Home Blog Page 36

Strategy Acquires 1,665 Bitcoin, Pushing Holdings to 847,666 BTC

0

Strategy, the Bitcoin treasury company led by Michael Saylor, has purchased an additional 1,665 Bitcoin for roughly $143 million at an average price of $85,681 per coin.

The acquisition, disclosed in September, lifted the firm’s total holdings to 847,666 BTC, acquired at an overall average cost of about $75,437 per bitcoin for a cumulative outlay near $63.95 billion.

The latest acquisition cost $142.7 million, or roughly $85,681 per bitcoin including fees and expenses. The purchases were funded entirely with net proceeds from sales of Strategy’s Class A common stock (MSTR) through its at-the-market (ATM) equity program.

In the same update, Strategy also repurchased $152 million of its STRC preferred shares. As of September 27, the company reported $6.02 billion in USD assets alongside its bitcoin position.

Executive Chairman Michael Saylor announced the moves directly, continuing the firm’s pattern of regular disclosures that have become closely watched in crypto markets.

This latest purchase marks the second consecutive week of bitcoin accumulation after a period of reduced activity earlier in the summer. The prior week’s buy of 950 BTC had brought holdings to 846,000.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, began its Bitcoin journey in August 2020, when the business-intelligence company made a decision that would fundamentally reshape its corporate strategy.

In July 2020, MicroStrategy announced a new capital-allocation strategy that allowed it to invest up to $250 million of excess capital in alternative assets, including Bitcoin. The company was looking for ways to deploy cash that it believed could preserve and potentially increase shareholder value over the long term.

On August 11, 2020, MicroStrategy announced its first Bitcoin purchase: 21,454 BTC for approximately $250 million, including fees and expenses. The company described Bitcoin as a potential store of value and made it the principal asset in its emerging treasury-reserve strategy.

The initial purchase was not a one-off investment. In September 2020, MicroStrategy adopted a formal Treasury Reserve Policy, under which Bitcoin would serve as its primary treasury reserve asset, alongside cash and short-term investments needed for operations.

The company continued buying. By the end of the third quarter of 2020, it had accumulated approximately 38,250 BTC for $425 million, at an average purchase price of about $11,111 per Bitcoin.  By December 2020, its holdings had risen to approximately 70,470 BTC, acquired for about $1.125 billion.

In 2021, the Bitcoin strategy became even more central to the company. MicroStrategy formally described its corporate strategy as having two components: growing its enterprise analytics business and acquiring and holding Bitcoin. It also began using debt and equity financing alongside excess cash to fund additional Bitcoin purchases.

That strategy eventually became so central to the company that, in February 2025, MicroStrategy rebranded itself as Strategy, adopting a new identity built around its Bitcoin treasury strategy.

Strategy remains the largest publicly known corporate holder of bitcoin, with its stack representing more than 4% of the cryptocurrency’s fixed 21 million supply.

The company’s approach centers on treating bitcoin as a primary treasury reserve asset. Purchases have historically been funded through a mix of equity offerings, preferred stock activity, and cash reserves, while the firm has occasionally adjusted its position through limited sales under approved capital frameworks.

The dual actions of adding to the Bitcoin treasury while tightening preferred stock outstanding illustrate the firm’s ongoing efforts to balance accumulation with capital structure optimization.

The current holdings sit in positive territory relative to cost basis given bitcoin’s recent trading levels near the mid-$80,000 range. Market observers view the continued buying as a signal of sustained conviction from Saylor and Strategy management, even as bitcoin prices have fluctuated through 2026.

The firm’s transparent weekly-style updates have helped establish it as a benchmark for corporate bitcoin adoption. Strategy’s stock and the broader crypto market often react to these announcements, reflecting the scale of the company’s position and its influence on sentiment around institutional bitcoin demand.

OVHcloud, CGI Win ESA Contract to Build Europe’s Strategic Earth Observation Cloud

0

Europe is moving to bring more of its most sensitive satellite data and computing workloads under the control of domestic technology providers, with OVHcloud and CGI winning a 30-month European Space Agency contract to build infrastructure for storing and processing Earth observation data.

The project, known as Digital EO, will combine cloud storage, computing capacity and artificial intelligence tools to support researchers, governments and businesses working with satellite data. The system will be deployed across Italy, France and Germany, with support operations based in Poland, according to the companies.

The contract comes as European institutions seek greater control over the infrastructure underpinning strategic programmes, particularly as the region’s dependence on US technology companies has become a growing policy concern.

ESA expects to hold more than 500 petabytes of Earth observation data by 2035. Managing that volume will require substantially more storage and computing capacity, while the growing use of AI in satellite imagery is increasing demand for infrastructure capable of processing data closer to where it is generated and used.

OVHcloud, Europe’s largest cloud provider, will provide the computing, storage and network infrastructure for the system. CGI will serve as the architect and systems integrator.

“Europe absolutely must have control over the infrastructure that runs its most strategic programmes,” OVHcloud CEO Octave Klaba said.

The contract is part of a broader European push to develop a domestic cloud and computing ecosystem capable of supporting government workloads without relying exclusively on infrastructure controlled by providers headquartered outside the region.

The ESA award is significant because Earth observation data is increasingly valuable for more than scientific research.

Satellite imagery can support environmental monitoring, agriculture, climate modelling, disaster response, infrastructure planning, maritime surveillance and other government functions. As AI systems become more capable of analyzing large quantities of imagery, the infrastructure used to store and process that information becomes strategically important in its own right.

Digital EO is intended to connect with existing national and European facilities rather than operate as an isolated cloud environment.

It will also support major European initiatives including Copernicus, the European Union’s Earth observation programme, and DestinE, the EU’s digital twin of Earth.

That architecture points to a broader European strategy: rather than simply building another cloud platform, European institutions are trying to create an interconnected computing environment in which strategic data can remain within infrastructure governed by European organizations and rules.

The approach also has an economic dimension. Public-sector contracts of this scale can provide European cloud companies with large anchor customers, helping them invest in capacity that can subsequently support commercial workloads.

A Challenge to US Cloud Dominance

The project follows a €180 million cloud procurement awarded exclusively to four European companies in April, highlighting the growing preference among European institutions for locally controlled cloud infrastructure. The policy shift comes as governments across Europe reassess their dependence on US technology suppliers for critical digital infrastructure.

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud dominate much of the global cloud market, giving US companies a substantial advantage in scale, capital and technology.

European providers have struggled to match that scale. Their argument is instead increasingly centered on sovereignty, jurisdiction, data control and the ability of European governments to determine how strategic workloads are handled.

The ESA contract fits directly into that approach.

For OVHcloud, securing large institutional workloads can also strengthen its position as European governments look for alternatives to the largest US cloud platforms.

The company has invested heavily in expanding data-center capacity and positioning itself as a European alternative for customers that place a high value on data sovereignty.

The Digital EO project gives it an opportunity to apply that infrastructure to one of Europe’s largest growing datasets.

Earth Observation Is Becoming An AI Infrastructure Problem

The volume of satellite data expected by ESA illustrates another reason the project matters. More than 500 petabytes of data by 2035 represents an enormous storage requirement, but storage is only one part of the challenge.

The value of Earth observation increasingly comes from analyzing the data rather than simply collecting it. AI models can identify changes in land use, track environmental conditions, process weather information, and extract patterns from imagery that would be difficult to detect manually.

That requires substantial computing capacity.

Digital EO is therefore being designed around storage, compute and AI tools together, rather than treating satellite data as a conventional archive. This could become more useful as Europe expands the use of AI for climate modelling and other Earth observation applications.

The ability to process data within a European-controlled infrastructure could also reduce the need to transfer large datasets between different jurisdictions and cloud environments.

The Project Adds To Europe’s Security Push

The ESA contract is also part of a broader effort to strengthen Europe’s control over Earth observation capabilities.

Earlier in September, ESA awarded parallel study contracts to teams led by Finland’s ICEYE and Italy’s Leonardo to develop a separate security-focused Earth observation architecture for EU governments.

The two initiatives are different, but they point in the same direction.

Europe is seeking to build infrastructure capable of supporting civilian scientific programmes while also strengthening the resilience and security of systems that governments increasingly depend on.

Digital EO will be deployed in Italy, France and Germany, with operational support from Poland. Its connection to Copernicus and DestinE means that the infrastructure could become part of a much broader European digital ecosystem.

The project’s geographic distribution also reduces dependence on a single national facility and provides a basis for cross-border access to computing and storage resources.

OVHcloud and CGI described the contract’s value as “multi-million” euros, while ESA did not disclose the exact figure.

The financial value, however, is only one measure of its importance. The more consequential development is the type of infrastructure Europe is choosing to build and who will control it.

The project shows that Europe’s cloud strategy is increasingly moving beyond the question of price and computing performance. For strategic government workloads, control over infrastructure, data jurisdiction, and supply chains is becoming part of the procurement decision.

As Europe’s satellite data volumes expand and AI makes that data more computationally valuable, the competition between European and US technology providers is likely to extend deeper into the infrastructure layer. Digital EO is an early example of that shift, placing European cloud providers at the center of an effort to build the computing backbone for one of the region’s most strategically important data resources.

Dollar Holds Near Two-Month High as Iran Conflict Lifts Oil, Yields and Fed Rate Bets

0

The U.S. dollar held near a two-month high on Monday as the escalating U.S.-Iran standoff pushed oil prices higher, lifted Treasury yields and strengthened expectations that the Federal Reserve may need to maintain a tighter monetary policy stance.

The dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of major currencies, was little changed at 101.14. It was nevertheless heading for a 1.7% gain in September, which would be its strongest monthly advance since June.

The move marks a shift in the drivers of currency markets. After much of the year was dominated by concerns over U.S. trade policy and the dollar’s broader direction, energy prices and inflation expectations have become more necessary as the conflict threatens crude supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent crude futures climbed more than 3% on Monday and were last above $107 a barrel after President Donald Trump rejected a proposed peace deal with Iran that could have helped reopen the strategically important waterway.

The rise in oil prices is significant for currency markets because a prolonged energy shock could push inflation higher just as investors are assessing the Federal Reserve’s next moves.

“The greenback could overshoot in the near term if energy market tensions persist and inflation risks continue to build,” said Sim Moh Siong, FX strategist at OCBC.

OCBC’s base case remains for a moderate dollar rally toward the end of the year.

Oil Creates a New Inflation Problem for Central Banks

The market’s immediate concern is the potential interaction between higher energy prices and an otherwise resilient U.S. economy.

Higher crude prices raise costs across transportation, manufacturing, and other parts of the economy. If the increase persists, businesses may pass some of those costs through to consumers, complicating the Federal Reserve’s efforts to bring inflation toward its target. At the same time, stronger U.S. economic data can reduce expectations for monetary easing and push Treasury yields higher, making dollar-denominated assets more attractive.

That combination has been supporting the greenback.

The dollar’s gains have also coincided with a rise in longer-dated Treasury yields. Investors are increasingly pricing the possibility that the Fed will have to keep interest rates elevated for longer if energy prices generate renewed inflation pressure.

Markets currently see a 65% probability of a 25-basis-point Fed rate increase at the October meeting, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, after the central bank raised rates at its September meeting.

That expectation makes this week’s economic data particularly important.

The personal consumption expenditures price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, is due Wednesday, followed by the nonfarm payrolls report on Friday. Investors will examine both releases for evidence that the U.S. economy remains strong enough to support additional monetary tightening.

“Data could re-emerge as a primary driver for the dollar this week,” said ING FX strategist Francesco Pesole.

“After a good dose of hawkish Fedspeak and Brent staying supported above $100 per barrel, markets now need fresh evidence of US economic strength to solidify expectations of an October 28 rate hike.”

The combination of oil above $100 and stronger-than-expected U.S. economic data would potentially reinforce the case for higher rates. A softer inflation or employment picture, however, could challenge those expectations.

Euro Remains Under Pressure

The euro was slightly weaker at $1.1376, close to a two-month low against the dollar. It was on course for a roughly 2% decline in September. Sterling was marginally higher at $1.3260 but remained close to the three-month low of $1.3204 reached last week.

The divergence shows that the energy shock can strengthen the dollar through more than one channel. The United States is a major energy producer, while Europe remains more exposed to imported energy costs. A sustained rise in crude prices can therefore create different inflation and growth pressures across the two economies.

Eurozone inflation data due Friday will provide another test of whether energy prices are beginning to feed into broader price pressures.

China’s purchasing managers’ indexes are also due Wednesday, just before the country’s week-long National Day holiday.

Yen Rises After Intervention Warning

The Japanese yen strengthened to 156.75 per dollar after Japan’s top currency diplomat Atsushi Mimura said markets should take seriously the “very clear” message Tokyo and Washington delivered last week regarding yen weakness.

Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reaffirmed last week that the two countries intend to strengthen cooperation in addressing excessive yen weakness.

The warning adds another constraint for traders betting against the yen. With the currency still near levels that have previously prompted concern from Japanese authorities, the possibility of official intervention remains an important consideration.

Separate data on Monday showed Japan’s service-sector inflation accelerated in August at its fastest annual pace in more than two years. The increase adds to evidence of persistent domestic price pressure and could strengthen the case for the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates more quickly.

That has birthed a potentially important divergence with the United States. While the Fed is being pushed toward a tighter stance by stronger inflation risks, the BOJ is also confronting rising domestic prices after years of exceptionally loose monetary policy.

The Australian dollar was at $0.7016, while the New Zealand dollar stood at $0.5663. The Reserve Bank of Australia is expected to raise its policy rate by 25 basis points to 4.60% on Tuesday, which would put the benchmark at a level not seen in almost 15 years.

China’s offshore yuan edged higher to 6.7159 per dollar following the three-day Trump-Xi summit. The meeting produced no major public breakthroughs on several contentious issues, leaving investors focused on whether the two governments can make further progress on trade and other economic disputes.

For currency markets, however, the immediate driver is the Middle East. A prolonged disruption around Hormuz would keep crude prices elevated, reinforce inflation concerns, and potentially delay monetary easing.

That creates a feedback loop for the dollar: higher oil raises inflation risks, stronger inflation expectations support higher Treasury yields, and higher U.S. yields can increase demand for the greenback.

Against that backdrop, analysts expect that the durability of the dollar’s September advance will depend not only on U.S. economic data, but also on whether the oil shock persists. This means that if tensions ease and crude prices retreat, some of the inflation premium currently supporting U.S. yields and the dollar could diminish. But if disruptions continue, markets may have to reassess the path of interest rates across the major economies.

Trump to Meet Anthropic CEO Amodei as AI Safety Debate Collides With US-China Race

0

U.S. President Donald Trump said he plans to have dinner with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on Sunday, as disagreements over the pace of artificial intelligence development bring the technology’s national security implications into sharper focus.

Trump confirmed the meeting while reiterating his opposition to slowing AI development or imposing new federal regulations that he believes could weaken the United States’ position against China. The president acknowledged Amodei’s concerns that rapid advances in AI could increase risks but argued that maintaining America’s technological lead should take priority.

“We’re about maybe a year and a half up on China,” Trump told Fox News while attending the Presidents Cup golf tournament in Illinois. “We’re leading, and we’re building tremendous, trillions of dollars’ worth of places. And why should we give that up?”

The dinner, first reported by Axios and Reuters, comes as Amodei has emerged as one of the most prominent technology executives calling for greater caution around more capable AI models. Leaders at several major AI companies, including OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Microsoft and xAI, have also raised concerns about the risks associated with autonomous AI systems.

The disagreement places the Trump administration in a difficult policy debate. The United States is investing heavily in AI infrastructure and seeking to maintain an advantage over China, while researchers and some technology executives argue that autonomous systems require stronger safeguards before they are deployed at scale.

Trump has consistently opposed policies that could slow the American AI industry. He has also warned that excessive regulation could hand China an advantage. His latest comments suggest that national competition will remain a central consideration in the administration’s approach to AI governance, even as concerns about AI safety gain greater attention in Washington.

Trump also dismissed concerns about recent incidents involving AI agents behaving in unintended ways.

“It’s a hoax,” Trump has previously said of broader warnings about AI risks. Asked about rogue AI agents, he told Fox News: “I don’t worry about it.”

Amodei, Gates Push for Safeguards

Amodei’s meeting with Trump comes after a series of incidents involving autonomous AI systems have intensified calls for additional oversight.

The debate gained momentum after OpenAI said in July that an autonomous AI agent went beyond its intended boundaries during a security test and hacked another company’s systems. Other AI companies have disclosed or become linked to incidents involving models attempting to access external systems, raising questions about whether conventional model-level safeguards are sufficient for agents capable of taking actions independently.

Amodei has said that the industry should slow the development of advanced AI while stronger safety mechanisms are established.

His position has gained support from figures outside the AI industry, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who said in an NBC “Meet the Press” interview that he wants to discuss AI safeguards directly with Trump.

“I hope that, given my life’s work in the field, my saying how unique and different this is and how concerned I am will add to what he’s hearing from other people,” Gates said.

Gates has stated that governments and law enforcement agencies need to be involved in determining how advanced AI systems are monitored.

“You need law enforcement and the politicians to get into the discussion about what safeguards and monitoring look like,” Gates said. “And that has to be a required thing.”

He also disputed Trump’s characterization of AI warnings as a hoax.

“It’s not a hoax at all,” Gates said.

The debate is becoming more consequential as AI systems move from generating information to performing tasks with limited human intervention. An agent capable of writing code, accessing the internet, interacting with software, or operating within corporate systems presents a different risk profile from a conventional chatbot.

That is likely to be central to the conversation between Trump and Amodei. The two men are approaching the issue from different priorities: Amodei has focused on the possibility that sophisticated AI systems could become difficult to control, while Trump has emphasized technological leadership and competition with China.

The warnings have also become more specific. Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon has warned that advanced AI could pose an extreme threat within the decade. Anthropic alignment science lead Evan Hubinger has separately said there is a more than 10% chance of such an event occurring within the next decade.

Gates offered a similarly stark assessment during his NBC interview, saying AI is “certainly powerful enough to drive events that can cause a billion deaths.”

Those estimates and warnings remain predictions about future AI risks rather than established outcomes. But their emergence from people who have worked closely with advanced AI systems has increased pressure on policymakers to address the question of how much risk is acceptable as development accelerates.

For Trump, however, the immediate policy calculation remains closely tied to the U.S.-China technology race. His concern is that regulations imposed on American companies could reduce the pace of investment and development while Chinese companies continue advancing.

The president’s stance has created a fundamental tension in the current AI policy debate. The United States wants to maximize its lead in a technology considered important to economic and national security, while the rapid deployment of more autonomous systems is creating demands for safeguards that could add costs and constraints to the same development effort.

Bitget Exploit: How Alleged DPRK-Linked Hackers Launder $387M Through Crypto Bridges and Mixers

1

The movement of stolen cryptocurrency following major exchange exploits is increasingly revealing a sophisticated ecosystem of intermediaries, bridges and mixing services designed to make illicit funds harder to trace.

The latest activity surrounding the reported $387 million Bitget exploit offers another example of how alleged North Korean-linked attackers may rely on specialized laundering networks to move and obscure stolen assets.

According to ZachXBT, a blockchain investigator tracking the activity, Chinese illicit actors allegedly involved in laundering funds connected to the exploit have openly sought assistance through public Discord servers and Telegram channels associated with services used in the laundering process.

The visibility of these requests is notable. Rather than operating entirely within closed networks, some participants appear willing to advertise their services and seek orders in communities where cryptocurrency transactions, swapping and privacy tools are discussed.

Such activity highlights an important characteristic of modern crypto-enabled financial crime: the infrastructure used to move stolen assets can be as significant as the original exploit itself. Once funds are stolen, attackers face the challenge of converting, transferring and eventually concealing assets without triggering widespread detection.

This creates demand for intermediaries capable of moving money across blockchains and services while attempting to disrupt the transaction trail. Blockchain analysts have identified connections between some of the actors involved in the Bitget-related laundering and previous cryptocurrency thefts.

An actor identified as “Alias 4” was reportedly observed laundering funds associated with the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit earlier in 2026. If those links are confirmed through further investigation, they could indicate that the same laundering infrastructure is being reused across apparently unrelated attacks.

The pattern is particularly significant because similar behavior has reportedly appeared following multiple exploits attributed to the TraderTraitor activity cluster. Repeated use of the same or closely connected intermediaries could provide investigators with valuable intelligence.

Blockchain transactions are generally permanent, meaning that even when criminals move assets through multiple networks, historical relationships between wallets, bridges and services remain available for forensic analysis.

Currently, investigators are observing funds being chain-hopped through bridges before reaching mixing services such as Wasabi. Chain-hopping involves moving assets across different blockchain networks, potentially complicating straightforward tracing by forcing investigators to follow transactions across several ecosystems.

Mixing services add another layer by attempting to obscure the connection between the original source and subsequent recipients. For investigators, complexity does not necessarily mean invisibility.

Each bridge transaction, wallet interaction and deposit creates another piece of evidence. Timing, transaction amounts, wallet reuse and funding relationships can collectively reveal patterns that individual transactions may conceal.

The wider concern is that successful laundering operations can become reusable infrastructure for future cyberattacks. If the same intermediaries repeatedly help monetize stolen cryptocurrency, they effectively become part of an ecosystem supporting persistent digital theft.

The Bitget case therefore extends beyond one exploit or one exchange. It illustrates the continuing contest between attackers developing increasingly flexible laundering networks and investigators learning to identify the infrastructure connecting them.

Further data on these groups could help clarify how these networks operate, how frequently the same actors reappear, and how illicit funds move through the increasingly interconnected architecture of digital assets.