Who’s Liable in a Ride-Share Accident? What Drivers, Passengers, and Victims Need to Know

By

-

September 23, 2025

Ride-share apps make life easier. One tap, a car appears, and off you go. But accidents? They happen. And then comes the headache: who’s responsible?

Drivers, passengers, and even unrelated victims all face different challenges. Knowing what each group should do can save stress and a lot of confusion.

Accidents aren’t just about law papers. They’re about real people, injuries, and figuring out how to handle everything without losing your mind.

How Accidents Happen

It’s rarely one simple cause. Usually, it’s a mix:

A driver looking at their phone for just a second too long
Wet or icy roads
Car issues nobody noticed
Another driver made a mistake

For drivers, this might mean understanding insurance coverage. For passengers, it’s about knowing what to report. And for victims outside the car? It’s about figuring out who’s actually responsible.

Who Can Be Liable?

Liability changes depending on the role you play:

Drivers

You’re in charge of the car and your actions. Texting, speeding, or ignoring traffic rules can make you liable. And your insurance coverage? It depends on whether you had a passenger, were actively on a trip, or just waiting.

Passengers

Getting hurt in a ride isn’t always straightforward. Claims might go to the driver or the ride-share company. Rights can change depending on whether the ride was active or the car was parked and waiting for a request.

Other Victims

Pedestrians, cyclists, or other drivers can get caught up. Liability could land on the ride-share driver, another driver, or the company.

It gets messy, and that’s why guidance from someone familiar with ride-share laws can save headaches.

What to Do Right After an Accident

Immediate actions make a difference. Here’s a simple guide:

Drivers: Check for injuries, take photos of damage, exchange info, report to insurance, and the app. Not fun, but necessary.
Passengers: Seek medical attention, document injuries and scene, collect contacts, report in-app.
Victims: Take photos, get witness info, and understand what you can claim.
Act fast. Missing a detail now can cause problems later.

How Lawyers Can Help

Accidents are tricky. Lawyers make it less messy:

Investigate: Evidence, reports, and app data.
Determine liability: Who’s actually responsible?
Negotiate compensation: Medical bills, lost wages, property damage.
Handle multiple parties: Some accidents involve more than one driver or passenger; lawyers make sure nothing is skipped.

Drivers, passengers, and victims often reach out to platforms like LegalRideshare, where Uber accident & injury attorneys can explain things. Even “minor” accidents might need advice, especially if responsibility isn’t obvious.

Common Questions

What should I do immediately?

Check injuries, take photos, collect info, report, and consider legal advice.

Can passengers or victims file a claim if the driver is partly at fault?

Yes. Compensation can come from the driver’s insurance, the ride-share company, or both.

What if I’m not sure who caused the accident?

Document everything and report it. A lawyer can help sort out liability.

Do I need to inform my insurance?

Yes. It protects you and ensures all claims are handled properly.

Wrapping It Up

Accidents happen. And the reason behind it can be anything, such as bad luck, mistakes, or negligence, sometimes all three. Drivers, passengers, and victims all have different concerns. But understanding who might be liable and what the right steps to take helps everyone handle the situation better.

Document everything, report correctly, and get advice if needed. It’s not fun, but it’s manageable if you know what to do. Ride-share accidents are confusing, but understanding what to do and what can happen makes a big difference for drivers, passengers, and victims.

Fintechnolization Is Why Stablecoin Is Part of the Future

By

Ndubuisi Ekekwe

-

September 23, 2025

0

Every great digital platform eventually matures with fintech component. That is the message of fintechnolization—a construct I have studied over years. Amazon began with books, Apple with devices, Grab with rides, but all found their way into payments, wallets and broad fintech. Why? Because to control ecosystems, you must also control the financial rails. Fintech is the final bus stop of digital platforms, the state of maturity every digital journey travels to.

In that redesign, stablecoins have emerged as the lubricant. Unlike volatile cryptos, they are pegged to stable assets like the US dollar, offering predictability. They cut the costs of moving money, power instant cross-border settlements, and through smart contracts, make finance programmable. In marketplaces, gaming, logistics, or insurance, stablecoins are not just tools—they are bridges connecting industries to the inevitable fintech layer of their platforms.

So, when you see industries adopting stablecoins, understand the deeper plot: fintechnolization at work. The platforms are maturing. They are finding their destiny in finance. And in this era, stablecoins have become the vehicle of that destiny. As the Igbo say, you may run, but you cannot outrun your destiny. For platforms, that destiny is fintech—and stablecoins are helping them get there. And that means: stablecoins are thus not a passing fad.

Stablecoin as the Currency of Digital Platforms

Stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to stable assets like the US dollar—fit into this evolution. As digital platforms fintechnolize, they look for low-cost, borderless, and programmable money that can serve their global and multi-industry ambitions. Stablecoins provide exactly that:

Low-cost settlements: Cross-border remittances and trade payments can clear in seconds, bypassing expensive correspondent banks.
Programmability: Smart contracts enable platforms to integrate payments into their workflows automatically, from supply chain financing to subscription renewals.
Trust and stability: Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies, stablecoins offer predictability, making them usable for payroll, savings, and trade.

In this way, stablecoins become the preferred financial instrument that accelerates the fintechnolization process for industries.

Industries Adopting Stablecoins

E-commerce & Marketplaces: Platforms use stablecoins to settle international vendor payments instantly, reducing FX friction.
Gaming & Creators’ Economy: Stablecoins power in-game transactions and payouts to creators globally, avoiding delays in traditional banking.
Insurance & Finance: Firms explore stablecoin-based premium collections and claim payouts, ensuring faster liquidity for customers.
Logistics & Supply Chains: Stablecoins are adopted for cross-border B2B settlements, reducing dependency on fragmented banking systems.

Connecting the Dots

Fintechnolization explains why industries are turning to stablecoins: as firms mature into fintech providers, they require instruments that transcend national currencies and banking inefficiencies. Stablecoins are thus not a passing fad but a manifestation of the digital destiny Ndubuisi Ekekwe described—where every platform eventually builds fintech layers, and in today’s global internet, stablecoins serve as the lubricant of that transition.

Dangote’s free fuel plan exposes fault lines in Nigeria’s oil market

By

Mutiu Iyanda

-

September 23, 2025

0

Dangote Refinery’s decision to absorb the cost of transporting petrol to selected states landed as both relief and provocation. For years, Nigerians have endured a volatile downstream market shaped by import dependence, subsidy collapses and layers of rent-seeking. The announcement that fuel would be delivered to outlets in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Ekiti, Osun, Rivers, Edo and Abuja without transport charges was greeted with cheers in some quarters.

The company deployed more than 1,000 compressed natural gas trucks for the operation, describing it as a way of demonstrating efficiency and commitment to easing household pressures. In parts of the South West, prices quickly fell to around ?841 a litre compared with ?865 a few days earlier. In Abuja and parts of the Niger Delta the average price dropped closer to ?851, with a gantry price set at ?820. Consumers began to sense that indigenous refining could finally influence the market after decades of reliance on imports.

Online responses reflected the mixture of relief and nationalist pride. “Imagine what ten indigenous companies like this would have done for the country. God bless Dangote Group,” wrote one user. Others cast the refinery as a “master driver” of the oil sector, while voices in the diaspora framed the move as a blow to “corrupt and greedy marketers” who had long extracted rents from the supply chain.

Associations bristle at disruption

The optimism was not universal. Unions and associations tied to petroleum logistics reacted with unease. The National Association of Road Transport Owners, whose members traditionally move products from depots to retail outlets, said the plan undermined existing contracts. Leaders warned that thousands of jobs were at risk if the refinery bypassed their services and operated a parallel delivery system.

Independent marketers were split. The national leadership of IPMAN encouraged members to register with Dangote’s online platform to qualify for allocation, emphasising that several stations in Lagos, Ogun and Ondo had already benefited. Yet within the association some questioned the sustainability of free haulage and cautioned against allowing a single company to dictate distribution practices.

Behind these tensions lies the refinery’s direct challenge to a business model that has historically enriched middlemen. By reducing the role of transport unions and depot operators, Dangote threatens entrenched interests that have survived every round of subsidy reform. To supporters, this represents long-overdue disruption. To critics, it risks handing disproportionate leverage to one industrial empire.

Exclusions fuel regional resentment

The initial roll-out excluded most Northern and South Eastern states. Abuja was covered, but Kano, a city central to Dangote’s corporate identity, was not. The omission stung. “As someone from Kano, I always believed Dangote Industries would treat Kano and the North with respect,” one resident wrote, voicing a sense of betrayal.

In the South East the anger was sharper. Commentators complained that once again their region had been overlooked, with insecurity cited as an excuse for bypassing deliveries. “Not even one southeastern state? Damn!” was a typical reaction. Others accused the company of hypocrisy, arguing that it could leapfrog South Eastern states to serve Rivers.

The controversy illustrates how fuel distribution has become a stage on which broader grievances about belonging and fairness are performed. A scheme intended as a symbol of relief instead reinforced perceptions of regional inequality.

A battle for legitimacy in the oil economy

What is unfolding is more than a logistical adjustment. It is a struggle over legitimacy in Nigeria’s oil economy. Pump prices in the South West and parts of the Niger Delta have fallen, while competitors such as MRS have quietly lowered their prices to remain relevant. Yet consumers remain sceptical. Reports surfaced that some stations, even after receiving cheaper supply, still sold at ?870, fuelling suspicion that old habits die hard.

The refinery has nevertheless forced a recalibration. For ordinary Nigerians, the clash pits an indigenous company presenting itself as a patriotic alternative against entrenched unions seen as profiteers. For investors, it signals the risks of concentrated market power. For politicians, it highlights how quickly corporate gestures can feed into narratives of exclusion.

What began as a free delivery scheme has become a national conversation about trust, power and fairness. Dangote has positioned itself as both disruptor and unifier, but it now faces the delicate task of expanding distribution without reinforcing old regional wounds or sliding into monopoly. The refinery is not just a plant on the Lekki coast. It is symbolic infrastructure, where the price of petrol carries with it the weight of national legitimacy.

How “Contact Verified” Becomes a Tool for Managing the Crypto Liquidation Crisis

By

Mutiu Iyanda

-

September 23, 2025

2

Across the crypto world, warnings about frozen accounts, blocked withdrawals, and false fee demands have multiplied. Investors reeling from volatility or hacks nervously seek someone to trust. In the document of recent social media posts, one tweet declares: “ Withdrawals locked scammers demand fake ‘service fees’! Stop all transactions immediately. Contact verified #CryptoRecovery experts via DM for safe assistance”. Such language captures both panic and direction. The crisis is described as urgent and potentially devastating, yet the audience is offered an immediate point of action through the metaphor of contacting someone “verified.”

Verification as a Beacon in Chaos
When exchanges block access or liquidations wipe out holdings, users feel stranded. In such moments language like “SCAM ALERT #Xtbor Withdrawals blocked, accounts frozen — funds at risk! Contact verified #CryptoRecovery experts immediately for secure assistance” functions as a beacon. Verification appears to stand in for institutional trust that has collapsed. The tweet does not explain who these experts are or how they are verified, but the term reassures readers that legitimacy still exists. Verification becomes a symbolic safety net in an environment where conventional forms of consumer protection are absent.

Where the Metaphor Becomes a Promise
The phrase does more than suggest seeking help. It functions as a promise of restoration. One warning in the dataset notes: “#StakeDexk SCAM ALERT: • Lets small withdrawals through to gain trust • Blocks larger withdrawals • Demands extra deposits & fake fees Contact verified #CryptoRecovery experts for safe assistance”. Here, “contact verified” transforms a story of manipulation into one of potential redemption. Despite the scam’s sophistication, the call to action reframes the situation as manageable, provided that a trusted actor can be reached.

The Risk of Secondary Scams
Yet this metaphorical promise is fraught with danger. Fraudsters know that liquidation crises generate fear, and fear makes victims susceptible to new traps. Several tweets in the document repeat almost word for word: “Contact verified #CryptoRecovery experts immediately for secure assistance”. This formulaic repetition hints at automation and coordinated messaging, suggesting that the very advice to seek the “verified” may itself be part of a secondary scam. Victims already harmed by blocked withdrawals may fall into further losses by trusting so-called recovery experts.

News Cases Reinforce the Stakes
Recent global events show how fragile trust remains. The U.S. Department of Justice moved to recover over 12 million USDT tied to spoofed trading platforms that blocked withdrawals through fake fees. In another case, BigONE exchange paused withdrawals after a $27 million hack but promised to cover user losses. These real events echo the warnings seen in the tweets. They remind us that whether through genuine exchange crises or fabricated scams, the promise of “verified” expertise is central to how users try to navigate turmoil.

Turning Verification from Rhetoric into Protection
For “contact verified” to serve investors rather than scammers, verification must be backed by credible systems. Right now it is a discursive shield, repeated in almost every scam warning. Without institutional frameworks, audits, or recognized standards, the phrase remains vulnerable to exploitation. The metaphor has power because it speaks to human need for order in chaos, but that power must be translated into practical safeguards that users can rely on.

For the crypto sector to build resilience, “verified” must evolve from language into mechanism. Only then will the call to “contact verified” provide more than symbolic comfort. It will instead represent a genuine pathway to security in the liquidation crisis.

BlockDAG’s $0.0016 Offer Rare Profit Window! Testnet & Buyer Battles Gain Attention, While LINK Eyes $150 & ETH Targets $10K

By

TI Partners

-

September 23, 2025

0

The crypto market is gaining speed as leading names and strong newcomers fuel momentum in the last quarter of 2025. Ethereum (ETH) has recovered to $4,700, with analysts pointing toward $10,000 as the next major mark, supported by ETF inflows and rising demand. Chainlink (LINK), currently trading near $25, has cleared its resistance range, with expert forecasts eyeing $150 in the near future.

Still, the buzz extends beyond these market giants. BlockDAG (BDAG) has captured attention with its Awakening Testnet, Buyer Battles presale model, and a $0.0016 limited-time entry price. These catalysts add both credibility and urgency, underlining how fresh technology and strong demand are reshaping the crypto space.

Ethereum Approaches $10K Milestone

Ethereum (ETH) has reclaimed the $4,700 level, bringing renewed optimism across the crypto market. Analysts and traders are now setting their sights on $10,000 as the next target, with institutional demand and ETF support playing a crucial role.

The SEC’s approval of spot Ethereum ETFs in 2024 has added over $11 billion in inflows, with nearly $3 billion arriving in just one week. This surge in demand has tightened supply, creating conditions that support Ethereum’s growth.

From a technical standpoint, Ethereum is now testing the $5,000 resistance. A strong breakout at this point could unlock new highs, pushing ETH into unexplored price ranges. On top of this, expected Fed rate cuts later this year may add fuel to its upward move.

Many traders view this cycle as distinct from earlier ones, with greater adoption from Wall Street driving momentum. If these factors continue, Ethereum could soon achieve five-digit pricing, cementing its role as the market’s leading digital coin after Bitcoin.

Chainlink Builds Toward $150

Chainlink (LINK) is showing resilience as it trades around $25, having broken through the tough $21 to $23 resistance zone. This structural shift has increased confidence among analysts who now project further growth.

With a market cap above $16 billion and daily trading volume exceeding $1.21 billion, LINK’s activity reflects strong engagement from both individual and institutional participants. Well-known analyst FitzoCrypto has mapped a long-term breakout pattern, suggesting LINK could climb to $150 in the coming months.

The projection is supported by consistently higher lows since 2022, a bullish MACD crossover, and growing trading volumes. Fibonacci retracement levels point toward short-term targets of $27.50 to $31.50, while mid-range checkpoints stand at $51 to $53 before the $150 goal.

Maintaining a steady price above $25 is key to preserving momentum. Suppose Chainlink can push past $30 with strength. In that case, analysts believe it could trigger a much larger rally, positioning LINK as one of the highest potential crypto opportunities to watch in the coming year.

BlockDAG’s Awakening Testnet and Buyer Battles Drive 2900% Growth

While Ethereum and Chainlink continue to show strength, BlockDAG (BDAG) is reshaping discussions with its major developments. The Awakening Testnet, scheduled for September 25, is more than just a technical update.

It will test the blockchain’s strength under live conditions, including core blockchain activation, UTXO removal for a leaner ledger, real-time explorer tools, and live miner integration through the Stratum Protocol. These features highlight maturity in infrastructure, showing that BDAG is already functioning beyond early-stage hype.

The project has also incorporated account abstraction and prepared the ground for EIP-4337, making it ready for smart accounts and advanced dApp ecosystems. These details show that BlockDAG (BDAG) is forward-looking and technically capable.

Furthermore, the Buyer Battles presale has become a driving force. Each day, 50 million BDAG coins are made available, and any unsold portion goes to the top buyer of the day. This gamified approach has created urgency and competition, driving contributions to almost $410 million. With over 26.4 billion coins sold and more than 312,000 coin holders already engaged, the numbers reflect strong momentum.

BlockDAG has also sold nearly 20,000 X-Series miners to more than 130 countries, alongside 3 million users on its X1 Miner app. The coin is currently priced at $0.0016 for a limited time.

By blending innovation, adoption, and urgency, BlockDAG has shown it is more than just another presale story. For those looking at the highest potential crypto in today’s market, BDAG is quickly proving itself as a project with unmatched credibility and growth prospects.

Closure Note

The 2025 crypto market surge shows how established projects and new challengers are reshaping opportunities. Ethereum’s path toward $10,000 underscores its role as a backbone of decentralised finance, while Chainlink’s bullish breakout points to increasing use of oracle technology and a potential move to $150.

Yet, BlockDAG has captured the spotlight as the highest potential crypto of the year. Its Awakening Testnet, Buyer Battles system, nearly $410 million raised, 26.4 billion coins sold, and growing global adoption set it apart from other presale projects.

As the Singapore Deployment event nears, BlockDAG continues to build momentum. For anyone tracking which coin leads the 2025 crypto growth story, BDAG remains the most exciting name to watch.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu