Electronic Arts, the video game giant behind titles such as Madden NFL and The Sims, is set to go private in a blockbuster $55 billion acquisition, the largest leveraged buyout ever recorded.

The deal, announced Monday, brings together private equity firm Silver Lake Partners, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), and Affinity Partners, the private equity firm founded by President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Under the agreement, the consortium will acquire 100% of EA at $210 per share in cash, a figure that represents a 25% premium to EA’s unaffected share price of $168.32 at market close on September 25, 2025. It also stands above EA’s unaffected all-time high of $179.01, reached on August 14, 2025. The price values the company far beyond any prior gaming transaction, eclipsing even Microsoft’s $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard.

The transaction, which will end EA’s 36-year run as a publicly traded company, underscores the scale of global capital now flowing into the gaming industry.

Founded in 1982 by former Apple employee William “Trip” Hawkins, EA went public in 1989, with its shares ending their first day at a split-adjusted 52 cents. Since then, the company has become a pillar of the global gaming economy, with a library of titles that shaped generations of players.

The $55 billion price tag makes this the most expensive leveraged buyout in history, surpassing the $32 billion take-private of Texas utility TXU in 2007. Financing will be structured as a mix of equity and debt: approximately $36 billion in equity from the consortium, alongside $20 billion in debt financing fully committed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., with $18 billion expected to be funded at close. PIF, which already holds a 9.9% stake in EA, will roll over its shares into the new ownership structure.

If approved by shareholders and regulators, the deal is expected to close in Q1 FY27. Once finalized, EA’s common stock will be delisted from public markets. The company will remain headquartered in Redwood City, California, with Andrew Wilson continuing as Chairman and CEO.

What The Buyers Are Saying

For the investors, the transaction is being framed as both financial and strategic.

• Andrew Wilson, EA CEO: “Our creative and passionate teams at EA have delivered extraordinary experiences for hundreds of millions of fans, built some of the world’s most iconic IP, and created significant value for our business. This moment is a powerful recognition of their remarkable work. Looking ahead, we will continue to push the boundaries of entertainment, sports, and technology, unlocking new opportunities. Together with our partners, we will create transformative experiences to inspire generations to come.”
• Turqi Alnowaiser, PIF Deputy Governor: “PIF is uniquely positioned in the global gaming and esports sectors, building and supporting ecosystems that connect fans, developers, and IP creators. This partnership will help further drive EA’s long-term growth, while fueling innovation within the industry on a global scale.”
• Egon Durban, Co-CEO of Silver Lake: “EA is a special company: a global leader in interactive entertainment, anchored by its premier sports franchise, with accelerating revenue growth and strong and scaling free cash flow. We are honored to invest and partner with Andrew – an extraordinary CEO who has doubled revenue, nearly tripled EBITDA, and driven a fivefold increase in market cap during his tenure. We are going to invest heavily to grow the business and accelerate innovation.”
• Jared Kushner, CEO of Affinity Partners: “Electronic Arts is an extraordinary company with a world-class management team and a bold vision for the future. I’ve admired their ability to create iconic, lasting experiences, and as someone who grew up playing their games – and now enjoys them with his kids – I couldn’t be more excited about what’s ahead.”
• Luis A. Ubiñas, EA Lead Independent Director: “The Board carefully evaluated this opportunity and concluded it delivers compelling value for stockholders and is in the best interests of all stakeholders. We are pleased this transaction delivers immediate and certain cash value while strengthening EA’s ability to continue building the communities and experiences that define the future of entertainment.”

The Implications

The consortium — blending Silver Lake’s private equity firepower, PIF’s sovereign wealth clout, and Kushner’s Affinity Partners — is betting on gaming’s continued convergence with entertainment, sports, and global media. With Saudi Arabia already making aggressive moves into esports and digital content, and Silver Lake known for technology and sports investments, the deal positions EA at the nexus of physical and digital fan engagement.

Industry analysts say the size of the transaction reflects both the enduring profitability of EA’s franchises, like FIFA (now EA Sports FC), Battlefield, and The Sims, and the belief that future growth will come from blending immersive gaming, live services, and global fan communities.

The deal also puts EA in a stronger position to compete with rivals that are increasingly backed by big capital, including Microsoft’s gaming division, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Tencent, and NetEase.

With regulatory review pending, the buyout, if approved, could serve as a template for how sovereign wealth funds and private equity consortia reshape the entertainment and gaming sector — using massive cash reserves to pry iconic companies off public markets and scale them in new directions.

A new chapter has begun for EA. The company is no longer a Wall Street stock but a privately held powerhouse, with some of the world’s deepest-pocketed investors betting billions on its future.

Pull up the five–year Bitcoin chart and you’re staring at a story written in peaks and valleys. From a low around 25,000 to today’s climb past 114,000, the line isn’t smooth, but it’s relentless. That kind of growth doesn’t happen by accident. Behind it sits blockchain, the engine that keeps Bitcoin running no matter how wild the ride gets.

Bitcoin has boomed in the past year. It’s more than just a price surge. It’s proof that a decentralized system can survive shocks, regulation talk, and waves of panic selling. Crypto is at the cutting edge of finance because blockchain makes it possible. It isn’t a trend. It’s a shift in how money can work.

The Pull of Price

Anyone who’s tracked the Bitcoin price knows the numbers are magnetic. In just five years the value is up more than 960 percent. Think about that. A coin worth less than 25,000 in 2020 now trades above 114,000. That’s why the phrase Bitcoin price ends up in conversations everywhere from dinner tables to gym floors. It’s not just the scale of the move, it’s the persistence. Each crash gets headlines. Each recovery writes the bigger story.

Yi He, the co-founder of crypto exchange Binance, said it best: “Crypto isn’t just the future of finance. It’s already reshaping the system, one day at a time.” That reshaping is written on the chart itself. The climb isn’t clean, but the trajectory is clear.

What Blockchain Actually Does

Strip away the buzzwords. Blockchain is a ledger — but not the kind locked in a bank’s vault. It’s public, distributed, and nearly impossible to alter. Every Bitcoin transfer is stamped into this digital record. Once written, it can’t be erased. That permanence is where the trust comes from. Not in a government. Not in a company. In the system itself.

Look at what it delivers:

• Resilience. No single server or authority can be taken out to end Bitcoin.
• Transparency. Every transfer is visible, open for anyone to verify.
• Security. Changing records would require impossible computing power.

These qualities explain why Bitcoin didn’t fade after its early hype. Even when markets tanked, blockchain kept processing blocks. The system didn’t blink. That resilience is why long–term optimism holds weight.

The Past Five Years as Proof

The chart tells a story of pain and persistence. 2022 brought deep losses. 2023 was stagnant. But in 2024, the curve turned and by 2025 it touched record highs. That arc matters. It proves that the network can recover from blows that would kill a weaker system. It’s not just investors pushing it higher. It’s the faith that blockchain won’t stop, won’t fail, and won’t lie.

When you zoom out, the volatility looks like noise around an upward march. That’s why so many people see the last five years not as a warning but as evidence. Blockchain doesn’t guarantee profit, but it guarantees the system itself holds.

The Human Side of the Ledger

Blockchain isn’t just machines. It’s people. Miners validating transactions. Developers strengthening code. Users sending and receiving coins across borders. This collective effort is what turns the technology into a living network.

Think of the final minutes of Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals. LeBron blocks, Kyrie shoots, the Cavs win. No single play made the victory. It was the sum of each part, each person doing their role under pressure. Blockchain works like that. Alone, each participant is small. Together, they make something unshakable.

The Caveats Nobody Should Ignore

Optimism shouldn’t be confused with blind faith. Bitcoin’s past five years include brutal drops as well as record highs. Blockchain protects the system, not your portfolio. If you buy at the wrong time or invest money you can’t afford to lose, the pain is real.

The responsible view is simple: treat Bitcoin as a high–risk, high–potential asset. Diversify. Don’t stake your future on it. Respect the volatility. Blockchain ensures the game keeps running, but it doesn’t promise you’ll always win.

Where the Story Heads Next

The future isn’t going to be smooth. Governments will argue. Markets will lurch. Headlines will flip between triumph and disaster. But while all that unfolds, blockchain will keep adding blocks to the chain. That quiet consistency is the strongest argument for optimism.

If the past five years prove anything, it’s that the system survives storms. That survival alone is revolutionary. It makes Bitcoin more than speculation. It makes it a case study in how technology can carry value across time without permission from above.

A Revolutionary Foundation

To understand why Bitcoin keeps fueling optimism, you don’t need to memorize code or parse every chart tick. Just look at what blockchain does. It makes a currency that doesn’t need a referee. It builds trust without a central power. And it has carried Bitcoin from the margins of 2009 to a chart line over 114,000 in 2025.

That’s not a fad. That’s a revolution playing out block by block. The optimism isn’t naïve. It’s rooted in the evidence of a system that hasn’t stopped, hasn’t broken, and keeps writing its own history one transaction at a time.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday signed SB 53, landmark legislation that for the first time requires large AI companies to disclose their safety protocols and creates new protections for whistleblowers inside the industry.

The bill, passed by state lawmakers earlier this month, applies to major AI labs such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Google DeepMind. It mandates that companies provide transparency into how they manage AI risks, while also establishing a mechanism for reporting potential “critical safety incidents” to the California Office of Emergency Services. That includes crimes committed without human oversight — such as AI-enabled cyberattacks — and incidents of deceptive behavior by a model, requirements that go beyond what the EU AI Act currently enforces.

In addition, SB 53 protects employees who raise safety concerns from retaliation, an increasingly pressing issue as some AI researchers have left firms like OpenAI amid disputes over safety and governance.

Tech Industry Pushback

The measure has divided the AI sector. Anthropic endorsed the bill, but both Meta and OpenAI lobbied aggressively against it. In fact, OpenAI went as far as publishing an open letter to Gov. Newsom warning that the law could slow innovation and stifle research. Broadly, companies argue that state-by-state laws risk creating a “patchwork” of regulation that complicates compliance for global firms.

The tension comes as Silicon Valley leaders have begun investing heavily in politics to shape the regulatory climate. Executives at both Meta and OpenAI have launched pro-AI super PACs, funneling hundreds of millions of dollars into supporting candidates who favor a light-touch approach to AI oversight.

National Ripple Effect

California’s move is likely to reverberate well beyond its borders. Other states are already considering similar measures: New York’s legislature has passed its own AI safety bill, now awaiting Gov. Kathy Hochul’s decision. If signed, it would further signal a willingness by states to step in while federal lawmakers in Washington remain gridlocked on comprehensive AI policy.

“California has proven that we can establish regulations to protect our communities while also ensuring that the growing AI industry continues to thrive,” Newsom said in a statement.

Calling AI “the new frontier in innovation,” he argued that the bill strikes a balance between safeguards and economic growth.

More Regulation on the Horizon

Newsom’s signature is not the end of the story. He is currently weighing SB 243, another measure that passed with bipartisan support, which would specifically regulate AI companion chatbots. That bill would require operators to implement safety protocols and hold them legally accountable if their systems fail to meet standards, responding to mounting concerns about mental health risks and exploitation by human-like bots.

For State Senator Scott Wiener, SB 53 marks a breakthrough after last year’s setback. Newsom vetoed Wiener’s earlier, broader SB 1047 following heavy industry pushback. Learning from that defeat, Wiener worked directly with AI companies to refine the new measure, a more targeted bill that still manages to set a national precedent.

With SB 53, California has planted a flag in the ongoing struggle to define how the U.S. will manage the risks of frontier AI. While federal lawmakers debate whether to leave oversight largely to industry or impose stricter national rules, Sacramento is asserting itself as a laboratory for AI governance.

If other states follow California’s lead, companies like OpenAI and Meta could soon face a patchwork of requirements across the country — a prospect they warn could fragment innovation. But to policymakers, California’s approach could also serve as a blueprint for bridging public trust and technological progress at a moment when concerns over AI’s rapid advancement are growing louder.