31
05
2025

PAGES

31
05
2025

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

How Political Messaging Is Shaping the 2027 Oyo Governorship Race

0
Nigerian Newspapers, 2024-2025; Infoprations Analysis, 2025

As Nigeria prepares for the 2027 general elections, one state to watch closely is Oyo. The race for governor is already gaining momentum, and what’s emerging is more than just political posturing. It’s a contest shaped by messages, alliances, and shared goals that are forming long before any ballots are cast.

Our analysis of recent activities of stakeholders, examining how often political actors and groups are mentioned together in public discussions gives us a new perspective. It tells us who is at the center of these conversations, who is working together, and what themes are driving the momentum.

At the center of this picture is a message, not a person or party. “Unseat PDP” has become the most talked-about theme among various groups and individuals. It reflects a growing effort by different stakeholders to focus public attention on removing the ruling People’s Democratic Party from office in Oyo State.

This is more than just a slogan. It appears to be the common thread connecting different opposition groups, campaigners, and political voices. When a message like this appears so frequently and in connection with so many different players, it becomes a powerful organizing tool. It provides clarity, focus, and a sense of shared direction.

This kind of clarity matters. In politics, as in business, success often depends on how well a message resonates and how many people rally behind it. Right now, “Unseat PDP” is serving as the main point of agreement for a diverse set of actors. That gives it real power.

Another important message gaining ground is the “Oke-Ogun Agenda.” While it is not as widely connected as “Unseat PDP,” it represents something significant. Oke-Ogun is a region in Oyo State that has historically played a quieter role in state politics. The emergence of this message suggests that people in that region are becoming more politically organized and assertive.

Exhibit 1: Activities and actors’ connectivity

Source: Nigerian Newspapers, 2024-2025; Infoprations Analysis, 2025

The growing attention to Oke-Ogun may point to a desire for greater political inclusion or even a push to support a candidate from that area. Either way, it shows that regional voices are starting to matter more in the bigger picture.

What’s also worth noting is who is not yet at the center of these conversations. Most of the political figures, party leaders, and advocacy groups included in the data appear only on the margins. Each is linked to only a small number of others and does not seem to be playing a key role in shaping the central narrative of the race.

This includes Governor Seyi Makinde, the current officeholder. While his position gives him visibility, he does not appear to be a major part of the ongoing discussion around the future of the state’s leadership, at least not yet. That could be a sign of caution on his part, or it could reflect a deliberate strategy to stay above the early noise of campaign season.

The same goes for many members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the main opposition party. There are several groups aligned with the APC, but none of them is currently taking the lead in framing the conversation or building alliances around a clear message. This may be a missed opportunity. When groups remain fragmented and disconnected from one another, it becomes harder to drive momentum or persuade undecided voters.

Exhibit 2: Activities and actors’ prestige position

Nigerian Newspapers, 2024-2025; Infoprations Analysis, 2025

So what does this all mean for political leaders, campaigners, and citizens watching the 2027 race unfold?

First, it shows the importance of having a strong and simple message. The message to remove the PDP from power is clear and easy to understand. That kind of clarity makes it easier to bring people together.

Second, it highlights the value of unity. A single, widely shared goal is more powerful than several small efforts moving in different directions. For the opposition to succeed, it will need to stay focused and work together around a common vision. Third, it suggests that regional voices are becoming more influential. Political campaigns that want to win will need to listen carefully to these voices and find ways to include them in broader state-wide plans.

Lastly, for those currently on the sidelines of the discussion, there is still time to get involved. But doing so will require more than just statements or press releases. It will require joining the conversation that is already shaping the race and contributing something meaningful to it.

The 2027 election in Oyo will not be decided on election day alone. It is already being shaped by the way people talk about the future, the messages they choose to rally around, and the alliances they are building today. For those who want to lead, now is the time to step into that conversation with purpose and clarity.

How Nigerians Are Responding to President Tinubu’s Two-Year Anniversary Speech

0

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu recently marked two years in office with a national statement that sought to instill optimism and present evidence of steady progress. He spoke of tough economic reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies and changes to the foreign exchange system, and claimed these were necessary measures to avoid fiscal disaster. The president emphasized improved revenue, a stronger oil and gas sector, and increased investor confidence. In his words, “the worst is behind us,” and he called on citizens to “bet on Nigeria.”

However, the response from Nigerians has been anything but uniform. Social media, particularly Twitter, became a vibrant arena of contestation. For many, the president’s tone and claims felt out of touch with the everyday reality on the ground.

Some voices welcomed the speech and praised the administration’s resolve. One user wrote, “Congratulations on IMF debt settlement. Looking forward to more action, Mr. President.” Another added, “You are taking the bullets others were scared of. You could have continued with the norm, but you chose a different path. Patriots are behind you.”

These citizens view Tinubu’s policies as bold and necessary. They argue that while the impact might not yet be widespread, the groundwork is being laid for long-term improvement. Supporters credited him for increasing the tax-to-GDP ratio, settling international debt, and restoring investor confidence in the oil and gas sector.

Yet others responded with cautious skepticism. They acknowledged parts of the government’s progress, but questioned the extent to which these improvements translated into better lives. As one user said, “We are listening, yes, we’re also watching. We want actions that match the speeches — fuel in our tanks, food on our tables, and peace in our communities.” For this group, there’s a growing desire to see numbers reflect reality, not just in reports, but in households and streets across the country.

A significant number of Nigerians expressed deep dissatisfaction. They felt the speech glossed over the suffering many are experiencing. One critic put it starkly: “Your message sounds like a corporate PR memo, not a sincere address to a people in deep anguish.” This sentiment echoed widely, as many argued that removing subsidies and unifying exchange rates without strong safety nets plunged more people into poverty.

Another user painted a harsher picture: “Today, millions cannot afford basic food items, transportation, rent, or healthcare. Families are choosing between feeding their children and paying school fees.” While the government claims inflation is easing, the cost of a 50kg bag of rice still hovers near ?95,000. Critics argue that the president’s reforms, though potentially sound in theory, lacked the compassion and support mechanisms needed in practice.

Insecurity remains another key area of concern. Despite Tinubu’s assertion that security forces are stepping up, Nigerians continue to report kidnappings, communal violence, and unsafe roads. “You say the worst is behind us, yet insecurity still haunts us,” one tweet read. “Every Nigerian deserves to live without fear. That’s not our reality today.”

Some responses also reflected deep political resentment. A number of users outright rejected the legitimacy of Tinubu’s administration, claiming he “forced his way into power” during a controversial election. As one person bluntly posted, “Nobody entrusted anything to you. You stole it.” While these sentiments may be politically charged, they highlight a trust gap that cannot be ignored.

Others went further, accusing the government of enriching a few while the majority suffer. “You entrusted yourself with the sacred responsibility of enriching your future generations with Nigeria’s plundered wealth,” another user wrote. These comments show how public trust is not just fragile, but in many quarters, completely broken.

Still, not all responses were hostile. A few expressed hope and wished the president well. “Happy 2 years anniversary sir. May your remaining years be smoother,” one tweet read. Another prayed: “God will continue to silence all your enemies and the enemies of our great country.”

The mixed reactions show that Nigerians are not simply passive recipients of political messaging. They are actively engaging, questioning, supporting, and challenging. They are not merely reacting emotionally; they are responding based on how they experience government policies in their daily lives.

This moment presents a crucial lesson in leadership. National progress is not just measured by GDP or oil rig counts. It is measured by how people feel, what they can afford, and how safe they are. A successful administration must not only make good policies, it must ensure those policies touch the lives of citizens in real and visible ways.

Revolut’s Relaunch Could Democratize Crypto And Increase Competition Among Exchanges In The United States

0

Revolut, a British fintech company, plans to relaunch its cryptocurrency services in the United States, as announced by Mazen ElJundi, Global Head of Crypto, on May 30, 2025. This move follows a suspension of crypto services in the U.S. in October 2023 due to regulatory uncertainties and market challenges. The relaunch aims to capitalize on the growing demand for crypto services, focusing on Bitcoin and Ethereum offerings, with strategic partnerships like Pyth Network to enhance DeFi data integration.

No official asset listings or exact relaunch dates have been confirmed, but the initiative aligns with Revolut’s goal to bridge traditional finance and Web3. This could increase competition in the U.S. crypto market, potentially driving regulatory and technological advancements. The relaunch of Revolut’s crypto services in the U.S. carries significant implications for the fintech and crypto markets, while highlighting the divide between traditional finance and decentralized finance (DeFi).

Implications of Revolut’s Crypto Relaunch in the U.S.

Revolut’s reentry into the U.S. crypto market will intensify competition among platforms like Coinbase, Binance.US, and Kraken. With Revolut’s established user base of over 40 million globally and its focus on seamless fiat-to-crypto integration, it could capture significant market share, particularly among retail investors seeking user-friendly platforms. The emphasis on Bitcoin and Ethereum, as noted in the announcement, suggests a conservative approach targeting mainstream cryptocurrencies, potentially appealing to new investors wary of volatility in altcoins.

Revolut’s return signals confidence in navigating U.S. regulatory challenges, which prompted its 2023 exit. The company’s collaboration with Pyth Network for real-time DeFi data indicates a strategic approach to compliance, leveraging partnerships to meet regulatory standards for transparency and data accuracy. This could set a precedent for other fintechs, encouraging them to reenter or expand in the U.S. crypto space, potentially influencing regulators to clarify crypto frameworks, especially under evolving political climates post-2024 elections.

Revolut’s platform, known for its banking and payment services, positions it to bridge traditional finance with crypto. By offering crypto alongside fiat services, it could normalize digital assets for mainstream users, accelerating adoption. The relaunch may introduce features like crypto staking or DeFi integration (via partnerships like Pyth), making complex crypto services more accessible within a familiar banking app.

The move could boost investor confidence in the U.S. crypto market, especially amid recent bullish trends (e.g., Bitcoin’s growth in 2024). Revolut’s entry may drive innovation in user experience, such as lower fees or integrated financial tools, challenging competitors to enhance their offerings. However, the focus on major cryptocurrencies might limit innovation in supporting emerging DeFi tokens or protocols, potentially slowing broader Web3 adoption.

Revolut operates as a centralized fintech platform, subject to regulatory oversight and KYC/AML requirements. Its crypto services are custodial, meaning users don’t control their private keys, aligning with traditional banking’s controlled environment. DeFi platforms emphasize decentralization, allowing users to retain control over assets via non-custodial wallets and interact directly with blockchain protocols. This contrasts with Revolut’s model, which prioritizes ease of use over full user sovereignty.

Revolut’s relaunch may attract users seeking simplicity but could alienate DeFi purists who value decentralization, reinforcing the divide between centralized crypto services and DeFi ecosystems. Revolut’s reentry reflects a cautious approach, prioritizing compliance with U.S. regulations. This ensures user trust but limits the speed of innovation due to regulatory constraints. DeFi operates in a permissionless space, enabling rapid development of protocols but often clashing with regulators, as seen in SEC actions against DeFi projects. Revolut’s partnership with Pyth Network suggests an attempt to integrate DeFi’s real-time data while staying compliant.

The relaunch may bridge some gaps by bringing DeFi-like features (e.g., real-time pricing) to a regulated platform, but it also underscores the tension between innovation and regulatory hurdles. Revolut’s user-friendly interface lowers barriers to crypto adoption, appealing to retail investors unfamiliar with blockchain complexities. Its focus on Bitcoin and Ethereum simplifies choices for beginners. DeFi platforms often require technical knowledge (e.g., managing wallets, understanding gas fees), which can deter mainstream users despite offering greater financial autonomy.

Revolut’s relaunch could democratize crypto access but may steer users away from exploring DeFi’s broader potential, perpetuating a divide between simplified, centralized crypto services and the more complex, decentralized ecosystem. Revolut’s services cater to users already engaged with traditional banking, potentially excluding unbanked or underbanked populations who rely on DeFi for financial inclusion. This creates a socio-economic divide, as DeFi’s permissionless nature serves users in regions with limited banking infrastructure, while Revolut’s model targets regulated markets like the U.S.

The relaunch may widen this gap by prioritizing wealthier markets, though it could also inspire DeFi platforms to improve user experience to compete. Revolut’s crypto relaunch in the U.S. is poised to enhance competition, drive mainstream adoption, and influence regulatory clarity, but it also underscores the divide between centralized fintech and decentralized DeFi.

While Revolut bridges some gaps by integrating DeFi data and offering user-friendly crypto access, its custodial, regulated approach contrasts with DeFi’s ethos of decentralization and permissionless innovation. This tension reflects broader challenges in aligning traditional finance’s stability with crypto’s disruptive potential, shaping the future of financial services in the U.S. and beyond.

Trump Media Raises $2.44bn to Build One of America’s Largest Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries

0

Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), the operator of Truth Social and related platforms, has completed a massive $2.44 billion private placement aimed at turning the company into one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin among U.S.-listed firms.

The move underscores a dramatic shift in the company’s financial strategy as it deepens its commitment to digital assets and seeks to redefine its future within what it describes as the “America First economy.”

The company secured the $2.44 billion through two primary vehicles:

  • A common stock offering of 55.86 million shares priced at $25.72 each, raising approximately $1.44 billion.
  • A convertible note issuance totaling $1 billion. These are 0% senior secured notes due in 2028, which can be converted to equity at $34.72 per share.

The net proceeds—approximately $2.32 billion after fees—will be primarily allocated toward acquiring Bitcoin and supporting general corporate operations. According to a company press release, crypto platforms Crypto.com and Anchorage Digital will provide custodial services for the firm’s expanding Bitcoin holdings.

A Crypto-First Pivot

The move reflects Trump Media’s growing commitment to a crypto-first strategy. CEO Devin Nunes, a former U.S. congressman and staunch Trump ally, framed the deal as an expression of financial independence.

“This capital raise enables us to advance our business and execute on our long-term vision,” he said, describing the Bitcoin investment as a hedge and a foundation for future growth.

This pivot follows other recent crypto-aligned initiatives by Trump Media, including partnerships with Crypto.com to launch crypto-themed ETFs and explore decentralized financial services through the company’s apps—Truth Social, Truth+, and Truth.Fi.

The shift positions Trump Media alongside firms like MicroStrategy and GameStop, which have used capital raises and debt financing to amass substantial crypto holdings. However, Trump Media’s balance sheet now makes it one of the most liquid U.S. companies with direct exposure to Bitcoin, with more than $3 billion in liquid assets post-deal.

Shareholder Dilution and Loss of Trump Majority

One side effect of the offering was the dilution of existing shareholders, including Donald Trump himself, who saw his majority stake fall from 52% to 41.5%. This means that Trump, while still the largest individual shareholder, no longer holds a voting majority—a development that introduces potential governance implications. Analysts noted that this could open the door for activist investors or dissenting shareholders to gain more influence in corporate decisions.

Shares of DJT initially fell earlier in the week but recovered following the announcement of the capital raise. The stock closed higher Friday and showed renewed investor confidence in the company’s evolving direction. Nevertheless, DJT stock remains down over 36% year-to-date, raising questions about how long investor optimism can be sustained given the volatility of the company’s chosen asset—Bitcoin.

Political and Regulatory Overhang

The announcement comes as Donald Trump has openly embraced cryptocurrency in contrast to the regulatory skepticism seen during the Biden administration. The Trump administration recently backed the idea of a federal cryptocurrency reserve using seized digital assets and has rolled back some enforcement measures against major crypto platforms, including Coinbase, Kraken, and Robinhood.

However, the political proximity between the Trump administration and Trump Media has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Senator Elizabeth Warren has already raised concerns over potential conflicts of interest. She has specifically questioned Trump Media’s plans to expand into ETF offerings, citing the need for transparency and regulatory oversight given the company’s links to the president.

A High-Risk, High-Reward Future

While Trump Media now boasts a formidable war chest and a clear crypto focus, it also faces substantial risks. Bitcoin remains a volatile asset, and the company’s ability to translate this bold financial maneuver into long-term shareholder value is uncertain. Analysts say the real test will come not from Bitcoin’s market swings alone, but whether Trump Media can monetize its media, finance, and tech platforms in a way that complements its crypto treasury.

It is believed that the company, which still derives most of its attention from Trump’s political presence, is betting on financial engineering rather than product innovation. Supporters, however, see the move as a game-changing pivot toward decentralized financial empowerment.

Either way, Trump Media’s $2.44 billion Bitcoin plunge places it at the heart of America’s crypto experiment—and squarely on Wall Street’s radar.

Anthropic CEO Warns AI Could Eliminate Half of Entry-Level White-Collar Jobs Within Five Years

0

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that artificial intelligence could wipe out as much as half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years — a dire projection delivered as companies across industries accelerate job cuts amid deepening structural shifts and economic pressure.

The prediction, shared during an interview with Axios at Anthropic’s inaugural developer conference Code with Claude, comes amid a surge in job cuts at major tech firms — including IBM, Business Insider, and LinkedIn — which have collectively laid off more than 8,500 employees in recent weeks.

“We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming,” he said. “I don’t think this is on people’s radar.”

He warned that unemployment in the United States could reach between 10 and 20 percent within one to five years, driven in large part by AI’s rapid encroachment on white-collar roles.

He criticized the current U.S. policy direction under the Trump administration for aggressively accelerating AI adoption while dismantling prior safety measures.

“That’s a polite interpretation of the Trump administration’s no-questions-asked AI policy,” Amodei told Axios, referring to the executive order that rescinded Biden-era AI safety rules.

The layoff numbers back up the urgency of Amodei’s concern. IBM recently laid off more than 3,500 workers, even as it expands AI-driven enterprise tools. Business Insider has cut over 500 positions as part of a newsroom restructuring, and LinkedIn has eliminated more than 2,000 roles in the last year across engineering, recruiting, and marketing teams. All three companies have publicly embraced AI as part of their long-term strategy.

The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 echoes Amodei’s fears. The report, based on a survey of over 11,000 executives, found that “almost half of organizations are expecting to reorient their business models toward new AI-driven opportunities (49 percent), while 47 percent plan to transition employees from AI-disrupted roles to other positions.” Alarmingly, “a significant share (41 percent) also expect to downsize their workforce as AI capabilities to replicate roles expand.”

The report further predicts that “on average, workers can expect that two-fifths (39 percent) of their existing skill sets will be transformed or become outdated over the 2025–2030 period.”

However, Amodei’s warnings are not universally accepted. A recent paper titled Artificial Intelligence and the Labor Market, authored by Menaka Hampole (Yale), Dimitris Papanikolaou and Bryan Seegmiller (Northwestern), and Lawrence D.W. Schmidt (MIT), found that the impact of AI on labor has so far been muted due to offsetting effects — namely, productivity gains that result in overall job creation despite losses in certain sectors.

Papanikolaou, a finance professor at Northwestern, clarified the distinction between job exposure and actual displacement.

“People tend to think that, okay, if a job is exposed to AI, that means the AI is going to do my job and then I’m going to be out of work. So the point we’re trying to make is that, well, not necessarily. There are some potentially offsetting factors,” he said.

He added, “What matters is not just the average exposure of your job, but also how that’s distributed across the different tasks that you’re doing. If AI is good at only some of those tasks, workers may be able to focus on what it can’t do.”

Another study, Large Language Models, Small Labor Market Effects, authored by economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard, analyzed how AI tools such as chatbots affected employment in 11 occupations in Denmark.

“These tools have really not made a significant difference in employment or earnings in any occupation,” Humlum said, stressing that AI’s real economic impact — if significant — may take decades, just as it did with steam power, electricity, and computing.

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna has argued that AI hasn’t reduced his company’s workforce overall.

“Our total employment has actually gone up, because what it does is it gives you more investment to put into other areas,” he told The Wall Street Journal.

While Krishna insists that AI has allowed the company to invest in new business areas, a closer look at IBM’s job postings shows the majority of new roles are opening outside the U.S., particularly in cheaper labor markets. And

Amodei believes there is little time left to delay serious conversations around AI and employment.

The uncertainty around AI’s future impact hasn’t stopped companies from betting on it as a transformational force. While AI has generated some new opportunities, the pace and distribution of those gains remain uneven — especially in developed economies facing stagnant real wages and rising cost-of-living pressures.