DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4237

Nigerian Government Suspends Fuel Subsidy Removal

0

The National Economic Council, NEC, has suspended the planned removal of subsidy on petroleum products by the end of President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration.

The Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Mrs. Zainab Ahmed disclosed this while briefing State House correspondents at the end of the NEC meeting presided over by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

According to the minister, the NEC concluded in its meeting that it is not a favourable time for the action.

She stated that the Council deliberated on the matter and resolved that it cannot be removed for now, but it equally agreed on the need to continue the discussion on the matter and the necessary preparatory work in conjunction with states and representatives of the incoming administration.

Mrs Zainab Ahmed explained that the planned subsidy removal should be due in June because the Petroleum Industry Act, PIA and the 2023 budget provided subsidy till June, hence any delay may require the amendment of the PIA and the budget provision.

She, however, noted that there was no deadline given for the subsidy removal and that the incoming administration will have to make decision on when it is possible to do so.

The Play on Transcorp at Nigerian Stock Exchange – Scene with Elumelu and Otedola

1

Hahaha – the men are “talking” and the words are “cash. cash. cash”, totally different from what Hamlet said in ages past. Lord Polonius in Shakespeare’s Hamlet would have wondered and said, “what an answer!”, hearing something better than the “words, words, words” from the mouth of Hamlet. 

The play is in the Nigerian stock exchange and the actors are Tony Elumelu (my mentor in business and a man who opened his heart to guide a village boy, and his company provided the first support which enabled my breakthrough) and Femi Otedola, a business icon. On the script, the words are “cash” and the stage is Transnational Corporation Plc (Transcorp).

Otedola  has been buying this company and was close to 6.5% – and a little more, he would become the dominant shareholder, controlling the company. But today, Elumelu, upped the game, pushing all the way to 25.58% of the company’s total shares: “The acquisition of 9,697,189,984 units of shares brings HH Capital’s total holdings in Transcorp to 9,991,173,177 units, representing 25.58% of the company’s total shares.”

Femi Otedola has taken his stake in Transcorp to 6.3%: ‘“We write to inform you that our client Femi Otedola (C4430272AP) has acquired additional unit of Transcorps shares that brings his percentage holdings with us to 5.8…Stanbic IBTC Stockbrokers Limited, in its own letter, informed Africa Prudential the energy magnate procured shares… That takes his entire holding in Transcorp to 6.3 per cent or 2.6 billion shares’.

We will wait for how Otedola will respond. Investors in Transcorp, rejoice because it will turn out good. I am liking it because I bought this company during the IPO, circa 2007, and I also got it for Ifeoma for her birthday! (village man who buys shares as birthday gifts instead of gold and silver for his wife). 

If Otedola responds with 50% interest, Elumelu may just go for the 100% and that means they will pay us a premium as ordinary investors. #louder, do not stop this play; I am liking it.

“In compliance with Chapter 17, Rule 17.13 of the NGX Issuers Rules, Transnational Corporation Plc (the Company) hereby informs the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) and the investing public of the below new acquisition of shares in the Company. With this new acquisition, HH Capital Limited now holds a total of 9,991,173,177 units, representing 25.58% of the Company’s total shares.”

US Crypto Regulation Uncertainty Is Helping Fuel Global Adoptions

0

The United States is one of the largest and most influential markets for cryptocurrencies, but it is also one of the most uncertain and unpredictable in terms of regulation. The lack of clear and consistent rules for crypto assets and services has created challenges and risks for both investors and innovators in the industry. Many crypto firms are considering moving their operations overseas, where they can find more favorable and stable regulatory environments.

One example of this trend is Binance US, the American affiliate of the world’s largest crypto exchange by volume. Binance US recently walked away from a deal to acquire the assets of Voyager Digital, a crypto broker that went bankrupt in 2022 after the collapse of Terra’s LUNA and UST tokens. Binance US cited “the hostile and uncertain regulatory climate in the United States” as the reason for terminating the agreement, which had already been approved by a bankruptcy judge but faced objections from several regulators, including the SEC, the FTC, and the CFTC.

Binance US is not alone in facing regulatory hurdles in the US. Many other crypto firms have been subject to enforcement actions, lawsuits, investigations, and fines from various federal and state agencies. Some of these cases have raised questions about the jurisdiction and authority of different regulators over crypto activities, as well as the applicability and interpretation of existing laws and regulations to new and emerging technologies.

In contrast to the US, some other countries have taken a more proactive and supportive approach to crypto regulation. The European Union, for instance, has proposed a comprehensive framework for crypto assets and services, known as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), which aims to harmonize and clarify the rules across the bloc. MiCA is expected to be published in the Official Journal of the EU this summer and take effect by late 2024. The EU hopes that MiCA will foster innovation, competition, and consumer protection in the crypto sector.

The regulatory divergence between the US and other jurisdictions could have significant implications for the global adoption of cryptocurrencies. While some crypto enthusiasts may see the US as a hindrance to innovation and growth, others may view it as a source of legitimacy and credibility for the industry. The US still has a large and active crypto community, as well as a robust legal system and a strong tradition of entrepreneurship. However, if the US fails to provide clear and consistent guidance for crypto regulation, it may lose its competitive edge and influence in this rapidly evolving space.

It is no news that the United States of America is one of the largest and most influential markets for cryptocurrencies, but it also has one of the most complex and fragmented regulatory landscapes. Different federal agencies have different views on how to classify, regulate, and tax digital assets, creating confusion and uncertainty for crypto businesses and investors. Some crypto firms have decided to move their operations overseas, where they can find more favorable and clear rules.

However, this regulatory uncertainty may also have a positive effect on the global adoption of cryptocurrencies. As the US struggles to establish a coherent policy framework, other countries have taken the lead in developing and implementing crypto-friendly regulations. For example, countries like Singapore, Switzerland, Japan, and El Salvador have enacted laws that recognize and support various forms of digital assets, such as stablecoins, decentralized exchanges, and even Bitcoin as legal tender.

These countries are attracting more crypto innovation and investment, as well as providing more opportunities for financial inclusion and economic growth. By creating a more welcoming environment for crypto, they are also encouraging more people to use and adopt digital assets as part of their everyday lives. As a result, the global crypto market is becoming more diverse, resilient, and competitive.

The US may eventually catch up with its peers and establish a clear and consistent crypto policy that balances innovation and regulation. However, until then, its regulatory uncertainty may continue to drive more crypto activity and adoption around the world.

Free Services and Advertising Revenues –  Dr Yasam Ayavefe

0

The ubiquitous advertising on most Internet sites can be considered a special case of exploiting network effects by sites that offer it.

Indeed, the value of the service for consumers depends on the amount of advertising. The value of an ad depends on the number of users who will see it. This corresponds to the idea of ??the indirect network effect.

An example of a site that uses ad revenue in this way is Buy, an online supermarket that offers discounted items such as computers, software, books, videos, travel, and music.

This site encourages its use as an advertising tool, allowing it to offer discounts to consumers.

Advertising on the Internet can be tailored to the customer’s purchasing behavior. Such a strategy cannot be used as effectively as in traditional discount supermarkets.

Because each new subscriber to a site generates ad revenue, subscribers can switch from customer status to resource status for a site.

This may justify providing the service for free and even offering negative prices or free services to customers.

The effective cost per subscriber for the site is negative if a new subscriber brings advertising revenue even though it costs the site. In this case, the site may therefore offer “negative prices”.

The impact of ad revenue financing on site entry and profitability remains an open question. If there is competition, it will tend to wipe out profits and pass on the benefit of advertising revenue to consumers. Therefore, its impact on company profit is uncertain.

It depends on the link between audience and ad revenue. Advertising finance offers a kind of economies of scale, especially when ad revenues are very sensitive to the audience. (revenue per listener increases with audience size)

In this case, the net unit cost of ad revenue per subscriber decreases with the viewership. A market that can compete without advertising financing may be highly concentrated because of this financing alone.

The second point is that on a theoretical level, advertising revenue and financing problems are very similar to product quality selection problems. From the point of view of a site’s users, advertisements are one of the features of the service provided, the value of which can be positive or negative.

This is actually a dimension of service quality. As long as one interprets the value of income as negative (opportunity) cost, one obtains a quality model.

The ad can take a vertical (screen footprint) and horizontal (related products) size. Accordingly, the traditional consequences of quality choices should be looked at.

Particularly those related to product differentiation need to be expanded to a certain extent, with advertising choices serving as differentiation tools.

The difference is that the advertising medium is much more flexible than other quality choices, and vertical and horizontal dimensions are intertwined on the internet.

Some sites offer paid services with little or no ads, while others offer free services with ads. This corresponds to more vertical differentiation.

A horizontal dimension appears when sites target specific categories of users by selecting appropriate ads for them.

One of the innovations is the customization of services. With sponsorship opportunities, each user can be individually targeted with ads for special interests.

The horizontal and vertical distinction may later turn out to be irrelevant. Instead, advertising becomes an instrument of affirmative action. So, discrimination is not a priority.

It is clear that the role of web advertising is still evolving. We can expect to see innovations in this area. An open question is the capacity of such resources to finance the long-term development of activities on the Internet.

As a matter of fact, if we collect all revenues at the sector level, the financing of Internet advertising. must come from the revenues that this industry can generate because of the value of goods and services offered to individuals or companies.

Conclusion

In this article, we have examined a few economic phenomena that stand out in particular when it comes to the use of the Internet as a tool for business activities. It is difficult to summarize an entire article that attempts to change perspectives on a single phenomenon.

The evolution of these economic exchanges is found in other areas of activity (increasing returns, reputation, loyalty, network effects, etc.). But it includes phenomena that take on a new dimension here.

For this reason, we will content ourselves with repeating that although the existing literature offers important lessons, there are many theoretical studies to be done on this subject.

These studies should focus on the role of intermediaries and field certification companies in managing information flows.

At the same time, this article primarily focuses on lessons to be learned from current studies in economics.

The development of the Internet depends on the lessons of economic literature such as community sites or free software. It is also clear that it gives rise to new phenomena and forms of organization. So, there’s also a whole new area of ??research under construction. 

 

Find out more about Dr. Ayavefe and his work here:

https://yasamayavefe.com/

https://milayacapital.com/

Samsung Records $3.4 Billion Loss in The First Quarter as Chip Demand Slumps

0

Giant tech company Samsung recorded a $3.4 billion loss in its first quarter report following the slump in the demand for microchips, which often generate about half of its profits.

The South Korean company which reported its worst quarterly profits in 14 years, disclosed that its operating profit fell 640 billion ($478.6 million) down from 95 percent from a year earlier. The company’s chip division reported 4.58 trillion won in losses, its first operating loss since 2008.

Samsung said in a statement, “The slump in the Microchip division was due to continued price declines and an increased valuation loss, amid weakening sentiment and continued impacts of inventory adjustments by customers caused by prolonged external uncertainties.”

Samsung’s first-quarter net income fell 86.1 percent to 1.57 trillion won, and sales dropped 18 percent to 63.75 trillion won. It stated that overall consumer spending slowed amid the uncertain global macroeconomic environment.

Samsung’s first-quarter revenue decline is the third consecutive margin squeeze, which saw a 70 percent fall in operating profits in the fourth quarter-on-year. The South Korean giant tech company has for a long time enjoyed record profits in recent years as prices for its products soared, unfortunately, the global economic slowdown has dealt a blow to memory sales.

While increased sales in its new flagship mobile device Galaxy S23, helped offset deficits in the chip sector in the first quarter (Q1), analysts predict that from April to July, the company would experience the worst first profit loss since 2008. Samsung is focusing on profit rather than shipments as it meets more resilient demand for premium smartphones rather than volume. The tech giant has forecasted that the smartphone market would increase in both shipment and revenue.

Despite the decline in profits in its chip division, Samsung has remained committed to pushing forward after it unveiled that its investment in memory chips this year will be similar to last year because it is seeking to safeguard its longer-term competitiveness.

The company revealed plans to contribute $227 billion over the next two decades to building the world’s largest chip center in Yongin. Samsung is optimistic about its long-term outlook, noting that the proliferation of electric vehicles, artificial intelligence, and high-performance computing would fuel demand for chips.

On the other hand, shoppers around the world have slowed down on their purchases of tech devices due to the uncertain economy and surging inflation. As a result, smartphones, PCs, and server companies have run down inventories, causing chip prices to plunge by about 70 percent over the past nine months.

Samsung’s first-quarter profit has tumbled 95% from a year ago, its steepest decline since 2009, due to plummeting chip demand. The memory chips that are found in computers, phones, and a wide range of other electronics are the company’s mainstay, but after a period of high demand and stockpiling during the pandemic, buyers have pulled back amid economic uncertainty. Samsung is cutting production in line with demand, but the South Korean firm expects sales to gradually pick up in the second half of the year.

Samsung’s mobile business was a bright spot, with revenue up 22% from last quarter as customers snapped up its premium smartphone, the $1,200 S23 Ultra. (LinkedIn News)