Access to funds or financial resources constitutes a major challenge to Startups and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The inability of most Startups and SMEs to meet their financial needs through the traditional financial system such as the Banks, the Capital market and Personal savings necessitated an alternative financial system now known as Crowdfunding. Crowdfunding is an innovative social financing, mostly facilitated on the digital platform, whereby the entrepreneur raises funds for a project or venture through small contributions in the form of donation, pre-selling or pre-ordering, reward or sponsorship, debt or equity from a large number of people who may or may not have technical knowledge of the project or venture.
Though Crowdfunding is a relatively new concept in business and investment management, the practice of collecting contributions from the people towards a bigger social course dates back to history. A typical example often referenced is the platform for Sculpture of Liberty. In 1885, Joseph Pulitzer, publisher at the New York World championed a campaign requesting people to contribute financially to the erection of the great Statue in the New York City. He then chose to print the names of the contributors at the back of his newspaper. Within five months, the sum of US$102,000 was raised through the campaign, and 80 Percent of the donors were people that contributed less than $1 of the total amount. Also, the concept of Esusu in the traditional African societies provides a lofty background to the modern practice of Crowd funding.
The term Crowdfunding in the modern sense of it was introduced by Michael Sullivan, the founder of Fundavlog, an online social platform that involves simple blog funding features for projects. Sullivan defined funds from the crowd as the base on which everything else depends. Since 2007, Crowdfunding has begun to gain theoretical and technical relevance in Europe and America and has spread significantly to the developing countries. The concept became especially important after the 2008 financial crisis. In response to the challenges faced by the early-stage enterprises, business leaders began to look inward in search of an alternative means of generating funds to sustain their businesses. Thus, Crowdfunding developed as a viable option.
Crowdfunding has three major components, namely; the business enterprise, the crowd funders and the digital platform that connects funders to the enterprise. Since funds are raised mainly online, it allows entrepreneurs to circumvent the barriers of geographical location and promote the financial inclusion of all classes of people that can be reached on the internet.
Crowdfunding became popular in Nigeria in late 2015 and early 2016 when it was adopted by Startups and SMEs mostly in the agriculture and agribusiness sector. One of the early adopters of Crowdfunding in Nigeria is Farmcrowdy now Crowdyvest. Farmcrowdy and others raise funds from interested investors and use the funds to develop digital technologies that enhance the capacity of the smallholder farmers to operate optimally towards achieving increased food production and sustainable food security in the country and across the continent. Investors are rewarded with profits, interests and media mention etc.
The following are factors that impacted Crowdfunding in Nigeria:
1. Bandwagon: Since the introduction of Crowdfunding into the Nigerian corporate ecosystem, the model has been widely adopted by emerging Statups and existing SMEs. Thus, the practice became a big cash cow for most companies and the success rates of early adopters inspired the development of new businesses which focus solely on Crowdfunding as a means of finance. This led to oversaturation of the market, high likelihood of fraud and the need to regulate the market.
2. Oversubscribed Investment: Since Crowdfunding has very limited barriers to funders and mostly thrive on people’s emotions such as trust, greed and immediate gratification, many Crowdfunding platforms witnessed massive response rate of funders and therefore took in more money than they could naturally handle or manage.
3. Cash-flow Trap: The Cash flow trap entails a false consciousness that a business is doing well due to massive inflow of cash and availability of funds from increasing investment that are debt or equity-based. This kind of mindset is responsible for the lavish tendencies of most business leaders that operate the Crowdfunding model.
4. Covid-19: The Pandemic came with a great economic shock and financial crisis for most enterprises. The global supply chain downtime in the wake of the lockdown affected the operations of most of the Crowdfunding businesses, especially those in the agriculture and agribusiness sector. In the agriculture industry, much of the funds that were raised in the early Covid period could not be channelled into operation due to movement restriction. Thus, many of the affected businesses had to divert funds to other aspects of the business such as administration, adverts and PR etc. with the hope of recouping after the pandemic.
5. Crowdfunding Regulatory Policy: The Crowdfunding regulatory policy by the Security and Exchange Commission came at a very unfavourable period for most of the Crowdfunding businesses. It was a time that most businesses were barely coming out of the Covid19 shock and were expected to put up resilience and adapt to the new normal. Without proper transitioning, some of the platforms endeavoured to change their business models or move from investment to the capital market in order to circumvent the policy. But this resulted in further delays and constant defaulting by these platforms to meet investors’ expectations.
6. Poor Investment Management System: A lot of the Crowdfunding companies are self-sabotaged by poor investor relations and public communication in terms of constant engagement with investors when they have internal or external issues and the impacts of the external challenges on their process, people, technologies and products. Analysis of customers’ reviews on Google and social media reveals that some of the platforms experienced high rate of investment liquidation or investor turnover due to failure to effectively communicate challenges to investors and secure their empathy.
7. Overspending on Media: Since the digital platform is the primary medium through which funds are raised from the public, most Crowdfunding business focused too much attention and resources on the digital media, especially digital marketing and social events for social media engagement usually at the expense of the core operational activities of their businesses. Thus, it was not uncommon of Crowdfunding enterprises to sponsor shows and social media campaigns.
8. Unrealistic ROI: Due to oversaturation of the Crowdfunding ecosystem, it became expedient for Crowdfunding businesses to offer competitive returns on investments to win over potential investors or sponsors rather than considering the economics of production. Some offer as high as 50 percent returns to investors which culminated in a backlog of debts of these platforms.
9. Unspecific Investors: Crowdfunding does not have a specific investor in mind; rather it targets any individual that is willing and capable to fund a project for profits or interest as returns. However, high level of illiteracy and unfamiliarity of most of these investors with certain disruptions in the market are responsible for their lack of empathy and patience capital needed at the trying times.
10. Value-Strategy Misalignment: Studies find that there is a great gap in the value proposition of most of the Crowdfunding businesses and their strategies in achieving those values. For instance, while companies believe in positioning people to create value, they tend to pay less attention to how their people could generate profits through their portfolio. There is also an indication that companies are more interested in market, products and profits, while there is least concern for employees, public image and philosophy.
11. Ponzi/Pyramid Scheme: Many of the companies were already out of business due to unrealistic return on investment. Hence, they resorted to Ponzi scheme in settling investors which in any case only aggravated their debt backlog.
