DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1438

JPMorgan Predicts US Recession as Trump Doubles Down on Tariffs Despite Economic Fallout

0
JP Morgan Chase puts contents through its CEO account, it goes viral. But the same content via JPMC account, no one cares (WSJ)

JPMorgan has become the first major Wall Street institution to formally project that the United States will fall into a recession in the latter half of 2025, citing the economic damage from sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

The bank’s chief US economist, Michael Feroli, warned in a note to clients that the cumulative weight of these tariffs — especially the 10% duties Trump has slapped on imports from most US trading partners — will begin to contract economic growth, pushing the country into what Feroli describes as a “stagflationary” scenario.

In his latest forecast, Feroli projects the US economy will shrink by 1% in the third quarter of 2025, followed by a further 0.5% contraction in the final quarter of the year. For the full year, GDP is expected to fall by 0.3%. The downturn, he said, would push the unemployment rate to 5.3%, up from the 4.2% recorded in March.

“We now expect real GDP to contract under the weight of the tariffs,” Feroli wrote Friday evening. “The pinch from higher prices that we expect in coming months may hit harder than in the post-pandemic inflation spike, as nominal income growth has been moderating recently, as opposed to accelerating in the earlier episode.”

The stark prediction is already being felt across financial markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 3,300 points over the week, an 8% decline that dragged the index into correction territory. The S&P 500 lost 9%, while the Nasdaq Composite fell 10%, pushing it officially into bear market territory — down more than 20% from its previous peak.

Feroli said the tariffs will increase consumer prices, depress household spending, and weigh heavily on business investment. While Trump insists the import taxes will help fund his planned extension of the 2017 tax cuts and bring back domestic manufacturing jobs, economists argue they’re already fueling inflation at a time when consumer spending is vulnerable.

“Consumers may be reluctant to dip too far into savings to finance spending growth,” Feroli warned, noting the fragile state of household balance sheets in a high-interest rate environment.

The White House, however, remains unshaken. Trump has continued to champion his economic strategy as a long-term fix to decades of trade imbalances, claiming that the pain Americans are experiencing now will eventually pay off. Speaking Thursday as markets were in freefall, Trump dismissed the economic concerns, saying the country would “boom.” The next day, he hit the golf course, as the Dow suffered its worst one-day drop since March 2020 — falling by 2,200 points.

Trump’s tariff plan is viewed by many Republicans as one of the boldest gambits of his presidency. After feeling constrained by advisers in his first term, Trump has now leaned fully into his long-held protectionist beliefs. The latest round of tariffs spares almost no major trade partner, including Canada, Mexico, the European Union, and China. That has prompted swift retaliation from Beijing and sharp criticism from European capitals, where leaders are preparing their own countermeasures.

Despite the financial turmoil, Trump has shown no signs of reversing course — at least for now. He has framed the tariffs as a patriotic obligation and a path to restoring American greatness.

“We have to endure a little pain to win back our economic independence,” he said in an address earlier this week.

That defiance, however, is beginning to stir unease — even among some of Trump’s supporters and Republican lawmakers.

Rep. French Hill, a Republican from Arkansas, voiced his reservations during a town hall Thursday night, particularly about the broad application of tariffs on neighbors like Canada and Mexico.

“I don’t support across-the-board tariffs as a general matter,” Hill said. “And I will be urging changes there because I don’t think they will end up raising a bunch of revenue that’s been asserted.”

But others remain supportive, even if uneasily so. Frank Amoroso, a 78-year-old retired engineer from Michigan who voted for Trump, told AP the tariffs are a step in the right direction — though he’s worried about short-term pain. “I think he’s doing things too fast,” he said. “But hopefully things will get done in a prudent way, and the economy will survive a little downfall.”

Doug Deason, a Republican donor based in Texas, echoed the sentiment. “It is hard to watch our portfolios deteriorate so much, but we get it. We hope he holds course,” he said, noting that Trump had always warned that economic disruptions would accompany his trade policies.

The broader economic implications are still unfolding, but JPMorgan’s projection has amplified fears that the president’s tariffs — far from being a tool of leverage — are pushing the US into the early stages of stagflation: a toxic mix of stagnant growth and rising prices. Feroli’s team expects the Fed’s preferred inflation measure — the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index — to rise to 4.4% by the end of 2025, up from 2.8% in February.

That would complicate the Federal Reserve’s response. While investors had previously priced in four rate cuts by the Fed this year, Feroli now warns that the central bank may be paralyzed by the conflict between rising unemployment and stubborn inflation.

“If realized, our stagflationary forecast would present a dilemma to Fed policymakers,” he said.

Still, he believes the Fed will prioritize the labor market and begin cutting rates as early as June, reducing the benchmark rate by 25 basis points at each meeting until it hits 3% in January 2026.

The political fallout from the economic turmoil is also beginning to reshape the national mood. Democrats, still reeling from their 2024 defeat, are showing renewed momentum. They clinched a key state Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin and have begun organizing what is expected to be the largest round of protests since Trump’s return to office.

“The winds are changing,” said Rahna Epting of MoveOn, one of several advocacy groups planning nationwide demonstrations.

Progressive groups believe Trump’s economic gamble could hasten a political realignment.

“Raising prices across the board for your constituents is not popular,” said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. “It’s the kind of thing that can lead to a 1932-style total generational wipeout of a party.”

For now, however, the recession JPMorgan predicts appears increasingly likely — not as a risk on the horizon, but as the logical outcome of policies that Trump has no intention of backing down from.

Real World Assets, American Dynamism and Maturation of Decentralized Finance

0

Real World Assets (RWAs) are tangible or traditional financial assets—like real estate, bonds, or commodities—tokenized on blockchain networks. They’re becoming a big deal in DeFi because they bring real-world value into a space that’s often been criticized for being speculative and detached from physical economies. By bridging traditional finance (TradFi) and DeFi, RWAs offer stability, liquidity, and a way to attract institutional players who’ve been hesitant to dive into crypto’s wilder side. American dynamism, point to the U.S.’s push to stay a leader in innovation and capital markets. Tokenizing RWAs fits right into that—it’s a chance for the U.S. to flex its financial muscle by blending its robust infrastructure with cutting-edge blockchain tech.

Think of it as a modern take on American ingenuity: solving big problems like illiquid markets or financial exclusion with bold, builder-driven solutions. It’s not just about keeping up; it’s about setting the pace. DeFi’s growing up means it’s moving beyond its early, chaotic days of yield farming and meme coins. RWAs are a sign of that maturity—shifting the focus from crypto-native speculation to practical, scalable applications. Protocols like Centrifuge or MakerDAO are already tokenizing assets like invoices or Treasuries, proving DeFi can handle real economic activity.

Tokenizing physical and financial assets on blockchains has some hefty implications: Illiquid assets like real estate or fine art become tradable 24/7 as tokens. A $300 trillion global asset pool suddenly gets more accessible, potentially unlocking billions for smaller investors who’ve been locked out of high-value markets. Middlemen—brokers, banks, escrow services—get sidelined. Transactions settle faster and cheaper on-chain, shaving off fees that eat into profits. Smart contract bugs or regulatory crackdowns could tank projects. If a tokenized apartment building’s contract gets hacked, you’re not just losing crypto—you’re losing a piece of the real world. Plus, unclear legal status in many countries could stall adoption.

Fractional ownership means more people can invest in, say, a Manhattan skyscraper or a government bond. But it’s not all rosy—without proper oversight, it could amplify scams or widen inequality if the tech-savvy hoard the gains. If the U.S. leans into this as a national strength, the impacts are big: Leading RWA tokenization could reinforce the dollar’s dominance in a digital era, keeping America at the center of global finance. It’s a way to outpace rivals like China, who are focused on centralized digital currencies. New industries—blockchain devs, compliance experts, asset managers—spring up. Places like Austin or Miami could become hubs, drawing talent and capital.

Exporting this tech strengthens soft power. If American platforms set the standard, other nations might have to play by the rules. Overreach or mismanagement (think heavy-handed SEC rules) could stifle innovation, pushing startups to friendlier shores like Singapore or Dubai. As DeFi matures with RWAs, the shift has broad consequences: Pegging value to real assets reduces the wild price swings of pure crypto. DeFi becomes less of a casino, more of a utility—think less Dogecoin, more digital Treasuries. Banks and institutions dip their toes in, bringing billions in capital. A Goldman Sachs tokenized bond isn’t sci-fi anymore—it’s happening. This could balloon DeFi’s total value locked from $100 billion to trillions.

Governments won’t sit idly by. Expect stricter KYC/AML rules, which could clash with DeFi’s ethos of decentralization. Some projects might buckle; others might thrive by adapting. Financial power moves from Wall Street to decentralized networks. That’s empowering for individuals, but it also risks chaos if governance fails—imagine a DAO mismanaging a tokenized power plant. When you mash these together, the synergy amplifies everything. RWAs powered by DeFi, with American leadership, could create a parallel financial system—faster, cheaper, and more inclusive than today’s. Cross-border payments in seconds, not days. Micro-investments for the masses.

Opportunity spreads, but so does risk. The digitally illiterate or under-resourced could get left behind, widening gaps even as new winners emerge. The U.S. driving this could spark a global tech arms race. Europe’s already experimenting with tokenized bonds; Asia’s not far behind. It’s a chance for breakthroughs—or a recipe for fragmentation if standards don’t align. Short-term, expect growing pains: legal battles, tech glitches, and market volatility. Long-term, it’s a shot at redefining how value moves around the world.

It’s less about gambling on volatility and more about building a system that works for businesses, investors, and everyday people. Together, these ideas suggest a future where DeFi doesn’t just disrupt finance—it redefines it. RWAs could unlock trillions in value, American dynamism could drive the charge, and DeFi could finally shed its rebellious teen phase for something more grounded and impactful.

Sell Off by MicroStrategy Could Further Dip Bitcoin Price as Tariff Supremacy Pushes On

0

China announced a 34% retaliatory tariff on all U.S. goods, a move that came after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed additional levies on China and other trading partners earlier in the week. This tit-for-tat escalation has rattled global markets, with Bitcoin falling from around $85,600 to $82,599—a roughly $3,000 drop—since China’s announcement, according to market chart on CoinGecko. The crypto market’s reaction reflects broader economic jitters. Tariffs, especially at this scale, threaten to disrupt supply chains and spike inflation, which can dent investor appetite for risk assets like Bitcoin.

If MicroStrategy sells their Bitcoins, it could significantly impact the cryptocurrency industry and market. A large-scale sale by MicroStrategy could lead to a sharp decline in Bitcoin’s price, potentially triggering a market-wide downturn. As one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin, MicroStrategy’s actions can amplify market fluctuations, making it challenging for investors to predict price movements. A sale by MicroStrategy could create uncertainty among investors, potentially leading to decreased confidence in the market and a subsequent price drop.

MicroStrategy’s significant holdings have raised concerns about centralization, which could further erode investor confidence. Large-scale transactions by prominent players like MicroStrategy may attract regulatory attention, potentially leading to increased oversight and compliance requirements. MicroStrategy’s involvement in the Bitcoin market has legitimized it as a potential asset for corporations but also highlights the need for more mature and stable market structures.

While tariffs and economic pressures may not directly impact MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin sales, they can contribute to market volatility and investor uncertainty. As the global economy continues to evolve, it’s essential to consider how external factors, such as tariffs and inflation, might influence the cryptocurrency market. Keep in mind that the cryptocurrency market is highly unpredictable, and the actual impact of MicroStrategy’s actions may differ from these potential outcomes.

The implications of Bitcoin reversing gains as China ramps up tariff retaliation, particularly with the 34% tariff on all U.S. goods announced on April 4, 2025, ripple across economic, market, and geopolitical spheres. China’s retaliatory tariffs, a direct response to U.S. duties escalating to 54% on Chinese imports, intensify the ongoing trade war. This escalation disrupts global supply chains, raising costs for goods like electronics, cars, and raw materials that U.S. consumers and businesses rely on. The U.S. economy, already navigating Trump’s aggressive trade stance, could face stagflation risks like Bitcoin.

Bitcoin’s Dual Nature

Long-term, though, Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative might strengthen. If trade disputes erode trust in fiat currencies—say, through inflation or retaliatory devaluations—it could draw capital as a hedge, much like gold’s rally to all-time highs amid this chaos. The BTC-gold ratio, noted as trending lower, might flip if gold pulls back and Bitcoin stabilizes, signaling a potential bull run. China’s 34% tariff hits U.S. exporters hard, slashing demand for American goods in a $580 billion bilateral trade relationship. This could weaken the dollar if export-driven growth falters, though tariffs might also prop it up short-term as a safe-haven play.

For Bitcoin, this tug-of-war matters: a weaker dollar historically boosts crypto, but near-term trade war fallout favors cash and bonds over digital assets. China’s simultaneous stimulus push and pivot to non-U.S. trade partners (e.g., BRICS) might also reduce its crypto influence—once a mining powerhouse, its market sway is waning, per Forbes analysis from 2024. Beyond Bitcoin, the tariff spat dents crypto-related stocks—Coinbase and MicroStrategy fell 6-9%—and mining economics. U.S. miners, reliant on Chinese hardware (e.g., Bitmain rigs), face higher costs as semiconductor tariffs bite, a pain point echoed in earlier trade war cycles. This could shrink mining profitability post-halving, dragging Bitcoin’s hash rate and sentiment.

The tariff escalation marks a structural shift in global trade, as one X user called it an “inflection point.” If sustained, it could fracture globalization further, boosting regional blocs and domestic production—potentially a U.S. jobs win, but at the cost of higher prices and recession risks. Bitcoin’s fate hinges on how markets digest this: a quick stabilization might spark a V-shaped recovery (analysts peg $85,000 as a key resistance), but prolonged trade chaos could test lower supports like $70,000. Either way, its volatility underscores crypto’s growing entanglement with global economic fault lines.

A $37 billion wipeout in Bitcoin’s market cap in just 20 minutes after China’s retaliation speaks volume about Bitcoin volatility, underscoring the speed and severity of the sell-off. Analysts suggest this volatility ties to macro pressures as liquidity tightens and uncertainty grows, risk-on assets—crypto included—tend to bleed first. China’s response isn’t just tariffs; it’s also pushing domestic stimulus and strengthening trade ties elsewhere, per CNBC, which could further shift global economic dynamics.

Bitcoin’s longer-term outlook isn’t necessarily grim. Some see it as a potential hedge if trade wars fuel inflation or weaken fiat currencies—gold often rallies in such scenarios, and Bitcoin sometimes follows. CoinDesk notes limited downside so far, hinting that the market might be pricing in the worst already. Still, with U.S.-China trade flows worth over $580 billion annually at stake, per the U.S. Trade Representative, the stakes are high. For now, expect choppy waters as markets digest this tariff escalation and watch for Beijing’s next move.

Join us today at Tekedia Mini-MBA On Webinality

0

You are not having a GREAT career ascension yet if people are not  recommending you in your absence. Join us today at Tekedia Mini-MBA as I explain the path to career advancement with effective webinality.  Join the next edition https://school.tekedia.com/course/mmba17/

 

Implications of US Treasury Yields Dropping By 15 Bps

0

The impacts of US Treasury yields on 2- to 10-year bonds dropping by 15 basis points (bps), are multifaceted. A 15bps drop means yields have decreased from, say, 4.20% to 4.05% on a 10-year bond, or similarly across the 2- to 10-year range. Lower Returns on New Bonds: A 15bps yield drop reduces the interest income investors earn on newly issued Treasury bonds. For example, on a $10,000 investment in a 10-year bond, annual interest falls from $420 (at 4.20%) to $405 (at 4.05%), a $15 loss per year.

Reinvestment Risk: As older, higher-yielding bonds mature, investors must reinvest at these lower rates, shrinking future income. This is especially tough for pension funds or retirees relying on fixed income.

Bond Price Increase: Since bond prices move inversely to yields, existing bonds with higher yields become more valuable. A 15bps drop could boost the price of a 10-year bond by roughly 1.3-1.5% (depending on duration), benefiting current bondholders who might sell. With Treasury yields less attractive, investors might chase higher returns in stocks, corporate bonds, or even cryptocurrencies, potentially increasing market volatility.

Cheaper Borrowing: Treasury yields influence mortgage rates, car loans, and other consumer borrowing. A 15bps drop could lower 30-year mortgage rates by a similar amount (e.g., from 4.5% to 4.35%), saving a borrower with a $300,000 loan about $30 monthly or $360 yearly. However, this effect often lags as lenders adjust.

Reduced Savings Income: Lower yields signal lower interest rates on savings accounts and CDs. A drop from 4% to 3.85% on a $10,000 CD cuts annual interest from $400 to $385, hitting savers’ wallets. Falling yields often reflect investor fears of weaker growth or recession, as they flock to safe assets like Treasuries. This could foreshadow job cuts or wage stagnation, indirectly affecting livelihoods.

Government Debt Costs: The U.S. has over $36 trillion in debt, with significant portions maturing soon. A 15bps drop across 2- to 10-year bonds could save billions in interest payments annually when refinancing, easing fiscal pressure short-term. For instance, on $7 trillion of maturing debt, this translates to roughly $10.5 billion less in yearly interest.

Inflation Dynamics: Lower yields might stimulate spending and investment by reducing borrowing costs, potentially nudging inflation up. However, recent tariff announcements (e.g., Trump’s “reciprocal tariff” policy reported around April 4, 2025) could amplify this, as higher import costs drive prices higher, possibly reversing the yield decline later.

Cheaper borrowing and a flight from bonds can lift equities, especially growth stocks. However, if the yield drops signal economic weakness (as seen in posts on X and reports of a 50bps 10-year yield decline earlier this week), stock gains might be short-lived amid recession fears. U.S. Treasury yields set a benchmark for global rates. A 15bps drop could weaken the dollar slightly, making U.S. exports cheaper but imports costlier, especially under new tariffs. This might ripple through emerging markets, lowering their borrowing costs too.

Reports from April 4, 2025, show the 10-year yield hit 4.045% after a 15bps drop, with the 2-year falling 20bps to 3.704%, tied to tariff uncertainty and recession fears. This suggests the 15bps decline you mentioned aligns with a flight to safety, amplifying the impacts above—particularly cheaper government borrowing and potential stock market volatility.