Citigroup (Citi) has recently updated its year-end 2025 price targets to $132,000 for Bitcoin and $4,500 for Ethereum, citing shifting investor flows toward ether amid macroeconomic factors and sustained ETF demand, though with smaller inflows expected for Ethereum compared to Bitcoin.
These forecasts represent a slight trim for Bitcoin from prior estimates like an earlier $135,000 base case but a lift for Ethereum from $4,300 announced in September.
Citi’s models incorporate user activity, ETF inflows which explain over 40% of Bitcoin’s recent price variation, and Ethereum’s utility in areas like stablecoins and tokenization, with bull cases reaching $199,000 for BTC and $6,400 for ETH.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Separately, JPMorgan has indicated Bitcoin is undervalued relative to gold and could see significant upside to $165,000, driven by institutional adoption, ETF inflows, corporate treasuries, and potential state-level reserves in the U.S.
This aligns with broader JPMorgan views on Bitcoin outperforming gold in the second half of 2025, though exact year-end targets vary across reports some cite $150,000. These predictions come amid Bitcoin trading above $120,060 and Ethereum above $4,483 as of early October 2025, with risks tilted upward due to accelerating institutional demand but tempered by macro uncertainties.
The price targets from Citi $132K for Bitcoin, $4,500 for Ethereum and JPMorgan $165K for Bitcoin by year-end 2025 carry several implications for investors, markets, and the broader crypto ecosystem.
JPMorgan’s higher Bitcoin target $165K reflects growing institutional interest, driven by ETF inflows, corporate treasury allocations, and potential state-level Bitcoin reserves in the U.S. This suggests increasing mainstream acceptance, which could stabilize prices and reduce volatility over time.
Citi’s focus on Ethereum’s utility like the stablecoins, tokenization indicates confidence in its long-term value beyond speculative trading, potentially attracting more institutional capital to ETH-based projects.
Bitcoin’s current price at $120,060k is below both targets, suggesting potential upside of 11–39% by year-end. Ethereum’s price $4,483 is close to Citi’s target, implying limited short-term growth 2–3% unless bull-case scenarios ($6,400) materialize.
ETF inflows, which Citi notes explain over 40% of Bitcoin’s price variation, will likely remain a key driver. Any slowdown in inflows or regulatory hurdles could cap upside potential.
Investment Strategies.
Investors may tilt portfolios toward Bitcoin for higher upside potential, per JPMorgan’s outlook, while Ethereum could appeal to those focused on blockchain utility and diversified crypto exposure.
The bullish forecasts could spur retail FOMO, but macro risks like the interest rate hikes, geopolitical tensions noted by Citi may prompt caution, favoring hedged positions or stablecoin-based strategies.
Rising prices could accelerate development in Ethereum-based DeFi and tokenization, as higher valuations attract more developers and capital. JPMorgan’s mention of state-level Bitcoin reserves signals potential policy shifts, which could legitimize crypto further but also invite stricter regulations, impacting market access and liquidity.
Discrepancies between Citi’s conservative ($132K) and JPMorgan’s aggressive ($165K) Bitcoin targets highlight uncertainty in macro conditions and adoption pace. Investors face risks from market corrections if ETF inflows or institutional interest wane.
Ethereum’s growth may lag Bitcoin’s due to smaller ETF inflows, potentially leading to underperformance relative to expectations. These targets signal a bullish outlook for crypto, with Bitcoin likely to lead due to stronger institutional backing, while Ethereum’s growth hinges on its ecosystem’s expansion.
Investors should weigh these opportunities against macro risks and monitor ETF flows and regulatory developments closely.