DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4

Uber Strikes $14.8bn Deal For Delivery Hero To Create Global Food-Delivery Powerhouse

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Uber has agreed to acquire German food-delivery giant Delivery Hero in a deal valued at $14.8 billion, marking one of the biggest consolidation moves in the global online food-delivery industry and creating the world’s largest delivery platform outside China.

The acquisition significantly expands Uber’s international footprint, strengthens its competitive position against DoorDash and Prosus-backed Just Eat, and underscores how scale has become the defining advantage in an industry facing slower growth, rising regulatory costs and mounting competition.

The transaction is a major milestone in Uber’s transformation from a ride-hailing company into a diversified mobility and logistics platform. By combining Delivery Hero’s extensive international operations with Uber Eats, the company will nearly double the number of markets where it offers both transportation and food delivery, enabling it to deepen customer engagement through bundled services and its Uber One subscription program.

“We’ll nearly double the number of markets where we offer both mobility and delivery services,” Uber Chief Executive Dara Khosrowshahi said in a joint statement announcing the transaction.

The acquisition values Delivery Hero at €41.50 per share, representing about a 34% premium to its three-month volume-weighted average share price and roughly 40% above the company’s undisturbed share price before takeover speculation emerged. Uber’s offer is also significantly higher than its earlier proposal in May, which valued Delivery Hero at around €10 billion, or €33 per share, and was rejected by the German company.

The deal has the backing of Delivery Hero’s management and supervisory board, although Uber has made the transaction conditional on securing acceptance from shareholders representing at least 50% plus one share.

If completed, the combined company will operate across 99 countries, up from roughly 50 markets for Uber today, with a projected gross merchandise value (GMV) of $236 billion in 2025. Delivery Hero contributed approximately $42 billion in gross bookings last year and serves around 60 million monthly active users, providing Uber with immediate scale in regions where its presence has historically been limited.

The acquisition substantially expands Uber’s reach across Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America through Delivery Hero’s portfolio of brands, which includes Talabat, PedidosYa, Glovo, and several regional delivery platforms.

The rationale extends beyond food delivery.

Uber has been pursuing a “super app” strategy that combines ride-hailing, restaurant delivery, grocery delivery, retail logistics, and subscription services within a single ecosystem. Adding Delivery Hero’s customer base gives Uber new opportunities to cross-sell mobility services, expand Uber One memberships, and improve customer retention while spreading technology and marketing costs across a much larger platform.

Analysts say those network effects have become increasingly important as industry growth normalizes following the pandemic-era surge in online food ordering.

The acquisition also points to the rapid consolidation of the global food-delivery industry. What was once a fragmented market populated by dozens of regional competitors has increasingly become dominated by a handful of global companies. Slowing order growth, higher interest rates, increasing labor costs, and tighter regulation surrounding gig-economy workers have made scale essential for maintaining profitability.

The industry has witnessed a succession of large transactions over the past several years. Uber acquired Postmates to strengthen its U.S. business. DoorDash expanded internationally through its purchases of Wolt and Deliveroo. Just Eat merged with Takeaway.com before acquiring Grubhub, while Delivery Hero itself grew aggressively through acquisitions, including Glovo and foodpanda, before later exiting selected markets to improve profitability.

The latest transaction further concentrates the industry, effectively leaving Uber and DoorDash as the dominant global competitors outside China, where Meituan continues to lead.

Despite the strategic logic, the deal is expected to face an extensive regulatory review. Because Uber and Delivery Hero operate in numerous overlapping markets, competition authorities are likely to closely examine whether the combination could reduce consumer choice, weaken competition, or increase commissions charged to restaurants.

To help address those concerns before formal reviews begin, Delivery Hero has agreed to divest operations in 14 markets to U.S. investment firm SSW Partners for approximately €1.4 billion. The divestitures are intended to reduce competitive overlaps and improve the transaction’s chances of securing regulatory approval.

Another important element involves Prosus, one of Delivery Hero’s largest shareholders. Prosus has agreed to sell its nearly 17% stake in Delivery Hero as part of commitments it previously made to the European Commission to secure approval for its acquisition of Just Eat Takeaway. Those commitments required the Dutch technology investor to reduce its ownership in Delivery Hero, effectively removing a potential obstacle to Uber’s acquisition.

People familiar with the matter said the divestment was driven by regulatory obligations rather than a strategic desire to exit, describing Prosus as a “false seller.”

The transaction nevertheless highlights an irony within Europe’s technology space. While European policymakers have repeatedly emphasized the importance of nurturing homegrown technology champions capable of competing globally, regulatory remedies attached to another merger have helped pave the way for one of Europe’s largest digital platforms to be acquired by a U.S. company.

Analysts expect the regulatory process to be lengthy.

Jefferies described the proposed completion timetable, which extends into the second half of 2027, as evidence that regulators are likely to conduct an extensive antitrust review.

“The use of a financial investor to get ahead of the antitrust questions could prove successful, though the long timeline to completion suggests it won’t be a straightforward review,” Jefferies analysts wrote.

Investor reaction was relatively muted following the announcement. Delivery Hero shares edged modestly higher, while Uber shares gained around 2%, suggesting markets largely anticipated an improved offer after takeover discussions became public earlier this year.

As part of the agreement, Uber committed to invest €2 billion in Germany through 2031 and pledged to maintain Delivery Hero’s Berlin headquarters and workforce until at least 2029. Those commitments may help ease political concerns over foreign ownership while preserving Germany’s role as a major European technology hub.

The acquisition also strengthens Uber’s long-term competitive positioning beyond traditional food delivery.

According to Adam Ballantyne, an analyst at Cambiar Investors, the newly acquired markets provide Uber with years of additional organic growth opportunities as it introduces bundled ride-hailing and delivery services while expanding Uber One subscriptions into regions where customers currently use Delivery Hero’s platforms but have limited access to Uber’s broader ecosystem.

If regulators ultimately approve the acquisition, Uber will emerge as the most geographically diversified food-delivery company outside China, with an unmatched global network spanning nearly 100 countries.

U.S. Imposes 25% Tariffs On Most Brazilian Imports After Trade Probe, Escalating Dispute With Latin America’s Largest Economy

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

The United States has imposed 25% tariffs on most imports from Brazil following a yearlong investigation into what Washington describes as unfair trade practices, sharply escalating trade tensions between the two countries after negotiations failed to produce an agreement.

The tariffs, which take effect on July 22, were imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, a powerful trade enforcement tool that allows the U.S. government to levy duties against countries found to have engaged in unfair trade practices.

The move marks another major use of Section 301 by the Trump administration as it seeks to reassert its trade agenda after the U.S. Supreme Court in February struck down President Donald Trump’s earlier 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods, leaving only the 10% universal tariff in place. Rather than abandon the effort, the administration launched a formal Section 301 investigation, creating a new legal pathway to impose country-specific duties without additional congressional approval.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) said the new tariffs are necessary to create a level playing field for American businesses and workers.

The investigation cited several Brazilian policies that Washington argues discriminate against U.S. companies, including court orders directing American technology firms such as Meta, Google and X to remove political content and suspend accounts belonging to U.S. residents. U.S. officials also pointed to what they described as inadequate intellectual property protection, preferential tariff treatment for countries including Mexico and India, and barriers to U.S. ethanol exports.

While the tariffs apply broadly to Brazilian imports, several strategically important products have been excluded, including beef, orange juice, aircraft and aircraft parts, and energy products. Those exemptions are likely aimed at limiting disruptions to U.S. industries and consumers that rely on Brazilian supplies while preserving pressure on other sectors of Brazil’s export economy.

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva swiftly rejected the U.S. action, calling it unjustified and announcing plans to pursue both retaliatory measures and legal action through the World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement mechanism.

In a statement posted on X, Lula argued there was “no justification for unilateral measures,” noting that the United States has accumulated a $424.5 billion surplus in goods and services trade with Brazil over the past 15 years, based on U.S. government figures.

According to U.S. trade data, America recorded a $14.4 billion goods trade surplus with Brazil in 2025, more than double the previous year’s level. The figures complicate Washington’s traditional argument that tariffs are needed to reduce persistent trade deficits, suggesting the administration’s concerns are focused more on market access, regulatory treatment and digital trade than on the overall trade balance.

The latest measures follow months of negotiations between Brazilian officials and USTR representatives that ultimately failed to bridge differences. Lula had warned last month that Brazil would not accept what he described as unfair treatment after Trump initially proposed imposing the 25% tariffs.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio blamed Brazil for the collapse in negotiations.

In a post on X following the announcement, Rubio said Lula’s administration had “not negotiated in good faith” and accused the Brazilian president of “putting his own ego ahead of making a deal.”

Trade tensions could intensify further. A separate U.S. investigation into Brazil’s enforcement of forced labor rules is expected to conclude next week and could result in an additional 12.5% tariff on Brazilian goods, potentially raising duties on many products to 37.5%.

The dispute has also become intertwined with Brazil’s domestic politics ahead of the country’s October presidential election.

Lula has accused Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro, of helping trigger the U.S. tariffs following a visit to Washington. The senator has denied the allegation, saying instead that he sought to persuade the Trump administration to postpone the tariffs until after the election.

Beyond the bilateral relationship, the dispute shows that the Trump administration is not relenting in its aggressive use of Section 301 investigations to address a broad range of trade grievances extending beyond traditional tariff barriers. Unlike earlier trade disputes that focused primarily on manufacturing or market access, the case against Brazil includes digital content moderation, intellectual property enforcement and regulatory policies affecting U.S. technology companies.

The tariffs now pose another challenge for Brazil’s economy, which is already navigating slower global growth and volatile commodity markets. Although exemptions for key exports such as aircraft, beef and orange juice soften the immediate economic impact, broader tariffs could weigh on manufacturing exports and investment if the dispute remains unresolved or expands through additional U.S. trade actions.

Visa Launches Stablecoin Platform to Serve Over 200 Million Merchants

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Visa, a world leader in digital payments, has officially introduced the Visa Stablecoin Platform (VSP), a new enterprise solution designed to make stablecoin integration straightforward for financial institutions, fintech companies, and crypto-native businesses.

The platform operates as a single, Visa-managed environment where participants can access, store, and redeem stablecoins.

Building on Visa’s broader crypto strategy, VSP gives FIs, fintechs, and other payment providers a simple way to access, store, and redeem stablecoins, beginning with Open USD (OUSD), a new stablecoin recently introduced by Open Standard.

According to Jack Forestell, Visa’s Chief Product and Strategy Officer, stablecoins represent programmable money with significant potential, but institutions often struggle with the operational side.

Announcing the launch of the platform, he said,

“Stablecoins are opening up a new layer of programmable money, but for most institutions the hard part isn’t the concept, it’s the operational reality. With the Visa Stablecoin Platform, we’re giving our clients a single place to mint, move and manage stablecoin operations with the controls, security and network reach they already expect from Visa. It’s how we help them turn interest in stablecoins into real products and real payment flows.”

Visa Stablecoin Platform provides direct access to a range of stablecoin capabilities and flows alongside Visa’s network, risk and fraud capabilities, so institutions can move from exploration to implementation with greater confidence.

These include:

  • Access to Open USD: VSP integrates seamlessly into the Open Standard, providing institutions with direct access to Open USD alongside Visa’s network services. This gives clients a way to easily mint, burn, manage, and transfer Open USD, bringing fiat onchain and managing flows in an environment they already trust.
  • Onchain wallet infrastructure: VSP packages the wallet infrastructure, controls, and workflows needed to make stablecoins usable inside real-world treasury, settlement, and product stacks for a range of institutional use cases.
  • Integration into Visa’s network: VSP is designed to enable connectivity of stablecoins into Visa’s network and tools, allowing users to embed stablecoin capabilities into existing payment flows, treasury operations and settlement processes. For existing Visa clients using Visa’s settlement, treasury and currency solutions, VSP provides direct interoperability to seamlessly integrate stablecoins into the workflows and systems they rely on today.
  • Built for trust on day one: VSP allows institutions to interact with stablecoin flows with the same security and trust that Visa is known for. Users will have access to features like dual-control approval for workflows, where one user initiates a sensitive action and another authorized user must approve it, comprehensive audit logging, and Wallet-as-a-Service features of secure passkeys and allow lists to control transfers, to help provide the level of security and control they require to operate.

The Explosive Growth of Stablecoins in Global Finance

Stablecoins have evolved from a niche crypto product into one of the fastest-growing segments of global finance. What began as a tool for crypto trading is increasingly becoming core payment infrastructure, enabling near-instant, low-cost, 24/7 settlement for businesses, banks, and fintechs.

According to Visa, the global stablecoin supply grew by more than 50% during 2025, rising from approximately $186 billion to $274 billion.

After adjusting for non-economic activity such as bots and high-frequency trading, stablecoin transaction volume was still on track to exceed $10 trillion in 2025, highlighting their growing role in real-world payments rather than speculation alone.

This rapid growth has prompted major payment companies to move beyond simply observing the market to actively building infrastructure around stablecoins.

The institutional push extends beyond card networks. Companies including Stripe, Circle, PayPal, Paxos and numerous fintech infrastructure providers are investing heavily in stablecoin payment rails, custody services and cross-border settlement capabilities.

Meanwhile, regulators in major jurisdictions are introducing clearer frameworks, encouraging traditional financial institutions to participate more actively.

Outlook

Stablecoins are increasingly being viewed not as a replacement for traditional payment networks, but as a complementary layer that enhances global money movement.

Instead of resisting the technology, industry leaders such as Visa are integrating stablecoins into their infrastructure, positioning themselves to support the next generation of digital payments.

By lowering technical and compliance barriers, Visa aims to help its vast merchant network more than 200 million businesses explore and adopt stablecoin payments more effectively.

This move builds on the payments giant’s ongoing crypto strategy and signals growing mainstream financial integration of stablecoins for faster, more programmable global payments.

TSMC Q2 Earnings Smash Profit Forecasts, Company Announces $100bn Additional U.S. Chip Expansion

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) delivered another record-breaking quarter on Thursday, as surging demand for advanced chips from customers including Nvidia, Apple and Broadcom drove earnings well above market expectations and prompted the company to raise both its capital spending and U.S. investment plans.

The world’s largest contract chipmaker reported second-quarter net profit of NT$706.56 billion ($39.45 billion), up 77.4% from a year earlier and comfortably ahead of analysts’ estimates of NT$632.64 billion, according to LSEG SmartEstimates. Revenue climbed 36% year-on-year to a record NT$1.27 trillion, also exceeding expectations of NT$1.264 trillion.

The results underpin TSMC’s position as the biggest beneficiary of the unprecedented global buildout of AI infrastructure, with hyperscalers and semiconductor companies continuing to spend aggressively on next-generation computing capacity. The company has now posted record quarterly net income for five consecutive quarters, highlighting the resilience of AI-related investment even as broader semiconductor markets recover at a slower pace.

Looking ahead, TSMC projected third-quarter revenue of between $44.6 billion and $45.8 billion, alongside an operating profit margin of 56% to 58%, signaling that demand remains exceptionally strong.

“AI related demand continues to be extremely robust,” Chairman and Chief Executive C.C. Wei said during the company’s earnings call.

To support that demand, Wei announced that TSMC will invest an additional $100 billion in Arizona, increasing its total planned investment in the U.S. state to $265 billion.

“This is to build several or more semiconductor logical wafer fab for two nanometer MP (mass production) technologies, as well as advanced packaging fabs to support the strong multi-year demand from our leading U.S. customers,” Wei said.

The announcement further cements Arizona as one of TSMC’s most strategically important manufacturing hubs outside Taiwan and reflects growing efforts by customers and governments to diversify semiconductor production geographically while securing access to advanced chips.

Chief Financial Officer Wendell Huang also raised the company’s 2026 capital expenditure forecast to between $60 billion and $64 billion, marking one of the largest annual investment budgets in semiconductor industry history.

The increased spending is seen as another indication that AI is reshaping capital allocation across the semiconductor sector. While many technology companies are racing to develop larger AI models and build new data centers, TSMC remains the critical manufacturing partner producing the advanced processors powering that expansion.

The company’s technology mix also illustrates how quickly customers are migrating toward leading-edge manufacturing nodes.

Advanced technologies of 7 nanometers and below accounted for 77% of total wafer revenue during the quarter. The 5-nanometer process contributed 33% of revenue, while 3-nanometer chips represented 30%, demonstrating continued customer migration toward increasingly sophisticated manufacturing technologies.

High-performance computing remained the primary growth engine, accounting for 66% of revenue in 2026, well ahead of smartphones at 22% and Internet of Things applications at 5%. The figures highlight how AI servers and data-center processors have become the company’s most important business segment, reducing its historical reliance on smartphones.

Industry analysts said TSMC continues to enjoy significant pricing power because of its unmatched technological leadership, although management has exercised restraint in passing higher costs on to customers.

“Net, they have far more pricing power than they are currently exercising,” said Sravan Kundojjala, an analyst at SemiAnalysis.

He added that TSMC is capturing greater value through selective price increases while deliberately avoiding aggressive pricing strategies that could pressure customers.

Kundojjala also noted that booming demand for AI-related memory is beginning to affect other parts of the semiconductor industry.

“The memory boom is now squeezing TSMC’s non-AI business. Consumer and price-sensitive end markets took a hit from rising memory prices and tight component supply,” he said.

AI-related chips continue to experience supply constraints and premium pricing across the tech industry, but consumer electronics markets remain comparatively subdued, creating a two-speed industry where AI infrastructure investment continues to offset weakness in traditional computing and consumer devices.

TSMC’s results also lend credence to recent optimism across the semiconductor supply chain. Equipment makers, including ASML, have raised sales forecasts amid expanding AI-related capacity, while Nvidia, Broadcom and other major chip designers continue to launch powerful processors that rely on TSMC’s most advanced manufacturing technologies.

Investors welcomed the strong results, with TSMC shares rising 1.23% on Thursday. The stock has gained more than 58% this year, extending its rally as investors continue to view the company as one of the clearest long-term beneficiaries of the global AI investment cycle.

The latest earnings suggest that demand for advanced semiconductors remains far ahead of available manufacturing capacity, supporting TSMC’s strategy of maintaining record capital expenditure while expanding production across Taiwan, the United States, and other international locations.

With customers continuing to commit tens of billions of dollars to AI infrastructure, the company’s elevated investment plans indicate it expects the current AI spending cycle to remain intact for several years rather than representing a short-term surge.

How Bola Oyebamiji Can Build a Winning Online Strategy for Osun 2026 Governorship Election

By
Mutiu Iyanda
-
0

The 2026 Osun State governorship election is shaping up to be one of the most digitally influenced elections in the state’s political history. While traditional campaign structures, grassroots mobilisation, and party organisation remain essential determinants of electoral success, digital communication has become a powerful force in shaping voter perceptions before election day. Publicly observable online activity suggests that Governor Ademola Adeleke currently enjoys greater visibility and engagement across major social media platforms. However, this digital advantage does not place the election beyond the reach of the All Progressives Congress candidate, Bola Oyebamiji. Instead, it presents an opportunity to rethink campaign communication and deploy a more strategic digital approach.

History demonstrates that elections are rarely won solely because one candidate has more followers or receives more online engagement. Digital popularity creates visibility, but electoral victory depends on converting attention into trust, persuasion, and votes. For Oyebamiji, the challenge is not to imitate his opponent’s communication style. Rather, it is to build a distinctive digital identity that reflects his strengths while addressing voter expectations.

One of the first priorities should be strengthening issue ownership. Current online conversations often portray Oyebamiji as a candidate with experience in financial management and public administration. These credentials provide an opportunity to dominate discussions on economic development, fiscal responsibility, job creation, infrastructure financing, and investment promotion. Every digital campaign requires a clear narrative that answers a simple question. Why should voters choose this candidate? Consistent messaging around competence, accountability, and sustainable development would help reinforce that narrative.

Digital communication should also move beyond official announcements and political endorsements. Modern audiences engage more readily with stories than with formal statements. Instead of focusing primarily on meetings, endorsements, and campaign events, the campaign should produce content that explains how proposed policies will improve the lives of ordinary citizens. Short videos, animated explainers, infographics, and testimonials can translate complex policy ideas into accessible messages that resonate with diverse audiences.

Another important opportunity lies in audience segmentation. Social media platforms provide the ability to communicate differently with different voter groups without compromising message consistency. Young graduates may respond to discussions about entrepreneurship and digital innovation. Farmers may be more interested in agricultural value chains and rural infrastructure. Women entrepreneurs may prioritise access to finance and market opportunities. Civil servants may focus on public sector reforms and welfare. A single campaign message cannot effectively address every constituency. Data driven segmentation enables campaigns to deliver more relevant and persuasive communication.

The campaign should also invest in expanding its network of independent digital advocates. One of the characteristics of successful online political communication is decentralisation. Messages become more credible when they are shared voluntarily by respected community leaders, professionals, youth organisations, business groups, and local influencers rather than exclusively through official campaign accounts. Building such a network requires continuous engagement, relationship management, and the production of shareable content that supporters are motivated to distribute.

Another strategic consideration is responsiveness. Digital campaigns should not function as one way communication channels. Citizens increasingly expect interaction, clarification, and timely responses to public concerns. Establishing dedicated teams to monitor public conversations, respond to misinformation, and engage constructively with citizens can improve public confidence. A campaign that listens as much as it speaks often develops stronger public legitimacy than one that focuses only on broadcasting messages.

Video should become a central element of the communication strategy. Across Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X, video consistently generates higher engagement than static graphics. However, effectiveness depends on authenticity rather than production cost. Voters are often more interested in genuine interactions with market women, students, artisans, health workers, and community leaders than in highly polished campaign advertisements. Authenticity communicates confidence and accessibility, two qualities that influence public perception of leadership.

Importantly, digital communication should remain evidence based. Policy proposals supported by credible data, independent reports, and measurable targets are more likely to persuade educated voters, professionals, and opinion leaders. Rather than making broad promises, the campaign should communicate specific objectives, implementation timelines, and expected outcomes. This approach not only strengthens credibility but also distinguishes policy communication from political rhetoric.

Campaign planners should equally recognise that social media success requires continuous measurement. Metrics such as engagement rates, audience growth, sentiment trends, content reach, and issue performance should inform strategic decisions throughout the campaign. Weekly performance reviews can identify which messages resonate most effectively and where communication adjustments are necessary. Political campaigns that rely on evidence rather than assumptions are generally better positioned to adapt to changing public opinion.

Perhaps the most important lesson is that digital communication cannot replace grassroots politics. Instead, it should reinforce field operations. Every online campaign should support voter registration efforts, community meetings, local outreach, volunteer recruitment, fundraising, and election day mobilisation. The strongest campaigns integrate digital engagement with physical political organisation, ensuring that online enthusiasm translates into measurable electoral participation.

The broader implication extends beyond a single election. Nigerian political competition is entering an era where digital competence increasingly influences democratic participation. Candidates who invest in strategic communication, evidence based messaging, audience engagement, and policy transparency will be better positioned to build lasting political credibility. Digital platforms are no longer supplementary campaign tools. They have become central arenas where leadership is evaluated, public trust is earned, and political narratives are established.

For Bola Oyebamiji, the current digital gap should therefore be viewed not as a permanent disadvantage but as a strategic challenge. By strengthening issue ownership, embracing authentic storytelling, expanding independent supporter networks, applying data driven communication, and integrating online engagement with grassroots mobilisation, his campaign can substantially improve its digital competitiveness. Whether these improvements ultimately influence the outcome of the 2026 Osun governorship election will depend on several political variables. However, one conclusion is increasingly clear. In contemporary Nigerian politics, campaigns that communicate strategically, consistently, and credibly are more likely to shape public opinion and strengthen their electoral prospects.

1...345...8,997Page 4 of 8,997

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy