U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins has expressed confidence that the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could advance through the Senate this month, identifying September 15 as a critical date for the legislation and the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States.

His comments have renewed attention around a bill that has become central to Washington’s effort to establish a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets.

Atkins reportedly told Fox Business that he anticipates and hopes the CLARITY Act will pass the Senate and eventually reach President Donald Trump’s desk for signature.

The Senate is scheduled to take up a procedural vote on September 15, although that vote is not itself final passage. The measure must first overcome the Senate’s procedural requirements before lawmakers can move toward a final vote.

The distinction is important for crypto markets. The September 15 vote is expected to test whether lawmakers can secure the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation. Industry participants therefore view the date as a major political milestone rather than an automatic indication that the bill will immediately become law.

At the heart of the CLARITY Act is an attempt to resolve one of the cryptocurrency industry’s longest-running regulatory problems: determining which digital assets fall under the jurisdiction of the SEC and which should instead be overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Greater clarity could provide exchanges, token issuers, developers and investors with more predictable rules for operating in the American market.

For years, uncertainty over whether particular tokens should be treated as securities or commodities has generated disputes between regulators and the crypto industry.

A statutory framework could replace much of that uncertainty with clearer classifications and defined responsibilities. The legislation is therefore being watched not simply as another crypto bill, but as a potential foundation for America’s broader digital-asset market structure.

Atkins’ support also comes as the SEC pursues its own regulatory initiatives. The agency has proposed a broader framework known as “Regulation Crypto Assets,” which Atkins has described as an important step toward modernizing the rules governing digital assets.

The proposal includes exemptions and regulatory approaches that are intended to align with the framework contemplated by the CLARITY Act. This parallel approach could prove significant if Congress fails to complete the legislation.

Atkins has indicated that the SEC can continue developing crypto rules under its existing authority even without congressional action. Legislation would provide a stronger statutory foundation and could make the resulting framework more durable across future administrations and changes in SEC leadership.

For the cryptocurrency industry, the potential passage of CLARITY represents more than regulatory housekeeping. Clearer rules could influence where exchanges establish operations, how companies raise capital.

How tokens are listed and traded, and whether institutional investors feel comfortable expanding their exposure to digital assets. The September 15 Senate vote will therefore be closely monitored by both Wall Street and the crypto sector.

Atkins’ optimism signals growing confidence within the regulatory establishment, but significant political hurdles remain. Until the Senate actually advances and ultimately passes the legislation, the CLARITY Act remains a work in progress.

If lawmakers succeed, the bill could mark one of the most consequential developments in U.S. crypto policy, potentially replacing years of regulatory uncertainty with a more defined market structure. For an industry seeking mainstream adoption, September 15 could become a pivotal date in that transition.

Volkswagen plans to eliminate roughly 50,000 additional jobs worldwide as part of an aggressive restructuring designed to reduce costs, simplify its sprawling vehicle portfolio and restore profitability amid intensifying competition from Chinese automakers.

The German automaker’s supervisory board approved its “Future Plan 2030” on Thursday, a 12-part programme that Volkswagen described as the most extensive transformation effort in its history.

The company said it would need a “fundamental adjustment” of its global workforce, including management positions, beyond cost-cutting measures already under way.

Volkswagen did not specify which countries or operations would bear the new reductions, when the jobs would be eliminated or how much of the reduction would come through compulsory layoffs, voluntary buyouts or natural attrition.

The additional cuts mark a significant escalation of Volkswagen’s restructuring as the group confronts a combination of excess manufacturing capacity, weak demand in Europe, high production costs and the expensive transition to electric vehicles. The company is also under growing competitive pressure from Chinese manufacturers that have expanded rapidly in Europe with lower-cost electric vehicles and sophisticated technology.

Volkswagen to Halve Model Portfolio

The workforce reduction is only one element of the restructuring.

Volkswagen plans to halve its model portfolio by 2035 and cut the complexity of its vehicle offerings by about 75%. The company wants to concentrate production and investment on fewer models and variants, allowing higher volumes per vehicle while reducing development, manufacturing and supply-chain costs.

By 2030, Volkswagen is targeting annual vehicle sales of about 9 million units and an operating margin of 9%.

The strategy represents a substantial shift for a group whose size and brand portfolio have historically been major competitive advantages.

Volkswagen controls a collection of marques ranging from mass-market brands such as Volkswagen, Skoda, Seat and Cupra to premium and luxury names including Audi, Porsche, Bentley and Lamborghini. The group has found that scale alone does not guarantee adequate returns. Its large number of platforms, models, powertrains and variants has created substantial manufacturing and development complexity at a time when the industry is demanding faster product cycles and lower costs.

Reducing that complexity could improve factory utilization and purchasing economics while allowing Volkswagen to concentrate capital on models with stronger demand and margins.

German Factories Face Uncertain Future

The scale of Volkswagen’s manufacturing challenge is particularly visible in Germany. The company said its European factories currently have capacity to produce more than 500,000 vehicles above existing demand. That excess capacity leaves the future of four German plants in Emden, Zwickau, Hanover and Neckarsulm uncertain from 2031 through 2034.

Volkswagen said it is examining alternative uses for the facilities.

The announcement adds another layer of uncertainty for Germany’s automotive manufacturing base, where high labor and energy costs have become more difficult to reconcile with weaker European demand and intensifying international competition.

Volkswagen has already agreed with German labor representatives to reduce more than 35,000 positions at its German sites by 2030 under a programme announced in 2024. The company has not yet clarified how the new global target of roughly 50,000 additional job reductions will overlap with those previously announced German cuts.

That will help to assess the true scale of the restructuring. If the new figure is incremental, Volkswagen’s global workforce reduction could be substantially larger than the reductions already announced. If some of the positions overlap, the headline figure would overstate the number of additional jobs ultimately lost.

Chinese Competition Changes the Economics

Volkswagen’s restructuring comes as Chinese automakers increasingly challenge established European manufacturers in their most important markets. Chinese companies have built cost advantages in electric vehicles through large domestic production bases and highly integrated battery and supply chains. They have also moved quickly on software, connected-car features and battery technology.

Volkswagen competing against those manufacturers requires substantial investment at the same time that the company is trying to lower its cost base. The EV transition has therefore created a difficult capital-allocation problem. Automakers must finance new electric platforms, batteries, software and manufacturing technologies while maintaining conventional vehicle programmes during the transition.

Higher energy costs and U.S. tariffs add further pressure to a business model already facing weaker margins.

Volkswagen’s response is to reduce the number of products it develops and manufacture larger volumes of the models it retains. The approach is expected to help the company achieve economies of scale, but it also carries risks. A smaller portfolio gives Volkswagen fewer products with which to capture different segments of the market, while concentrating sales on fewer models increases the consequences if consumer preferences shift or a key product underperforms.

A Broader Auto Industry Reset

Volkswagen’s moves form part of a broader restructuring across the global automotive industry.

Manufacturers are reducing model ranges, consolidating platforms, closing or repurposing plants and cutting corporate overheads as they seek to cope with slowing growth, excess capacity and rising technology costs. The pressure is especially acute in Europe, where manufacturers face relatively high production costs while competing with imported vehicles from lower-cost producers.

For Volkswagen, the immediate challenge is to convert its enormous industrial footprint into a smaller and more profitable operation.

The 9% operating-margin target by 2030 will require more than job cuts. It will depend on whether the company can raise factory utilization, simplify engineering and procurement, improve the profitability of its electric vehicles, and allocate investment toward models capable of competing on both price and technology.

The restructuring also signals that Volkswagen no longer views its extensive product and manufacturing footprint as an asset in its current form. The company’s strategy for the next decade appears to be centered on doing less, but doing it at greater scale and lower cost.

Volkswagen shares jumped 5.8% on Friday. It’s down 21% since the beginning of the year.