DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 16

Dangote at FUTO for 37th Public Lecture: A Gathering of Enterprise, Leadership, and Service

0

Good People, Alhaji Aliko Dangote will deliver the 37th Public Lecture of my alma mater, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, on Saturday, April 25, 2026. And when he is done, a peerless icon of Africa’s entrepreneurial capitalism will be honoured with the Ikenga, FUTO’s enduring symbol of strength, excellence, and citizenship (two of mine in photo).

In the Igbo tradition, it takes the killing of one leopard to be called a killer of leopards. In the marketplace of enterprise, Dangote has brought many business leopards home. We warmly welcome him to our University and look forward to him sharing from his vast experience, elevating minds and inspiring the next generation.

Seventeen years ago, I had the privilege of standing on that same podium to deliver FUTO’s 15th Public Lecture, the first by an alumnus in the University history. It remains one of the highest honours because it is the Public Lecture. As an undergraduate, I attended one delivered by late HRM Prof. Joseph Chike Edozien, the former Asagba of Asaba. It was an intellectual festival chaired by Prof. Oba, then Vice Chancellor of FUTO.

On April 25, Dangote will speak under the academic chairmanship of Prof. Mrs. Nnenna N. Oti, our distinguished Vice Chancellor and leader of our University.

Good People, the road leads to Owerri. Come and experience what makes FUTO Africa’s finest technical university. To all the students, Dangote will solve “ODE – o di egwu” but here instead of calculus, it will be the “mystical” calculus of markets. Enjoy the lecture.

Airline Operators of Nigeria Warns about Suspension of All Flight Operations Due to Unsustainable Surge in Jet A1 

0

The Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) has issued a formal warning that domestic airlines may suspend all flight operations nationwide starting Monday, April 20, 2026, due to the unsustainable surge in aviation fuel (Jet A1) prices.

Jet A1 has risen from around ?900 per litre as of late February 2026 to ?3,300 per litre now — a more than 300% increase in just weeks. Airlines argue this far outpaces global crude oil price movements and involves unfair/local pricing practices by marketers. At least one airline has already grounded its entire fleet since March 13, 2026.

Operators say fuel costs alone now exceed ticket revenues, making continued operations unviable without major changes. In a letter dated April 14, 2026, to the Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria (MEMAN), AON President Dr. Abdulmunaf Yunusa Sarina described the situation as astronomical and unsustainable.

They are urging immediate intervention to align prices with international realities, or they will halt flights from April 20. This is currently a threat and ultimatum rather than a confirmed shutdown — it depends on whether fuel marketers or the government; the letter was copied to the presidency, aviation minister, NCAA, etc. step in quickly with relief or price adjustments. No final confirmation of a full grounding has been reported as of April 16.

Aviation fuel typically accounts for 40%+ of airline operating costs in Nigeria. Geopolitical factors have contributed to broader price volatility, but operators are pointing to significant local markups. Passengers could face major disruptions to domestic routes if it proceeds, with knock-on effects for business, cargo, and the wider economy.

The surge in Nigeria’s aviation fuel (Jet A1) prices—from around ?900 per litre in late February 2026 to ?3,300 per litre by mid-April 2026 (a >300% jump in under two months)—stems from a mix of global geopolitical shocks, domestic economic vulnerabilities, and market structure issues. Airlines via AON describe the local increase as artificial and disproportionate, noting that global crude oil prices rose only ~30% in the same period.

The sharp escalation traces back to the US-Israel-Iran conflict that intensified around late February 2026. This led to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for ~20% of global oil and LNG supplies and ~70% of Africa’s jet fuel and kerosene imports. Shipping and refined product flows from Middle Eastern refineries nearly halted, causing global supply shortages and price volatility.

International crude prices climbed reaching above $100–$112 per barrel at peaks but Jet A1; a refined kerosene derivative saw amplified spikes due to refining margins, processing costs, and logistics. In the US, for example, Jet A1 averaged $8.63 per gallon in April 2026 up ~$2 from March. Africa, heavily reliant on imports via Hormuz routes, faced compounded effects like thinner physical stocks and higher delivered costs.

MEMAN cite these tensions—especially potential Strait of Hormuz closures—as the core driver, dismissing airline claims of extreme local markups. Nigeria’s situation worsened due to structural weaknesses, even as the Dangote Refinery ramped up production and began exporting Jet A1 including cargoes to Europe and West Africa: Heavy reliance on imports and forex constraints: Despite Dangote’s capacity, domestic supply chains still involve significant importation or dollar-denominated costs.

Naira volatility and limited foreign exchange access inflate landed costs. Aviation fuel often requires forex for components, shipping, or blending. Post-subsidy removal, prices fully reflect supply and demand. With limited local refining historically and ongoing debates over crude feedstock to Dangote, marketers pass on global shocks plus local costs. High inland transport costs, airport delivery variations, and infrastructure gaps add premiums. Prices reportedly vary by airport and volume purchased.

Airlines accuse a few major marketers of arbitrary and unilateral hikes and exploitation of the crisis, claiming local prices far exceed international benchmarks adjusted for the ~30% crude rise. MEMAN disputes the exact figures quoted but acknowledges upward pressure. New airlines entering the market have kept ticket prices relatively stable despite fuel now comprising 40–45%+ of operating costs. This squeezes margins further, as operators absorb costs rather than fully passing them on.

Dangote’s role adds nuance: The refinery has helped Nigeria become a net petrol exporter in some months and a Jet A1 supplier to Europe amid global shortages. However, domestic Jet A1 prices have still surged—partly due to export prioritization, crude supply challenges to the refinery, and the fact that local distribution and pricing remains market-driven rather than fully insulated.

Jet fuel isn’t crude; it involves refining yields, transportation especially when routes are disrupted, storage, and quality specs. In Nigeria, layering on naira depreciation, import duties and logistics, and thin competition in marketing magnifies the effect. Fuel costs can exceed ticket revenue on many routes, leading to grounded fleets and the April 20 shutdown threat.

The crisis highlights Nigeria’s vulnerability to both global shocks and domestic bottlenecks in a key sector. If you’re planning travel in or out of Nigeria around or after April 20, consider flexible tickets or alternatives in the short term. The situation is developing rapidly — any intervention could still avert or delay the suspension.

World Liberty Financial Proposes Unlocking 62.28B Locked WLFI Tokens, as BTC Enters Post Rejection Consolidation Zone 

0

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family-backed DeFi project, posted a governance proposal, to restructure the unlocking of approximately 62.28 billion locked WLFI tokens.

The plan differentiates between two main groups of locked tokens: Early supporters about 17.04 billion WLFI tokens: These would shift to a 2-year cliff, no tokens unlock for the first 2 years followed by a 2-year linear vesting period. Holders keep 100% of their allocation with no burn required. If they do not opt in, the tokens remain locked indefinitely under the original terms.

Founders, team, advisors, institutions, and partners about 45.24 billion WLFI tokens: These would face stricter terms: a 2-year cliff + 3-year linear vesting (total 5-year schedule), with a mandatory 10% burn upon opting in. This burn could permanently destroy up to 4.52 billion WLFI tokens. The proposal aims to provide a structured, predictable unlock schedule instead of indefinite locks, while emphasizing long-term governance alignment.

WLFI stated that passing it would keep billions of tokens committed to governance for at least 2 years and signal strong ecosystem commitment through burns and extended vesting. This comes amid broader discussions about token liquidity in the project, which has faced criticism over its tokenomics and governance. Some community members and figures like Justin Sun have pushed back, calling aspects of the proposal unfair or coercive, while others see the burn and vesting as positive for reducing supply pressure and demonstrating alignment.

The official WLFI governance forum post outlines the full details, and it is currently open for community discussion before a potential on-chain vote. Crypto proposals like this can evolve, and token values are highly volatile—always review the latest official sources and do your own research before engaging with governance or investments. The project has highlighted this as a move toward greater transparency and long-term stability.

Up to 4.52 billion WLFI ~10% of the 45.24B founder, team, advisor and partner allocation could be permanently burned if they opt in. This reduces total supply (100B max) and removes a large potential overhang. Replaces indefinite locks with predictable schedules — no meaningful unlocks for at least 2 years (cliff period). This significantly lowers near-term sell pressure on the circulating supply.

Early supporters ~17B tokens get a 4-year total schedule (2y cliff + 2y linear vest) with no burn. Insiders get a stricter 5-year schedule (2y cliff + 3y linear) + mandatory burn. Early investors gain a defined though delayed path to liquidity starting in ~2 years potentially post-Trump term in 2029, but face extended illiquidity compared to hopes for quicker unlocks.

Opt-out keeps tokens locked indefinitely.
Founders/team/advisors/partners: Must accept a 10% haircut (burn) for any vesting schedule; otherwise, tokens stay locked forever while retaining governance rights. Signals stronger skin-in-the-game alignment.
Existing open-market holders: Generally bullish in theory — reduced future dilution and clearer tokenomics could support price stability or upside.

WLFI saw short-term pops (1-7%) on the news in some reports, though the token trades near all-time lows. Project frames it as one of the strongest long-term alignment moves in DeFi, emphasizing commitment over quick exits. Community reaction is mixed — praise for the burn and structure from some less dumping risk; criticism from others including Justin Sun calling it punitive, coercive, or a hostage situation due to the opt-in-or-stay-locked dynamic and ongoing lockup frustrations.

Proposal still needs community discussion + on-chain vote. If it fails or faces low turnout, uncertainty lingers. Broader WLFI challenges remain. Short-term positive for supply discipline and perceived team commitment; medium-term introduces clarity but extends illiquidity for many. Crypto is volatile — check the official governance forum for the latest and do your own research before any decisions.

Bitcoin Sitting Comfortably in Post Rejection Consolidation Zone

Bitcoin is trading right around $75,215 sitting comfortably in that post-rejection consolidation zone after testing higher levels recently. It’s showing a modest +2.7% over the past 24 hours and +7.4% on the week, but nothing dramatic—classic hovering behavior while the broader crypto mood stays glued to Extreme Fear.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is locked at 23 (Extreme Fear), unchanged from yesterday and still down from last week’s 14. It’s been grinding in deep fear territory for a while now; last month averaged around 28/Fear, which historically tends to be a contrarian signal when sentiment bottoms out this hard.

Ethereum is outperforming BTC relatively. The ETH/BTC ratio has climbed to around 0.0313–0.0315, marking its highest level since January 2026 recovering from a February low near 0.028, though still well below the January peak closer to 0.038. ETH itself is trading near $2,320–$2,360, up roughly 4% over the past week versus BTC’s ~3.9%.

On-chain drivers are helping: Ethereum added a ton of new users in Q1, trading volume hit records, and total stablecoin supply on the network just crossed an all-time high of $180 billion. This ETH/BTC strength is one of the brighter spots in an otherwise cautious market—it’s the kind of rotation that often hints at capital starting to rotate into alts when BTC dominance pauses.

That said, the overall macro backdrop (high fear, BTC still ~40% off its Oct 2025 ATH of $126k) keeps things tense. Classic fear while price holds setup—capitulation vibes without the full meltdown. Thinking this is the bottoming process, or waiting for a cleaner BTC breakdown before the next leg.

Deep Extreme Fear (unchanged at 23) while price holds above recent lows ~$74,500 often marks capitulation zones. Historically, such sentiment extremes precede rebounds as weak hands exit and accumulation builds. Consolidation near $75k resistance suggests indecision; a clean break above could spark short-covering and momentum shift. Failure to hold $74k–$72k support risks deeper correction toward $70k or lower.

Still 40% off 2025 ATH ($126k) — implies room for recovery if macro conditions ease, but high fear reflects ongoing caution, possible liquidity tightness or risk-off flows. ETH outperforming BTC; ratio up, network metrics strong with rising users, volume, and stablecoin supply,  hints at early capital shifting from BTC into alts. This is a classic precursor to broader altcoin rallies once BTC stabilizes.

Could benefit more from any risk-on turn in 2026, driven by Ethereum-specific upgrades, DeFi/RWA growth, and ETF flows. Short-term: ETH may continue to hold or gain ground vs. BTC even if overall market stays choppy. Overall market fear while holding setup — often a bottoming process rather than full meltdown. Low sentiment + sideways action can lead to sharp relief rallies on positive triggers like ETF inflows resuming, macro easing.

Prolonged fear could amplify downside on any bad news; BTC dominance pausing favors selective alt plays but doesn’t guarantee a bull run yet. High-conviction holders see opportunity in the fear (buy-the-dip mentality), while cautious traders wait for sentiment improvement or clearer breakout.

Volatility likely stays elevated near these levels. In short: Cautiously constructive for patient bulls, especially on ETH relative value, but no strong directional conviction until fear eases or BTC claims $76k+.

Sequoia Capital Raises $7bn Late-Stage Fund, Betting Big on AI’s Expanding Ecosystem Beyond the Model Builders

0

Sequoia Capital has closed one of its largest funds in recent memory, securing roughly $7 billion for a new vehicle aimed squarely at late-stage investments in the United States and Europe.

The amount nearly doubles the $3.4 billion it raised for a comparable fund in 2022, signaling the firm’s conviction that the AI opportunity is not only enduring but accelerating in ways that demand ever-larger checks and longer holding periods.

The capital will support Sequoia’s “expansion strategy”, its late-stage investing arm, where the rules of the game have fundamentally changed. In the pre-AI era, late-stage funding typically meant helping already-proven companies polish their operations ahead of an IPO or acquisition.

Today, it often involves backing businesses that can achieve massive scale with startling speed and relatively modest capital intensity, thanks to cloud infrastructure, open-source tools, and the plummeting cost of training and deploying advanced models. Sequoia sees this shift as structural, not cyclical, and the bigger fund gives it the firepower to participate at the table stakes now required.

What stands out is where the firm is placing its bets. Sequoia has long been one of the most aggressive venture investors in foundational AI, backing OpenAI early and pouring substantial capital into Anthropic more recently. Both companies are reportedly preparing for potential public listings in 2026, which could deliver outsized returns if the current valuations hold.

Yet Sequoia is not limiting itself to the handful of giants racing to build the largest models. It has also invested in a growing cohort of applied-AI companies that are putting the technology to work in the real world—most notably Physical Intelligence, the Bay Area robotics startup blending AI with physical dexterity, and Factory, which develops autonomous AI agents for enterprise engineering teams.

This diversification mirrors a broader market trend: there has been a clear uptick in the number of companies raising substantial late-stage funds outside the narrow band of foundational model developers. While OpenAI, Anthropic, and a few peers continue to dominate headlines and command the largest single rounds, a widening circle of startups in vertical applications—robotics, enterprise automation, healthcare diagnostics, scientific discovery, and specialized infrastructure—is attracting nine- and ten-figure checks from top-tier firms. These companies are moving from prototype to revenue faster than previous generations of software startups ever could, often hitting meaningful traction with far smaller teams.

The result is a more crowded and competitive late-stage landscape, where capital is flowing not just to the picks-and-shovels providers of AI but to the builders who are embedding intelligence into specific industries and workflows. Sequoia’s new fund positions it to capture upside across this expanding stack.

The raise also marks the first major capital call under the firm’s updated leadership. Alfred Lin and Pat Grady now serve as co-stewards of the 54-year-old Silicon Valley institution, and the $7 billion vehicle is their opening statement: Sequoia intends to stay at the forefront of the AI wave rather than rest on decades of past success.

Their approach appears pragmatic—maintaining the firm’s historic discipline around founder quality and market timing while adapting to an environment where the best opportunities require both speed and patience.

For the broader venture ecosystem, the fund underscores a simple reality: AI has compressed timelines and inflated check sizes across the board. Founders who once needed multiple smaller rounds to prove product-market fit can now reach escape velocity with a single large infusion, provided they can demonstrate defensible moats in data, distribution, or domain expertise.

That dynamic benefits Sequoia’s portfolio companies but also intensifies pressure on the firm to pick winners early and support them aggressively.

Of course, there are risks. Valuations in AI have reached rarefied air, energy demands for training and inference continue to climb, and regulatory scrutiny is only increasing. Yet Sequoia’s willingness to commit fresh billions suggests it views these challenges as speed bumps on a multi-decade runway. The firm’s long history of riding transformative technology cycles, from the internet to mobile to cloud, has taught it that the biggest returns often come from doubling down when others begin to hesitate.

With this fund, Sequoia is not merely participating in the AI boom; it is structurally repositioning itself to own meaningful pieces of the companies that will define the next era of computing.

Food For Thought: A Decolonised Economic Measure of African Price Indexes

0

Food has emerged as an effective comparative tool in global economics because it connects abstract macroeconomic concepts to everyday consumption. The Big Mac Index, popularised by The Economist, uses the price of a standardized fast-food product as a proxy for purchasing power parity (PPP), allowing simplified comparison of currency valuation and cost of living across countries. By translating exchange-rate theory into the price of a widely recognised meal, the index demonstrates how labour costs, supply chains, and domestic inflation shape consumer purchasing power.

However, the rise of the Jollof Rice Index represents a shift toward culturally grounded economic indicators. Reported by CNBC Africa, the index measures the cost of preparing a staple West African dish using locally sourced ingredients.

Unlike the Big Mac Index, which reflects multinational corporate production and globalised consumption, the Jollof Index captures inflation as experienced in household food economies. Its significant increase in Nigeria highlights how food price changes reveal immediate social impacts of economic instability and currency pressures.

The contrast between the two indexes suggests a broader transformation in economic measurement. The Big Mac Index reflects a Western-centric model rooted in global corporate uniformity, whereas the Jollof Index foregrounds regional consumption patterns and cultural identity. This shift echoes the long-standing culinary rivalry between Nigeria and Ghana, often referred to as the “Jollof Wars,” noted by BBC News. In this sense, the Jollof Index functions as a decolonised counterpoint, re-centring economic analysis on indigenous food systems rather than imported consumer brands.

Together, these food-based metrics illustrate that economic comparison is not purely technical but also cultural. While the Big Mac Index globalised the language of purchasing power, the Jollof Rice Index localises it, signalling a move toward plural, context-sensitive approaches to understanding inflation, affordability, and lived economic reality.


Nnamdi O. Madichie is Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship. He is the author of “Going Global – A Qualitative Analysis of Nigerian Cuisine Beyond the ‘Jollof Rice’ Rivalry