India collected 1.70 trillion rupees ($18.98 billion) in gross GST revenues in November, rising just 0.7% from a year earlier, even as cess-inclusive revenues fell 4.2%.
The softer showing suggests that large parts of the economy have not fully absorbed the impact of the government’s September 22 tax cuts on hundreds of goods, particularly in categories tied to everyday consumption. Net collections stood at 1.52 trillion rupees, up only 1.3% from November 2024.
“Instead, there is a reduction in the gross domestic GST collections,” said Karthik Mani, partner – indirect tax at BDO India.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Because GST data is published with a lag, November is the first complete month showing the effect of the rate cuts. A closer reading of the numbers reveals that while certain industries enjoyed stronger sales during the festive period, the gain in volumes did not translate into commensurate revenue because many of the goods now fall into lower tax brackets.
The FMCG and household goods segment, for instance, saw clear improvements in footfall and retail activity. Items such as shampoos, soaps, and detergents sold more briskly through October, but these products already attracted relatively low GST rates before the cuts. As a result, even a substantial uptick in purchases did not generate enough tax to push collections higher in any meaningful way.
A similar pattern played out in the automobile sector. Reducing GST on small cars was intended to lift sentiment among middle-income buyers, yet the response appears uneven. November’s revenue pattern suggests that sales improved, but not dramatically. Higher interest rates and broader household budget constraints continue to limit momentum in both two-wheelers and entry-level passenger cars. The modest lift in demand was not enough to counter the lower tax rate.
Electronics and home appliances, which typically benefit strongly from festive spending, also delivered mixed results. Retailers reported strong interest in smartphones, televisions, and other appliances during October’s promotional events. But because these are relatively high-value purchases, the tax cut exerted a stronger downward pull on GST receipts than the rise in sales could offset. The segment appears to have boosted consumption without delivering a corresponding bump in revenue.
The services sector, which includes telecom, hospitality, entertainment, and professional services, did not undergo any GST rate cuts but has been moving at a slower clip. Telecom spending has stabilized but is no longer expanding rapidly. Travel and hospitality enjoyed a festive surge but remain short of a full recovery.
Professional services and consulting have been moving through irregular billing cycles. These sectors ultimately helped prevent a sharper drop in overall GST revenue, yet the pace was not enough to compensate for the weaker inflows from goods.
Manufacturing and industrial inputs reflected similar fragility. GST collections tied to intermediate goods often offer a window into the health of factories and supply chains. The November outcome suggests that companies are drawing down inventories rather than expanding output. Momentum in light manufacturing and textiles appears soft, consistent with recent activity indicators that show uneven factory-floor recovery.
Even the e-commerce and organized retail sector, which saw energetic trading during festival sales, could not fully offset the effect of lower GST rates. Much of the online basket consists of FMCG items, personal care products, electronics, and other goods affected by the tax reductions. That meant shoppers bought more, but the government collected less per item.
Taken together, the November numbers show the tension between India’s push to stimulate household consumption and the reality of short-term revenue arithmetic. The government’s expectation was that higher demand would largely neutralize the impact of rate cuts. Instead, the initial data shows that lower taxes have had a stronger influence than the rise in volumes.
The next few months will become a clearer test of whether consumption is settling onto a stronger footing or whether November marks the first evidence that the revenue gap may linger longer than expected.