DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 22

Tokenized Stocks Crossed $800M Milestone

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Tokenized stocks— blockchain-based representations of traditional equities like Tesla, Nvidia, Apple, and others have reached a significant milestone, with on-chain monthly trading volume hitting a record high of approximately $800 million.

This figure comes from recent market analysis shared by The Kobeissi Letter and echoed across crypto analytics sources. It reflects rapidly growing liquidity as traditional finance (TradFi) assets migrate on-chain, enabling 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, instant settlement, and global access without traditional market hour restrictions.

Platforms like Jupiter Exchange on Solana are handling nearly $200 million of that monthly volume alone, capturing a substantial share ~25%. Robinhood has described tokenized assets as an “unstoppable freight train” heading toward major markets.

Nasdaq is actively pushing for SEC approval to enable tokenized stock trading, with comments from their crypto chief indicating they’re “moving as fast as they can” this was noted about two months prior to the latest surge.

This comes amid broader growth in real-world assets (RWAs): Total tokenized public stocks value is now in the range of $800M–$1.2B market cap/TVL figures vary by source, with some reports showing surges like 2,500% year-over-year growth.

Leading platforms include xStocks via BackedFi and Ondo Finance, with popular tokens mirroring high-demand names like TSLAx (Tesla), NVDAx (Nvidia), and indices like SP500/SPYX. Solana has been a dominant chain for tokenized stock activity in some periods, flipping others like Ethereum in volume share due to low fees and high speed.

The trend signals accelerating convergence between TradFi and crypto/DeFi, driven by regulatory progress, institutional interest from players like Robinhood, Coinbase, Kraken, and Ondo, and demand for efficient, borderless exposure to equities. However, risks remain, including regulatory hurdles, custody concerns, potential for synthetic and fake tokens, and market volatility.

This is part of the larger RWA boom, where tokenized assets overall are expanding liquidity and accessibility—quietly reshaping finance at a historic pace. Tokenized stocks are digital tokens on a blockchain that represent ownership in — or economic exposure to — traditional company shares like Apple, Tesla, Nvidia, or ETFs tracking indices such as the S&P 500.

They bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and blockchain/DeFi, allowing equities to be traded, held, and used in ways not possible on conventional stock exchanges. Tokenized stocks are part of the broader Real-World Assets (RWAs) category, where off-chain assets get represented on-chain. The process typically follows these steps.

A regulated entity (custodian, issuer, or special purpose vehicle) holds the actual shares or provides the backing. This is usually done 1:1 — meaning one tokenized stock corresponds to one real share or a fraction thereof.

Token Issuance

The issuer creates digital tokens via smart contracts on a blockchain commonly Solana for speed/low fees, Ethereum for maturity, or others like BNB Chain/TON. These tokens are ERC-20-like or equivalent and track the real stock’s price using oracles like Chainlink price feeds for accurate, real-time valuation.

Direct/1:1 backed models most common today: Real shares are custodied off-chain by regulated institutions like banks or broker-dealers. Proof-of-reserves via Chainlink or audits verifying the backing. Tokens mirror price movements, dividends often passed through, and corporate actions.

Some older/simpler versions were synthetic derivatives tracking price without holding shares, but these carry higher risks and are less dominant now. Trading and Usage Tokens trade 24/7 on crypto platforms, centralized like Kraken, Bybit, Bitget; decentralized like Jupiter on Solana.

Fractional ownership is easy (buy 0.1 of a Tesla token). Instant settlement (T+0 vs. traditional T+1 or T+2). Global access without traditional brokers or market-hour limits. Composability: Use in DeFi (collateral for loans, liquidity pools, yield farming). Redemption (if supported).

Holders can sometimes redeem tokens for the underlying shares or cash equivalent, depending on the issuer’s rules and regulations. 1:1 custody of real shares; token represents economic rights (price, dividends) Token = legal share ownership on-chain (rarer, more complex).

Leading examples in 2026 include: xStocks by Backed Finance, often on Solana: Dominates retail volume; tokens like TSLAx, NVDAx, AAPLx; live on Kraken, Bybit, and DeFi. Ondo Global Markets: Multi-chain (Ethereum, Solana, etc.); strong institutional push; high TVL. Others: Securitize, Dinari, emerging Nasdaq and Coinbase efforts.

Fractional shares ? lower entry barriers. Global, permissionless access non-U.S. users often prioritized due to regs. Transparency via blockchain ledger. Treated as securities in many jurisdictions; availability often excludes U.S. persons due to SEC rules. Platforms comply variably, Swiss/EU issuers common for xStocks.

Relies on the issuer/custodian holding real shares. Manipulation or delays could affect accuracy. No full voting rights in most cases. Combines stock market + blockchain volatility.

Tokenized stocks represent the accelerating fusion of TradFi equities with blockchain efficiency. As of January 2026, the sector has grown rapidly (hundreds of millions to billions in value/volume), driven by platforms like xStocks and Ondo, signaling a shift toward more accessible, always-on global equity markets — though still early and regulation-dependent.

Dogecoin and Zcash Hunt for Momentum While Zero Knowledge Proof Runs Live Auction With $100M Foundation

By
TI Partners
-
0

Bullish signs are showing up across the market again. Dogecoin is flashing early turnaround hints. Zcash is fighting to take back lost ground after a steep slide. Traders are glued to charts, hunting for the next big move. But price patterns by themselves don’t create lasting gains. What counts is whether demand can keep going without falling apart under pressure.

This is where Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) steps in. Unlike Dogecoin and Zcash, ZKP isn’t trying to climb back from an old high. It sits in active price discovery through a live presale auction with a daily coin spread and zero private deals. Instead of hoping momentum comes back, ZKP builds bullish pressure through its design. That gap matters. One path is guesswork recovery. The other is planned growth.

Dogecoin (DOGE): Bullish Hints but Shaky Ground Underneath

Dogecoin is showing early bullish action again. Based on recent chart coverage, DOGE bounced from key support levels and is trying to form higher lows. This sparked fresh interest from traders who see it as a quick momentum play. For many, DOGE stays a known name, simple to trade, and packed with emotion.

But the trouble with Dogecoin has never been getting in. It’s been staying power. DOGE rallies tend to run on bursts of social buzz rather than steady use-driven demand. When interest fades, price often drops just as fast. That pattern has played out across several cycles.

Supply setup also plays a part. A big chunk of DOGE sits in a small number of wallets. This crowding makes price moves sensitive to what big holders do. Retail energy can push DOGE higher, but without built-in demand mechanics, it struggles to stay up.

So while the Dogecoin (DOGE) price bull story may pull short-term eyes, it doesn’t fix the core problem. DOGE moves because people guess that others will buy. It doesn’t move because the system itself pushes prices up. That makes its bullish hints weak.

Zcash (ZEC): Bounce Tries, but Stability Stays Risky

Zcash has always been known for putting privacy first. It brought zero-knowledge payments to the table long before most of the market knew what that meant. Recently, ZEC bounced from lows, pulling attention from traders watching for snap-back plays. But that bounce comes with warnings.

The current Zcash (ZEC) price breakdown review shows holes in the price structure and uneven liquidity. When ZEC falls, it often falls hard. When it rises, the move is usually sharp but shaky. This kind of action suggests big holders still have major pull on short-term swings.

ZEC also faces a spotlight problem. While its tech earns respect, its use hasn’t kept up with newer privacy-focused trends. Many buyers now link Zcash with past cycles rather than future ones. That turns each bounce into more of a chart trade than a true belief play.

Like Dogecoin, Zcash is trying to regain steam. But both need the mood to swing their way. Neither has a built-in system that forces a fair spread or blocks sudden supply dumps. That makes lasting bullish movement hard to keep.

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP): Growth Engine Built From Day One

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) doesn’t need a comeback story. It’s not rising from a crash as the top bullish crypto. It’s not waiting for a fresh buzz cycle. Its presale auction runs live, its coin spread keeps going, and its setup is already done. That changes the whole game.

Instead of handing out coins through private rounds, ZKP spreads a set number of coins every day. Buyers get coins based on daily joins, with a strict per-wallet cap. This stops big holders from grabbing control early. It also stops sudden supply floods that can crush prices.

This design creates steady scarcity. As more people join, the daily supply stays the same. Price moves up not because of hype, but because demand gets squeezed by spread rules.

ZKP also ties future gains to real use, not guessing games. Through its Proof Pods system, network action connects to real compute and checking tasks. Rewards don’t hang on market noise. They link to activity. That’s a key split from meme coins or old privacy coins.

The project funded itself with $100 million, cutting ties to venture fund cycles or private deals. No seed unlocks wait to hit the market. No insiders got special terms. Everyone enters under the same rules.

This is why ZKP looks like a top bullish crypto from a structural view. It doesn’t need hope to work. It works by design. If adoption follows the system’s planned path, huge upside results become math-based, not hype-based, because the supply mechanics back it up.

Why Planned Growth Beats Guesswork Recovery

Dogecoin and Zcash are both trying to win back lost ground. Their bullish cases rest on traders believing others will jump back in. That can work in quick bursts, but it rarely lasts long. Without built-in demand rules, the price stays fragile.

ZKP handles growth another way. It doesn’t ask the market to believe. It forces fairness through code. It controls supply through the daily spread. It limits control through wallet caps. And it wipes out insider edges completely.

This is the gap between hoping for a pump and building one. Dogecoin might spike. Zcash might bounce. But ZKP is built to climb.

When markets turn toward projects with openness, controlled spread, and trackable demand, systems like ZKP tend to shine. That’s why it doesn’t look like a wild bet. It looks like a built one. In cycles where trust runs low and swings run high, structure becomes the top bullish crypto signal.

Find Out More about Zero Knowledge Proof:

Website: https://zkp.com/

Auction: https://auction.zkp.com/

X: https://x.com/ZKPofficial

Telegram: https://t.me/ZKPofficial

Bitcoin Hits 50-Day High as US–Iran War Tensions Escalate

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Bitcoin has surged to a 50-day high, briefly climbing above $97,000 in recent trading sessions amid escalating geopolitical tensions between the US and Iran.

This rally, which began around January 13, 2026, pushed BTC past key resistance levels not seen since mid-November 2025, with prices hovering around $96,000–$97,000 as of January 15, 2026. The price action aligns with reports of Bitcoin reaching this milestone as investors sought “haven” or alternative assets during uncertainty.

The US State Department issued urgent warnings for American citizens to leave Iran immediately and prepare for potential prolonged communication outages, amid ongoing mass protests in Iran and hardening rhetoric from Washington.

Fears of broader regional conflict potentially involving military action have prompted some to view Bitcoin as a hedge outside traditional government-controlled systems. Iranian-backed groups have issued threats, and US officials have reportedly weighed strike options, though no direct conflict has erupted yet.

Steady US inflation data has eased concerns over aggressive rate hikes, boosting risk-on sentiment in crypto markets. Institutional and whale accumulation has outpaced retail selling in some analyses, with Bitcoin ETFs seeing strong inflows recently.

This move reflects Bitcoin’s occasional role as a “geopolitical hedge” during crises, similar to patterns seen in past global tensions. However, crypto remains highly volatile—prices could face pullbacks if de-escalation occurs or if risk-off sentiment dominates broader markets.

As of mid-January 2026, Bitcoin trades in the high $96,000s, up roughly 1–2% in the last 24 hours across sources, with traders eyeing $100,000 as the next psychological target if momentum holds.

Bitcoin’s historical performance during major crises has been mixed, often showing short-term volatility and correlation with broader risk assets like stocks rather than consistent “safe-haven” behavior like gold.

While Bitcoin is sometimes called “digital gold” due to its fixed supply and decentralization, empirical evidence reveals it frequently behaves more like a high-risk asset in acute downturns, with sharp drops followed by strong recoveries in many cases.

Bitcoin experienced one of its most severe drawdowns, plunging over 50% in a single day on March 12–13, dropping from around $7,900–$8,000 to a low near $3,800–$4,000. This mirrored the global stock market panic, S&P 500 fell sharply, disproving early claims of it being a reliable safe haven during liquidity crises.

However, BTC rebounded aggressively, recovering to $10,000 by May 2020 and eventually surging to new all-time highs above $60,000 by early 2021 and much higher in later cycles. The crash highlighted Bitcoin’s risk-on nature in forced liquidations but also its resilience in post-crisis environments fueled by stimulus and monetary easing.

Russia-Ukraine War 

Bitcoin initially dropped significantly around 7–16% in the first days of the invasion, falling to lows near $34,000 amid broader risk-off sentiment. It later saw temporary surges up to 16–20% in early March of 2022 as some viewed it as a hedge against sanctions or capital flight in Russia and Ukraine.

It correlated with stocks during the initial shock but recovered strongly over months, rising from post-crash levels to new highs by late 2024/early 2025. Studies note increased trading volume and use in affected regions, but Bitcoin did not consistently act as a strong safe haven—often amplifying volatility instead.

US-Iran Tensions, Soleimani Assassination in  January 2020

Bitcoin surged notably, rising from around $7,000 to over $8,500 roughly 20%+ in the days following the event, as investors sought non-sovereign assets amid fears of escalation. This aligned with a brief “geopolitical hedge” narrative, similar to gold’s reaction, though the move faded as tensions de-escalated.

Analyses of dozens of geopolitical events like Israel-Gaza/Hezbollah conflicts, Iran-Israel escalations in 2024–2025, Russia-Ukraine ongoing show a common pattern. Often sharp sell-offs or high volatility e.g., 8–16% drops in some Iran-Israel flare-ups, with Bitcoin behaving like a risk asset.

Frequent recoveries and outperformance, sometimes rising above pre-crisis levels within weeks/months. For instance, in several 2023–2025 Middle East conflicts, Bitcoin stabilized or rebounded quickly, aided by institutional inflows.

Compared to gold: Gold often outperforms in medium-term horizons e.g., stronger in ~62% of events over 90 days, while Bitcoin shows higher average long-term returns but greater downside risk.

Bitcoin does not reliably act as a strong safe haven during the acute phase of crises—especially liquidity-driven ones like March 2020—where it tends to correlate positively with equities and suffer amplified drops.

However, it has demonstrated hedge-like qualities in specific geopolitical scenarios e.g., sanctions evasion, currency controls in affected countries and often excels as a “recovery asset” post-shock, driven by factors like monetary stimulus, institutional adoption, and its narrative as an alternative to fiat systems.

Recent patterns suggest growing institutional buffering via ETFs may reduce downside severity compared to earlier eras, but volatility remains high. With ongoing tensions, Bitcoin’s rally to 50-day highs reflects this evolving “geopolitical hedge” role in uncertain times—though always monitor live conditions, as crypto can shift rapidly.

Trump’s 10% Credit Card Rate Cap Proposal Splits Corporate America, Exposing Fault Lines in Consumer Finance

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

President Donald Trump’s call for a one-year cap of 10% on credit card interest rates has evolved into more than a policy soundbite. It is now a flashpoint that exposes long-standing tensions in the U.S. consumer finance system, pitting banks and card issuers against fintech executives and consumer advocates, while raising questions about how far government should go in reshaping private markets.

Trump framed the proposal as a response to what he described as excessive borrowing costs, arguing on Truth Social that Americans are being “ripped off” by rates that can climb into the 20% and 30% range. Although Congress would need to legislate any such cap, the idea has already unsettled financial markets and boardrooms because it strikes at one of the most profitable segments of retail banking.

For large banks, credit cards are not only a lending product but a cornerstone of broader customer relationships, driving deposits, payments, and loyalty. Executives from JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America, and others have been unusually direct in warning that a blunt interest rate ceiling would undermine the economics of that system. Their central argument is that higher rates subsidize risk. Remove that pricing flexibility, they say, and lenders will respond by tightening approval standards, shrinking credit limits, or exiting parts of the market altogether.

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chief executive, captured that concern when he told investors that sharply lower rates could hurt customers with weaker credit profiles most, because banks would be less willing to lend to them at all. Citi’s finance chief Mark Mason went further, warning that a cap could have a “very negative impact on the economy,” not just on banks, by constricting consumer spending at a time when growth remains uneven.

The airline industry has also sounded the alarm, underscoring how intertwined credit cards have become with sectors far beyond banking. Delta Air Lines chief executive Ed Bastian said a 10% cap would “upend the whole credit card industry,” highlighting the risk to co-branded card partnerships that generate billions of dollars annually through rewards programs and interchange fees. Those partnerships, particularly with American Express, are a major source of predictable cash flow for airlines.

Yet the pushback from incumbents has been met by an equally forceful counter-narrative from parts of the fintech world. Klarna chief executive Sebastian Siemiatkowski has emerged as one of the most vocal supporters of Trump’s idea, arguing that the traditional credit card model is designed to encourage persistent debt at high interest rates. In his view, the system disproportionately penalizes lower-income borrowers while rewarding wealthier users who pay off balances monthly and collect perks such as cash back and airline miles.

Siemiatkowski’s support reflects a broader critique that has gained traction in recent years: that credit card rewards are effectively cross-subsidized by borrowers who carry balances, often at punitive rates. From that perspective, a cap is not just a consumer protection measure but a corrective to what supporters see as a structurally unfair market.

Other executives see opportunity rather than threat. SoFi chief executive Anthony Noto suggested that if traditional card lending contracts are under a rate cap, alternative products such as personal loans could fill the gap. His comments point to a likely second-order effect of any cap: credit demand would not disappear, but could migrate to different forms, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape in consumer lending.

Critics of the proposal warn that this migration could be dangerous. Bill Ackman, the billionaire head of Pershing Square, argued that restricting rates would push some borrowers out of regulated credit markets entirely, increasing reliance on informal or higher-cost options. While he acknowledged Trump’s stated goal of lowering borrowing costs, Ackman said structural reforms to encourage competition and innovation would be more effective than price controls.

The debate also carries political and historical echoes. Interest rate caps have surfaced repeatedly in U.S. policy discussions, particularly during periods of high inflation or public frustration with banks, but they have rarely advanced far in Congress. Opponents often cite lessons from state-level usury laws and international examples, arguing that strict caps tend to reduce credit availability rather than make borrowing cheaper overall.

What makes Trump’s proposal notable is not just the policy itself, but the signal it sends. It aligns with a broader pattern of his administration, showing greater willingness to challenge entrenched corporate interests, even in sectors traditionally aligned with free-market orthodoxy. Whether the proposal is ultimately enacted or not, it has already forced a public reckoning over who benefits from the current credit card system and who bears its costs.

The central tension has so far remained unresolved, even as lawmakers weigh the idea. Supporters argue that unchecked interest rates amount to consumer exploitation. Opponents counter that credit, by its nature, must be priced for risk, and that blunt intervention could do more harm than good.

BlockDAG’s Fast-Approaching Presale Deadline and 16.67× ROI Potential Draw Traders’ Attention! XRP & DOGE Show Rally

By
TI Partners
-
0

Several trends are shaping the crypto space at the moment. The Dogecoin price continues to push higher, with many market watchers suggesting the move could stretch into 2026. At the same time, the XRP price has slipped by 5.52%, raising fresh questions about its short-term direction.

At the center of attention, however, is BlockDAG (BDAG). Many now see it as the best crypto to buy today, especially after the project confirmed agreements with 20 well-known exchanges, including MEXC, BitMart, and Coinstore. This level of preparation before trading begins has made BlockDAG stand out in a crowded market.

What truly matters now is timing. The presale is ending on January 26, and only about 3.1 billion coins remain at the special presale price of $0.003. Once trading begins at $0.05, that gap reflects a 16.67× upside for early buyers. There will be no deadline changes. After January 26, the $0.003 price is gone for good.

Dogecoin Price Builds Strength as Community Support Holds Firm

Recent weeks have seen the Dogecoin price continue its upward path. Analysts from Pintu Academy believe this strength could remain in place through mid-2026, driven largely by loyal community backing and positive sentiment around the original meme coin. That support keeps interest alive even during slower market phases.

Still, the Dogecoin price has a history of sharp swings. Online chatter, high-profile mentions, and fast-moving traders can quickly push prices up or down. While many everyday buyers feel confident about Dogecoin, there are no major upgrades or new use cases expected soon.

Because of this, Dogecoin’s future depends more on ongoing excitement than on technical progress. This makes long-term forecasting difficult, as the Dogecoin price often reacts more to trends and mood shifts than to concrete changes or added features.

XRP Price Slips as Selling Pressure Weighs on Short-Term Outlook

According to the Traders Union, the XRP price recently dropped by 5.52%. This move reflects market hesitation and some profit-taking after earlier gains. Even with Ripple’s legal matters with the SEC now resolved, the XRP price continues to face resistance at higher levels.

Institutional activity and bank adoption still play a major role in how XRP trades. The network already supports global payments and has real-world usage, which gives it a level of stability many newer coins lack. However, current trading data suggests buyers are cautious.

Experts often note that XRP behaves more like a steady asset during uncertain periods. While this can limit downside risk, it also reduces the chance of sudden large price jumps. As a result, the XRP price is showing controlled moves rather than signs of a rapid breakout.

BlockDAG’s 20 Exchange Agreements Reshape Presale Expectations

Unlike many presales that rely on future promises, BlockDAG has secured signed agreements. The project has confirmed access to 20 exchanges ahead of trading, including MEXC, BitMart, Coinstore, LBank, and XT.com, with additional platforms expected after the presale closes.

This setup means buyers will not face long waiting periods to access their coins. When trading begins, activity will open across multiple platforms at the same time. Broad exchange coverage helps reduce price control by a single venue and supports fair price discovery from the start, which strengthens BlockDAG’s case as the best crypto to buy today.

Interest levels back this up. BlockDAG has raised over $443 million so far, attracted more than 312,000 holders, sold over 20,000 mining rigs, and onboarded more than 3.5 million users through its X1 app. With only around 3.1 billion coins left in the current presale batch, the January 26 deadline is approaching fast.

At present, BlockDAG is available at a special presale price of $0.003 in Batch 35. The confirmed trading price is set at $0.05, creating a clear 16.67× difference, equal to a potential 1,566% rise. This figure is fixed, not estimated, and applies only before the presale ends.

Missing this window means missing the price entirely. Once the presale finishes on January 26, the $0.003 level will never return. Buyers are moving quickly, aware that there are no extensions, no resets, and no second chances once the countdown ends.

Which Is the Best Crypto to Buy Today Right Now?

In 2026, the crypto market is offering several paths, each with its own risks and rewards. The Dogecoin price may continue to rise, but it remains heavily driven by hype. The XRP price benefits from legal clarity, yet repeated resistance levels limit its upside.

For those focused on the best crypto to buy today, BlockDAG presents a different picture. With 20 confirmed exchange agreements, including MEXC, BitMart, and Coinstore, access will be immediate once trading begins. More than $443 million raised and over 312,000 holders point to growing demand.

The calculation is straightforward. A $0.003 presale price compared to a $0.05 trading price equals a 16.67× difference. With only about 3.1 billion coins remaining and the presale ending on January 26, buyers who see this opportunity are acting before the window closes permanently.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

1...212223...8,080Page 22 of 8,080

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy