DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3761

Crypto Industry cautious on new EU AML rules

0

The European Union has reached a provisional agreement on new anti-money laundering (AML) rules that will affect the crypto industry. The new rules, which are part of the AML/CFT package proposed by the European Commission in July 2021, aim to enhance the EU’s ability to prevent and combat money laundering and terrorist financing, as well as to ensure a level playing field for all actors in the financial sector.

The crypto industry has cautiously welcomed the agreement, which is expected to be formally adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU in the coming months. The agreement introduces a number of changes to the existing AML framework, such as:

Creating a new EU-level authority, the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), that will supervise and coordinate national AML authorities and have direct supervisory powers over some high-risk entities.

Extending the scope of AML rules to cover all crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), such as exchanges, wallets, custodians, brokers, and issuers of crypto-assets. CASPs will have to register with AMLA or a national authority and comply with customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and reporting obligations.

Establishing a single EU-wide list of high-risk third countries that pose a threat to the EU’s financial system and imposing enhanced due diligence measures on transactions involving those countries.

Harmonizing the rules on beneficial ownership registers, which will require all legal entities and trusts to disclose their ultimate owners and make this information accessible to the public.

Introducing a limit of 10,000 euros for large cash payments, which will apply to both professional and non-professional transactions.

The crypto industry has expressed support for the EU’s efforts to create a clear and harmonized regulatory framework for crypto assets, which could foster innovation, competition, and consumer protection. However, some industry representatives have also raised concerns about the potential impact of the new rules on privacy, innovation, and competitiveness.

For instance, some CASPs have argued that applying the same AML rules as traditional financial institutions could undermine the privacy and security of crypto users, as well as create excessive compliance costs and barriers to entry for smaller players. Some CASPs have also questioned the feasibility and effectiveness of applying AML rules to decentralized platforms and protocols that operate without intermediaries or central authorities.

Moreover, some industry experts have warned that the new rules could create regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty in the global crypto market, as different jurisdictions may adopt different approaches to AML regulation. They have called for more international cooperation and coordination among regulators to ensure a consistent and balanced approach that respects the global nature of crypto assets.

The agreement on the new EU AML rules is a significant milestone for the crypto industry, as it signals the EU’s recognition of crypto assets as a legitimate and important part of the financial system. However, it also poses significant challenges and opportunities for CASPs and crypto users, who will have to adapt to the new regulatory environment and ensure compliance with the new rules.

The final outcome of the agreement will depend on how it is implemented and enforced by AMLA and national authorities, as well as how it interacts with other existing or upcoming regulations on crypto assets in the EU and beyond.

US stock futures rise early Monday after the S&P 500 hit a record high Friday

US stock futures rose early Monday after the S&P 500 hit a record high Friday 19th January 2024. The positive momentum was driven by strong earnings reports, easing inflation fears and optimism about the economic recovery from the pandemic.

The S&P 500 futures gained 0.4%, indicating a higher open for the benchmark index, which closed at an all-time high of 5,321.67 on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures also rose 0.4%, while the Nasdaq 100 futures advanced 0.5%.

The earnings season kicked off last week with some of the biggest banks and tech companies reporting better-than-expected results. According to FactSet, more than 80% of the S&P 500 companies that have reported so far have beaten analysts’ estimates. The blended earnings growth rate for the fourth quarter of 2023 is now 25.2%, up from 21.7% at the end of December.

Investors also shrugged off the latest inflation data, which showed that consumer prices rose 6.8% year-over-year in December, the highest since 1982. The core inflation, which excludes food and energy, rose 4.9%, the highest since 1991. However, many analysts and policymakers believe that inflation is transitory and will ease as supply chain bottlenecks and labor shortages are resolved.

Meanwhile, the economic outlook remains bright as the Omicron variant of the coronavirus appears to be less severe and more people get vaccinated and boosted. The U.S. added 199,000 jobs in December, below expectations but still enough to push the unemployment rate down to 3.9%, the lowest since February 2020. Consumer confidence rebounded in January, reaching the highest level since July.

The market will be watching for more earnings reports this week, as well as some key economic data, such as housing starts, existing home sales and leading indicators. The Federal Reserve will also hold its first policy meeting of the year on Tuesday and Wednesday, where it is expected to announce a faster tapering of its bond-buying program and signal a possible interest rate hike in March.

On the positive side, inflation can boost corporate revenues and earnings, as companies can charge higher prices for their products and services. This can increase their stock prices and dividends, benefiting shareholders. Inflation can also stimulate economic growth and consumer spending, which can drive up the demand for stocks.

On the negative side, inflation can increase the cost of production and operation for companies, reducing their profit margins and cash flows. This can lower their stock prices and dividends, hurting shareholders. Inflation can also increase the interest rates and the cost of borrowing, making it harder for companies to finance their projects and expand their businesses. This can reduce their growth potential and future earnings, weighing on their stock valuations.

Therefore, the impact of inflation on stocks depends on the magnitude, duration, and source of inflation, as well as the industry, sector, and company-specific factors. Some stocks may perform better than others in an inflationary environment, depending on their ability to pass on the higher costs to customers, maintain or increase their market share, and hedge against inflation risks.

Generally speaking, stocks that have strong pricing power, stable demand, low debt levels, and high dividend yields tend to do well in inflationary periods, while stocks that have weak pricing power, cyclical demand, high debt levels, and low dividend yields tend to struggle in inflationary periods.

ARK swaps another $15M of BITO as $1.5B flows out of GBTC with more to come- JPMorgan

0

ARK Invest, the investment firm led by Cathie Wood, has swapped another $15 million worth of shares in the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) for its own ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) on Friday, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This is the second time that ARK has made such a move, after swapping $20 million of BITO for ARKB on Wednesday. The firm now holds about $35 million of ARKB, which is the first actively managed bitcoin ETF in the US.

ARKB, which launched on January 10, aims to provide exposure to bitcoin by investing in bitcoin futures contracts and other bitcoin-related instruments. The fund charges a 0.95% expense ratio and has an initial target allocation of 60% bitcoin futures and 40% Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC).

BITO, on the other hand, is a passive ETF that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate, a benchmark that reflects the price of bitcoin based on spot and futures markets. BITO charges a 0.95% expense ratio and invests solely in bitcoin futures contracts.

By swapping BITO for ARKB, ARK is betting on the superior performance of its own fund, which has more flexibility and diversification than BITO. ARK also believes that ARKB will benefit from the growing adoption and innovation in the bitcoin ecosystem, as well as the potential approval of a spot bitcoin ETF in the future.

ARK is one of the most prominent and influential investors in the crypto space, with over $1 billion worth of GBTC and over $300 million worth of Coinbase (COIN) shares across its various funds. The firm also holds stakes in several crypto-related companies, such as Square (SQ), PayPal (PYPL), Robinhood (HOOD), and Twitter (TWTR).

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) is one of the most popular ways for investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin without having to buy and store the cryptocurrency themselves. However, the trust has been underperforming the price of Bitcoin in recent months, leading to a large discount in its shares compared to the underlying asset value. This has prompted some investors to sell their GBTC shares and seek other avenues to invest in Bitcoin, such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or spot markets.

According to a report by JPMorgan, the outflows from GBTC have been significant and could continue in the near future. The report estimates that about $1.5 billion worth of GBTC shares have been sold since mid-November 2021, representing about 9% of the total assets under management (AUM) of the trust. The report also suggests that the outflows could accelerate as more GBTC shares become unlocked and eligible for sale in the coming weeks.

The main reason for the GBTC discount is the lack of an arbitrage mechanism that would allow investors to buy GBTC shares at a discount and redeem them for Bitcoin at a premium, thus narrowing the gap between the two prices. However, GBTC does not offer such a redemption option, and instead relies on periodic creations of new shares by accredited investors who depo1sit Bitcoin into the trust. These investors have to wait for six months before they can sell their GBTC shares on the secondary market, creating a supply and demand imbalance that affects the price.

The report argues that the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs in the US could provide a more efficient and liquid alternative for investors who want to access Bitcoin through a regulated vehicle. The report notes that several Bitcoin ETF applications are pending approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and that some of them could launch as early as February 2022. The report expects that these ETFs would trade at a much smaller premium or discount than GBTC and would also offer a redemption option that would allow investors to exchange their ETF shares for Bitcoin or cash.

The report concludes that the outlook for GBTC is challenging, and that its AUM could decline further as more investors switch to other Bitcoin products. The report also warns that the GBTC discount could have a negative impact on the price of Bitcoin itself, as it reduces the demand for the cryptocurrency from institutional investors who use GBTC as a proxy.

Mark Zuckerberg’s GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) flex

0

Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of Facebook, recently posted a photo of his personal computer setup on Instagram. The photo showed a sleek and minimalist desk with a large monitor, a keyboard, a mouse, and a pair of headphones. But what caught the attention of many tech enthusiasts was the massive GPU (graphics processing unit) that was visible behind the monitor.

A GPU is a specialized chip that handles graphics-intensive tasks such as rendering images, videos, and games. GPUs are also used for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications, such as facial recognition and natural language processing. GPUs are usually installed inside the computer case, but Zuckerberg’s GPU was mounted externally on a stand, presumably to showcase its size and power.

Zuckerberg did not reveal the exact model of his GPU, but some speculated that it could be the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090, which is one of the most powerful and expensive GPUs on the market. The RTX 3090 has 24 GB of memory and can deliver up to 36 teraflops of performance, which is equivalent to 36 trillion floating-point operations per second. The RTX 3090 costs around $1,500 and is often sold out due to high demand.

Zuckerberg’s GPU flex was interpreted by some as a sign of his passion for technology and innovation, as well as his involvement in Facebook’s research and development projects. Facebook owns Oculus, a leading virtual reality company, and also invests in artificial intelligence and augmented reality technologies. Zuckerberg has said that he wants to create a “metaverse”, which is a shared virtual environment where people can interact with each other and digital content.

The metaverse is not a new concept. It was first coined by sci-fi author Neal Stephenson in his 1992 novel Snow Crash and has since been explored by various media and entertainment franchises, such as Ready Player One, The Matrix, and Fortnite. However, Zuckerberg believes that the metaverse is more than just a fictional or gaming scenario. He sees it as the next evolution of the internet, where instead of browsing web pages or watching videos, people can immerse themselves in interactive and immersive experiences that span the physical and digital worlds.

According to Zuckerberg, the metaverse will enable new forms of social connection, entertainment, education, work, commerce, and creativity. He envisions a future where people can teleport to different virtual locations, such as a friend’s living room, a concert hall, or a classroom, using VR headsets or AR glasses.

They can also create and customize their own avatars, express themselves with gestures and emotions, and interact with realistic simulations of objects and environments. Moreover, they can access the metaverse from any device, whether it’s a smartphone, a tablet, a PC, or a console, and seamlessly switch between them.

To realize this ambitious vision, Facebook is not only developing its own hardware and software products, such as the Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, the Horizon social VR platform, and the Spark AR Studio for creating AR effects. It is also collaborating with other companies and developers to create an open and interoperable metaverse ecosystem.

For instance, Facebook recently announced a partnership with Ray-Ban to launch smart glasses that can capture photos and videos. It also joined forces with Microsoft to form the XR Association, an industry group that promotes responsible development and adoption of VR and AR technologies.

Facebook’s metaverse initiative is not without challenges and controversies. Some critics have raised concerns about the potential privacy, security, ethical, and social implications of creating a virtual world that is controlled by a single company that has a history of data breaches and antitrust issues.

Others have questioned the feasibility and desirability of the metaverse itself, arguing that it could create more isolation, addiction, and inequality among users. Furthermore, Facebook faces fierce competition from other tech companies that are also pursuing their own versions of the metaverse, such as Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon, and Epic Games.

Despite these hurdles, Facebook is determined to make the metaverse a reality. The company recently announced that it will create a new product team dedicated to building the metaverse platform. It also plans to invest at least $10 billion this year in its VR and AR businesses. Zuckerberg has said that he expects the metaverse to reach a billion users in the next decade. Whether or not Facebook will succeed in creating the ultimate virtual world remains to be seen.

However, Zuckerberg’s GPU flex also drew some criticism from those who questioned his motives and ethics. Some accused him of flaunting his wealth and privilege, especially during a time when many people are struggling financially due to the pandemic.

Others pointed out the environmental impact of using such a powerful GPU, which consumes a lot of electricity and generates a lot of heat. Some also argued that Zuckerberg should focus more on addressing the social and political issues that Facebook has been involved in, such as misinformation, hate speech, privacy breaches, and antitrust lawsuits.

Zuckerberg’s GPU flex was a simple photo that sparked a lot of reactions and discussions online. It showed how much technology has advanced and how much influence Facebook has in the world. It also revealed how people have different opinions and perspectives on Zuckerberg’s personality and leadership.

What is Self-Sovereign Identity?

0

Self-sovereign identity (SSI) is a concept that aims to give individuals full control over their digital identities, without relying on intermediaries or centralized authorities. SSI advocates argue that this approach can enhance privacy, security, and autonomy for users, as well as foster innovation and interoperability in the digital identity ecosystem.

However, SSI is not a silver bullet that can solve all the challenges and risks associated with digital identity. In fact, SSI may introduce new problems or exacerbate existing ones, if not implemented carefully and responsibly. I will discuss some of the limitations and pitfalls of SSI, and why it is not enough to ensure a fair and inclusive digital identity for all.

SSI does not guarantee verifiability or trustworthiness.

One of the main benefits of SSI is that it allows users to create and manage their own identity credentials, without depending on third-party issuers or validators. This can reduce the costs and friction of obtaining and using identity proofs, as well as protect users from identity theft or fraud.

However, this also means that SSI does not guarantee the verifiability or trustworthiness of the credentials. Users may create fake or misleading credentials or use them in inappropriate contexts. For example, a user may create a credential that claims to be a doctor but has no valid certification or license. Or a user may use a credential that proves their age, but not their nationality, to access a service that requires both.

Therefore, SSI requires a mechanism to ensure that the credentials are authentic, accurate, and relevant for the purpose they are used for. This may involve verifying the source and quality of the data, checking the validity and revocation status of the credentials, and establishing the trustworthiness of the issuers and holders. These tasks may require additional infrastructure, standards, and governance models, which may undermine the decentralization and self-sovereignty of SSI.

SSI does not ensure consent or data minimization.

Another benefit of SSI is that it enables users to control what data they share with whom, and for what purpose. SSI advocates claim that this can enhance the consent and data minimization principles of data protection, by allowing users to share only the necessary and relevant data for each transaction.

However, SSI does not ensure that users actually understand and exercise their consent and data minimization rights. Users may face challenges in managing their credentials, such as storing them securely, updating them regularly, and revoking them when needed.

Users may also lack the knowledge or skills to evaluate the risks and benefits of sharing their data, or to negotiate the terms and conditions of data sharing. Moreover, users may face pressure or coercion from service providers or other parties to share more data than necessary, or to accept unfavorable terms of service.

Therefore, SSI requires a mechanism to support users in making informed and autonomous decisions about their data sharing. This may involve providing clear and accessible information about the data requests and the consequences of accepting or rejecting them, offering meaningful choices and alternatives for data sharing, and ensuring accountability and redress for data misuse or abuse. These tasks may require additional education, guidance, and regulation, which may increase the complexity and burden of SSI.

SSI does not address social or ethical implications.

A final benefit of SSI is that it empowers users to express their identity in diverse and flexible ways, without being constrained by predefined categories or labels. SSI advocates suggest that this can promote social inclusion and diversity, by allowing users to self-identify with multiple and dynamic attributes that reflect their personal and contextual identities.

However, SSI does not address the social or ethical implications of self-identifying with certain attributes or groups. Users may face discrimination or exclusion based on their identity claims or be denied access to essential services or rights that depend on certain identity attributes.

For example, a user may self-identify as a refugee, but be rejected by a host country that requires official documentation. Or a user may self-identify as a woman but be excluded from a women-only space that requires biological verification.

Therefore, SSI requires a mechanism to balance the individual’s right to self-identify with the collective’s right to define membership and access criteria. This may involve respecting the diversity and fluidity of identity expressions, while also recognizing the legitimacy and authority of certain identity proofs. These tasks may require additional dialogue, collaboration, and compromise among different stakeholders,
which may challenge the self-sovereignty of SSI.

Kenyan Agtech Shamba Pride Announces $3.7M in Funding Round to Expand Its Merchant Network

0

Kenyan agriculture technology startup, Shamba Pride, has announced that it has secured the sum of $3.7 million in a debt-equity pre-series A funding round, to expand its merchant network.

The funding round saw investment from EDFI AgriFI (the EU Agriculture Financing Initiative) and Seedstars Africa Ventures. The investment is broken down to a $2 million long-term loan from EDFI Agrifi and $1.7 million in equity from Seedstars Africa Ventures.

With the recent funding, Shamba Pride plans to use it to further its expansion within Kenya, reaching more retailers and agricultural areas. Also, the startup aims to penetrate markets in Zambia, Tanzania, and Uganda, to address challenges in the agricultural supply chain.

Speaking on the funding round, the general partner at SAV, Maxime Bouan said,

“Shamba Pride’s success is based on innovations that facilitate day-to-day farming activities. We’ve been proud to support a scalable model which creates additional revenues for farmers and agro vets (agro-dealers) and strongly contributes to successful women entrepreneurship”.

Also speaking on the startup mission, Shamba Pride founder and CEO Samuel Munguti said,

Agriculture distribution in rural communities is heavily controlled by agro-dealers who decide how farmers access inputs, services, and training. We are empowering these agro-dealers by giving them the right tools and technology for visibility of their businesses, for their professional and commercial development, and the right support for farmers around them”.

Founded by Samuel Munguti in 2016, Shamba Pride is a technology-driven company that helps farmers access high-quality farm inputs, financing, insurance, and access through an online-to-offline platform that provides tools and technology to retailers to train them to provide quality agricultural products, finance, and insurance to their farmers.

Through Shamba Pride, last-mile agro-dealers and cooperative entrepreneurs are able to digitize their operations and provide smallholder farmers with the right and affordable technology, quality products, and services, thus creating a community of smart micro-entrepreneurs serving the smallholder farmer community.

Also, the agritech extends market connections, Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) financial services, and training information to farmers via its USSD platform. It focuses majorly on small-scale farmers within Kenya’s agriculture sector.

The startup transforms the most promising stores into DigiShops, with its platform connecting last-mile stores and farmers with manufacturers of quality inputs and services, thereby addressing problems of quality and price exploitation and promoting transparent supply chain systems.

The majority of smallholder farmers depend on informal agro-dealer stores and cooperatives to access inputs and key services, which are beset by poor supply, poor management, and exploitative prices.

Shamba Pride key purpose is to economically and socially empower and elevate farming communities at the grassroots level throughout Africa.