DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog

US-Listed ETF Trading Volume Hits a New All-Time in March 2026

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

US-listed ETF trading volume hit a new all-time high in March 2026, with reports indicating approximately $7.8 trillion in total notional volume for the month—the highest monthly figure on record.

This surpasses previous peaks, including the elevated activity seen during the March 2020 pandemic volatility period. ETF trading now represents a significant portion of overall US equity market volume often cited above 30% in recent periods, underscoring the growing dominance of ETFs in market participation.

US ETF assets reached new highs around $14.2–14.3 trillion by the end of February 2026, up substantially year-over-year. Global ETF AUM has also crossed the $20 trillion mark earlier in the year. While March trading volume was exceptional, net inflows (creations) moderated somewhat compared to January/February amid geopolitical tensions (e.g., Middle East developments).

Q1 2026 still saw strong overall flows of about $463.5 billion, putting the year on pace for potentially another record annual inflow total possibly exceeding $1.6–2 trillion. Equity ETFs led earlier in Q1 but slowed in March, while fixed income saw robust activity.

Heightened market volatility, ongoing retail and institutional adoption, rotation into international and sector ETFs, and the sheer liquidity/versatility of ETFs have fueled both volume and participation. Leveraged products, broad-market funds like those tracking the S&P 500, and even niche or active ETFs have seen heavy turnover.

This surge in trading volume reflects deeper market integration of ETFs—not just as investment vehicles but as primary tools for expressing views, hedging, and tactical allocation. It also highlights liquidity concentration: a handful of mega-ETFs often dominate daily turnover, but the overall ecosystem continues to expand with new launches.

Performance was heavily driven by surging energy and commodity prices, geopolitical tensions boosting oil/tankers/defense, and volatility in leveraged products. Many leaders were niche or leveraged funds rather than broad-market ones.

Returns can vary slightly by exact end date and source; figures below reflect reported Q1/YTD data as of late March and early April 2026. Leveraged and commodity ETFs often top lists due to amplified moves but carry significantly higher risk and volatility.

Leverage Shares 2X Long PBR Daily ETF (PBRG): ~188% — Leveraged exposure to Brazilian oil giant Petrobras. MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU): ~168% — Triple-leveraged energy/oil play. MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETNs (WTIU): ~142% — Another high-leverage energy bet.

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds (CCOM) and related commodity trusts: Extremely high returns; hundreds of percent in some commodity broad-basket or focused products, driven by oil and related futures rallies. Other notable high performers included various crude oil futures funds and energy futures products (DBE, UGA, DBO in the 60–70% range).

Energy dominated flows and performance amid rising oil prices and a rotation away from tech in parts of the quarter: Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE): Strong double-digit gains with related funds like XOP (45%) and oil services (OIH ~51% in broader energy context) performing well. iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) saw solid gains ~10% early in the year, extending with geopolitical news.

Some outperformance in areas like Japan (EWJ) and South Korea like EWY ~29% in February snapshots, continuing 2025 trends of international strength. SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and silver-related funds posted gains as safe-haven demand rose with tensions, though not at the extreme levels of energy plays. S&P 500 trackers like SPY/VOO/IVV delivered solid but more moderate returns ~15–18% in various YTD references, underperforming many sector and energy plays.

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) and growth/tech leaned higher in some periods but faced rotation pressure. Funds like Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets, VEA ~31% in longer snapshots and Total International (VXUS ~29%) showed resilience or outperformance vs. pure U.S. in parts of the period. Products like SOXL and TQQQ (UltraPro QQQ) had strong runs in volatile up periods ~39–52% in referenced data, but they amplify losses too.

Key Drivers in Q1 2026

Rising crude oil and tanker rates. Geopolitical developments like the Middle East tensions, defense spending. Energy gained flows and leadership over tech in March. Commodity volatility benefiting futures-based and leveraged ETFs. Many top performers are leveraged, inverse, or highly specialized, making them unsuitable for most long-term investors due to decay, high expense ratios, and extreme swings. Past performance doesn’t predict future results. Q1 strength in energy came amid broader market volatility.

Franklin Templeton Agrees to Acquire 250 Digital for An Undisclosed Price 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Franklin Templeton has agreed to acquire 250 Digital, a cryptocurrency investment management firm that recently spun out from the venture capital firm CoinFund. The deal includes 250 Digital’s investment team and all its liquid cryptocurrency strategies previously managed under CoinFund. Following the acquisition, Franklin Templeton will launch a new dedicated unit called Franklin Crypto.

Christopher Perkins, formerly CoinFund president, will head Franklin Crypto and Seth Ginns formerly CoinFund managing partner and head of liquid investments, will serve as Chief Investment Officer. They will work alongside Franklin Templeton’s digital assets veteran Tony Pecore. The new unit will report to Sandy Kaul, head of innovation at Franklin Templeton.

Financial terms were not disclosed. Franklin Templeton will invest in the acquired strategies. A portion of the consideration is reportedly being paid in BENJI tokens (shares of Franklin Templeton’s tokenized on-chain U.S. government money market fund, one of the first U.S.-registered funds to use blockchain for share ownership).

This makes it a notable early use of tokenized assets in an M&A transaction. The deal is expected to close in Q2 2026, subject to customary conditions and client approvals. The move expands Franklin Templeton’s digital assets capabilities; it currently has about $1.8 billion in its digital assets group, out of over $1.7 trillion in total AUM.

Franklin Crypto will focus on active, liquid crypto strategies aimed at institutional investors such as pensions, sovereign wealth funds, and other large clients. It combines crypto-native expertise from the 250 Digital team with Franklin Templeton’s global distribution network. 250 Digital was formally spun out from CoinFund in January 2026 to focus on active cryptocurrency investment management (liquid strategies), separating from CoinFund’s core venture investing activities.

Perkins and Ginns brought a mix of traditional finance experience and crypto expertise. This acquisition is part of a broader trend of traditional asset managers deepening their involvement in crypto and digital assets, especially amid evolving regulatory discussions around tokenized securities and institutional adoption.

The firm, with over $1.7 trillion in total AUM, currently manages about $1.8 billion in digital assets. The acquisition brings in active, liquid crypto strategies, a seasoned team and shifts from mostly passive exposure to active management. This positions Franklin among a small group of traditional asset managers with dedicated institutional-grade crypto teams.

Combines crypto-native expertise with Franklin’s global reach and institutional relationships, potentially accelerating growth in digital assets under Sandy Kaul. Modest near-term balance sheet impact expected. Part of the consideration uses BENJI tokens from Franklin’s tokenized on-chain U.S. government money market fund, marking an early real-world use of tokenized assets in M&A.

Franklin will also invest directly in the acquired strategies. Franklin Resources (BEN) shares saw modest gains, up to ~1.5% in pre-market trading on announcement day, reflecting investor approval of the crypto expansion. Institutions gain access to active crypto strategies beyond basic ETF exposure.

This aligns with growing intentional engagement in digital assets, offering tailored, regulated products for portfolio diversification or alpha generation in a complex asset class. The move capitalizes on a recent crypto market selloff creating a unique opportunity and favorable U.S. policy signals under the current administration, potentially easing regulatory hurdles for tokenized securities and crypto integration.

SWIFT Completes the Design Phase of its Blockchain Shared Ledger with International Banks 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

SWIFT, the global financial messaging network connecting over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries, confirmed it has completed the design phase of its blockchain-based shared ledger in collaboration with a group of international banks. The project has now moved into active development of the first Minimum Viable Product (MVP).

The shared ledger creates a digital orchestration layer that records and validates interbank payment commitments. It enables interoperability between banks’ tokenized deposits (digital representations of commercial bank money on a ledger) for 24/7 real-time cross-border payments and settlement.

It builds on existing SWIFT standards and bank payment applications rather than overhauling them. Banks can continue using familiar workflows while gaining blockchain-based capabilities for faster, always-on settlement. It supports multiple settlement options and leverages existing compliance processes.

Built on open-source foundations using an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible architecture based on Hyperledger Besu; an enterprise-friendly Ethereum client. It’s a permissioned system; not a public blockchain like Ethereum mainnet and does not involve a native cryptocurrency. Earlier prototypes involved collaboration with ConsenSys, developers of Linea, an Ethereum L2.

The MVP is scheduled to go live with real-world transactions later in 2026. Participating banks will start testing live tokenized deposit payments in the near term, with a focus on cross-border use cases initially. SWIFT is working with banks to define a roadmap for additional functionality, explore other on-chain settlement assets, and expand use cases to accelerate the shift toward digital finance globally.

This represents a pragmatic step by traditional finance toward tokenization and instant settlement without disrupting core infrastructure. It aligns with broader industry trends in tokenized bank deposits and programmable money, potentially reducing friction in cross-border flows that have historically relied on slower correspondent banking or messaging-only systems like SWIFT GPI.

This project acts as a digital orchestration layer on top of existing SWIFT infrastructure, enabling interoperability between banks’ tokenized deposits (digital representations of commercial bank money) for 24/7 cross-border payments and settlement. It is not replacing SWIFT’s core messaging system but augmenting it.

Traditional cross-border payments often take days due to time zones, intermediaries, and batch processing. The shared ledger supports real-time, 24/7 execution using tokenized deposits, with better liquidity visibility and reduced reconciliation efforts. This could significantly cut settlement risk and improve predictability.

By validating commitments on a shared ledger and supporting multiple settlement options while reusing existing compliance processes, it reduces reliance on correspondent banking chains. This may lower operational costs, fees, and friction for the ~$183 trillion annual cross-border payments market.

Banks keep familiar workflows and internal systems. SWIFT operates the ledger, making adoption easier for the 11,000+ connected institutions. It builds on open-source EVM-compatible tech (Hyperledger Besu) without introducing a native cryptocurrency. The MVP focuses on live transactions with tokenized commercial bank money.

This is a concrete step toward programmable money and atomic settlement. SWIFT plans to explore other on-chain settlement assets and expand use cases. This positions the ledger as a bridge for interoperability across tokenized ecosystems. As a permissioned system, it maintains regulatory compliance, security, and scalability—key for mainstream adoption of tokenization in trade finance, securities, or remittances.

Over 40 banks including JPMorgan, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, and others like Wells Fargo collaborated on the design, showing strong industry buy-in. Early participants gain competitive edges in speed and efficiency for international operations. Challenges include integration with legacy systems, cross-jurisdictional regulatory alignment, data privacy, and ensuring the MVP scales globally without introducing new risks.

This signals traditional finance’s serious embrace of distributed ledger technology (DLT) on its own terms—permissioned, controlled, and compliant. It could reduce fragmentation in digital finance and help banks compete with or integrate fintech/blockchain-native solutions. By acting as a coordination layer, it aims to connect different networks and asset types, potentially easing the shift to a more digitized global financial system.

It may pressure pure blockchain players while also creating opportunities for collaboration. Some observers note parallels to shared ledger concepts in crypto, but SWIFT’s version prioritizes regulated institutional use over public chains. With SWIFT’s reach across 200+ countries, successful rollout could accelerate the transition to digital finance worldwide, influencing standards for tokenized assets and real-time payments.

However, full impact depends on adoption rates, regulatory support, and expansion beyond the initial MVP. Early focus is narrow (tokenized deposits for cross-border), with full benefits emerging as functionality expands. Not all banks will move quickly; regulatory differences across jurisdictions could slow progress.

This remains a closed, bank-controlled environment—no public blockchain speculation or decentralization in the crypto sense. This is a pragmatic, high-impact development that could make cross-border value transfer more efficient and “always-on” while preserving the stability and compliance of the existing system. It reinforces tokenization as a mainstream trend rather than a niche experiment.

Hyperliquid Unveils MVP Version of its Android Mobile App

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized perpetuals exchange on its own L1 just launched the beta/MVP version of its official Android mobile app on the Google Play Store.

It’s a limited initial release focused on trade execution notifications, serving as a step up from their previous Progressive Web App (PWA). The team is capping downloads during this testing phase to gather feedback on features, priorities, and device compatibility. They’ve emphasized downloading only from the verified/official listing to avoid fakes. No full trading interface yet in this MVP—it’s notifications-first, with more expected based on user input. An iOS version hasn’t been announced.

This addresses a common request from the community, as mobile access has been a gap for a platform that’s been very desktop/perp-focused though third-party tools and PWAs already drove some mobile volume. Separately but often discussed together due to timing.

Hyperliquid has a large HYPE token unlock scheduled around April 6, 2026: approximately 9.92 million HYPE tokens, valued at roughly $375M at recent prices ($37–38 range). This is a cliff-style release primarily for core contributors and team, representing about 2.39–2.7% of the adjusted circulating supply and making up the bulk (58%) of the week’s total token unlocks across crypto ~$643M including SUI, ENA, etc.

Hyperliquid has a structured monthly vesting schedule for team tokens often around the 6th of the month, with prior unlocks following similar patterns. These events can introduce short-term selling pressure or volatility as newly unlocked tokens enter the market, though the actual impact depends on holder behavior, lockups, market sentiment, and protocol fundamentals.

Native mobile push notifications improve UX and accessibility, potentially driving more retail and on-the-go trading volume on an already dominant perp DEX. Hyperliquid has shown strong product momentum. The sizable unlock adds supply; history shows unlocks often lead to 3–7 days of potential dip pressure before absorption not financial advice—DYOR and manage risk.

This fits Hyperliquid’s growth narrative: high-performance on-chain order books, expanding features, and ecosystem developments. Hyperliquid has been strongly desktop-oriented with a high-performance on-chain order book. The MVP starts with push notifications for trade fills, a meaningful upgrade over the previous Progressive Web App (PWA). This lowers friction for retail and on-the-go traders, potentially expanding the user base beyond power users.

Limited downloads during testing allow the team to prioritize features based on real feedback and device compatibility. Better mobile UX could drive incremental perpetuals volume; Hyperliquid already leads with billions in daily perp volume and strong open interest. Native notifications improve execution awareness and risk management, which may boost retention and session frequency.

Full trading interface is expected to roll out iteratively. No iOS version announced yet—Android focus first. Third-party mobile UIs/builders on Hyperliquid (HIP-3 markets) now face more direct competition from the official app, but it also validates the platform and could grow overall ecosystem activity. Community sentiment sees it as a positive step, though not an immediate killer feature since PWAs already worked on mobile.

Signals maturing product development. If feedback is strong, it positions Hyperliquid to capture more share in the competitive perp DEX space, where mobile access is increasingly table stakes. This is a scheduled monthly-style release primarily core contributors and team vesting. It’s large in absolute dollars ($375M, ~58% of the week’s major unlocks) but moderate as a percentage of adjusted circulating supply (2.4–2.7%).

History with similar events shows it can create short-term overhang—traders often hedge or take profits in advance, leading to potential volatility or dips in the days around unlock.
Past unlocks have sometimes caused 3–7 days of selling pressure as new tokens become liquid, though absorption depends on: Holder behavior. Protocol strength (high fee generation, revenue sharing via HLP, strong perp dominance).

Hyperliquid demonstrates real value accrual through massive trading fees/revenue (no heavy incentives needed). Strong fundamentals—like leading perp volume, deep liquidity in certain markets (crypto and commodities), and on-chain transparency—can help offset supply shocks over time.

The app launch and unlock happening close together creates mixed signals: product bullishness (UX expansion, growth potential) vs. supply caution (short-term pressure risk). Markets may price in the unlock overhang first, with app momentum providing a counter-narrative if adoption picks up quickly.

Watch price action around April 6 for volatility. Risk management is key—unlocks often see pre- and post-event flows rather than one-way moves. Positive if mobile drives measurable volume growth or user metrics. Hyperliquid’s moat remains intact. Monitor post-unlock flows, exact claimed amounts, and app feedback and iteration speed.

This fits Hyperliquid’s trajectory as a high-revenue perp leader expanding beyond desktop while managing a structured token release schedule. Fundamentals have supported resilience in prior cycles, but crypto is volatile—always manage risk and do your own research.

According to Reports on Dune Analytics, Average Hold Time on Solana Memecoins Cratered to 58 Secs in 2026

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

According to reports citing Dune Analytics data shared widely by analysts like Eric Cryptoman and outlets such as Cointelegraph, the average hold time for memecoins on Solana has cratered to just 58 seconds in 2026.

For context: It was around 100 seconds in 2025. A full day (24 hours) back in 2024. This isn’t just people are trading faster—it’s a symptom of how hyper-speculative the Solana memecoin ecosystem has become. Launches happen in seconds via platforms like Pump.fun, bots snipe entries and exits, and most tokens pump on pure hype or social momentum before crashing.

Holding anything longer than a minute often means you’re the exit liquidity. Traders or more accurately, algorithms and degens are flipping positions almost instantly. This points to a market dominated by short-term speculation rather than any belief in long-term value. Attention economy on steroids: Memecoins thrive or die on virality. If a coin doesn’t moon in the first minute, it’s often abandoned.

Bot-driven frenzy: Much of this volume likely comes from automated trading, sniping tools, and copy-trading setups that prioritize speed over fundamentals. Solana’s low fees and high throughput enable this casino-like environment. Similar trends show up in broader Solana token holding times sometimes cited around 44–62 seconds depending on the exact dataset, suggesting it’s not isolated to pure memes.

It’s classic late-cycle or high-hype behavior. In bull markets, FOMO drives rapid rotations; when sentiment cools, the average hold time can signal thinning conviction or maturing trading infrastructure. Some see it as healthy Darwinism—only the strongest memes with real community or utility survive the 58-second gauntlet. Others view it as evidence the pure vibe-based memecoin meta is maturing or even peaking, with capital rotating toward infrastructure, AI agents, or revenue-generating apps on Solana.

Either way, it underscores a core truth in crypto: time horizons have compressed massively. What used to be diamond hands for days is now measured in heartbeats. The drop in average memecoin hold time on Solana to around 58 seconds with broader token medians cited between 44–62 seconds in early 2026 has several ripple effects across traders, the ecosystem, liquidity, volatility, and the broader market.

With positions flipped in under a minute, price swings become extreme. Coins can 10x or rug in minutes, driven by hype, bots, and social momentum rather than fundamentals. This creates a high-risk, high-reward casino environment where retail traders often become exit liquidity. Short-term speculation dominates, reducing any sense of conviction investing.

More frequent rugs, wash trading, and manipulation attempts some studies note Solana tokens targeted for manipulation earlier than other chains. The ultra-short horizon favors automated tools: snipers, copy-traders, and high-frequency setups that exploit Solana’s low fees and speed.

Human traders without advanced tooling struggle to compete — by the time you see a signal and act, the move may already be over. Shift from community-driven memes to pure flow trading: less emphasis on long-term holders or diamond hands, more on rapid rotations. High turnover generates massive transaction counts and DEX volume in the short run (Solana’s meme era previously drove huge revenue).

However, when hype fades, liquidity can dry up quickly — leading to sharper crashes and liquidity crunches as seen in periods of 60%+ DEX volume drops. Surviving projects need real distribution, tooling, or utility to attract stickier capital; pure vibe-based launches die faster. Sustains high throughput and fee generation for Solana, but makes metrics more sensitive to sentiment swings.

Active addresses and engagement can plummet when the speculative crowd rotates out. Signals a move away from investment toward pure speculation/flow trading. Long-term belief in most memecoins erodes — even top holders in some cases show limited conviction beyond weeks/months.

Retail becomes more cautious: Fewer ape into anything moments, with attention shifting toward infrastructure, AI agents, revenue-generating apps, or established tokens. Extreme memecoin behavior can amplify overall market risk and sentiment swings, though established assets like SOL or BTC may decouple somewhat.

Launchpads like Pump.fun benefit from volume in bull phases but face backlash and scrutiny when the meta cools. Forces better projects to evolve — those with actual communities, narratives, or utility stand out amid the noise. The meme supercycle that fueled Solana’s growth in prior years matures or partially rotates elsewhere. Hyper-speculation draws attention from regulators and critics, potentially impacting the chain’s image even as its core tech.

This 58-second reality reflects a hyper-efficient or hyper-ruthless trading meta enabled by Solana’s infrastructure. It’s bullish for speed-obsessed degens and infrastructure plays, but challenging for anyone seeking stability or long-term value in the meme segment. Many view it as a late-cycle or maturation signal.

The easy money from 2024-style launches gets harder, pushing capital toward more substantive use cases. If the trend continues, expect even more emphasis on tools for ultra-fast execution, better risk management, and selective participation.

123...8,436Page 1 of 8,436

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy