DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5958

Let’s Debate With Respect On The BIG BAN

0

Good People, let us discuss and debate with civility. Make your points and do not attack people. Those who are saying that Twitter ought NOT to have banned President Trump while he is a president have the rights to their opinions. The same applies to those who think otherwise. But calling names should stop please. Trump was the only person who made me vote for the first time in America; I campaigned and voted against him BIG time. He is a poor leader. Yet, banning him on Twitter while a President is not about Trump but about his office. I think that is WRONG. He is the Commander-in-Chief as we write, and he commands the land, air, sea, space, and bytes.

See what Twitter is doing to the @Potus handle. Since they cannot ban Potus which belongs to the American people, they are deleting his tweets. Is that not what we have proposed to Twitter? Embargo his tweets for 60 seconds and filter as necessary. We do that in Tekedia Forum; New York Times does it,  and it is a common protocol.

Please you do not need to agree with those who think that Trump should not be banned, at least, while he is the big boss in the land. But respect that perspective. The other argument applies. I want people to keep coming to this digital square; let us not use hard words. Make your point and do not attack please.

What Thrive Agric Means to Other Nigerian Agritech Brands

1

Nigeria is one of the countries in Africa where the digital agriculture startups are evolving every year. The emergence is not strange to a number of public analysts and business minded people because the continent and the country cannot continue to play second fiddle in terms of modern agricultural practices. Available information reveals that Nigeria has more than 85 technology hubs, supporting development and growth of over 80 Agritech companies in the last decade.

The main aims of these Agritech companies have been significant improvements of the livelihood of smallholder farmers and encouraging those with sufficient money for investment to consider agriculture industry as one of the best areas to invest in.  Outcomes of these objectives include food sufficiency and increase in the contribution of agriculture to the Gross Domestic Products in real and nominal values. As stated by one of the leading technology companies in the world, GSMA, Nigerian Agritech companies are offering services such as digital advisory and agri digital financial services (access to services), agri e-commerce and digital procurement (access to markets) and smart farming (access to assets).

From FarmCrowdy to Thrive Agric and a number of other brands, Nigerian farmers and investors deserve better products and services. This is one of the reasons these brands have strategic mission and vision statements. In the world of business development, these statements say a lot about how businesses see themselves in the short, medium and long time periods. Having a clear and communicated mission with the targeted customers and stakeholders makes value creation and sharing easier. A clear mission statement is the one that encompasses how people, products, processes and technologies would be used to create and share value proposition expressed in business model.

However, our examination of 34 Nigerian Agritech companies indicates that these elements [people, processes, products and technologies] are not stated [at first, second and third word levels] in all the mission statements of the brands available to our analyst. Only 20 brands have their mission and vision statements stated on their websites. According to our analyst, this has many implications. For instance, it would be difficult for customers and prospective investors to understand the value proposition from the mission statement indirectly. Analysis further shows that Thrive Agric, out of the 2o analysed brands, crafted its mission uniquely. The uniqueness of the statement lies with the fact that the company chooses words that resonate with the issues and needs in the industry. It also has 90 unique words, the highest from a total of 431 unique words employed by the brands.

Exhibit 1: Companies’ Ranking in Terms of Mission Statement Uniqueness

Source: Companies’ Websites, 2021; Infoprations Analysis, 2021

All the 20 companies do not have technology related words in their strategic mission statements. With this, our analyst notes that it would be practically impossible for stakeholders to believe these companies truly applying emerging technologies to solve issues and providing needs. It also suggests that the companies do not see technology related words as one of the strategies for attracting targeted publics.

From our analysis, it emerged that product as a core element appears at the second and third levels of dominant words in the mission statements, while process mostly appears at the third level. Analysis indicates that people as an element appears at first level than at other levels. Having people element in the first level implies that the brands prioritise people than other elements, which aligns with the fact that people are the heart of any business. Without people, processes cannot be formulated towards sustainable value creation and sharing.

Exhibit 2: Business Components Driven by Mission Statement

Source: Companies’ Websites, 2021; Infoprations Analysis, 2021

Our analyst examines public sentiments about Thrive Agric, with a view of revealing attitudinal dispositions towards the company’s processes, people and products. The statement that the company is making investment in agriculture seamless is explored along with the mission statement and views expressed by customers on online review community. In its bid of providing improved services and value to investors, Thrive Agric made a number of strategic decisions and choices between 2019 and 2020.

Despite this, customers believe that the company needs to work more on its value delivery, responses to investors’ plights, especially the payment of returns. Our analysis reveals that in the last six months, people were more negative than being positive to Thrive Agric’s value creation and delivery than in the last one year. More than 49% of 51 customers expressed negative feelings about the company, while 31.37% and 19.61% of the same number maintained positive inclinations and neutral views about the company respectively.

However, these feelings are blessings and issues for other brands. According to our analysis, positive sentiment towards Thrive Agric gives FarmKart and Payfarmer same sentiment. This does not lead to same sentiment for Farmfunded. When customers had negative feelings about how Thrive Agric is creating and delivering value, it leads to negative and absence of negative feelings for FarmKart and Payfarmer. Neutral dispositions towards Thrive Agric leads to neutral expressions towards Farmfunded.

Tesla Becomes the 5th Most Valuable Company in S&P 500 with Over $800b in Market Cap

0

As Elon Musk scales heights of fortune, Tesla follows. The electric vehicle manufacturer has become the fifth most valuable company in the S&P 500, overtaking social media platform Facebook. Tesla now has more than $800 billion market capitalization.

The Democrat’s win of the Georgia senatorial election cemented the swift run Tesla had had last year, upping its shares more than 15% year-to-date.

Democrat’s control of the Congress means American push for cleaner energy will get legislative backing through the passage of Biden’s clean energy bill that will boost the sales of electric vehicles. On the other hand, it means tech companies are going to face more antitrust scrutiny.

Facebook’s shares dipped 1% in the full trading week of 2021. The Capitol riot by Trump supporters also cast negative view on the social media platform that has been accused of complicity for allowing pro-Trump groups to promote their ideas which fueled the violence on Wednesday.

Tesla’s market value on Thursday crossed $774 billion, pushing Musk’s net worth above $188 billion. At Friday’s session high, Musk’s 21% stake in the company contributes more than $170 billion to his net worth, which belittles the combined market capitalization of General Motors, Ford Motor Co and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

Shares rose as much as 8.4% to a fresh record following analyst Chris McNally’s upgrade of the stock to the equivalent of a hold, according to Bloomberg.

He raised his price target on Tesla to $650 from $225, telling clients on a note that “whether we call it valuation confusion or valuation rotation, we have been on the considerably wrong side of Tesla for over year now.”

McNally explained that investors see Tesla as two separate technology companies – one that’s a market leader in electric vehicles and another that has several potential businesses, from full self-driving cars to battery and powertrain developers. While one part of the automaker’s value comes from the revenue it generates, there are two other components that are more market driven and are a bet on an uncertain future and a bet on Elon himself, he said.

“The market is currently ascribing a $100 billion value to Tesla’s self-driving initiatives, and about $80 billion to the potential of it becoming a battery and powertrain supplier, with about $25 billion to $75 billion to a possible energy-storage business that some think could become larger than the car business,” McNally said.

Tesla’s market valuation now stands at $829 billion and is likely going to hit a new height after Biden’s inauguration on January 20. The company reported a fifth straight quarter of profit in October, with plans to improve battery efficiency and halve the cost over the next three years. Delivery of cars made in its Shanghai factory also boosted sales and added to its rising valuation.

Bloomberg noted that investors’ enthusiasm for the stock also got a big boost as analysts and market watchers started predicting its addition to the S&P 500 around mid-2020.

And the astonishing rise has not only made Musk the richest man on earth, it has also turned the limelight to Ark Investment Management, a shareholder in the stock and one of the most vocal and ardent Tesla bulls. Ark has 0.36% shares in Tesla.

However, Tesla still has Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Apple to beat in the S&P 500.

The Twitter’s BIG Mistake on Trump’s Account

0

I do not think this is the right move by Twitter – banning the United States President is offensive and certainly WRONG. The best option would have been to embargo his tweets by 60 seconds before they become public. That way, you can filter whatever you want. While I am not a fan of Trump, it is very important that the US modulates before it makes a caricature of its ordinance.

The whole idea that the President of the US was “banned” in an open social media platform may not accomplish what Twitter has in mind. Certainly, I am not supporting Trump’s actions which I have written here will lead to one outcome: disgrace. Yes, without grace, the end is always downwards.

It takes a man who has reached the topmost mountain to know the deepest of valleys. I feel like reaching him, and talk about redemption as we do in the Scripture Union. It may be all lighted up in White House but he is certainly seeing the darkness of power. Grace to him.

They even went after @Potus to ensure he is cut-off

Comment on LinkedIn Feed

Comment #1: A mere social media company banning the president of the United State? Dumb people won’t understand the implication, they think it’s about Trump. No, it’s no longer about Trump, but whether a mere social media company can trample on a constituted authority. A president is an institution, not just the office. This is how you prepare for a failed state, by giving ordinary people the impression that anyone can capture power, it’s a very dangerous trajectory.

When people cheer a nonsense like this, their own freedom is imperilled. If you think a social media company could have such powers to decide who has a voice or not, then you are automatically a slave.

Some things should remain sacrosanct, irrespective of ideological differences, a president remains a president until the last minute, it is the Constitution that determines when the time is up, at which point he loses legitimacy, it cannot happen ahead of time, else you are calling for anarchy.

The social media companies will soon be converted to publishing firms, since they have been inching to become gatekeepers. No single entity should be powerful enough to be both prosecutor and judge; it will be catastrophic if does happen.

Comment #2: Ndubuisi Ekekwe are you now saying Twitter should create an exception? This company and many others have been under the scrutiny of the Congress with respect to how their operations or community affects security and politics. Why should they risk being fined ? I don’t know why the president should be treated differently when he violates terms and condition of the said service or community. I don’t know why you came up with this, but it’s sounds like what we do in Nigeria- the law is for some and not for everyone.

My Response to #2: Pick a newspaper tomorrow, check those on the cover pages. They are not people in your village and mine. Those people hold influence. It is an illusion to think the law is blind and T&C apply equally. If I am to do it, I will filter his tweets as they are doing now in @POTUS where they are moderating him since that property belongs to the US Government and Twitter cannot ban it. Moderate him for two weeks and then put him in the bucket like everyone. Sure, I do not expect the President of Nigeria, US, Mali, etc to be treated the same way as I am treated! 

#2 AGAIN: My concern here is that your focus is on his portfolio or office and not the insecurity that he orchestrated. Congress is even thinking of disarming him of the nuclear passcodes, my goodness, no disrespect for the president’s office but the man there has fallen below standard and no longer act in the interest of the people. I rest my case.

My last response: Embargoing his tweet by 60 sec will be a balance. You have to respect that office. 

Apple Taps Hyundai for Electric Vehicle Partnership

0

Apple’s bid to delve into vehicle manufacturing has got a boost with a potential partnership with Hyundai Motor. The South Korean automaker said it is in early discussion with Apple to team up and build electric vehicles.

Korea Economic Daily reported that Apple suggested the team-up and Hyundai is reviewing the terms. According to the report, the proposal involves vehicle as well as battery production, and the cars are expected to be released in 2027.

Apple declined to comment on the matter and Hyundai said discussion is at early stage.

“We understand that Apple is in discussion with a variety of global automakers, including Hyundai Motor. As the discussion is at its early stage, nothing has been decided,” the company’s representative told CNBC.

The news pushed Hyundai’s shares up in South Korea.

Hyundai Motor rose 19.42%, Hyundai Wia added 21.33%, Hyundai Mobis gained 18.06% and Hyundai Glovis went up 0.75%. The company’s subsidiary, Kia, which is the second-largest automaker in South Korea also recorded 8.41% surge.

Apple’s bid to join Google and Tesla in electric and self-driving car production has been under speculation for years, as the smartphone maker was not open about it.

“Over the last six years we have seen many twists and turns in Apple’s automotive ambitions,” analysts from Wedbush Securities, said in a note.

“Project Titan as its been known within the halls of Cupertino has ultimately been significantly scaled down from its initial ramp a few years ago and now appears to be front and center again on the radar screen of the Street,” they said.

The sudden surge in interest of tech companies getting involved in car manufacturing projects a competitive future for the automobile industry, where traditional carmakers will have to fight to keep their market share. But it comes with uncertainties for the newcomers; years of hard work and no promise of success. Some analysts say the reality of making an Apple-branded car could potentially mean heavy investments for low margins.

Reuter reported earlier that Apple’s automotive program, known as Project Titan, which has been in the pipeline since 2014, with the iPhone maker targeting 2024 to produce passenger electric vehicles with a breakthrough battery technology, has stumbled on a couple of bumps.

At a point, Apple had to stop and reassess its goals. CNBC noted in a report that Apple veteran Doug Field, who worked for Tesla had to return in 2018 to oversee the project, laying off 190 people from the team.

There were questions then about who Apple would likely partner with to assemble the vehicles.

While challenges and speculations trail the project, there was hope that Apple’s involvement in electric vehicle production will cause disruption that many consumers have been waiting for.

“Apple’s design means that more active material can be packed inside the battery, giving the car a potentially longer range. Apple is also examining a chemistry for the battery called LFP, or lithium iron phosphate, which is inherently less likely to overheat and is thus safer than other types of lithium-ion batteries,” a person familiar with the project said.

Apple Car

With Cupertino’s financial muscle, the challenges were sure to be met. But the question of time remains. It took Elon Musk 17 years of struggle to turn the fate of Tesla into a sustained fortune-making company, which means, the computer and mobile device making company may take longer.

Prominent Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said that the market was too bullish on the Apple car, adding that he wouldn’t be surprised if the vehicle doesn’t launch until 2028 or later.

But with the news of Hyundai’s partnership, the path to Apple’s electric vehicle has become clearer. Apple had previously engaged Magna in talks about car manufacturing, but the talk did not materialize as Apple was not sure of anything then.

The person familiar with the project said automotive contract manufacturers often demand volumes that could pose a challenge in order to make profit. And newcomers like Apple are not exempted.

While Apple undoubtedly has the financial power to pull off the project, other challenges still stand in the way. Ives and Backe said they would give Apple’s chance of launching its standalone car 35%-40% due to the “Herculean-like auto production capabilities, battery technology ramp, financial model implications, and regulatory hurdles involved in such a game changing initiative.”

The WedBush analysts said the project is expected to take longer given the circumspection tradition of Apple, but that partnerships are likely the first step.

“In addition, on the autonomous front and given safety/regulatory issues we would see a longer timeframe if Apple ultimately heads down this path especially given the cautious DNA of Cook & Co. in launching new products,” they said.