DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 7698

South Sudan Gets International Dialing Code – It Is 211

0

South Sudan officially the Republic of South Sudan, is a landlocked country in East Africa. Its capital and largest city is Juba. South Sudan is bordered by Ethiopia to the east; Kenya to the southeast; Uganda to the south; the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the southwest; the Central African Republic to the west; and Sudan to the north.  It is youngest country on earth.

 

As they transition and integrate into the world, the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has helped by assigning them an international dialling code 211 (think of 234 for Nigeria). They have also gotten  a mobile country code (MCC) and a signalling area/network code (SANC) which helps to indicate how calls are routed.

 

The International Telecommunication Union (Union internationale des télécommunications, in French) is the specialized agency of the United Nations which is responsible for information and communication technologies. ITU coordinates the shared global use of the radio spectrum, promotes international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits, works to improve telecommunication infrastructure in the developing world and establishes worldwide standards.

Predictability of Financial Crises – The Challenge Is The Tool, Build Them And You Can Model Crises

0

We live in an era of financial crises: from the Argentine currency crises of old to the Greek debt crises. We have become so accustomed to financial crises that we may think that financial crises are random and cannot be predicted.  It is like Solomon of the Bible who thinks that there is time for everything: ‘ time to sow, time to harvest’. So, there is time for gloom, time for boom and time for burst.

 

Hell, No! Tekeida is very confident that there is no unpredictability to financial crises. The unpredictability has to do with lack of capability to look at data and make sense of it by regulators, governments and analysts. A curious look into the numbers that were coming out for years before the 2008 crash would have shown what was on the horizon. Unfortunately, people ignored them. Why? We are now a nation of Companies, and not Country. People think what is good for their bottom lines before what is good for the nation, in most cases.

 

Doubt me? Show me an analyst that remembers America when making a call on a stock or bond before he remembers his bonus? It is rare people of Earth because we live in the age of Wall Street. They always win because on good days, they enjoy the parachute and when their fail, we bail them out.  Privatize success; socialize failures. Amerigeddon!

 

In October 2006, I was shocked on the number of credit card offers I received one afternoon after coming back from school. I wondered if it was that easy, can this be sustained? It was a bubble as banks were giving credits with ease. I sent an email to friends that I was skeptical on how these banks were giving credits to people. They told me the same thing; they were getting as much offers.

 

People went on loose spending. Thank Heavens, I have been a banker and never spend on emotions. And there is nothing innovative spending what you do not have or cannot afford. But in this generation, people do it and the world was set on fire.

 

Around the same time, banks in Nigeria were involved in endless public offers. Nigerians abroad helped oversubscribed those shares because credit was too loose. In a city in Arkansas, students were buying houses and renting them while living on stipends. In Maryland, a friend bought a house on the first three months of his graduate program with the very little they were paying him as stipends.

 

The world was in a state of total lack of human capacity to call risk and access it. It was a fantasy world because the risk model was flawed as we knew it. We always get the small risk profiles right, and usually miss the very non-stochastic and big ones.  The latter comes rarely, but when they hit, it is always like a financial tsunami. You could model a loan default of 0.75%; what happens when it is 10%? If the risk model has been well developed, it is very possible that man can live without gloom, boom and burst. Yes, we can predict financial crises if the people doing this try to make it engineering. In other words, if we create the future, we can predict it as Peter Drucker noted. If the models are ahead of the risks, we can see the risks and contain them before they burst in our families.

 

As engineers, Tekedia has this understanding that the models of predictive risks used by banks are overly simplistic. The limitation of the models is the human limitation of understanding reality. Right now, how can the models understand the policy change that will affect Washington which is most likely going to be extremely Right or Left based on those that are winning in the primaries? I do not know, but I do know that America is undergoing a paradigm shift from the centre that made this nation so exciting that all humans want to come here.

 

The best risk officer is man and it is the best that can plan for risk mitigation. Models cannot do that. The simple reason is that there are many events that cannot be captured in models. Relying on them without common sense is asking for calamity.

 

The collapse of Lehman Brothers is not an ordinary event. A potential default of one EU nation will not be an ordinary event. How do you model them? What is the solution to real estate bubble in China? What happens to predictive models if North Korea wages full war with South Korea? If US or Israel attacks Iran, where is your computer model going to converge? This shows the obsolete and primitive nature of model in the financial sector. It works for the small things, but for the main and big things, it will fail flat.

 

Let the world finance do one thing: stop the over reliance on financial models, but rather have more human systems that tract events and make sense out of them in real time. Models could help them, but those models must not give us a peace of mind when the humans cannot assure us that peace. In statistics, we say that the models and human systems are mutually inclusive with the former a subset of the latter.

 

In conclusion, we recommend that all banks must have Chief De-Risk Officer (CDO). This officer will lead a team of people that will constantly attack the financial risk model to see how it behaves in real time. It will be a battle between the Chief Risk Officer (CKO) and the CDO.

 

The idea is that CDO will help discover problems before they hit the world by constantly kicking the models based on present and future events (economics, world trends, business risk exposures, etc).  As he tries to crush them, he gets more data and the CKO will use that knowledge to update the model. By doing this, we keep the failures out of families and leave them only in computers.

Forget Engineering, Be A Lawyer. Lawyers Seat On The Keg Of Money The Engineers Create

0

“All those damn-fool engineers and doctors trying to make people healthier. They should have gone to law school” Forbes Magazine, May 24, 2010

 

The engineers build devices and lawyers make damm good money out of these ideas by creating jobs for themselves. You get a situation where lawyers earn 5X the salaries of PhD engineers that create the ideas just to protect the ideas. Why not? They go to different schools before they can practice while a dropout can qualify as an engineer. Everyone is an engineer!

 

Have you ever heard of an Attorney General that is not a law school graduate? Not possible as in Africa we have all Ministers of Justice as lawyers. But for technical jobs? Forget it, a trained linguist can be a Minister of Science and Technology.

 

So they have created a big barrier of entry. The same happens in medicine. That makes me smile when people complain why kids hate maths and science. It does not pay that much. Lawyers seat on the keg of money the engineers create.

 

Enjoy this report from Forbes. Read at Forbes Magazine

The Institution That Changed Taiwan – Industrial Technology Research Institute. Can Africa Copy The Idea?

0

Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) is the government institution that changed Taiwan for good. Since it was founded in 1973, ITRI has played a major role in defining the future of Taiwan. It helped to import technology; it lead in investment in R&D; trained engineers and scientists; incubated firms and produced a league of very innovative and pragmatic startups. The legendary Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world’s biggest chip fabrication house was born of out ITRI.

 

From HTC, the cellphone company to Acer, the computer maker, Taiwan is today a respected player in the global semiconductor industry. Taiwan firms produce excess of 50% of all chips, about 70% of all computer displays and more than 90% of all portable computers, according to the Economist, May 29th, 2010. This shows the level of advancement of this nation.

 

The Industrial Technology Research Institute  is a non-profit research institute located in Taiwan under the supervision of the Republic of China Ministry of Economic Affairs. It conducts research and development in applied technologies to advance private sector growth. Founded in 1973, it gave birth to numerous key technologies now employed by the companies at the nearby Hsinchu Science Park and was instrumental in fostering the “Taiwan Miracle” and propelling Taiwan to become one of the “Four Asian Tigers”. (wikipedia)

 

ITRI is the type of vision we anticipate that Africa must have. A combination of sound education, entrepreneurship and favorable business environment will make Africa not just a player, but a leader in many technology areas within two decades. That roadmap must be articulated because other nations and continents are ramping up innovations and competitive capabilities. We need more than 10 institutions of the stature of ITRI.

Barometer Of Google – Google Health Lost To WebMD

0

 

With the arrival of Google+, we continue to evaluate some of the past Google creations and acquisitions and how they have performed. Which one was good business and which one went bad. Today, we are looking at Google MD vs Web MD. The Google MD is also Google Health.

 

Google launched  health in 2008 to get into digital medical information, yes, after WebMD and Yahoo Health.  But it was not to be. The service will be discontinued in 2012 because Google lost to WebMD.

 

Google Health is a personal health information centralization service (sometimes known as personal health record services) by Google. The service allows Google users to volunteer their health records – either manually or by logging into their accounts at partnered health services providers – into the Google Health system, thereby merging potentially separate health records into one centralized Google Health profile.
 
Volunteered information can include “health conditions, medications, allergies, and lab results”.Once entered, Google Health uses the information to provide the user with a merged health record, information on conditions, and possible interactions between drugs, conditions, and allergies.Google Health’s API is based on a subset of the Continuity of Care Record. (wikipedia)
 

On the other hand, WebMD s an American corporation which provides health information services. It was founded in 1996 by Jim Clark and Pavan Nigam as Healthscape, later Healtheon, and then acquired WebMD in 1999 to form Healtheon/WebMD. The name was later shortened to WebMD.

 

Between WebMD and Google MD, WebMD has done far better.  WebMD remains the top go place for health information online. They present realtime accurate and well curated information that Google could offer.