U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in the early stages of developing a generic listing standard for token-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in collaboration with exchanges. This initiative aims to streamline the approval process for crypto ETFs by allowing issuers to bypass the complex and time-consuming 19b-4 rule-change filing process.
Instead, if a token meets predefined criteria—potentially including metrics like market capitalization, trading volume, and liquidity—issuers could file an S-1 registration statement, wait 75 days, and list the ETF directly on an exchange. This shift could significantly reduce regulatory hurdles, accelerate approval timelines, and foster innovation by making it easier for asset managers to launch diverse crypto ETFs, including those for assets like Solana, XRP, and others.
The proposed framework responds to growing demand for regulated crypto investment products and aims to provide clearer application of securities laws while maintaining investor protections. For instance, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has issued guidance on disclosure expectations for crypto ETPs, covering aspects like net asset value calculation, benchmarks, and custody practices.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Recent approvals, such as Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund and a Solana staked ETF, signal a more favorable regulatory stance. Bloomberg analysts estimate a 90–95% chance of approval for ETFs tied to major altcoins like Solana and XRP by year-end 2025, reflecting optimism about the initiative’s potential impact. However, specific listing criteria remain undisclosed, and the SEC’s focus on investor protection will likely ensure rigorous standards for market manipulation risks and asset eligibility.
A streamlined approval process for crypto ETFs would lower barriers for retail and institutional investors to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies without directly holding them, potentially increasing mainstream adoption. Tokens like Solana, XRP, and others could see ETFs launched, diversifying investment options beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. This could drive capital inflows and boost the prices of eligible tokens.
By replacing the complex 19b-4 filing with a standardized S-1 process, the SEC could reduce approval times from months to as little as 75 days, encouraging innovation and competition among asset managers. Defined criteria (e.g., market cap, liquidity, trading volume) would provide issuers with predictable guidelines, reducing regulatory uncertainty. Regulated ETFs could enhance the crypto market’s legitimacy, attracting risk-averse investors and institutions hesitant to engage with unregulated platforms.
Increased ETF adoption could improve liquidity for underlying tokens, potentially reducing volatility, though risks like market manipulation remain a concern. A robust crypto ETF framework could position the U.S. as a leader in regulated crypto products, competing with jurisdictions like Canada and Europe, which already have established crypto ETP markets. The SEC’s focus on metrics like market manipulation resistance and custody standards aims to protect investors from fraud and operational risks, though overly stringent criteria could limit token eligibility.
Crypto exchanges, asset managers (e.g., Grayscale, BlackRock), and industry advocates view the standard as a game-changer, enabling faster product launches and broader market access. They argue it aligns with the crypto market’s growth, with global crypto ETP assets under management reaching $120 billion in 2025. Bloomberg analysts and industry leaders like Nate Geraci predict approvals for altcoin ETFs (e.g., Solana, XRP) by late 2025, citing the SEC’s recent approvals as evidence of a softening stance.
Some traditional financial institutions and SEC officials remain cautious, emphasizing risks like market manipulation, insufficient liquidity for smaller tokens, and custodial challenges. For example, only tokens with robust market infrastructure may qualify, potentially excluding newer or smaller assets. Critics argue that the SEC’s stringent investor protection standards could lead to narrow eligibility criteria, limiting the range of tokens available for ETFs and frustrating issuers seeking flexibility.
Retail Investors may benefit from easier access to diversified crypto exposure but could face risks if complex products (e.g., staked ETFs) are not clearly explained. Larger players may dominate the ETF market, potentially sidelining smaller issuers and creating a concentration of influence among major asset managers. Some in the crypto community oppose ETFs, arguing they undermine the decentralized ethos by funneling investment through traditional financial systems, potentially increasing regulatory oversight over tokens.
Others see ETFs as a necessary step toward mainstream adoption, even if it means greater integration with centralized finance. The SEC’s generic listing standard could transform the crypto ETF landscape by fostering innovation, improving access, and enhancing market legitimacy. However, the divide between crypto advocates pushing for rapid expansion and skeptics prioritizing investor safety highlights ongoing tensions. The success of this framework will depend on balancing regulatory rigor with flexibility to include a diverse range of tokens, while addressing concerns about market risks.