction serves the public interest.

The deal may additionally receive political attention because ITV remains one of Britain’s designated public service broadcasters, with statutory obligations covering news, regional programming and public-interest content. Many Members of Parliament maintain close ties with ITV through its longstanding regional broadcasting network, which originated more than 70 years ago as a federation of local franchises serving communities across the United Kingdom.

The political environment has also become more interventionist. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy recently signaled the government’s willingness to examine major media transactions when she indicated she could intervene in the proposed merger involving Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery, suggesting regulators could closely examine the Sky-ITV transaction before granting approval.

ITV to Focus On Global Content Production

The agreement significantly reshapes ITV’s business model. Following completion of the transaction, the media giant will effectively become a standalone international production company centered on ITV Studios, one of the world’s largest television production businesses.

ITV Studios already supplies content to broadcasters and streaming services worldwide, producing programmes for the BBC, Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video and numerous international networks. Its portfolio includes globally recognised programmes such as Love Island, Coronation Street, The Voice, and the hit Disney+ drama Rivals.

Under the terms of the agreement, Love Productions, the producer behind the internationally successful The Great British Bake Off, will also become part of the remaining ITV Studios business, strengthening its position as a global content supplier.

This structure allows ITV Studios to continue producing programming not only for the combined Sky-ITV business but also for competing broadcasters and streaming platforms worldwide, preserving an important source of diversified revenue.

Under the agreed terms, ITV will receive:

  • £1.2 billion in cash upon completion.
  • An earn-out payment of up to £200 million, linked to the advertising performance of the business during the 2027 financial year.
  • Ownership of Love Productions, which will join ITV Studios.

The merged broadcasting business has also committed to investing at least £2.1 billion in programming between 2028 and 2032, underscoring plans to maintain investment in British television production despite broader industry cost pressures.

The commitment is intended to reassure regulators, policymakers, and viewers that domestic programming and public service content will remain central to the combined company’s strategy.

Shares of ITV rose around 1% to 83 pence in early London trading following the announcement, reflecting cautious investor optimism that the transaction unlocks value while allowing ITV Studios to focus on its faster-growing international production business.

The Hidden Price of Fiscal Irresponsibility in Nigeria

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The recent observations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) regarding Nigeria’s fiscal management have reignited an old debate about governance, accountability, and the country’s economic direction.

For many Nigerians, the IMF’s assessment came as a shocking revelation, exposing what some describe as widespread fiscal irresponsibility among those entrusted with managing public resources. Yet for others, the report merely confirmed what years of economic hardship, declining public services, and growing debt had already suggested.

The real surprise is not the content of the report but that anyone could still be surprised by it. Nigeria’s fiscal challenges have not emerged overnight. For decades, concerns have been raised about inefficient public spending, poor budget implementation, revenue leakages, rising debt obligations, and inadequate transparency in the management of public finances.

These structural problems have repeatedly weakened the country’s ability to deliver quality infrastructure, education, healthcare, and social services despite its enormous natural and human resources.

Reports from domestic watchdogs, civil society organizations, and international institutions have consistently highlighted these weaknesses, yet meaningful reforms have often progressed slowly. The deeper issue extends beyond government institutions alone.

It also involves the broader political and economic elite whose influence shapes public policy and national priorities. Many influential individuals have benefited from systems that reward patronage over performance and loyalty over accountability.

In such an environment, governance becomes less about serving the public interest and more about preserving networks of privilege. This creates a cycle in which fiscal indiscipline persists because those with the power to challenge it frequently benefit from maintaining the status quo.

Public silence has also played a significant role. While many Nigerians have voiced frustration over corruption and economic mismanagement, sustained civic engagement has often struggled against political intimidation, institutional weakness, and widespread voter disillusionment.

Elections alone cannot guarantee accountability if citizens remain disconnected from governance between election cycles. A healthy democracy requires continuous public scrutiny, active civil society participation, an independent judiciary, and a free press capable of investigating abuses without fear.

Economic consequences inevitably follow fiscal mismanagement. Rising debt servicing costs consume resources that could otherwise fund development projects.

Inflation erodes purchasing power, unemployment limits opportunities for young people, and investor confidence weakens when policy consistency becomes uncertain. These realities affect ordinary citizens far more than political elites, widening inequality and deepening social frustration.

Assigning blame solely to government risks overlooking the broader responsibility shared across society. Political leaders emerge from existing institutions and social structures. Business leaders, traditional authorities, professionals, and citizens all influence governance through their choices, advocacy, and participation.

When corruption is tolerated, institutions weakened, or accountability ignored, the entire system gradually becomes vulnerable to abuse. The path forward requires more than outrage over international reports. Nigeria needs stronger institutions capable of enforcing fiscal discipline regardless of political affiliation.

Budget transparency, independent oversight, anti-corruption enforcement, responsible borrowing practices, and meaningful public participation in governance are essential for restoring confidence. Equally important is cultivating a political culture where public office is viewed as a position of service rather than personal enrichment.

Nigeria’s future will depend not only on exposing fiscal excesses but also on building institutions and civic values that make such practices increasingly difficult to sustain. International assessments may highlight existing problems, but lasting solutions must come from Nigerians themselves through consistent demands for accountability, responsible leadership, and active participation in shaping the nation’s democratic and economic future.

Michael Saylor Says Bitcoin is “Digital Energy” Built For Long-Term Capital Preservation

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Strategy CEO Michael Saylor has characterized the world’s largest cryptocurrency Bitcoin, as “digital energy,” emphasizing its ability to store value more effectively than traditional assets.

He believes Bitcoin’s scarcity, portability, and resistance to manipulation positions it as a next-generation financial asset capable of safeguarding wealth over the long term.

In a post on X, he wrote,

“Bitcoin is digital energy”.

This was posted alongside a detailed chart highlighting MicroStrategy’s substantial Bitcoin holdings as of July 5, 2026. The visualization shows the company controls 847,363 BTC with a total reserve value of $53.06 billion.

This reflects 113 purchase events, an average acquisition cost of $75,653 per Bitcoin, and a current unrealized position down approximately 17.24%.

The chart maps Bitcoin’s price trajectory alongside orange bubbles representing individual purchase sizes and a green line tracking the average purchase price over time, underscoring MicroStrategy’s long-term accumulation strategy amid market volatility.

Saylor’s statement reinforces his long-held belief that Bitcoin represents a revolutionary form of energy portable, verifiable, and resistant to degradation.

Far from a speculative gamble, the Strategy CEO treats these acquisitions as the accumulation of digital energy that can be stored indefinitely and transferred across borders without friction.

At its core, Saylor’s framing draws an analogy between Bitcoin and energy itself. Traditional energy sources like oil or electricity power physical machines, but Bitcoin powers the digital economy by securing value, enabling trustless transactions, and acting as a battery for human productivity.

Unlike fiat currencies that lose purchasing power through inflation, Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins creates scarcity akin to conserved energy. Once mined, this energy cannot be created anew or arbitrarily diluted by central authorities.

This perspective explains MicroStrategy’s aggressive Bitcoin strategy. By converting cash reserves into BTC, the company effectively transforms depreciating fiat into an asset designed to appreciate as adoption grows.

The volatility visible in the chart—dips and surges—becomes secondary to the long-term trajectory. Saylor has consistently argued that holding Bitcoin is like storing energy in its purest, most efficient digital form, one that survives political instability, currency devaluation, and technological disruption.

Critics often dismiss Bitcoin for its energy consumption during mining, yet Saylor flips the narrative. Mining converts real-world electricity into an immutable ledger entry, creating something far more valuable than the input.

In an article on X, titled “Bitcoin evolves by not changing”, Saylor says Bitcoin’s greatest evolution over the next decade will come from changing less at the protocol layer and mattering more everywhere else.

He adds that the base layer will harden, the capital markets will deepen, the applications will expand, and the world will build on Bitcoin.

This “digital energy” can then be moved instantly anywhere in the world, settled in minutes, and verified by anyone. In an era of increasing digitalization, from AI to global finance, Bitcoin serves as the monetary layer that underpins secure value exchange.

Saylor’s message resonates because it aligns with observable trends. Institutional adoption continues to accelerate, with companies and governments exploring Bitcoin as a treasury asset or strategic reserve.

The chart of MicroStrategy’s holdings serves as both proof and blueprint of  disciplined accumulation through market cycles yields substantial reserves of this digital energy.

As Bitcoin matures, Saylor’s statement highlights the crypto asset unique properties, decentralization, scarcity, portability, and verifiability that distinguish it from all prior forms of money.

In this view, holding Bitcoin is not merely investing, it is participating in the creation of a new energy standard for the digital age.

123...8,938Page 1 of 8,938

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy