DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

Lookonchain Data Shows Bitcoin Short Reaches $136M as Liquidation Risk Builds

1

A major Bitcoin short position is drawing increasing attention across the crypto market after Lookonchain data showed one wallet continuing to increase its bearish bet.

The position has now reached approximately 2,136 BTC, worth around $136 million, making the trader one of the largest identifiable on-chain Bitcoin bears at a time when market positioning remains highly sensitive to sudden price movements.

The scale of the position is significant not only because of its dollar value, but because of the liquidation level attached to it.

According to the data, the wallet faces liquidation at approximately $64,592 per Bitcoin. That level creates a potentially important battleground for the market. If Bitcoin climbs through it with enough momentum, the trader could be forced to close the short, potentially adding further buying pressure to an already rising market.

This is the basic mechanism behind a short squeeze. A trader who expects Bitcoin to fall borrows or sells the asset with the intention of buying it back at a lower price. If the market instead rises sharply, losses increase.

When the price approaches the liquidation threshold, leveraged positions can be automatically closed by the trading platform. Those forced closures require Bitcoin to be bought back, creating additional demand and potentially pushing the price even higher.

The 2,136 BTC position therefore represents more than a single trader’s market view. It has become a potential source of volatility.

Bitcoin does not need to remain above $64,592 for an extended period to create pressure. A rapid move through the liquidation zone could trigger a chain reaction if other traders are positioned similarly.

The situation highlights the increasingly transparent nature of cryptocurrency markets. On-chain analytics allow investors to track large wallets, monitor transfers and identify concentrated positions that might previously have remained hidden from public view.

While wallet data does not necessarily reveal the identity or complete strategy of the trader, it can provide valuable clues about market positioning. However, liquidation risk should not automatically be interpreted as a guaranteed short squeeze.

Large traders can hedge positions elsewhere, add collateral, reduce exposure, or manage their positions through multiple wallets and exchanges. On-chain data also provides only part of the picture. The wallet’s 2,136 BTC position may represent one component of a broader trading strategy.

Still, the $64,592 threshold deserves attention because it represents a clear technical and psychological level for this particular position.

If Bitcoin approaches it, traders are likely to watch open interest, funding rates, spot volume and liquidation data closely. A breakout accompanied by strong spot buying would provide a stronger signal that a squeeze could develop.

Conversely, if Bitcoin fails to reclaim the level and sellers regain control, the massive short could continue working in the trader’s favor. That makes the current setup a direct contest between bearish conviction and bullish momentum.

The key lesson is that leverage can amplify both sides of the market. A $136 million short may reflect strong confidence in lower prices, but it also creates a potentially powerful source of forced demand if the market moves against the position.

As Bitcoin tests the boundaries around the liquidation zone, this whale short has effectively become another pressure point for the market. A decisive move above $64,592 could turn one trader’s bearish conviction into fuel for a broader Bitcoin rally.

Why Bank of America Expects the Fed to Raise Interest Rates Again

0

While traders interpreted July’s inflation report as a reassuring sign that the Federal Reserve can ease its monetary policy, Bank of America strategist Aditya Bhave sees a very different picture.

For Bhave, the latest data does not signal that the inflation battle is over. Instead, it reinforces the argument that the Federal Reserve may need to keep monetary policy restrictive and deliver three additional interest-rate hikes this year.

July’s Consumer Price Index came in at 3.4%, broadly matching expectations and initially calming financial markets. Investors had been watching inflation closely for evidence that price pressures were continuing to moderate after the volatility seen earlier in the year.

The in-line reading therefore provided some relief, particularly for traders hoping that the Fed could avoid further tightening.

Bhave, remains skeptical. His central argument is that the Federal Reserve moved too aggressively toward supporting the economy last year, cutting interest rates because policymakers were concerned about weakening labor-market conditions.

Those fears, in his assessment, failed to materialize to the extent expected. With employment proving more resilient than anticipated, Bhave believes policymakers now face the difficult task of reversing part of that earlier easing.

His forecast amounts to another 75 basis points of tightening, potentially spread across three rate increases. Such a path would represent a significant shift from the expectations of investors who have increasingly positioned for monetary policy to become less restrictive.

It would put renewed pressure on borrowing costs across the economy, from mortgages and corporate loans to consumer credit. One of the biggest disagreements between Bhave and the market centers on the labor market.

A recent shock jobs report raised concerns that economic momentum could be deteriorating rapidly. Bhave has dismissed that report as largely a one-off event rather than evidence of a sustained collapse in employment. If the labor market remains fundamentally resilient, the Fed would have greater room to prioritize inflation over growth.

The more persistent threat, according to Bhave, is services inflation. Unlike goods prices, which can fall relatively quickly as supply chains normalize and commodity costs decline, services inflation can remain stubborn because it is closely connected to wages, rents, insurance, healthcare, and other domestic costs.

Sticky services prices could therefore prevent inflation from returning to the Federal Reserve’s desired level even if headline CPI continues to moderate.

That creates a complicated policy environment for Fed officials. Cutting rates too soon could allow inflationary pressures to regain momentum, while maintaining or increasing rates risks slowing economic activity and weakening employment.

The challenge is particularly important because monetary policy operates with a lag, meaning decisions made today can affect economic conditions months later. Bhave’s forecast represents a sharp warning against complacency. A 3.4% CPI reading may look manageable, but the underlying composition of inflation matters just as much as the headline number.

If services prices remain elevated and employment stays stronger than expected, investors may have to reconsider assumptions about rapid monetary easing. The debate is no longer simply about whether inflation is falling.

It is about whether inflation is falling quickly enough for the Federal Reserve to relax. Bhave’s position is clear: the process is unfinished, and policymakers may still have considerable work ahead before they can confidently declare victory.

My Question to Governors Soludo and Lawal During NiDEC 2026

0

During the NiDEC 2026 fireside conversation with Governor Chukwuma Charles Soludo of Anambra State and Governor Dauda Lawal of Zamfara State, I raised a simple but consequential question: Can Nigerian states create large, professionally managed investment vehicles that allow ordinary Nigerians in the diaspora to participate in building their economies?

I asked Governor Soludo whether we could expect something comparable to a Transcorp Plc at the state level in Anambra, a commercially driven investment vehicle capable of mobilizing capital and undertaking large industrial projects. Governor Soludo indicated that such a vehicle is being contemplated and that the components would be unveiled in due course, with opportunities for Nigerians in the diaspora to participate as investors. The idea is powerful: instead of expecting every diaspora investor to establish a factory or business independently, create an institutional vehicle through which thousands of people can pool capital to finance transformational projects. During lunch, Governor promised to launch this in the coming months.

I posed a similar question to Governor Lawal. Zamfara is richly endowed with minerals, but much of the activity involves artisanal mining. I asked whether the state would support the establishment of a fully private-sector-managed company focused on processing minerals produced by artisanal miners, with Nigerians in the diaspora able to invest in the enterprise. Governor Lawal was receptive to the concept. During lunch, he went deeper into the potential playbook: mobilize Nigerian capital, establish processing infrastructure within Nigeria, add value to the minerals locally, and ensure that Nigerians can participate in the ownership of those assets.

That was really the foundation of my questions to both governors. Not every Nigerian in the diaspora has millions of dollars to return home and build a factory from scratch. But someone may have $10,000, another $25,000, another $100,000, while institutional investors can provide much more. If states can facilitate credible investment vehicles that are professionally and independently managed by the private sector, with strong governance, transparency and accountability, those vehicles can be connected to the capital market so that diaspora investors can participate at different levels.

That is one of the great powers of the capital market: you do not need to be wealthy enough to build the whole factory; you only need enough capital to own a piece of it. Pool thousands of those pieces together, and factories, processing plants, infrastructure and great companies can emerge.

The opportunity is to move diaspora engagement from simply sending money home to owning productive assets at home. From $10,000 to whatever anyone can afford, aggregated capital can do big things. That is how Money becomes Capital, and when capital is pooled around credible visions, nations build.

After the conversation, Rt. Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief of Staff to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, joined us on stage for a group photograph.

Hyperliquid Open Interest Hits New ATH as Bitcoin ETFs See Outflows and Gemini Reports Q2 Loss

0

The cryptocurrency market is sending mixed signals as traders increase their exposure to derivatives while institutional demand for Bitcoin through exchange-traded funds weakens.

Hyperliquid has reached a new all-time high in open interest, Bitcoin ETFs recorded $131 million in net outflows, and Gemini reported a $107 million loss for the second quarter.

The developments highlight a market caught between aggressive trading activity and cautious institutional positioning.

Hyperliquid’s latest open-interest milestone is particularly significant because open interest measures the value of outstanding derivative contracts that remain active. Rising OI generally indicates that more capital and leverage are entering the derivatives market, although it does not automatically mean traders are bullish.

Both long and short positions contribute to open interest. Hyperliquid has already established itself as one of the largest venues for perpetual futures, competing increasingly with centralized exchanges.

The growth also reflects Hyperliquid’s expanding product ecosystem. Its HIP-3 infrastructure allows permissionless markets for assets beyond traditional crypto, including stocks, commodities and other financial instruments.

CoinGecko reported that HIP-3 open interest reached $2.3 billion in April, demonstrating how quickly the platform has expanded beyond its original crypto-perpetuals focus.

Record open interest comes with a warning. Higher leverage can amplify both gains and losses. If Bitcoin or other major assets make a sharp move against heavily positioned traders, liquidations can accelerate volatility.

Hyperliquid’s history demonstrates this risk, with previous market disruptions showing how concentrated leverage can produce rapid changes in open interest and trading conditions. At the same time, Bitcoin’s institutional market is showing signs of hesitation.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $131 million in net outflows in the latest session, with ARKB reportedly accounting for the largest individual outflow at roughly $58.82 million.

ETF flows matter because these products have become an important bridge between traditional finance and Bitcoin. Persistent outflows can indicate profit-taking, reduced risk appetite or investors moving capital toward other opportunities.

Still, a single day of withdrawals should not be interpreted as a definitive change in the long-term institutional Bitcoin thesis. Gemini’s $107 million second-quarter loss adds another layer to the picture.

The result underscores the difficult operating environment facing crypto companies, where revenue remains highly sensitive to trading volumes, asset prices, competition and regulatory costs. A major exchange or financial platform can experience significant swings in profitability when market activity changes.

The contrast is striking. Hyperliquid is benefiting from intense derivatives activity, while Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing withdrawals and a major crypto platform is reporting substantial losses. This suggests that capital has not necessarily left the digital-asset ecosystem.

Instead, it may be moving between products, strategies and venues. For Bitcoin, the key question is whether ETF outflows persist or quickly reverse. For Hyperliquid, traders will watch whether record open interest is supported by sustainable volume and liquidity rather than excessive leverage.

And for Gemini, the challenge will be converting future market activity into consistent profitability. These three developments capture the evolving structure of the crypto market: speculative capital remains highly active, institutional flows are becoming more selective, and crypto businesses continue to face intense financial pressure.

The next phase will depend on whether rising derivatives participation can coexist with renewed spot-market demand.

Bitcoin Falls Below $63,000, Triggering $48 Million in Liquidations

1

The price of Bitcoin dropped back below $63,000 on Thursday, sparking a wave of liquidations across the cryptocurrency market.

According to data cited by Cointelegraph, the move wiped out approximately $48 million in positions over the span of one hour, with long positions accounting for $45.7 million of the total.

The sharp dip forced leveraged traders who had bet on further upside to automatically close their positions. Bitcoin made up the largest share of the liquidations at around $23.7 million, followed by Ethereum at roughly $14.4 million. Smaller amounts came from Solana and other altcoins.

Short-term holders (STHs), those holding BTC acquired within the past six months are currently around 7.2% underwater on their investment in aggregate.

On August 13, 2026, Bitcoin was trading in the mid $63,000 range, showing signs of recovery after the brief break below the psychological $63,000 support. The crypto asset traded as high as $63,487 igniting bullish optimism.

Traders continue to monitor open interest and funding rates for signs of further volatility. Bitcoin short-term holders are reportedly keen to sell into range highs as they seek to break even on their investment.

Crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen said Bitcoin’s next 60 days could determine how the current bear market ultimately plays out. He highlighted August and September as historically difficult months, particularly during U.S. midterm election years.

Cowen noted that across midterm years, Bitcoin has historically declined roughly 10%-11% on average in August and about 8% in September.

A similar decline from current levels could initially push Bitcoin toward $56,000, with additional weakness potentially taking it into the low-$50,000 range. However, Cowen stressed that seasonality is not guaranteed and estimated such patterns work roughly 70% of the time.

Analyst Rekt Capital additionally warned that $63,000 was weakening as local support, with price gaining progressively less ground with each rebound from that level.

Bitfinex Alpha, the research arm of crypto exchange Bitfinex, noted that a significant portion of the BTC supply has moved on-chain during the range-bound period.

“The reason the boundaries are so stubborn is due to ownership. The $62,000-$65,000 band holds 1,794,308 BTC at this cost basis, 8.93% of circulating supply per the UTXO Realised Price Distribution (URPD), with the largest holdings at $63,800,” it reported.

Meanwhile, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan said Bitcoin refusing to react to bad news, including BTC sales by Strategy and CLARITY Act delays, is one of the clearest signs the cryptocurrency winter is ending.

Amidst price predictions, Polymarket currently assigns only a 9% chance of Bitcoin hitting $100,000 and beyond this year, down from a high of 91% in January.

Outlook

Bitcoin’s near-term outlook remains highly uncertain, with the $62,000–$65,000 range emerging as a critical battleground.

A sustained break below $63,000 could expose BTC to deeper losses toward $56,000, while a loss of the broader $62,000 support zone could increase the risk of a move into the low-$50,000 range.

However, the outlook is not entirely bearish. Bitcoin’s resilience despite negative catalysts, including Strategy’s BTC sales and delays surrounding the CLARITY Act, suggests that underlying demand may be stronger than the recent price action indicates.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan views this resilience as a potential sign that the current crypto winter may be coming to an end