DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2

BitMine Immersion Bought Over 70k ETH in a Week Bringing its Holdings to 3.92% of Ether Supply 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), the public company chaired by Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, has been aggressively accumulating Ethereum as part of its Alchemy of 5% strategy—aiming to hold 5% of the total ETH supply roughly 6.035 million ETH based on ~120.7 million circulating supply.

Recent reports confirm ongoing large weekly purchases. For example: As of late March 2026, BitMine added 71,179 ETH in one week, bringing its holdings to 4,732,082 ETH — approximately 3.92% of the total supply. Earlier in March, it added 65,341 ETH, reaching ~4.66 million ETH.

BitMine has steadily ramped up its pace from earlier averages of 45–50k ETH/week, even during periods of price pressure or mini crypto winter conditions. Recently reported at 4.73+ million ETH, making it one of the largest known corporate ETH treasuries. A significant portion is staked, generating substantial yield—estimates have ranged from $176M to $272M annualized depending on rates and scale.

They’re developing their own MAVAN (Made in America Validator Network) staking solution aimed at institutional use. Alongside ETH, they hold some BTC (197), cash ($961M in the latest update), and smaller moonshot investments. Total crypto + cash + other holdings recently hit ~$10.7 billion.

Purchases have continued despite unrealized losses at times due to higher average entry prices in prior periods and market volatility, including geopolitical factors mentioned in their releases. This corporate accumulation adds sustained buying pressure and locks up a notable chunk of ETH supply via staking, which can support network security and reduce liquid supply.

It’s part of a broader trend of institutions treating ETH as a treasury asset with yield potential post-Merge. BitMine’s progress toward 5% has been tracked publicly. Note that exact percentages can shift slightly with total circulating supply changes or precise timing of filings.

MAVAN (Made in America Validator Network) is BitMine Immersion Technologies’ (BMNR) proprietary, institutional-grade Ethereum staking platform. The company officially launched, after developing it internally to manage and monetize its large ETH treasury.

MAVAN was originally built to support BitMine’s own massive Ethereum holdings part of its Alchemy of 5% strategy aiming for ~5% of total ETH supply. It has now been opened to external clients, positioning it as a premier staking destination for: Institutional investors, custodians, exchanges and ecosystem partners.

The platform emphasizes security, performance, and resilience while addressing institutional needs such as regulatory compliance, geographic control, and operational reliability. Key architectural features include: U.S.-based infrastructure — This provides Made in America validation for clients who prefer or require domestic validators.

Flexible, globally distributed architecture — This allows support for worldwide clients while maintaining high uptime and performance. This hybrid model aims to reduce risks associated with validator concentration in the Ethereum network and offer a differentiated, compliant option in a space where many staking services rely on offshore or highly centralized providers.

BitMine had ~3.14 million ETH staked on MAVAN, valued at approximately $6.3–6.8 billion. This makes BitMine via MAVAN one of the largest—if not the single largest—Ethereum stakers globally. Recent activity included adding over 100,000 ETH in a single week to the platform. Projected annual staking rewards: Nearly $300 million, such as a ~2.8–2.83% 7-day annualized rate.

These figures assume BitMine stakes nearly all of its remaining unstaked ETH in the coming weeks. Staking rewards come from Ethereum’s proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, where validators earn ETH for securing the network. BitMine describes MAVAN as a foundational piece of its long-term infrastructure strategy.

Plans include: Expanding to additional proof-of-stake (PoS) networks beyond Ethereum. Developing related blockchain infrastructure services, such as on-chain vaults and post-quantum client development. Positioning MAVAN as one of the leading staking and on-chain platforms globally.

Recent moves, such as acquiring the Pier Two infrastructure site, further bolster its validator capacity to support institutional-scale operations. MAVAN turns BitMine’s ETH treasury from a pure holding into a yield-generating asset. Combined with its Bitcoin mining operations and smaller moonshot investments, it supports recurring revenue for the public company.

Chairman Tom Lee has highlighted MAVAN as a critical step in building institutional-grade crypto infrastructure. Staking involves risks such as slashing; penalties for validator downtime or misbehavior, though institutional platforms like MAVAN aim to minimize these through robust operations. Yields fluctuate with Ethereum network conditions.

As a relatively new launch, full operational details and third-party audits may evolve; MAVAN is BitMine’s in-house solution to securely stake massive amounts of ETH while creating a scalable, U.S.-anchored service for other large players—blending self-custody of its treasury with a B2B infrastructure play.

South Korea Unleashes Emergency Oil Swap and $17bn Relief Budget, Contrasting Nigeria’s Approach to Global Oil Shock

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

South Korea has moved decisively to insulate its economy from the worsening global oil shock, unveiling an emergency crude swap mechanism for refiners alongside a 26.2 trillion won ($17.1 billion) supplementary budget to cushion households and businesses from surging fuel costs triggered by the Middle East conflict.

The swift intervention throws into the picture the contrasting position of other import-dependent economies, notably Nigeria, where expectations of similar relief measures have so far been met with official reluctance, largely because Abuja’s room for maneuver is severely constrained by weak crude output and pre-committed forward oil obligations.

Under the new policy, South Korean refiners will be allowed to borrow crude oil from the country’s strategic petroleum reserves and return the same volume once cargoes secured overseas arrive. The measure is aimed at preventing any disruption in refinery operations as global shipping routes remain under pressure.

Officials say more than 20 million barrels of crude have already been secured for delivery before the end of June, allowing authorities to assure markets that there should be no immediate supply gap. The government has also proposed a broad relief package, with 10.1 trillion won specifically targeted at easing the burden of high oil prices, including a fuel price cap, transport rebates, direct consumer vouchers, and targeted subsidies for farmers, fishermen, and logistics operators.

Minister of Planning and Budget Park Hong-geun said that “swift fiscal support is necessary to alleviate the hardships facing the people’s livelihoods as soon as possible and to ensure that the spark of economic recovery, which the current administration has painstakingly revived, does not die out.”

For South Korea, which imports about 94 per cent of its energy needs and sources most of its crude from the Middle East, the move is an acknowledgement that the Iran war has become an economic emergency rather than a distant geopolitical event.

However, the contrast with Nigeria beams with scorn. There had been growing expectations in policy and market circles that Abuja could adopt a similar intervention framework, either through temporary price support, direct crude allocation to domestic refiners, or emergency consumer relief, especially as petrol prices have surged sharply to N1500 per liter in recent weeks.

But government officials have indicated that there are no immediate plans for such a cushioning measure, a position that reflects both fiscal and supply constraints.

The fundamental challenge is that Nigeria, despite being Africa’s largest oil producer, is operating with limited effective crude availability. Nigeria’s oil production in 2026 averages about 1.31 to 1.46 million barrels per day (bpd), with a 2026 budget target of 1.8 million bpd. Production is significantly insufficient and volatile due to aging infrastructure, theft, and security challenges in the Niger Delta

A significant share of the country’s production is already tied to forward sales, crude-backed loans, and other pre-sold obligations, leaving less discretionary volume available for domestic intervention. This has had a direct bearing on the government’s ability to meet its domestic crude supply commitments, particularly to the Dangote Refinery.

The 650,000-barrel-per-day refinery, which was expected to serve as a stabilizing force for Nigeria’s fuel market, has repeatedly flagged insufficient local crude feedstock. Industry data shows the plant requires 13 to 15 cargoes per month to run optimally, but has in recent months received only about five to seven cargoes from the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, forcing it to rely heavily on more expensive imported crude.

That shortfall has become central to the domestic fuel pricing crisis. This is because the refinery must source a substantial portion of its crude from international traders at prevailing market prices plus freight and war-related premiums; the cost advantage Nigerians had hoped for has been eroded. This helps explain why pump prices have continued to climb even after the refinery reached full operational capacity.

In effect, Nigeria’s inability to deploy a South Korea-style buffer is not simply a policy choice. It is a function of structural limitations.

Unlike Seoul, which can draw from strategic reserves and use fiscal surpluses from semiconductors and equity markets to fund relief, Nigeria faces a narrower window. Higher crude prices would ordinarily imply a revenue windfall, but much of that upside is diluted because future production volumes have already been pledged under debt servicing arrangements and forward contracts.

This has stymied the government’s capacity to channel more crude to Dangote or introduce broad-based subsidies without worsening fiscal pressures.

The broader economic consequence is that Nigerian consumers remain more directly exposed to global oil volatility. Transport fares, food prices, and logistics costs have risen significantly in response to Iran’s war, and without a formal cushioning package, the inflationary pass-through is likely to intensify.

South Korea’s response shows what a state-backed buffer can look like.

That paradox is now playing out in real time: one of Africa’s biggest oil exporters finds itself with limited capacity to soften the blow of rising global oil prices for its own citizens.

Morgan Stanley Files for New Spot Bitcoin ETF with Proposed Annual Fee of 0.14%

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Morgan Stanley has filed for a new spot Bitcoin ETF (ticker: MSBT) with a proposed annual fee of just 0.14%, which would make it the lowest-cost option in the U.S. market if approved and launched.

The filing an amended S-1 with the SEC positions the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust as cheaper than current leaders. It undercuts Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (0.15%) by 1 basis point. It is 11 basis points below BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) at 0.25%.

Other competitors sit higher: Franklin Templeton (0.19%), Bitwise/VanEck (0.20%), ARK 21Shares (0.21%), and Fidelity/Invesco Galaxy (0.25%). This marks the first spot Bitcoin ETF directly issued by a major traditional U.S. bank. Morgan Stanley Investment Management manages ~$1.9 trillion in assets with over 16,000 financial advisors, giving it strong internal distribution channels.

Analysts note this fee structure removes any conflict for its advisors recommending the product over rivals and could attract external flows too. The ETF is expected to launch as early as April 2026. It will track Bitcoin’s spot price using the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Partners include Coinbase as custodian and BNY Mellon as  administrator.

The U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market has grown to around $83 billion in assets. Fees have already compressed since the 2024 launches, but Morgan Stanley’s aggressive pricing could spark another round of competition—potentially pressuring others to cut fees further to retain or win market share. Lower fees benefit investors directly by reducing drag on returns, especially for long-term holders.

Even small differences compound over time in a volatile asset like Bitcoin. For Morgan Stanley, this is a strategic play to capture advisory and retail allocations within its vast network while signaling mainstream institutional comfort with Bitcoin products. Bloomberg ETF analysts highlighted the move as a big or semi-shock development.

Emphasizing the distribution advantage a bank like Morgan Stanley brings. This development reflects broader maturation of crypto as an asset class, with traditional finance players competing aggressively on cost and accessibility. Whether it triggers a full fee war or significant asset shifts remains to be seen, but it clearly intensifies pressure on incumbents.

Bitcoin is currently trading around $66,000–$68,000 as of late March 2026, after pulling back from 2025 highs near $126,000. Analyst forecasts for Bitcoin’s price in 2026 show a wide range, reflecting uncertainty in macro conditions, ETF flows, regulatory developments, and the post-halving cycle.

Most serious institutional and research forecasts cluster in the $100,000–$170,000 range for the year, with some more aggressive or conservative outliers. Prediction markets like Polymarket show lower conviction for extreme upside;  only ~10% odds of hitting $150k by end-2026 in recent polling.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs: Continued inflows are a major structural tailwind. The market has already seen tens of billions in AUM; new entrants like Morgan Stanley’s low-fee MSBT ETF could unlock more advisory and retail capital through traditional wealth channels, potentially adding significant demand.

Growing allocations by pensions, corporations, and possibly nation-states. Post-2024 halving effects continue to tighten new supply, amplified if ETFs absorb more than daily issuance. Interest rate path, risk appetite, and correlation with equities/gold will play big roles. A more dovish Fed or improved liquidity generally supports risk assets like BTC.

Geopolitical tensions, regulatory delays, ETF outflows during risk-off periods, or a deeper correction some analysts flag potential tests of $50k–$60k before recovery. Bitcoin remains highly volatile. Short-term consolidation or pullbacks are possible, some technical views see near-term resistance around $68k–$72k, but longer-term structural shifts—especially from traditional finance integration—support the bullish bias held by most analysts.

Historical cycles suggest post-halving years can be strong, though this cycle may deviate due to institutional participation. These are speculative forecasts, not guarantees. Bitcoin prices can swing dramatically based on unpredictable events. Always do your own research and consider risk tolerance—past performance doesn’t predict future results.

US Department of Labor Proposes Rule for Easier 401(k) Plans to Include Alternative Assets 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) officially proposed a rule that would make it significantly easier for 401(k) plans to include alternative assets—such as cryptocurrencies, private equity, real estate, private credit, infrastructure, commodities, and related vehicles—in their investment menus.

The proposed regulation, titled Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives, focuses on process-based safe harbors for plan fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). It clarifies that fiduciaries have broad discretion and flexibility when selecting investment options, as long as they follow a prudent, objective process.

Fiduciaries must objectively, thoroughly, and analytically evaluate and document factors such as: Performance including risk-adjusted returns. This asset-neutral approach applies regardless of whether the asset is traditional or alternative. The rule aims to reduce regulatory burdens and litigation risks that have historically deterred plan sponsors from offering these options.

The proposal directly implements President Trump’s Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors executive order, which directed the DOL to review and update guidance on alternative investments in retirement plans. The DOL previously rescinded Biden-era warnings that had discouraged or heightened scrutiny on these assets. The new stance is neutral—neither endorsing nor prohibiting specific alternatives, but emphasizing a sound fiduciary process.

This primarily affects participant-directed defined contribution plans like 401(k)s covering ~90–100 million Americans with trillions in assets. Exposure to alternatives could come via target-date funds, asset allocation vehicles, or direct options, rather than requiring every plan to add them immediately.

Greater diversification potential and access to asset classes traditionally limited to institutional or high-net-worth investors. Proponents argue this could improve long-term returns and help democratize alternatives. Critics highlight risks like higher fees, lower liquidity, valuation challenges, complexity, and volatility especially for crypto.

Safe harbors provide more legal protection if they follow the outlined process, potentially reducing litigation abuse. Could open a massive pool of retirement capital, though adoption depends on plan sponsors, record-keepers, and custodians. Widespread inclusion may take time due to operational, educational, and risk-management hurdles.

The DOL has opened a 60-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register. After reviewing comments, the department will decide whether to finalize the rule possibly with changes. This is a proposed rule, not yet final or effective. Plan sponsors remain bound by ERISA’s core fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty.

This marks a clear shift from the rescinded Biden-era 2022 guidance, which urged fiduciaries to exercise extreme care with crypto due to volatility, fraud risks, custody issues, and valuation challenges. That guidance is gone, and the new proposal emphasizes that ERISA does not favor or prohibit any particular investment type.

Bitcoin exposure in 401(k)s would most likely occur through indirect vehicles rather than direct spot Bitcoin holdings or self-directed brokerage windows allowing individual crypto purchases. Common forms include: Bitcoin ETFs or Bitcoin futures ETFs.

Actively managed funds or asset allocation vehicles including target-date funds that allocate a portion to digital assets, including Bitcoin. Crypto-focused mutual funds or commingled trusts that hold Bitcoin or related instruments.

 

The proposal explicitly references holdings in actively managed investment vehicles that are investing in digital assets and provides examples of how fiduciaries can rely on audited financial statements and valuation procedures for such vehicles. Direct participant access to spot Bitcoin remains unlikely in most plans due to operational, custody, and education hurdles for plan sponsors and record-keepers.

Bitcoin and crypto vehicles can face redemption pressures or market-hour limitations, though spot Bitcoin ETFs have improved this compared to earlier crypto products. Bitcoin trades 24/7 on global exchanges; fiduciaries must ensure reliable, fair valuation procedures.

Fiduciaries must also consider participant demographics and overall plan diversification. A small allocation in a target-date or balanced fund might be easier to justify than a standalone Bitcoin option. Younger or longer-horizon participants could gain easier, tax-advantaged access to Bitcoin as a potential inflation hedge or growth asset, similar to how institutions.

Asset managers may develop more retirement-appropriate vehicles with Bitcoin exposure, such as diversified alternatives sleeves or funds with risk controls. The safe harbor lowers the fear of lawsuits for prudent processes, encouraging more plan sponsors to at least consider options.

Bitcoin’s price swings often 50%+ drawdowns could significantly impact retirement balances, especially for participants nearing retirement. Critics argue this makes it unsuitable as a core holding for most savers. Crypto products typically have elevated costs; fiduciaries must justify them against potential benefits.

Experts note the rule won’t open the floodgates. Plan sponsors move slowly due to record-keeper capabilities, participant education needs, potential fiduciary liability concerns, and the need to monitor evolving crypto regulation. Widespread inclusion could take years. If a Bitcoin option underperforms dramatically, participants could still sue if the process wasn’t thoroughly documented.

This proposal is not yet final. It will undergo public comments, possible revisions, and a final rulemaking process. Plan sponsors, participants, and advisors should monitor updates and consult ERISA counsel or qualified fiduciaries for plan-specific advice—individual circumstances vary widely.

 

 

 

Tether Names KPMG as First Audit Firm Since 12 Years of Operation 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin USDT with a market cap exceeding $184–185 billion, has taken a significant step toward greater transparency by engaging KPMG—one of the Big Four accounting firms—for its first-ever full independent financial statement audit.

Tether announced it had selected a Big Four firm through a competitive process for a comprehensive audit of its financial statements, including assets, liabilities, reserves backing USDT, digital assets, tokenized liabilities, and internal controls.

The company initially did not name the firm, describing the effort as potentially the biggest ever inaugural audit in the history of financial markets due to its scale and complexity. Reports from the Financial Times and others later identified KPMG as the auditor. Tether has also brought in PwC to help prepare its internal systems and controls ahead of the review.

This goes beyond Tether’s previous quarterly attestations; limited point-in-time confirmations of reserves, previously handled by firms like BDO Italia. A full audit involves a more rigorous, ongoing examination of the company’s overall financial health and operations. Tether has faced years of scrutiny and criticism over the quality and transparency of its reserves backing USDT; historically including questions about commercial paper, loans, and other holdings.

It was fined $41 million by U.S. regulators in 2021 for misleading claims about full backing by fiat currencies. For over a decade, it relied on narrower attestations rather than a complete Big Four financial statement audit. Tether’s new CFO, Simon McWilliams, has been credited with strengthening internal readiness for this process.

A clean full audit from KPMG could help dispel long-standing FUD about USDT’s backing and reserves. Institutional and regulatory angle: It aligns with Tether’s reported ambitions for U.S. expansion including a new GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoin, USAT, issued via Anchorage Digital and potential fundraising at a high valuation.

Setting a higher bar could pressure other stablecoin issuers to enhance disclosures. Tether has not yet disclosed a timeline for completion or publication of the audit results. As with any major audit, the final report’s details and any footnotes or qualifications will be key to assessing its implications. This development reflects broader maturation in the stablecoin sector amid growing regulatory expectations for accountability.

After 12+ years of relying on narrower quarterly attestations often criticized for being point-in-time snapshots, a clean full audit could validate reserves backing the ~$185 billion USDT supply, including U.S. Treasuries, cash equivalents, and other assets. This might dispel lingering doubts from past regulatory fines and improve trust among users and counterparties.

The process is driving internal improvements via PwC, including stronger controls, risk management, and readiness for rigorous scrutiny. Recent moves, such as parting ways with ex-HSBC gold traders amid the audit, suggest house cleaning to streamline operations and minimize risks during review.

It positions Tether better for U.S. expansion, including its GENIUS Act-compliant USAT stablecoin issued via Anchorage Digital and potential fundraising at a high valuation; reports mention $15–20 billion raise targeting ~$500 billion valuation. A positive outcome could ease institutional investor concerns tied to Tether’s regulatory history.

This sets a new standard, potentially pressuring other issuers including competitors to pursue similar full audits rather than limited attestations. It could accelerate maturation of the industry amid growing regulatory expectations.

Circle; USDC issuer saw its stock drop sharply ~17–20% around the initial Big Four audit announcement, with some analysts attributing part of the reaction to fears that a strengthened Tether could challenge USDC’s position in regulated U.S. markets. However, outcomes depend heavily on the final audit details.

123...8,430Page 2 of 8,430

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy