DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4762

Bank Fraud: Nigerians Knock Zenith Bank As Customer’s N6m Vanishes from Account

3

Nigerians on social media are calling out Zenith Bank over a series of fraudulent transactions resulting in the loss of depositors’ funds.

The recent complaints, which put Zenith on top of Twitter’s trend table on Friday afternoon, are part of the series of fraudulent cases that have characterized Nigeria’s banking industry in the past few years.

A Twitter user alleged that “a total of N6 million” was withdrawn from her Zenith account in the early hours of the 21st of October, 2022, in the space of about 15 minutes.

https://twitter.com/fashionjuel/status/1583383468435640321?s=20&t=i19NzU62xoRTbdg1MmIGAg

The post has triggered a heavy backlash targeting not only the bank but also the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the financial sector regulator, for its inability to sanitize the growing rot in the banking industry. The CBN’s insouciance toward the matter is believed to have emboldened the banks to be lax with depositors’ hard-earned money.

“On the 21st of October, 2022, I got to the bank at some minutes before 9am and the unprofessionalism of the bankers put me off,” the victim said. She added that the bank only kept pushing her from one manager to the next.

Today’s episode is just one in the banking fraud series that is increasingly dampening the faith of Nigerians in the banking system. Nigerians believe that most of the fraud cases, from the little to the big, have been perpetrated or aided by the banks’ employees.

“That’s how 23k was removed from my zenith account too just like that. My card was with me, I have a token yet money was removed from my account through Paystack. I went to their office they said there is nothing they can do about. I felt angry and helpless,” Yusuf Olakita, a Zenith Bank customer, lamented.

In 2021, four Nigerian deposit money banks; Access Bank Plc, Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, First City Monument Bank, and Wema Bank – collectively lost a total of N1.77 billion to fraudulent activities involving the banks’ employees and consumers, according to the 2021 financial statements of the banks.

With the rot fast-spreading, the distrust in the banks among Nigerians is increasing. Unfortunately, it is coming at a time when the central bank is pushing its financial inclusion policies that it is largely counting on cashless transactions to achieve.

Financial experts said the rising cases of fraud in the banking industry poses a threat capable of spooking investors’ confidence, especially as the CBN and the FCCPC, Nigeria’s competition and consumer protection agency, are not doing enough to tackle it.

Kloud Commerce Shuts Down

0

Kloud commerce, a Nigerian startup, has shut down its operation after it was reported that the founder Olumide Olusanya had mismanaged and misused the company’s funds.

After a year of securing USD 765 K in pre-seed funds to build a multi-channel commerce solution for African businesses, the direct-to-consumer (D2C) startup has shut down operations following a series of disputes that have left the startup crippled for months.

According to a lengthy investigative piece published by WeeTracker, the company’s investors have petitioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to launch an investigation into the founder and the CEO misuse of funds.

In a petition drafted by some investors, it alleged that the company’s founder misappropriated the company’s funds, referencing an account audit that suggests the founder had diverted various sums of money invested into the startup for personal ventures, as well as putting personal expenses on the company’s accounts, and lavished investors’ money on expensive hotels and car rentals on dodgy trips outside Nigeria.

One of the company’s investors said, “He was and still is a massive disappointment. A former accountant left as a result of coming under pressure to do things that were unethical. I believe he mismanaged the funds that we invested and misled us as investors. It is very rare for a founder to spend almost USD 1 M without being able to produce even a minimum viable product.”

Earlier this year, Kloud’s CEO had announced that the startup had received several offerings fromOmni, a B2C solution and GoDigital, a B2B product. The founder also mentioned that the startup was already powering retail sales for 10 global brands, the likes of Nike and Adidas in Nigeria and Ghana.

In December 2021, the founder told investors that one of its products had gone live in 800 locations across Ghana and Nigeria. According to an investigation, it was discovered that all these claims of progress by the CEO were all false as he did all these to lure more money from investors.

The plaintiffs also accuse Olusanya of carrying out fraudulent activities at the company, aside from a bloated payroll of employees working on non-existent or non-performing products, investors also claim Olusanya diverted funds from the company for personal use.

Olusanya reportedly withdrew 4 million ($9,000) as “entertainment allowance” between August and September 2021, as well as 22 million ($50,000) for publicity events in Ghana where he spent $100/night in hotels. A $15,000 angel investment allegedly also went into the founder’s accounts.

Investors reportedly tried to remedy the situation earlier this year by removing Olusanya as CEO a deal the founder initially agreed with, but changed his mind last minute and announced to employees that investors attempted to effect a “hostile takeover”, and then tried to fire employees despite owing salaries.

Some of the funders, including the one who spoke of some initial reservations, say they were encouraged to up their investments in Kloud Commerce by the periodic investor updates they received from D.O which painted a picture of impressive growth but turned out to be largely false.

Following all these allegations, Kloud CEO Olusanya is yet to respond, but is allegedly in the process of liquidating the company to settle its debts or at least some of it according to reports.

The Sale of Polaris Bank And Why Nigeria Must Stop Bailing Out Failing Banks

5
The logo of Polaris Bank is pictured in Abuja, Nigeria January 22, 2019. REUTERS/Afolabi Sotunde

Polaris bank has been sold.  The buyer paid N50 billion and will repay another N1.3 trillion over  25 years: “As part of its intervention, the CBN injected consideration bonds with a face value of N898 billion into Polaris Bank through AMCON. The fund, which was injected to save the bank from collapse and to enable its recovery and stability, has a future value of N1.305 trillion that will be repaid by the bank’s new owners in 25 years.”

The most valued bank in Nigeria (Zenith Bank) is worth N634.209 billion (GTBank* is worth N543.005 billion).  This is a really intriguing deal for a 3rd-tier banking institution considering that the landscape is changing rapidly. GTBank* has lost more than N400 billion of its value in the last few years. In other words, these companies are losing their moats due to the avalanche which fintechs are bringing. I wish Polaris Bank good luck on this 25-year commitment!

Next time, AMCON/CBN, do not bail out any bank. What you need to do is: secure 100% of depositors  funds and allow other stronger banks to buy pieces of anything of value in that bank. Simply, at the end, the bank ceases to exist in any way because it has failed, but NO DEPOSITOR will lose money. If we follow that playbook, Nigeria will not be wasting money.

And I repeat – do not be bailing out failing banks. I expect more than 40% of current traditional banks to leave the scene by 2035 in Nigeria as technology reshapes the ecosystem. So, we need to have a clear policy on how to manage that transition.

“The sale was coordinated by a Divestment Committee (the ‘Committee’) comprising representatives of the CBN and AMCON, and advised by legal and financial consultants. The Committee conducted a sale process by ‘private treaty’, as provided in section 34(5) of the AMCON Act to avoid negative speculations, retain value and preserve financial system stability.

“In the process, parties who had formally expressed an interest in acquiring Polaris Bank, subsequent to the CBN intervention in 2018, were invited to submit financial and technical proposals. Invitations to submit proposals were sent to 25 pre-qualified interested parties, out of which three parties eventually submitted final purchase proposals following technical evaluation.

“All submissions were subject to a rigorous transaction process from which SCIL emerged as the preferred bidder having presented the most comprehensive technical/financial purchase proposal as well as the highest rated growth plans for Polaris Bank,” the statement said.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: Prof while I agree that the CBN should not bail any bank. For this I will make an exception. Our economy has been in and out of comma (recession) since 2016, meaning that a bank failure (liquidation) could lead to more failures (investor & customer panic withdrawal) which would be a national catastrophe. CBN has tried to manage a total collapse by shielding the sector.
Example,the CBN had to manage a situation about one of the systemic important banks (SIB) for some years just to avoid a shock in the sector. If they had gone the way of 1997/98 liquidation of banks in Nigeria, I suspect that our situation would have been difficult to comprehend. Just my thought.

  • Though I believe some banks will either acquire, merge or be bought by fintechs in the near future.

My Response: I am not sure Skype is a consequential bank. I am not sure it has up to 2% of total deposit base. This is not First Bank, Access, UBA, etc. In 2009, US allowed 140 banks to fail but supported important 3-4. They setup Too Big to Fail classification. My point is that Nigeria cannot be wasting limited assets on marginal banks. Sure, you cannot allow First Bank to fail but more than 70% of microfinance banks started in the last 20 years have failed. We must tighten what we bailout.

Comment 2: Prof you are not correct this time, the FINTECH are not encroaching on any bank profit. Reason being that: None of the FINTECHs has come out to show the public a positive ROI except interswitch. Are are their private shareholders/Investors smiling to the bank?. Apart from Interswitch kindly name profitable FINTECH coy. all we hear is revenue/capitalisation. For instance remember Kuda bank. The Fintech are very quick to go raise funds and later ……..

My Response: I am not sure that is how accountants do that. TeamApt has processed $53 billion transaction volume. Say they take 2% as fee, that is huge. But due to growth, let us assume, they are not profitable, it does not mean they have not taken something away from the banks. That Uber is not profitable does not mean it is not taking profits away from tax drivers. Fintechs do not need to be profitable to extract value out of banks. Amazon was not profitable for more than a decade and still destroyed physical stores in America. They used their profits to finance growth.

Polaris Bank Sold by Central Bank of Nigeria and AMCON

Polaris Bank Sold by Central Bank of Nigeria and AMCON

0

Following the approval of the sale of Polaris Bank by the House of Representatives on Wednesday, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) have formally announced that the bank has been completely acquired by Strategic Capital Investment Limited (SCIL).

SCIL completed a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) for the acquisition of 100% of the bank’s equity in a transaction the House said it followed due process and was duly approved by the presidency.

Osita Nwanisobi, the director, corporate communications department at the CBN, said in a statement that for the 100% equity, SCIL paid an upfront consideration of N50 billion. He said the company also accepted the terms of the agreement, which includes repayment of the consideration bond injected into the troubled bank that amounted to N1.305 trillion.

“The CBN thus received an immediate return for the value it has created in Polaris Bank during the stabilization period, as well as ensuring that all funds originally provided to support the intervention are recovered.

“The sale was coordinated by a Divestment Committee (the ‘Committee’) comprising representatives of the CBN and AMCON, and advised by legal and financial consultants. The Committee conducted a sale process by ‘private treaty’, as provided in section 34(5) of the AMCON Act to avoid negative speculations, retain value and preserve financial system stability.

“In the process, parties who had formally expressed an interest in acquiring Polaris Bank, subsequent to the CBN intervention in 2018, were invited to submit financial and technical proposals. Invitations to submit proposals were sent to 25 pre-qualified interested parties, out of which three parties eventually submitted final purchase proposals following technical evaluation.

“All submissions were subject to a rigorous transaction process from which SCIL emerged as the preferred bidder having presented the most comprehensive technical/financial purchase proposal as well as the highest rated growth plans for Polaris Bank,” the statement said.

AMCON, the government’s bad debt buyer, took over Skye Bank in 2018 after the CBN withdrew its license and set up Polaris as a bridge bank.

As part of its intervention, the CBN injected consideration bonds with a face value of N898 billion into Polaris Bank through AMCON. The fund, which was injected to save the bank from collapse and to enable its recovery and stability, has a future value of N1.305 trillion that will be repaid by the bank’s new owners in 25 years.

Speaking on the bank’s acquisition, the CBN Governor, Godwin Emefiele, lauded the outgoing board and management of Polaris Bank for keeping it afloat since it was established as a bridge bank. He said the board and management were notable for their roles in stabilizing the Bank’s operations, its balance sheet and implementing strong governance structures to address the issues that led to the intervention.

The apex bank head said the process has provided the CBN with an unprecedented opportunity to recover its intervention funds in full and promote financial stability and inclusive growth.

“The sale of the bank marks the completion of a landmark intervention in a strategic institution in the Nigerian banking sector by the CBN and AMCON,” he said.

Political Economy of UK 21st Century Prime Ministers’ Resignation

0

Since Prime Minister Liz Truss announced her resignation, various reactions have followed and continue to follow her actions in the UK and around the world. Many political scientists and public affairs experts have offered conflicting opinions. Our check indicates that the country’s prime ministers of the twenty-first century have a history of quitting. It all started with Prime Minister David Cameron calling a referendum on quitting the European Union. Cameron resigned following the referendum, and Theresa May took over as Prime Minister. Boris Johnson followed in the footsteps of Theresa May. Liz Truss took over as Prime Minister in place of Boris Johnson. Truss is the fourth prime minister to resign since the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Exhibit 1: Average all items index in 12 years

Source: Google Trends, 2022; Office of National Statistics-UK, 2022; Infoprations Analysis, 2022

According to multiple sources, the resignation is motivated by national and global economic worries. The resignation has also been linked to global political uncertainty. For a better understanding of the economic aspects of the resignation, our analyst examines the inability to address growing uncertainties in the national economy cited by the resigned prime ministers (particularly Truss) using the country’s inflation rate over the last 12 years and the UK public interest in key economic concerns. Our analyst notes that when comparing the average consumer purchasing price index of all food items with the existing qualitative data, the four prime ministers’ resignations had largely occurred when the inflation rate became uncontrollable. According to our analyst, this could be traced to the ineffectiveness of policy agendas proposed before elections and multiplier effects of economic challenges in other countries, especially the country’s trading partners.

According to our analysis, the resignation’s political component may have more to do with the Brexit vote. It is obvious that the choice is having a strategic impact on the nation’s economy from Boris Johnson to Liz Truss. The country is also suffering significantly from the imbalance in the various geopolitical interests.

Exhibit 2: Public interest versus real all items CPI index between 2010 and 2021

Source: Google Trends, 2022; Office of National Statistics-UK, 2022; Infoprations Analysis, 2022

Further analysis of the UK public’s interest in the economy and inflation, as well as the real consumer price index for all food products between 2010 and 2021 in the context of the Prime Ministers’ varied policies, shows a strong resonation of interest in inflation in 2018 and 2019. Compared to prior years, the interest in the economy and the index during these years was more in line with the interest in inflation. Analysis, however, reveals that the UK public’s interest in understanding the economic situation increased between 2013 and 2018 as evidenced by patterns in the real inflation rate (see Exhibit 2).