DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2110

Bybit Declares War on “Notorious” Lazarus Group After $1.4B Hack, Offers $140m Reward

0

Bybit, a leading crypto exchange, has declared war on “notorious” Lazarus group, a hacker group made up of an unknown number of individuals, alleged to be run by the government of North Korea.

This is coming after the crypto exchange experienced a security breach resulting in the unauthorized transfer of over $1.4 billion in liquid-staked Ether (ETH) and MegaETH (mETH). The exchange reported unauthorized access to one of its Ethereum cold wallets on February 21, 2025.

Following the hack, Blockchain security firms, including Arkham Intelligence, identified North Korea’s Lazarus Group as the likely culprit behind the hack. This has spurred Bybit to declare war on the group, offering a $140M bounty reward.

Announcing this move, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou announced on X the launch of the first bounty site that shows full transparency on the money laundering activities of the sanctioned Lazarus Group dubbed Lazarusbounty.com.

He wrote,

“Join us on war against Lazarus. Industry-first bounty site that shows aggregated full transparency on the sanctioned Lazarus money laundering activities. V1 includes:

– Becoming a bounty hunter by connecting your wallet and help tracing the fund, when your submitted bounty leads to freeze, bounty is paid upfront upon instantly at freezing.

-All freezer gets 5% of the bounty, exchange, mixers, and all.

– live ranking of good and bad actor and their response time to deal with the sanctioned Lazarus group transactions. You don’t want to end up on the bad actor list, it’s a record of you helping to facilitate sanctioned transactions.

– Live API wallet address update for exchange, Chainanalysis”.

Zhou added that the exchange has assigned a team dedicated to maintaining and updating the website, stating that the hunt will not stop until Lazarus group or bad actors in the industry are eliminated.

Several users on X commended the initiative with others expressing the desire to provide necessary information to ensure that the perpetrators of the hack are exposed.

Here are some reactions;

@tallmetommy wrote,

“This is a game-changer for the industry. Transparency, accountability, and real-time action finally, a bounty system that incentivizes cleaning up the space while putting pressure on bad actors.”

@henlomeme wrote,

“Unity wins! The whole Web3 fam stands strong with ByBit to take down Lazarus and all da bad actors. Let’s keep our space clean, decentralized, and fair for ALL.”

@dcryptodragons wrote,

“Now this has become interesting. We will witness the first ever live hunt of thieves where the people from the whole world will take part to catch them”.

@HIVFOREVER wrote,

“Just when you thought cyber warfare couldn’t get any wilder. A ‘war’ on Lazarus, huh? I love how this industry’s first bounty site is all about transparency and accountability. It’s like the crypto community finally saying, ‘Hey, we’re not just a bunch of rebels – we’re team players!’ And that 5% cut for freezers? That’s some creative incentivization right there. But seriously, can’t help but wonder what kind of resources will be needed to take down these bad actors. Anyone have any ideas or expertise they’d like to share?”

@Derichio wrote,

“Good to see the transparency on your end @benbybit I And by involving the crypto community you have for sure a higher chance at succeeding! It is time to send a clear message: Even if you succeed in stealing tokens, you will not be able to use them. This should be rolled out!”

Bybit $1.4 Billion Hack

Bybit, announced Friday that a hack attack related to a cold wallet caused a loss of 401,346 Ethereum ($1.4 billion). Chief Executive and co-founder Ben Zhou announced on X that the theft is only related to Ethereum cold wallet, “warm wallet and all other cold wallets are fine.”

Bybit immediately sought to reassure its customers that their cryptocurrency holdings were safe, while its chief executive said on social media that Bybit would refund all those affected, even if the hacked currency was not returned.

“Bybit is solvent even if this hack loss is not recovered, all of clients assets are 1 to 1 backed, we can cover the loss,” Ben Zhou, Bybit’s co-founder and chief executive said.

He added that the company held $20bn in customer assets and would be able to cover any unrecovered funds itself or through loans from partners. Bybit, which has more than 60 million users worldwide and is the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, said news of the hack had led to a surge in withdrawal requests.

In a positive development, the exchange disclosed that it recovered its $1.46 billion stolen, through a combination of loans, whale deposits, and Ethereum (ETH) purchases, according to Lookonchain data.

On Monday 24, 2025, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou announced on X that Bybit has already fully closed the ETH gap, noting that a new audited POR report will be published very soon to show that the crypto exchange is again Back to 100% 1:1 on client assets through Merkle Tree.

Notorious Lazarus Group

The Lazarus Group is a notorious cybercrime organization widely believed to be backed by the North Korean government. Active since at least 2009, they are known for carrying out sophisticated cyberattacks targeting a variety of sectors, including financial institutions, cryptocurrency platforms, and critical infrastructure worldwide. Experts link them to North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau, a key intelligence agency, suggesting their operations serve both financial and geopolitical goals, such as funding the regime and gathering intelligence.

They first gained attention with attacks like “Operation Troy” (2009-2012), a cyber-espionage campaign using basic denial-of-service tactics against South Korea. Over time, their methods evolved significantly. High-profile incidents include the 2014 Sony Pictures hack, which exposed sensitive data in retaliation for a film mocking North Korea’s leader, and the 2016 Bangladesh Bank heist, where they stole $81 million through fraudulent SWIFT transactions. They’re also tied to the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack, which disrupted systems globally using an NSA exploit.

The group’s focus has shifted in recent years toward cryptocurrency theft, reflecting North Korea’s need for foreign currency under sanctions. Notable crypto heists include the $625 million Axie Infinity hack in 2022 and a staggering $1.46 billion Ethereum theft from Bybit in 2025, showcasing their growing expertise in exploiting digital finance. They often use social engineering—like fake job offers or phishing emails—and custom malware to infiltrate systems, adapting tactics to evade detection.

While their exact membership is unknown, estimates suggest subgroups like Bluenoroff, with around 1,700 members, specialize in financial crimes, and their total network could involve thousands of operatives. Despite their sophistication, occasional operational slip-ups, like exposing infrastructure in 2023, reveal they’re not infallible. Their persistence and adaptability make them one of the most significant cyber threats today, with losses attributed to them exceeding $2 billion by some accounts.

Moving Forward

The crypto space, with its billions in custodial assets have become a prime target for increasingly creative and well-resourced attackers. The Bybit hack, which occurred on February 21, 2025, stands as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that persist in the cryptocurrency space, even among major exchanges.

The sophistication of recent attacks, such as leveraging advanced phishing, social engineering, and user interface manipulation highlights the urgent need for equally sophisticated security measures to protect digital assets.

How to Win at Slots: Myths vs. Reality

0

Slots are one of the most popular casino games and for good reason. They offer fast-paced action, massive jackpots and the thrill of potentially hitting it big with a single spin. But with popularity comes plenty of myths. Many players believe there are secret tricks to winning at slots, while others think these games are completely random with no strategy involved. So, what is fact and what is fiction? In this guide, I will break down the biggest myths about slot machines and reveal the reality behind winning at slots.

Understanding how slot machines work can help you make informed decisions about your gameplay. While there are no guaranteed strategies for winning, knowing the facts can help you manage your bankroll effectively and enhance your overall gaming experience.

Common Myths About Winning at Slots

Myth 1: Slot Machines Are “Due” for a Win

One of the most common myths is that if a slot machine has not paid out in a while, it must be “due” for a win. This is completely false. Modern slots use Random Number Generators (RNGs) to determine the outcome of each spin. This means every spin is independent of the previous one. Whether a machine has just paid out a jackpot or has not hit in hours, the odds remain the same.

Some players fall into the trap of “chasing losses,” believing that continued play on a particular machine will eventually lead to a pay out. However, slots are entirely random and no amount of persistence will alter their programmed probabilities.

Myth 2: Higher Denomination Slots Pay More Often

While higher denomination slots generally have higher pay out percentages, it does not mean they pay out more frequently. They simply have a better return-to-player (RTP) rate over the long term. However, this does not guarantee short-term wins, so always play within your budget.

Myth 3: Playing at Certain Times Increases Your Chances

Some players believe that casinos adjust slot pay outs at specific times, such as weekends or late at night. In reality, slot machines operate using pre-programmed RTP rates and RNGs, which cannot be altered based on the time of day.

Casinos are heavily regulated and slot machines are continuously monitored to ensure fair play. If a casino were to manipulate pay out rates based on time, it would likely face severe penalties from regulatory authorities.

Myth 4: Casino Employees Know Which Machines Will Hit

This is another common myth. Casino staff do not have inside knowledge of which machines are “hot” or “cold.” Slots are programmed to operate randomly and even casino operators cannot predict when a jackpot will hit.

While some players may think that observing employees or high-traffic areas in the casino can provide insight into which machines are more likely to pay out, this is purely speculation with no basis in fact.

Myth 5: Betting Max Increases Your Odds of Winning

While betting max can activate all pay lines and increase potential pay outs, it does not increase your chances of winning. The game’s RNG ensures each spin is independent, meaning your odds remain the same whether you bet max or the minimum.

That said, betting max can be beneficial for progressive jackpot slots, where hitting the jackpot often requires the maximum bet. However, for regular slots, betting max is simply a matter of preference and budget.

The Reality: How to Improve Your Chances at Slots

1. Choose High RTP Slots

Slots with a high Return-to-Player (RTP) percentage give you a better chance of winning over time. Look for games with an RTP of 96% or higher.

RTP represents the theoretical pay out percentage over an extended period of play. While this does not guarantee wins in the short term, choosing a high-RTP slot can help stretch your bankroll.

2. Manage Your Bankroll

Smart bankroll management is key. Set a budget before playing and never chase losses. Playing responsibly ensures you enjoy slots without unnecessary financial stress.

One effective strategy is to divide your bankroll into smaller sessions and avoid spending it all in one go. Taking breaks between sessions can also help you maintain control over your spending.

3. Take Advantage of Bonuses and Free Spins

Online casinos offer free spins and bonuses that can help extend your playtime without extra cost. Always read the terms and conditions to ensure you get the most out of these offers.

Some bonuses come with wagering requirements, meaning you must play through the bonus amount a certain number of times before you can withdraw any winnings. Look for low-wagering or no-wagering bonuses to maximize your potential returns.

4. Play for Fun, Not Just Profit

Slots are designed for entertainment. While wins are exciting, the reality is that the house always has an edge. Approach slots with the mindset of having fun rather than solely trying to make money.

The best approach is to treat any winnings as a bonus rather than an expectation. This mindset shift can make your gaming experience more enjoyable and reduce the pressure of chasing big pay outs.

5. Try Different Games and Strategies

Not all slots are created equal. Experiment with different types of slots, including classic slots, progressive jackpots and Megaways games, to find what suits your playing style best.

Some players enjoy high-volatility slots that offer larger but less frequent pay outs, while others prefer low-volatility slots that provide smaller, more frequent wins. Understanding your risk tolerance and preferences can help you make informed choices.

FAQs

Can I really improve my chances of winning at slots?

While slots are games of chance, choosing high RTP slots, using bonuses wisely and managing your bankroll can help you get more out of your play.

Are online slots rigged?

Licensed and regulated online casinos use RNG software to ensure fair outcomes. Always play at reputable casinos with proper licensing to ensure fair gameplay.

What slot games have the best odds?

Slots with high RTP percentages offer better long-term returns. Some popular high-RTP slots include Mega Joker (99%), Blood Suckers (98%) and Gonzo’s Quest (96%).

Is there a strategy to winning at slots?

There is no guaranteed strategy to win at slots, but choosing high RTP games, managing your bankroll and playing with bonuses can maximize your chances of winning.

How do progressive jackpot slots work?

Progressive jackpot slots collect a small percentage of each bet into a growing prize pool. These jackpots can reach massive amounts, but the chances of hitting them are very low.

Final Thoughts

Winning at slots is not about secret tricks or myths… it is about understanding how the games work. While no strategy guarantees a jackpot, playing responsibly, choosing the right slots and taking advantage of bonuses can enhance your experience. At the end of the day, slots are all about fun, so enjoy the thrill and spin wisely!

If you are looking for the best online casinos to play slots, check out our recommended sites with top-rated games, generous bonuses and secure platforms for real money gaming at CasinoMatch

Bitcoin Reserves Bills Failed to Pass in North Dakota, Wyoming and Montana

0

Bitcoin Reserve proposals in Wyoming, Montana, and North Dakota. Lawmakers in these states shot down bills that would’ve allowed public funds to be invested in Bitcoin, mostly because they see it as too risky for taxpayer money. In Wyoming, the idea didn’t even make it out of committee—died quietly before it could get any traction. Montana’s House voted it down 41-59, with folks like Representative Steven Kelly calling it “speculation” and arguing it’s their job to protect public funds, not gamble with them.

North Dakota’s bill also flopped in a House Vote, though the specifics of the tally are less clear—just a lot of cold feet over volatility. The vibe in these states seems to be caution first—Bitcoin’s wild price swings spooked enough legislators to kill the momentum. Supporters pushed the angle of hedging against inflation or getting better returns than boring old bonds, but that didn’t sway the majority.

Meanwhile, other states like Utah and Arizona are still in the game, moving their own proposals forward, so it’s not a total washout for the idea—just a big stumble in these three. Lawmakers there clearly aren’t ready to roll the dice on crypto with the public’s cash.

Crypto laws across U.S. states are a mixed bag—some are pushing hard to embrace digital assets, while others are lagging or outright skeptical. Wyoming’s a standout: it’s been a crypto pioneer since 2018, exempting virtual currencies from money transmission laws and property taxes, and even letting companies use blockchain for corporate records.

It’s got a “Financial Technology Sandbox” too, encouraging businesses to test new ideas without heavy red tape. Montana’s another friendly one—no money transmitter license needed for crypto businesses, and it’s got tax breaks for mining operations, making it a quiet haven for blockchain startups.

On the flip side, New York’s got the BitLicense, a tough licensing regime since 2015 that’s scared off some crypto firms with its strict rules—think detailed audits and high compliance costs. California’s joining that club with its new Digital Financial Assets Law, signed in 2023, which hits businesses with a licensing requirement starting mid-2025, plus hefty penalties for slip-ups. Hawaii’s a nightmare for crypto exchanges—its rules demand they hold cash reserves equal to their crypto holdings, so big players like Coinbase have just pulled out.

Wyoming’s carved out a reputation as a crypto haven with some of the most progressive regulations in the U.S. Since 2018, it’s been stacking up laws to attract blockchain businesses and investors. One big move: it exempted cryptocurrencies from state money transmission laws, so companies handling Bitcoin or Ethereum don’t need a traditional money transmitter license. That cuts a ton of red tape compared to states like New York. It also said “no thanks” to property taxes on crypto holdings—buy, sell, or HODL, and Wyoming won’t ding you for it.

Texas doesn’t require a money transmitter license for selling Bitcoin, but it’s not all rosy lawmakers there have flirted with restrictive bills, like banning anonymous crypto trades. Colorado’s got a flat 4.4% income tax on crypto gains and lets you pay state taxes with it, but it’s not as laissez-faire as Wyoming. Arizona’s pushing forward with a bill to make Bitcoin legal tender and treats airdrops as tax-free at the state level, though it still has a 2.5% income tax. Utah’s in the race too, with a pending bill to let the state invest 10% of its funds in Bitcoin—still needs Senate approval as of early 2025.

Dangote Refinery Slashes Petrol Price Again to N825/Liter, Importers Lament Market Disruption

0

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery has once again reduced the ex-depot price of petrol by N65 per liter, bringing it down from N890 to N825, effective February 27, 2025.

While Nigerians have welcomed the move as a relief from high fuel costs, petroleum product importers have raised concerns that Dangote’s repeated price cuts are making importation unprofitable, effectively pushing them out of the market.

This marks the second price reduction of petrol in February 2025, following a previous N60 decrease earlier in the month. It also follows a similar move in December 2024, when Dangote slashed petrol prices by N70.50 during the yuletide season, cutting the cost from N970 to N899.50 per liter.

The refinery stated that this latest reduction was designed to provide relief to Nigerians ahead of the Ramadan season, while also aligning with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s economic recovery policy by easing the financial burden on citizens.

With this latest price adjustment, buyers in Lagos can purchase petrol at MRS outlets for N860 per liter, while prices vary across other regions.

  • South-West: N870 per liter
  • North: N880 per liter
  • South-South & South-East: N890 per liter

Meanwhile, in AP (Ardova Petroleum) and Heyden stations, prices are slightly higher:

  • Lagos: N865 per liter
  • South-West: N875 per liter
  • North: N885 per liter
  • South-South & South-East: N895 per liter

Dangote Using Price Reduction to Undercut Fuel Importers

This latest price adjustment is widely seen as an indication that Dangote is leveraging price reduction as a strategic tool to dominate the Nigerian fuel market.

The billionaire businessman is currently locked in a legal battle with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) and petroleum marketers, challenging their continued importation of fuel despite his refinery having 500 million liters of petrol in stock, which he said is enough to meet Nigeria’s demand.

However, even before the court delivers its ruling, Dangote appears to be using aggressive pricing to achieve his objective—making fuel importation unprofitable and forcing marketers to abandon imports in favor of buying locally.

An industry insider noted that Dangote’s consistent price slashes are forcing fuel importers to sell at a loss or exit the market entirely.

“Some of us who have imported PMS are feeling the heat of Dangote’s decision to slash prices. Though it is a good thing to reduce petrol prices, it is taking a toll on our business. That’s the simple truth,” a dealer who spoke anonymously, lamented in a chat with The PUNCH.

Another retailer explained that importation is becoming less attractive, as Dangote’s continuous price reductions are discouraging fuel imports altogether.

“Dangote understands the competition in the business, and this latest reduction will further discourage fuel imports. There will be losses, as we may have to drop our prices too. At the end of the day, some of us will source our products locally. I will just advise Dangote to create a level playing field for all,” the retailer stated.

Importers in Crisis as Landing Costs Soar Above Dangote’s Prices

Petrol importers’ plights are compounded by landing cost of petrol products. The cost reached N927 per liter last week—significantly higher than Dangote’s new ex-depot price of N825 per liter.

This means that importers are selling at a loss, as they cannot afford to compete with Dangote’s lower prices. Some have already begun reconsidering their role in the market, as importing fuel at a higher cost while competing with a local refinery selling at cheaper rates is financially unsustainable.

Confirming these concerns, the National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Chinedu Ukadike, told The Punch that Dangote’s pricing strategy is threatening fuel importers.

“Dangote may ‘kill’ fuel importers by this continued lowering of prices. All those importers who have challenged Dangote that they wanted to import cheaper fuel—as they’re just nearing the seashore—Dangote will reduce the price, and they will run into trouble,” Ukadike remarked.

He explained that Dangote is taking full advantage of Nigeria’s deregulated market, making it difficult for independent fuel importers to remain competitive.

Cheaper Fuel for Nigerians With Risk of a Monopoly

While consumers celebrate the price reductions, analysts warn that Dangote’s pricing strategy could eventually eliminate competition, leading to a long-term monopoly in the sector.

Industry experts have also noted that if importers are completely squeezed out of the market, Dangote will have total control over fuel pricing in Nigeria. This could potentially drive prices up in the future once competition is eliminated.

Bank of America is Primed to Facilitating Crypto Transactions Hinges on Regulatory Clarity

0

Bank of America’s CEO, Brian Moynihan, He’s saying they’re primed to roll out a USD-pegged stablecoin the moment U.S. lawmakers give it the green light. The idea’s been buzzing around since he dropped it at the Economic Club of Washington, D.C.—basically, if the regulatory stars align, they’re jumping in. Moynihan framed it as a no-brainer evolution, calling it “fully dollar-backed” and “no different than a bank account,” which hints at how they’d pitch it: a digital dollar with the bank’s seal of trust.

This ties into the broader stablecoin chatter heating up under the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly vibe. Lawmakers are apparently eyeing the first 100 days to push through some kind of legislation—maybe something like the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act or the Lummis-Gillibrand bill. The stablecoin market’s already massive, sitting at $231 billion, with Tether (USDT) and USDC dominating. Bank of America stepping in could shake that up, bringing a traditional finance heavyweight into the ring.

What’s wild is the shift—banks like BofA used to sideline crypto, but now they’re circling it like sharks. If they pull this off, it could mean faster payments or cheaper cross-border transfers for consumers, all wrapped in that big-bank security blanket. Still, Moynihan’s cagey on the “how”—no word yet on blockchain choice or exact use cases. Guess they’re waiting to see what Congress cooks up. What do you think—game-changer or just another corporate toe-dip into crypto?

Stablecoin regulation is a messy puzzle lawmakers are still piecing together—especially in the U.S.—because these digital assets straddle a line between crypto wildness and traditional finance. A stablecoin, like the USD-pegged one Bank of America’s eyeing, is a cryptocurrency designed to hold a steady value, usually tied 1:1 to something like the dollar. The catch? Keeping that peg solid—and ensuring it’s not a house of cards—means rules, and that’s where the regulatory headache kicks in.

Right now, stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and USDC operate in a gray zone. They’re issued by private companies (Tether Limited, Circle), not banks, and they promise each token’s backed by real assets—cash, bonds, whatever—in reserve. But there’s no uniform law forcing them to prove it consistently. The U.S. has a patchwork approach: the SEC might call some stablecoins securities if they’re investment-y enough, the CFTC could claim them as commodities, and Treasury frets about money laundering or systemic risks if they get too big. Remember 2022’s TerraUSD collapse? A $40 billion implosion that spooked everyone into realizing an unbacked stablecoin can tank fast.

For Bank of America, regulation’s the green light they’re waiting for. A USD-pegged stablecoin from them would likely mean FDIC-style oversight, full dollar reserves, and tight anti-money-laundering checks—think less “crypto cowboy” and more “digital checking account.” The upside? Trust and scale. The downside? Smaller players might get squeezed out if rules favor big banks.

Globally, it’s a mixed bag. The EU’s got MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets), rolling out now, which demands reserve proof and caps unhosted wallets. China? Forget it—crypto’s banned, stable or not. The U.S. is still playing catch-up, balancing innovation with not letting a Tether-sized time bomb blow up. What’s your angle on this—worried about overreach or just want the chaos tamed?