DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4649

A Deeper Look Into The Law of Contracts in Nigeria

0

Contracts are by far the most common legal instruments in use and demand, serving as a means of establishing business relationships or individual/corporate interactions across all levels of human endeavour.

Whether as professional retainer agreements, agreements of terms and conditions, supply contracts, SLAs, employment contracts, Joint Venture agreements or syndicated Loan documentations, contracts are the basis of relationships giving rise to causes of action under Nigerian law.

While almost everyone presumably knows what contracts are to the point of making the topic look simplistic, many people still do not know about the factors that make a contract voidable, void or enforceable. Many people also do not understand the conditions under which contractual obligations can no longer become binding, and that constitutes the focus of this article which will be looking deepest into the topics of :-

– What contracts are.

– The conditions for a valid contract.

– The factors that invalidate a contract.

– When contracts can no longer be binding.

What is a contract?

A contract is an agreement that is either written, spoken of or implied between 2 or more parties that is enforceable under the law.

What is the Regulatory Framework governing contracts in Nigeria?

Contracts are governed by the Contracts and Torts laws and Stare High Courts of various component states in Nigeria.

What are the ingredients of a valid and enforceable contract under law?

For a contract to be valid,the following must be present :-

– an offer made by a contracting party;

– an acceptance of this offer made by another contracting party, leading to a consensus ad idem or “meeting of minds”;

– the possession of contracting capability by the parties to a contract;

– the passing of consideration,or each party to a contract doing what they said they will do under the contract terms;

– the agreement not conflicting with law or public policy.

What are the elements or factors that can invalidate a contract?

A contract can be invalidated, or vitiated and rendered unenforceable, by the following factors :-

Undue Influence :- This is the wrongful use of a position of influence or power to pressure (not just persuasion) an unwilling party into a contract. 

Misrepresentation:- This is a false assertion of fact (which can be fraudulent, negligent or innocent)  made by a party which convinces another party into consenting to a contract.

A Mistake of facts :- Mistakes of this nature can either be common, mutual or unilateral and occur when the subject matter of a contract ceases to exist e.g. entering into an agreement to sell land that has been acquired by a state government.

Duress :- This is where the consent of a contracting party to a contract as evidenced by their signature for example is obtained through the use of wrongful force nullifying free will, exemplified by the Latin phrase “Non est factum” or “Not my will”.

Duress can only be claimed by an individual and not a corporation or company. It should also be noted that a party who enters into a contract under duress must move quickly to nullifying the contract afterwards by stating that his consent to the agreement was forced.

Legal Incapacity :- This is where a party is barred by law from entering into a contract by virtue of mental instability, being a minor below the age of 18, or death.

Conflict with the law :- This is where a contract goes contrary to public policy, law or government regulations e.g. Entering into a contract to supply banned narcotics or documenting a land sale in a manner contrary to the Land Use Act.

The Concept of Mistake under Nigerian Contract Law

There are instances in commercial legal disputes where a party might claim that he will not perform a contractual obligation because the said contract is rendered void by virtue of something called a mistake.

A mistake in contract law is when one or both parties have a false belief about a contract. A mistake might be a misunderstanding about terms, laws, or information relevant to a binding contract. If a party can prove their false belief has legitimate mistake grounds, the contract would become void.

This article will be looking into the concept of mistake under Nigerian Contract Law, with a focus on :

– The definition of a mistake as a contract law concept.

– The types of mistake in contract law.

– The categories of mistake under contract law.

What is a mistake in contract law?

A mistake is a wrong belief or understanding of facts at the point of contracting which a party to a contract relies on because he believes his understanding of the facts before him or the facts themselves to be correct.

What are the types of mistake under contract law?

A mistake can be either :

Unilateral – where only one party to a contract is mistaken about the fact of terms or contractual subject matters contained in an agreement;

Mutual – where parties to an agreement are both mistaken about the same material fact in the agreement, which would render them at opposing purposes or mismatched understandings of the offer, accept and consideration aspects of the contract; or

Common – where both parties to an agreement hold the same wrong beliefs of contractual facts or subject matters.

What are the categories of mistake under contract law?

The categories of contractual mistakes are:-

– Mistakes of Law 

– Mistakes of Fact 

What are the legal effects of mistakes in contract law?

– Mistakes can be argued as a defense in suits for breaches of contractual obligations which can lead to such obligations deemed voidable(open to being annulled by a party to an agreement) or void(of no legal effect).

– Unilateral mistakes will not render a contract void except if the other party knew of such mistakes or they are deemed unconscionable by a court of law.

– With common mistakes as to subject matter, a contract can be voided in the case of the mistake fundamentally altering the subject matter’s identity, form, description or substance. 

– Mutual mistakes can render a contract void where the parties are mistaken about a material subject matter.

Government of India Proposes Tougher E-Commerce Rules, Seeks to Protect Consumer’s Interest

0

The government of India has stepped in to protect consumers’ interests by implementing a strict framework to halt fake reviews on E-Commerce platforms in the country.

To make these platforms less deceptive for consumers, the government has disclosed that there will be an introduction of guidelines, starting from November 25th, to curb the spread of fake reviews.

The consumer affairs ministry along with the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) held a meeting with stakeholders, as well as several e-commerce entities to discuss how paid unverifiable reviews make it challenging for consumers to recognize genuine reviews.

India’s department of consumer affairs has already drafted standard guidelines that will mandate e-commerce platforms to set up review administrators to moderate reviews using automated or manual tools to filter out biases and restrict fraudulent reviews.

The reviews would also include the publishing date and star rating. The newly drafted guideline will ensure that consumers are not able to edit their reviews or use any foul language.

Platforms are also mandated to restrict authors giving fraudulent reviews from publishing fake reviews in the future.

Speaking in a press conference in New Delhi, India’s Consumer Affairs secretary Rohit Kumar Singh said, “All the countries where e-commerce is getting more and more prevalent and popular, they are all struggling with online fake reviews.

“Some are making rules, some are making a legal provision. But I think we are the first country and I qualify that statement subject to my knowledge, which is working at the standard, and we will take the standards route.

We don’t want to bulldoze the industry, we will first seek voluntary compliance and then if the menace continues to grow, we will maybe make it mandatory in the future depending on what happens”.

The issue of fake reviews on several e-commerce sites in India is not new, and these platforms have often claimed to have addressed it, yet it has continued to increase.

In a bid to drive sales, several sellers on these e-commerce platforms resort to unfair means to make their products sought after, knowing fully well that the algorithm on e-commerce platforms pushes products with more positive reviews to the top, which gives them an advantage over other products.

These reviews play a vital role in customer behavior as it spurs them to purchase products with more positive reviews.  With the recent development of a legal framework by the Indian government, hopefully, these fake reviews will be drastically reduced.

The rights of a remix maker in a song he remixed

0
music streaming

I am currently processing the license and clearance for a song that was made by (an artiste) client for an international deal.

A United States-based company wants to acquire the right to the songs from my client (the artiste) so they can legally use it in their production. 

Here is the twist; my client (an upcoming artiste), made a remix to a popular song that was initially released by a popular Nigerian star. The US-based company (for reasons best known to them) prefers the remix of the song made by my client who is an upcoming artiste to the original song made by the popular singer.

The issue now is who owns what rights to the remixed song that is to be purchased. Can the popular star who is the main originator of the song claim the right to both the original song he made and the remix made off the original song by my client?

This issue is peculiar to almost every Nigerian artiste and their record label. They find it difficult to distinguish the intellectual property rights of every individual who joined in the production and making of the song own in the song, especially if the song later becomes a “hit” song.

Now here is the law according to the general rule of intellectual property and music law:

Unless there is an otherwise agreement made by the parties involved, When an artiste remixes a song, even if he reproduces the song from the production to the composition of the song, in as much as he re-voiced the original lyrics of the song; the artistes only have master rights to the song but the original composer of the song that was remixed has the publishing and reproduction right to the song.

It does not matter that the remix maker of the song changed some words, phrases, or patterns of the song, in as much as there is a similarity in the lyrics of the original song, it will be said that he merely re-voiced the lyrics and the publishing rights to the song still vest in the original composer of the song.

This is not to say that the remix maker and the original composer of the song cannot enter into an agreement that states otherwise; hence the reason for the initial caveat. This general rule only comes into play when there is no prior agreement or contract between the original composer of the song and the remix maker.

How De-risking Your Crypto Portfolio helps in Securing Yields

0

Crypto assets, which were hitherto touted as deflationary, have witnessed an unusual sell-off in the past few days, as investors globally dumps risky assets. BTC is down -71% and ETH -73% within one year after a wide de-risking response to the Alameda Research, FTX and Genesis Implosion and also, the negative Inflation Margin, many Crypto degenerates are moving funds from Altcoins – BTC, ETH alike to stabilize asset class (presumably USDT, BUSD and USDC).

When the Crypto Market started looking wobbly a few weeks ago, it was an easy call for me to sell some altcoin losers (so many to choose from) and switch into stable-coins. But it’s good news for crypto as an asset class: Yields are lower simply because stablecoins have established themselves as a port of safety in a bear market storm.

While everyone has their own way of lowering risk, personally, de-risking to me means taking profits at certain preset levels and moving them into stablecoins or blue-chip Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum. While the cryptocurrency I’ve invested in could continue to trend higher, de-risking means that I’ve secured my profits and moved them to assets that are less volatile and have higher conviction in.

The fact that de-risking to money market funds yielding 0% is so uninviting is partly why I’m a buy-and-hold guy in equities, I’m much of a HODLer in crypto, though but the calculus there is different. That’s partly because it’s such a nascent asset class, but also because de-risking to stablecoins is a much more inviting option in a sell-off.

DeFi traders have been switching into stables in the same way that TradFi investors have been switching into US Treasury’s. Stable-coins are a more appealing hiding spot than Treasurys, however. For one thing, the yields in stablecoins, while lower, are still better than those in Treasurys where risks seem lower. Stable-coins are not entirely risk-free: You do have to take either some Smart Contract risk with a DeFi protocol or some counterparty risk with a CeFi exchange. But do those risks seem bigger than being long Treasurys when inflation is running at 8% and commodity prices are surging? To my mind, stablecoins represent a better risk-off option than what’s currently on offer in TradFi.

In one of my Tekedia Forum publications, I emphasized on what Smart Investors should do in safeguarding their funds. It is worthy to note that investment isn’t one off traffic, there are room for gains and losses, it makes sense if your gains outshine your loss, Crypto Investments is not about UPONLY, on fundamental analysis, there is room for retracement leading to break out which form hash for uptrend candle – this presumably takes along roll shifting base.

Points to note while Derisking an Asset

  • De-risk any investment as standard procedure when it hits a 10x multiple from the purchase price or more and the investment is liquid.
  • Standard de-risk by selling up to 100% of the initial dollar value of the investment at current prices back into the market.
  • A standard procedure where to take profit on another 100%, effectively taking back 200% of the initial dollar value that was invested.
  • Take profit on a maximum of 20% of the total token position. Meaning, the profit taking part could exceed 200%.
  • At this point, one would have doubled their investment. The investment is now completely risk-free and the Investor has double the amount of capital it can put into new projects.

With De-Risking your Crypto portfolio you manage your risk, take profits on the way up and buy cheaper so you own more.

Buhari Launches First Oil Drilling Project in Northern Nigeria

0

Three years after its oil exploration in northern Nigeria, President Muhammadu Buhari has flagged-off oil drilling projects in the region.

The project, dubbed Kolmani Integrated Development Project, heralds the first ever oil drilling Endeavour in the northern Kolmani River II Oil Field located at a border community between Bauchi and Gombe States.

NAN reports that Buhari will perform the official ground-breaking ceremony of the Oil Prospecting Lease (OPLs) 809 and 810 at the Kolmani River II Well on Tuesday.

The project partner, the New Nigeria Development Company, is owned by the 19 states of Northern Nigeria.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited, in October 2019, announced the discovery of crude oil, gas and condensate in the Kolmani River.

The commercial quantity discovery was the first in the region after several crude oil explorations on the Upper Benue Trough. The oilfield will be developed by Sterling Global Oil, New Nigeria Development Commission (NNDC) and NNPC Ltd.

The historical event would signal oil drilling and exploration in the oil field discovered in 2019 in the northern region. Many officials of Nigerian security agencies, including the State Security Service, the Nigerian Army, the Nigerian Air Force and Navy, and the Nigerian Police, are deployed at the site.

Some para-military agencies, including the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), the Federal Road Safety Corps and the Federal Fire Service, are also on ground. The officials of the NNPC Ltd, members of the cabinet and some medical teams with their equipment are also seen at the site.

The president is expected to be accompanied by the Minister of State, Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, Bauchi and Gombe States governors, Bala Mohammed and Inuwa Yahaya, and other top government functionaries.

The onshore oil discovery marks a significant turn in Nigeria’s oil economy. The discovery of the 1 billion barrels of crude oil will be crucial to Nigeria’s economic survival as a nation, according to minister of state for petroleum, Timipre Sylva.

“This will boost infrastructure and industrial development in Nigeria; this is the motivation that has sustained the quest for the Petroleum Industry Act in 2021,” he said.

He disclosed that the ministry of petroleum is poised to employ frontier development funds to commence frontier basins and boost oil reserves from 37 billion to 40 billion.

“The key implication of these measures is that Nigeria needs to seek sustainability and expand capital for government spending. Drilling for hydrocarbons in the frontier development is crucial to Nigeria’s survival as a nation,” he said.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Limited (NNPCL) said the Kolmani oil site would also have a petrochemical refining site with an oil refinery of 120,000 bpd, a gas processing site of 500 million cubic feet per day, and also a 300 MW power plant.

With the 1 billion barrels of crude oil reserve from the new northern oil wells, Nigeria is expected to earn about N32.3 trillion over a period of 10 years.